gmane.comp.gcc.java.devel archive

2133 archived articles, newest first (page 14 of 22). Latest articles →

[RFC PATCH] make libgcj_bc prims symbol sizes correct
Sat, 15 Aug 2009 01:08:06 +0100
Nix <[email protected]> • #17181
Re: Apache CXF wsdl2java with gcc
Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:27:48 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17180
Re: Apache CXF wsdl2java with gcc
Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:24:57 +0100
David Michel <[email protected]> • #17179
Re: Apache CXF wsdl2java with gcc
Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:10:55 +0100
David Michel <[email protected]> • #17178
Re: Using CNI on inner classes
Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:48:56 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17177
Re: Using CNI on inner classes
Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:44:09 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17176
Re: Using CNI on inner classes
Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:07:25 +0100
Bryce McKinlay <[email protected]> • #17175
Re: Apache CXF wsdl2java with gcc
Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:02:26 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17174
Re: Using CNI on inner classes
Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:10:05 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17173
Apache CXF wsdl2java with gcc
Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:01:30 +0100
David Michel <[email protected]> • #17172
Using CNI on inner classes
Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:48:08 +0530
Vaijayanthi Mala Suresh <[email protected]> • #17171
Re: Linker errors building libgcj.so (undefined refs to hidden aliases)
Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:46:43 -0400
Diego Novillo <[email protected]> • #17170
[patch win32]: Add missing header UnsupportedOperationException
Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:31:43 +0200
Kai Tietz <[email protected]> • #17169
Re: Linker errors building libgcj.so (undefined refs to hidden aliases)
Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:27:42 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17168
Re: ant with gcc
Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:57:01 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17167
Linker errors building libgcj.so (undefined refs to hidden aliases)
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:34:49 -0400
Diego Novillo <[email protected]> • #17166
ant with gcc
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 13:58:51 +0100
David Michel <[email protected]> • #17165
Re: libgcj testsuite FAILs on Ubuntu
Wed, 05 Aug 2009 14:50:01 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17164
Re: libgcj testsuite FAILs on Ubuntu
Wed, 05 Aug 2009 14:07:02 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17163
Re: libgcj testsuite FAILs on Ubuntu
Wed, 05 Aug 2009 12:12:17 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17162
Re: libgcj testsuite FAILs on Ubuntu
Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:08:10 +0200
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #17161
libgcj testsuite FAILs on Ubuntu
Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:58:22 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17160
Re: how to deal with non-generic (legacy) code ?
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:27:58 +0100
Andrew John Hughes <[email protected]> • #17159
Re: how to deal with non-generic (legacy) code ?
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:26:33 +0100
David Michel <[email protected]> • #17158
Re: how to deal with non-generic (legacy) code ?
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:21:02 +0100
Bryce McKinlay <[email protected]> • #17157
Re: how to deal with non-generic (legacy) code ?
Tue, 04 Aug 2009 10:20:36 -0500
"Philip A. Chapman" <[email protected]> • #17156
how to deal with non-generic (legacy) code ?
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:09:09 +0100
David Michel <[email protected]> • #17155
Re: gcj compilation size.
Mon, 03 Aug 2009 12:26:06 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17154
gcj compiled object file size is big
Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:55:56 +0530
abhishek desai <[email protected]> • #17153
gcj compilation size.
Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:44:29 +0530
abhishek desai <[email protected]> • #17152
Re: found redundant code in file natSystemProperties.cc
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:25:05 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17151
Re: found an overlapping data buffer in file natGCInfo.cc
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:11:33 +0200
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17150
Re: found an overlapping data buffer in file natGCInfo.cc
Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:17:36 +0200
"Martin Ettl" <[email protected]> • #17149
Re: found an overlapping data buffer in file natGCInfo.cc
Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:07:56 +0200
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17148
found redundant code in file natSystemProperties.cc
Tue, 28 Jul 2009 06:21:15 +0200
"Martin Ettl" <[email protected]> • #17147
Re: found an overlapping data buffer in file natGCInfo.cc
Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:09:30 +0200
"Martin Ettl" <[email protected]> • #17146
Re: found an overlapping data buffer in file natGCInfo.cc
Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:01:31 +0200
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17145
Re: converting a jar into a shared lib - requirements ?
Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:55:58 +0200
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17144
Re: Calling the garbage collector.
Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:15:56 -0700
"BGB" <[email protected]> • #17143
converting a jar into a shared lib - requirements ?
Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:02:25 +0100
David Michel <[email protected]> • #17142
Re: Calling the garbage collector.
Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:37:27 +0200
"Chris Gray" <[email protected]> • #17141
Re: Calling the garbage collector.
Mon, 27 Jul 2009 07:43:26 -0700
"BGB" <[email protected]> • #17140
Re: found an overlapping data buffer in file natGCInfo.cc
Mon, 27 Jul 2009 07:42:49 -0700
David Daney <[email protected]> • #17139
Re: Calling the garbage collector.
Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:07:19 +0200
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17138
Re: found an overlapping data buffer in file natGCInfo.cc
Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:03:09 +0200
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17137
Calling the garbage collector.
Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:11:13 +0530
abhishek desai <[email protected]> • #17136
found an overlapping data buffer in file natGCInfo.cc
Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:29:13 +0200
"Martin Ettl" <[email protected]> • #17135
Re: [patch libjava]: Add missing file for Win32
Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:13:58 +0100
Dave Korn <[email protected]> • #17134
Re: [patch libjava]: Add missing file for Win32
Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:28:38 +0200
Kai Tietz <[email protected]> • #17133
Re: [patch libjava]: Add missing file for Win32
Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:19:06 +0200
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17132
Re: [patch libjava]: Add missing file for Win32
Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:17:02 +0200
Kai Tietz <[email protected]> • #17131
Re: [patch libjava]: Add missing file for Win32
Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:03:28 +0200
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17130
[patch libjava]: Add missing file for Win32
Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:19:41 +0200
Kai Tietz <[email protected]> • #17129
Re: [GCC 4.4.0 / 4.4.1] GCJ - ecj1: undefined symbol: JvRunMainName, In function `_Jv_platform_nanotime()': undefined reference to "clock_gettime"
Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:09:14 +0200
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17128
Re: Bootstrap failure in 4.4.1
Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:41:00 +0200
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17127
gcc 3.4.6 build failure Solaris 5.8 (libgcj.la)
Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:00:36 -0700 (PDT)
Shaun Deacon <[email protected]> • #17126
[GCC 4.4.0 / 4.4.1] GCJ - ecj1: undefined symbol: JvRunMainName, In function `_Jv_platform_nanotime()': undefined reference to "clock_gettime"
Thu, 23 Jul 2009 23:38:48 +0200
"Piotr D. Kaczorowski" <[email protected]> • #17125
Re: Bootstrap failure in 4.4.1
Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:31:03 -0400
David Ronis <[email protected]> • #17124
Re: Bootstrap failure in 4.4.1
Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:20:41 +0200
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17123
Re: error: 'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded
Tue, 21 Jul 2009 10:44:47 +0200
Mathieu Malaterre <[email protected]> • #17122
Re: error: 'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded
Tue, 21 Jul 2009 08:48:48 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17121
Re: error: 'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded
Tue, 21 Jul 2009 09:16:57 +0200
Mathieu Malaterre <[email protected]> • #17120
Re: error: 'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded
Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:28:17 +0200
Florian Weimer <[email protected]> • #17119
Re: error: 'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded
Mon, 20 Jul 2009 09:17:24 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17118
Re: error: 'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded
Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:53:23 +0200
Florian Weimer <[email protected]> • #17117
Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:20:07 +0100
Dave Korn <[email protected]> • #17116
Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:23:22 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17115
Re: error: 'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded
Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:16:46 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17114
Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
Sun, 19 Jul 2009 15:52:03 +0100
Dave Korn <[email protected]> • #17113
Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
Sun, 19 Jul 2009 15:55:04 +0200
Kai Tietz <[email protected]> • #17112
Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
Sun, 19 Jul 2009 14:58:12 +0100
Dave Korn <[email protected]> • #17111
Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
Sun, 19 Jul 2009 15:31:04 +0200
Kai Tietz <[email protected]> • #17110
Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
Sun, 19 Jul 2009 14:29:26 +0100
Dave Korn <[email protected]> • #17109
Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
Sun, 19 Jul 2009 13:13:35 +0200
Kai Tietz <[email protected]> • #17108
Re: error: 'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded
Sun, 19 Jul 2009 10:17:05 +0200
Florian Weimer <[email protected]> • #17107
Re: error: 'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded
Sun, 19 Jul 2009 08:52:23 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17106
Re: error: 'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded
Sun, 19 Jul 2009 08:02:05 +0200
Florian Weimer <[email protected]> • #17105
Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
Sat, 18 Jul 2009 12:29:25 -0700
Andrew Pinski <[email protected]> • #17104
Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
Sat, 18 Jul 2009 21:27:08 +0200
Kai Tietz <[email protected]> • #17103
Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
Sat, 18 Jul 2009 20:36:00 +0100
Dave Korn <[email protected]> • #17102
Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
Sat, 18 Jul 2009 21:22:58 +0200
Kai Tietz <[email protected]> • #17101
Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
Sat, 18 Jul 2009 12:19:25 -0700
Andrew Pinski <[email protected]> • #17100
Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
Sat, 18 Jul 2009 20:08:51 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17099
Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
Sat, 18 Jul 2009 19:40:39 +0100
Dave Korn <[email protected]> • #17098
Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
Sat, 18 Jul 2009 19:27:46 +0100
Dave Korn <[email protected]> • #17097
Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
Sat, 18 Jul 2009 19:27:14 +0200
Kai Tietz <[email protected]> • #17096
Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
Sat, 18 Jul 2009 18:21:39 +0100
Dave Korn <[email protected]> • #17095
Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
Sat, 18 Jul 2009 18:01:18 +0200
Kai Tietz <[email protected]> • #17094
Re: [PING][C++][JAVA] Gimplification unit-at-a-time
Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:28:39 +0200 (CEST)
Richard Guenther <[email protected]> • #17093
Re: [PING][C++][JAVA] Gimplification unit-at-a-time
Sat, 18 Jul 2009 08:15:47 -0700
"H.J. Lu" <[email protected]> • #17092
Re: [PING][C++][JAVA] Gimplification unit-at-a-time
Sat, 18 Jul 2009 07:59:47 -0700
"H.J. Lu" <[email protected]> • #17091
Re: RFA: libjava seems to miss some files for win32
Sat, 18 Jul 2009 15:06:14 +0100
Dave Korn <[email protected]> • #17090
Re: [PING][C++][JAVA] Gimplification unit-at-a-time
Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:11:43 -0700
"H.J. Lu" <[email protected]> • #17089
[PING][C++][JAVA] Gimplification unit-at-a-time
Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:06:39 +0200 (CEST)
Richard Guenther <[email protected]> • #17088
error: 'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded
Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:37:38 +0200
Mathieu Malaterre <[email protected]> • #17087
Re: gcj 1.5.x: error: /classname/ cannot be resolved to a type
Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:11:43 +0200
Mathieu Malaterre <[email protected]> • #17086
Re: gcj 1.5.x: error: /classname/ cannot be resolved to a type
Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:43:13 +0200
Mathieu Malaterre <[email protected]> • #17085
Re: gcj 1.5.x: error: /classname/ cannot be resolved to a type
Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:35:09 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17084
Re: gcj 1.5.x: error: /classname/ cannot be resolved to a type
Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:29:01 +0200
Mathieu Malaterre <[email protected]> • #17083
Re: gcj 1.5.x: error: /classname/ cannot be resolved to a type
Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:24:59 +0100
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> • #17082
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.