Re: Not-completely-portable modules

Larry W. Virden writes:
> Even if they ARE generally portable, do we want to include the
> "four billion" modules of say Tk, or Apache?

Let's discuss Tk when we come to it.  I'm just trying to get a
feel for the platform-specific issue.  Application-specific will
come up soon enough, and we'll deal with it then.

Interestingly enough, nobody nominated any Apache modules.

Nat