gmane.comp.gis.postgis archive

363 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

raster2pgsql ignoring nodata (seemingly)
Wed, 5 Nov 2025 02:03:37 +0100
Lorenzo Curcio <[email protected]> • #44529
Fwd: Similarity index for pairs of features with the highest overlap?
Tue, 4 Nov 2025 13:19:00 +0100
celati Laurent <[email protected]> • #44528
Re: Spatial join issues
Wed, 29 Oct 2025 11:52:52 -0700
Paul Ramsey via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44527
Re: Spatial join issues
Wed, 29 Oct 2025 17:58:07 +0000
Shaozhong SHI <[email protected]> • #44526
Re: Spatial join issues
Wed, 29 Oct 2025 17:39:32 +0000
Shaozhong SHI <[email protected]> • #44525
Re: Spatial join issues
Wed, 29 Oct 2025 10:25:08 -0700
Paul Ramsey via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44524
Re: Spatial join issues
Wed, 29 Oct 2025 10:17:02 -0700
Paul Ramsey via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44523
Re: Spatial join issues
Wed, 29 Oct 2025 17:00:03 +0000
Shaozhong SHI <[email protected]> • #44522
Re: Spatial join issues
Wed, 29 Oct 2025 10:36:43 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #44521
Spatial join issues
Wed, 29 Oct 2025 14:10:18 +0000
Shaozhong SHI <[email protected]> • #44520
Re: Why PostGIS sets a max value for SRID IDs?
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:45:34 -0700
Paul Ramsey via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44519
Re: Why PostGIS sets a max value for SRID IDs?
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 13:37:00 -0500
Jim Klassen <[email protected]> • #44518
Re: Why PostGIS sets a max value for SRID IDs?
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 14:34:29 +0100
Vincent Picavet via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44517
Re: Why PostGIS sets a max value for SRID IDs?
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 14:15:31 +0100
"G. Allegri" <[email protected]> • #44516
RE: Why PostGIS sets a max value for SRID IDs?
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 09:11:54 -0400
"Regina Obe" <[email protected]> • #44515
Re: Why PostGIS sets a max value for SRID IDs?
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 16:17:38 +0400
Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski <[email protected]> • #44514
Why PostGIS sets a max value for SRID IDs?
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 10:46:26 +0100
"G. Allegri" <[email protected]> • #44513
RE: PostGIS 3.5.4 in PGDG packages?
Mon, 20 Oct 2025 10:40:10 -0400
"Regina Obe" <[email protected]> • #44512
Re: PostGIS 3.5.4 in PGDG packages?
Mon, 20 Oct 2025 07:32:45 -0700
Paul Ramsey via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44511
PostGIS 3.5.4 in PGDG packages?
Mon, 20 Oct 2025 10:11:21 +0300
Raine Ekman via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44510
Re: PostGIS 3.5.4 Released
Sat, 18 Oct 2025 21:55:49 -0400
Paragon Corporation <[email protected]> • #44509
Re: PostGIS 3.5.4 Released
Sat, 18 Oct 2025 23:08:51 +0300
Devrim Gündüz <[email protected]> • #44508
PostGIS 3.5.4 Released
Thu, 16 Oct 2025 16:12:04 -0700
Paul Ramsey via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44507
Re: different results for ST_Relate with 3 parameters compared to those for ST_Relate with 2 parameters
Thu, 16 Oct 2025 09:47:43 -0700
Paul Ramsey via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44506
Re: different results for ST_Relate with 3 parameters compared to those for ST_Relate with 2 parameters
Thu, 16 Oct 2025 09:25:41 -0700
Paul Ramsey via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44505
RE: different results for ST_Relate with 3 parameters compared to those for ST_Relate with 2 parameters
Wed, 15 Oct 2025 23:25:18 -0400
"Regina Obe" <[email protected]> • #44504
Re: different results for ST_Relate with 3 parameters compared to those for ST_Relate with 2 parameters
Thu, 16 Oct 2025 00:43:27 +0200
Antonio Valanzano <[email protected]> • #44503
Re: different results for ST_Relate with 3 parameters compared to those for ST_Relate with 2 parameters
Wed, 15 Oct 2025 15:31:36 -0700
Paul Ramsey via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44502
Re: different results for ST_Relate with 3 parameters compared to those for ST_Relate with 2 parameters
Thu, 16 Oct 2025 00:11:11 +0200
Antonio Valanzano <[email protected]> • #44501
Re: different results for ST_Relate with 3 parameters compared to those for ST_Relate with 2 parameters
Wed, 15 Oct 2025 14:22:03 -0700
Paul Ramsey via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44500
Re: different results for ST_Relate with 3 parameters compared to those for ST_Relate with 2 parameters
Wed, 15 Oct 2025 22:29:20 +0200
Antonio Valanzano <[email protected]> • #44499
Re: different results for ST_Relate with 3 parameters compared to those for ST_Relate with 2 parameters
Wed, 15 Oct 2025 13:03:33 -0700
Paul Ramsey via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44498
Re: different results for ST_Relate with 3 parameters compared to those for ST_Relate with 2 parameters
Wed, 15 Oct 2025 21:53:35 +0200
Antonio Valanzano <[email protected]> • #44497
Re: different results for ST_Relate with 3 parameters compared to those for ST_Relate with 2 parameters
Wed, 15 Oct 2025 11:59:21 -0700
Paul Ramsey via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44496
Re: different results for ST_Relate with 3 parameters compared to those for ST_Relate with 2 parameters
Wed, 15 Oct 2025 20:25:42 +0200
Antonio Valanzano <[email protected]> • #44495
Re: different results for ST_Relate with 3 parameters compared to those for ST_Relate with 2 parameters
Wed, 15 Oct 2025 10:45:24 -0700
Scott <[email protected]> • #44494
Re: different results for ST_Relate with 3 parameters compared to those for ST_Relate with 2 parameters
Wed, 15 Oct 2025 10:28:25 -0700
Paul Ramsey via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44493
different results for ST_Relate with 3 parameters compared to those for ST_Relate with 2 parameters
Wed, 15 Oct 2025 18:22:05 +0200
Antonio Valanzano <[email protected]> • #44492
FW: Important FOSS4GNA Updates
Tue, 14 Oct 2025 09:12:26 -0400
"Regina Obe" <[email protected]> • #44491
Percentage of area overlaped / covered by feature of another layer
Sun, 12 Oct 2025 19:25:07 +0200
celati Laurent <[email protected]> • #44490
RE: Documentation for 3.5 and 3.6 links not working
Sat, 11 Oct 2025 01:53:14 -0400
"Regina Obe" <[email protected]> • #44489
Documentation for 3.5 and 3.6 links not working
Fri, 10 Oct 2025 11:04:30 +0000
Alexandre Neto <[email protected]> • #44488
Re: Clarification on ST_CoverageClean Parameters: snappingDistance and gapMaximumWidth
Wed, 8 Oct 2025 10:02:14 +0200
Douglas Fan <[email protected]> • #44487
Re: Clarification on ST_CoverageClean Parameters: snappingDistance and gapMaximumWidth
Tue, 7 Oct 2025 12:11:58 -0700
Martin Davis <[email protected]> • #44486
Re: Clarification on ST_CoverageClean Parameters: snappingDistance and gapMaximumWidth
Tue, 7 Oct 2025 10:48:45 -0700
Paul Ramsey via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44485
Re: Clarification on ST_CoverageClean Parameters: snappingDistance and gapMaximumWidth
Tue, 7 Oct 2025 09:29:59 -0700
Martin Davis <[email protected]> • #44484
PostGIS Day 2025, Nov 20!
Mon, 6 Oct 2025 13:14:24 -0700
Paul Ramsey via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44483
Re: Dissolve keeping all attributes values (concatenation/aggregation)?
Mon, 6 Oct 2025 02:49:29 +0200
Erik Wienhold <[email protected]> • #44482
RE: PostgreSQL 18 PostGIS 3.6 installer Windows
Sun, 5 Oct 2025 10:50:45 -0400
"Regina Obe" <[email protected]> • #44481
RE: Installing latest PostGIS on Windows
Sun, 5 Oct 2025 10:19:01 -0400
"Regina Obe" <[email protected]> • #44480
Installing latest PostGIS on Windows
Sat, 4 Oct 2025 11:27:50 -0700
Anthony DeBarros <[email protected]> • #44479
Re: Dissolve keeping all attributes values (concatenation/aggregation)?
Tue, 30 Sep 2025 19:11:20 +0200
celati Laurent <[email protected]> • #44478
Re: Dissolve keeping all attributes values (concatenation/aggregation)?
Tue, 30 Sep 2025 17:37:48 +0200
Erik Wienhold <[email protected]> • #44477
Re: Dissolve keeping all attributes values (concatenation/aggregation)?
Tue, 30 Sep 2025 17:29:53 +0200
celati Laurent <[email protected]> • #44476
Re: Dissolve keeping all attributes values (concatenation/aggregation)?
Tue, 30 Sep 2025 17:03:55 +0200
Erik Wienhold <[email protected]> • #44475
Dissolve keeping all attributes values (concatenation/aggregation)?
Tue, 30 Sep 2025 16:08:20 +0200
celati Laurent <[email protected]> • #44474
Re: Clarification on ST_CoverageClean Parameters: snappingDistance and gapMaximumWidth
Wed, 24 Sep 2025 09:46:05 +0200
Douglas Fan <[email protected]> • #44473
Re: Clarification on ST_CoverageClean Parameters: snappingDistance and gapMaximumWidth
Tue, 23 Sep 2025 09:21:46 -0700
Paul Ramsey via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44472
Re: Clarification on ST_CoverageClean Parameters: snappingDistance and gapMaximumWidth
Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:28:51 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #44471
Clarification on ST_CoverageClean Parameters: snappingDistance and gapMaximumWidth
Tue, 23 Sep 2025 14:24:52 +0200
Douglas Fan <[email protected]> • #44470
Re: ST_Distance() query error
Thu, 18 Sep 2025 10:36:56 -0700
Paul Ramsey via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44469
Re: backend error after upgrading to 3.6.0
Thu, 18 Sep 2025 16:12:55 +0300
Yaroslav Minin via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44468
Re: Difference in behavior of AddGeometryColumn change in behavior between 3.5.2 and 3.5.3? SRID is listed as unknown when querying Geometry_Columns instead of the specified SRID
Tue, 16 Sep 2025 14:46:32 -0700
Paul Ramsey via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44467
RE: RE: backend error after upgrading to 3.6.0
Tue, 16 Sep 2025 13:53:40 -0400
"Regina Obe" <[email protected]> • #44466
Re: RE: backend error after upgrading to 3.6. 0
Tue, 16 Sep 2025 20:44:16 +0300
Ярослав Минин via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44465
Re: RE: backend error after upgrading to 3.6. 0
Tue, 16 Sep 2025 20:41:29 +0300
Ярослав Минин via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44464
RE: backend error after upgrading to 3.6.0
Tue, 16 Sep 2025 11:45:27 -0400
"Regina Obe" <[email protected]> • #44463
RE: backend error after upgrading to 3.6.0
Tue, 16 Sep 2025 11:36:43 -0400
"Regina Obe" <[email protected]> • #44462
backend error after upgrading to 3.6.0
Tue, 16 Sep 2025 17:48:02 +0300
Ярослав Минин via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44461
backend error after upgrading to 3.6.0
Tue, 16 Sep 2025 13:48:42 +0300
Ярослав Минин via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44460
RE: backend error after upgrading to 3.6.0
Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:05:23 -0400
"Regina Obe" <[email protected]> • #44459
Re: backend error after upgrading to 3.6.0
Tue, 16 Sep 2025 03:14:48 +0200
Erik Wienhold <[email protected]> • #44458
backend error after upgrading to 3.6.0
Mon, 15 Sep 2025 20:16:45 +0300
Ярослав Минин via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44457
Re: ST_Distance() query error
Mon, 15 Sep 2025 08:18:37 -0700
Paul Ramsey via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44456
ST_Distance() query error
Mon, 15 Sep 2025 13:43:40 +0300
Juho Rekilä via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44455
Re: PostGIS 3.5.2 ST_Contains() query on gist is slow
Thu, 11 Sep 2025 05:48:55 +0200
Sebastiaan Couwenberg via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44454
Re: PostGIS 3.5.2 ST_Contains() query on gist is slow
Thu, 11 Sep 2025 05:36:04 +0200
Sebastiaan Couwenberg via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44453
RE: PostGIS 3.5.2 ST_Contains() query on gist is slow
Wed, 10 Sep 2025 17:36:06 -0400
"Regina Obe" <[email protected]> • #44452
RE: PostGIS 3.5.2 ST_Contains() query on gist is slow
Wed, 10 Sep 2025 16:05:01 -0400
"Regina Obe" <[email protected]> • #44451
Re: PostGIS 3.5.2 ST_Contains() query on gist is slow
Wed, 10 Sep 2025 09:28:53 -0700
Paul Ramsey via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44450
Re: PostGIS 3.5.2 ST_Contains() query on gist is slow
Wed, 10 Sep 2025 18:26:07 +0200
Sebastiaan Couwenberg via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44449
Re: PostGIS 3.5.2 ST_Contains() query on gist is slow
Wed, 10 Sep 2025 09:05:38 -0700
Paul Ramsey via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44448
Re: PostGIS 3.5.2 ST_Contains() query on gist is slow
Wed, 10 Sep 2025 17:21:17 +0200
Sebastiaan Couwenberg via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44447
RE: PostGIS 3.5.2 ST_Contains() query on gist is slow
Wed, 10 Sep 2025 10:29:05 -0400
"Regina Obe" <[email protected]> • #44446
Re: Geometry / geography woes
Wed, 10 Sep 2025 13:39:15 +0000
"nikolai.berkoff via postgis-users" <[email protected]> • #44445
Re: PostGIS 3.5.2 ST_Contains() query on gist is slow
Wed, 10 Sep 2025 05:15:58 +0200
Sebastiaan Couwenberg via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44444
Re: Geometry / geography woes
Tue, 9 Sep 2025 12:29:10 -0700
Paul Ramsey via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44443
RE: Geometry / geography woes
Tue, 9 Sep 2025 15:25:14 -0400
"Regina Obe" <[email protected]> • #44442
Re: Geometry / geography woes
Tue, 9 Sep 2025 12:20:21 -0700
Paul Ramsey via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44441
Re: PostGIS 3.5.2 ST_Contains() query on gist is slow
Tue, 9 Sep 2025 21:19:05 +0200
Sebastiaan Couwenberg via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44440
RE: PostGIS 3.5.2 ST_Contains() query on gist is slow
Tue, 9 Sep 2025 15:07:50 -0400
"Regina Obe" <[email protected]> • #44439
RE: Geometry / geography woes
Tue, 09 Sep 2025 19:00:31 +0000
"nikolai.berkoff via postgis-users" <[email protected]> • #44438
Re: PostGIS 3.5.2 ST_Contains() query on gist is slow
Tue, 9 Sep 2025 11:32:35 -0700
Paul Ramsey via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44437
Re: PostGIS 3.5.2 ST_Contains() query on gist is slow
Tue, 9 Sep 2025 20:29:22 +0200
Sebastiaan Couwenberg via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44436
Re: PostGIS 3.5.2 ST_Contains() query on gist is slow
Tue, 9 Sep 2025 10:25:12 -0700
Paul Ramsey via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44435
RE: Geometry / geography woes
Tue, 9 Sep 2025 13:05:41 -0400
"Regina Obe" <[email protected]> • #44434
Re: PostGIS 3.5.2 ST_Contains() query on gist is slow
Tue, 9 Sep 2025 16:32:53 +0200
Sebastiaan Couwenberg via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44433
Re: PostGIS 3.5.2 ST_Contains() query on gist is slow
Tue, 9 Sep 2025 09:14:18 -0500
Daryl Herzmann <[email protected]> • #44432
Geometry / geography woes
Tue, 09 Sep 2025 11:35:31 +0000
"nikolai.berkoff via postgis-users" <[email protected]> • #44431
Re: PostGIS 3.5.2 ST_Contains() query on gist is slow
Tue, 9 Sep 2025 08:30:49 +0200
Sebastiaan Couwenberg via postgis-users <[email protected]> • #44430
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.