gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.win32 archive

1657 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 17). Latest articles →

Re: writing backend extensions using Visual
Sat, 26 Mar 2005 11:25:27 -0500
Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]> • #2710
Re: writing backend extensions using Visual Studio
Sat, 26 Mar 2005 07:58:30 -0800
Greg Landrum <[email protected]> • #2709
Re: writing backend extensions using Visual Studio
Fri, 25 Mar 2005 17:57:07 -0500
Tom Lane <[email protected]> • #2708
writing backend extensions using Visual Studio
Fri, 25 Mar 2005 14:28:03 -0800
Greg Landrum <[email protected]> • #2707
Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question
Wed, 23 Mar 2005 23:31:15 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> • #2706
Re: Simple query takes a long time on win2K
Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:49:22 -0700
"A. Mous" <[email protected]> • #2705
Re: Simple query takes a long time on win2K
Wed, 23 Mar 2005 12:57:46 -0700
"A. Mous" <[email protected]> • #2704
Re: [GENERAL] Simple query takes a long time on win2K
Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:04:12 +0100
"Magnus Hagander" <[email protected]> • #2703
Re: [GENERAL] Simple query takes a long time on win2K
Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:11:18 -0500
Tom Lane <[email protected]> • #2702
Re: explain analyze timings
Mon, 21 Mar 2005 09:49:05 +0100
"Magnus Hagander" <[email protected]> • #2701
Re: Half filled xlogs
Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:09:03 +0000
Simon Riggs <[email protected]> • #2700
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] explain analyze timings
Sun, 20 Mar 2005 17:30:20 -0500
Tom Lane <[email protected]> • #2699
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] explain analyze timings
Sun, 20 Mar 2005 19:37:13 +0100
"Magnus Hagander" <[email protected]> • #2698
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests
Sun, 20 Mar 2005 13:23:58 -0500
Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]> • #2697
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] explain analyze timings
Sun, 20 Mar 2005 12:42:58 -0500
Tom Lane <[email protected]> • #2696
Re: Half filled xlogs
Sun, 20 Mar 2005 17:02:35 +0100
"Magnus Hagander" <[email protected]> • #2695
Re: explain analyze timings
Sun, 20 Mar 2005 10:01:39 -0600
John A Meinel <[email protected]> • #2694
Half filled xlogs
Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:37:28 +0000
Simon Riggs <[email protected]> • #2693
Re: explain analyze timings
Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:31:48 +0000
Simon Riggs <[email protected]> • #2692
Re: explain analyze timings
Sun, 20 Mar 2005 14:42:24 +0100
"Magnus Hagander" <[email protected]> • #2691
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests
Sun, 20 Mar 2005 00:11:18 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> • #2690
Re: Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for
Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:00:01 +0800
Christopher Kings-Lynne <[email protected]> • #2689
Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question
Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:36:19 -0500
Tom Lane <[email protected]> • #2688
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question
Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:38:32 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> • #2687
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question
Thu, 17 Mar 2005 11:24:24 -0800
"Dann Corbit" <[email protected]> • #2686
Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question
Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:02:29 -0500
Tom Lane <[email protected]> • #2685
Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question
Thu, 17 Mar 2005 13:53:11 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> • #2684
Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for
Thu, 17 Mar 2005 13:42:56 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> • #2683
Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question
Thu, 17 Mar 2005 13:41:00 -0500
Tom Lane <[email protected]> • #2682
Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question
Thu, 17 Mar 2005 13:35:14 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> • #2681
Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for
Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:15:47 -0400 (AST)
"Marc G. Fournier" <[email protected]> • #2680
Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for
Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:11:04 -0400 (AST)
"Marc G. Fournier" <[email protected]> • #2679
Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for
Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:30:37 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> • #2678
Re: Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for Win32?
Thu, 17 Mar 2005 08:19:19 -0500
"Merlin Moncure" <[email protected]> • #2677
Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for
Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:11:51 -0000
"Dave Page" <[email protected]> • #2676
Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for Win32?
Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:05:41 -0000
"Dave Page" <[email protected]> • #2675
Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question
Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:05:39 +0100
"Magnus Hagander" <[email protected]> • #2674
Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for Win32?
Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:44:59 +0100
"Magnus Hagander" <[email protected]> • #2673
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question
Thu, 17 Mar 2005 08:07:59 +0100
"Michael Paesold" <[email protected]> • #2672
Re: Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for
Thu, 17 Mar 2005 01:32:20 -0400 (AST)
"Marc G. Fournier" <[email protected]> • #2671
Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for
Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:31:59 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> • #2670
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question
Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:29:09 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> • #2669
Re: Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for Win32?
Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:26:09 -0500
Tom Lane <[email protected]> • #2668
Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for Win32?
Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:20:12 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> • #2667
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression
Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:28:07 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> • #2666
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests
Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:07:28 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> • #2665
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail
Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:36:50 +0200
Nicolai Tufar <[email protected]> • #2664
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests
Wed, 16 Mar 2005 01:00:21 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> • #2663
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32
Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:47:50 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> • #2662
Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32
Mon, 14 Mar 2005 23:01:05 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> • #2661
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail
Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:41:01 -0500
Tom Lane <[email protected]> • #2660
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests
Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:39:19 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> • #2659
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail
Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:19:14 -0500
Tom Lane <[email protected]> • #2658
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests
Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:55:16 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> • #2657
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail
Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:00:14 +0200
Nicolai Tufar <[email protected]> • #2656
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail
Sat, 12 Mar 2005 01:58:15 +0200
Nicolai Tufar <[email protected]> • #2655
Re: Repleacement for src/port/snprintf.c
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:30:59 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> • #2654
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:18:07 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> • #2653
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:44:19 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> • #2652
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:37:24 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> • #2651
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:23:36 -0500
Tom Lane <[email protected]> • #2650
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:14:26 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> • #2649
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:02:29 -0500 (EST)
[email protected] • #2648
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:21:23 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> • #2647
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 08:41:39 +0200
Nicolai Tufar <[email protected]> • #2646
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 01:14:31 -0500
Tom Lane <[email protected]> • #2645
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 07:58:11 +0200
Nicolai Tufar <[email protected]> • #2644
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 23:10:12 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> • #2643
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:58:27 -0500
Tom Lane <[email protected]> • #2642
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:29:49 -0500 (EST)
[email protected] • #2641
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:21:41 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> • #2640
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:55:06 -0500
Tom Lane <[email protected]> • #2639
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 00:43:48 +0200
Nicolai Tufar <[email protected]> • #2638
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Repleacement for src/port/snprintf.c
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:25:56 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> • #2637
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:26:47 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> • #2636
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 21:22:13 +0200
Nicolai Tufar <[email protected]> • #2635
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests
Wed, 9 Mar 2005 22:51:27 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> • #2634
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression
Wed, 9 Mar 2005 10:38:27 -0500 (EST)
[email protected] • #2633
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail
Wed, 9 Mar 2005 14:40:24 +0200
Nicolai Tufar <[email protected]> • #2632
Connection is closed in pg801 using pgadmin3
Tue, 8 Mar 2005 17:37:30 -0300
"Rodrigo Moreno" <[email protected]> • #2631
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with
Tue, 8 Mar 2005 10:05:08 +0100
"Magnus Hagander" <[email protected]> • #2630
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with
Mon, 07 Mar 2005 22:35:09 -0600
John A Meinel <[email protected]> • #2629
Fw: Question about odbc
Sun, 6 Mar 2005 09:05:22 -0700
"E U" <[email protected]> • #2628
Question about odbc
Sat, 5 Mar 2005 12:21:02 -0700
"E U" <[email protected]> • #2627
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with
Tue, 08 Mar 2005 04:51:43 +0100
PFC <[email protected]> • #2626
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with
Tue, 8 Mar 2005 03:06:24 +0100
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <[email protected]> • #2625
Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with
Mon, 07 Mar 2005 21:02:38 -0500
Tom Lane <[email protected]> • #2624
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with
Tue, 8 Mar 2005 02:37:50 +0100
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <[email protected]> • #2623
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with
Mon, 7 Mar 2005 18:29:31 -0600
"Dave Held" <[email protected]> • #2622
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with
Mon, 7 Mar 2005 18:11:34 -0600
"Dave Held" <[email protected]> • #2621
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with
07 Mar 2005 18:15:29 -0500
Greg Stark <[email protected]> • #2620
Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with
Mon, 7 Mar 2005 23:08:57 -0000
"Dave Page" <[email protected]> • #2619
Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with
Mon, 07 Mar 2005 17:56:39 -0500
Tom Lane <[email protected]> • #2618
Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with
Mon, 07 Mar 2005 16:48:10 -0600
John A Meinel <[email protected]> • #2617
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with explain analyze finally)
Mon, 7 Mar 2005 16:34:32 -0600
"Dave Held" <[email protected]> • #2616
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with
Mon, 7 Mar 2005 16:30:40 -0600
"Dave Held" <[email protected]> • #2615
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Help with tuning this query (with
07 Mar 2005 13:05:30 -0500
Greg Stark <[email protected]> • #2614
Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with
Mon, 07 Mar 2005 11:24:07 -0600
John A Meinel <[email protected]> • #2613
Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with explain analyze finally)
Mon, 07 Mar 2005 11:38:51 -0500
Tom Lane <[email protected]> • #2612
Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with
Mon, 07 Mar 2005 10:29:46 -0600
John A Meinel <[email protected]> • #2611
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.