Re: Not-completely-portable modules

Nathan Torkington wrote:
>
> My feeling on it is that such modules should work in a *lot* of
> places.  I don't feel like including four billion Win32::* modules
> on the grounds that they're useful and platform-specific is okay.

Including 2**32 Win32::* modules would be useful if they were in the
perl-win32-sdk, not the (core) perl-sdk.  

Iff there is time/need/desire to address a series of mythical 
perl-foo-sdks,  that would be the forum to discuss things like 
Win32 (etc.) modules.

-- Adam