Re: Reworked module list for the SDK
[email protected] (Jarkko Hietaniemi) Thu, 30 Mar 2000 02:12:31 +0300 (EET DST)
| Newsgroups | perl.sdk |
|---|---|
| Organization | IKI ry, Finland |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jarkko Hietaniemi writes:
>
> Archive::Zip?
> File::Temp? (*)
>
> (*) Even if this gets integated t, say, 5.6.1, there are still a lot
s/gated t,/grated to,/; # time to leave for home, methinks
> of 5.005 systems out there, and even 5.004 systems...this is, in fact,
> an important point to remember: saying "it's in the standard distribution"
> isn't a good enough to reason to drop a module! I think we must at
E.g. CGI, Data::Dumper, Devel::Peek.
> least attempt to cover 5.6, 5.005, and 5.004. Yes, some module
> authors do not anymore support 5.004, and they are allowed to do so.
> The installation process of the SDK must be robust enough not to fall
> over in such situations.
** Skipping installation of of Umma:Gumma as it requires
** at least perl A.C and your perl is only A.B.
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen