gmane.comp.hardware.avr.gcc archive

359 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Build gcc 10.3.0 for avr on a amd64 linux host
Tue, 25 May 2021 12:23:19 +0530
Senthil Kumar <[email protected]> • #8923
Re: Build gcc 10.3.0 for avr on a amd64 linux host
Sun, 23 May 2021 20:09:08 +0530
Senthil Kumar <[email protected]> • #8922
Re: Build gcc 10.3.0 for avr on a amd64 linux host
Sun, 23 May 2021 09:17:38 +0200
BERTRAND Joël <[email protected]> • #8921
Re: Build gcc 10.3.0 for avr on a amd64 linux host
Sat, 22 May 2021 22:35:29 +0530
Senthil Kumar <[email protected]> • #8920
Re: Of course, I have a memory corruption, but I'm not able to fix it...
Sat, 22 May 2021 17:44:09 +0200
BERTRAND Joël <[email protected]> • #8919
Re: Of course, I have a memory corruption, but I'm not able to fix it...
Sat, 22 May 2021 15:03:30 +0200
Paweł Si <[email protected]> • #8918
Re: Of course, I have a memory corruption, but I'm not able to fix it...
Sat, 22 May 2021 09:49:25 +0200
BERTRAND Joël <[email protected]> • #8917
Re: Of course, I have a memory corruption, but I'm not able to fix it...
Fri, 21 May 2021 23:02:26 +0200
Paweł Si <[email protected]> • #8916
Build gcc 10.3.0 for avr on a amd64 linux host
Fri, 21 May 2021 21:50:49 +0200
BERTRAND Joël <[email protected]> • #8915
Re: Of course, I have a memory corruption, but I'm not able to fix it...
Fri, 21 May 2021 12:05:00 +0200
BERTRAND Joël <[email protected]> • #8914
Of course, I have a memory corruption, but I'm not able to fix it...
Thu, 20 May 2021 15:52:48 +0200
BERTRAND Joël <[email protected]> • #8913
Re: Problem linking *without* avr-libc, libm, etc. (SOLVED)
Fri, 30 Apr 2021 19:11:44 -0500
David Kelly <[email protected]> • #8912
Re: Problem linking *without* avr-libc, libm, etc. (SOLVED)
Fri, 30 Apr 2021 18:24:41 +0100
Ian Molton <[email protected]> • #8911
Re: Problem linking *without* avr-libc, libm, etc.
Fri, 30 Apr 2021 18:29:14 +0100
Ian Molton <[email protected]> • #8910
Re: Problem linking *without* avr-libc, libm, etc.
Fri, 30 Apr 2021 19:22:40 +0930
[email protected] • #8909
Re: Problem linking *without* avr-libc, libm, etc.
Fri, 30 Apr 2021 10:03:28 +0200
David Brown <[email protected]> • #8908
Problem linking *without* avr-libc, libm, etc.
Thu, 29 Apr 2021 20:43:56 +0100
Ian Molton <[email protected]> • #8907
Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
Mon, 12 Apr 2021 08:35:25 -0700
"Bruce D. Lightner" <[email protected]> • #8906
Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
Mon, 12 Apr 2021 17:06:27 +0200
Klaus Rudolph via Gcc-help <[email protected]> • #8905
Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
Mon, 12 Apr 2021 16:56:24 +0200
Klaus Rudolph via Gcc-help <[email protected]> • #8904
Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
Mon, 12 Apr 2021 07:25:55 -0700
Anton Staaf <[email protected]> • #8903
Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
Mon, 12 Apr 2021 08:49:33 -0500
David Kelly <[email protected]> • #8902
Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:46:41 +0200
David Brown <[email protected]> • #8901
Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
Mon, 12 Apr 2021 14:12:30 +0200
Klaus Rudolph via Gcc-help <[email protected]> • #8900
Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
Mon, 12 Apr 2021 13:53:38 +0200
Matthijs Kooijman <[email protected]> • #8899
Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
Mon, 12 Apr 2021 13:16:32 +0200
Klaus Rudolph via Gcc-help <[email protected]> • #8898
Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
Mon, 12 Apr 2021 11:20:50 +0200
"Peter Sommerlad \(C++\) via Gcc-help" <[email protected]> • #8897
Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
Mon, 12 Apr 2021 11:07:21 +0200
David Brown <[email protected]> • #8896
Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
Mon, 12 Apr 2021 10:46:16 +0200
Klaus Rudolph <[email protected]> • #8895
Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
Mon, 12 Apr 2021 09:35:12 +0200
David Brown <[email protected]> • #8894
Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
Sun, 11 Apr 2021 17:30:22 -0700
Anton Staaf <[email protected]> • #8893
Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
Sun, 11 Apr 2021 20:30:12 -0400
Trampas Stern <[email protected]> • #8892
Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
Sun, 11 Apr 2021 19:33:21 -0400
Trampas Stern <[email protected]> • #8891
Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
Sun, 11 Apr 2021 08:20:53 -0400
Trampas Stern <[email protected]> • #8890
Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
Sun, 11 Apr 2021 14:10:36 +0200
David Brown <[email protected]> • #8889
Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
Sun, 11 Apr 2021 14:21:36 +0200
David Brown <[email protected]> • #8888
Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
Sat, 10 Apr 2021 20:40:44 -0700
Anton Staaf <[email protected]> • #8887
Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
Sun, 11 Apr 2021 13:18:28 +1000
Russell Shaw <[email protected]> • #8886
Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
Sat, 10 Apr 2021 17:35:45 -0700
"Bruce D. Lightner" <[email protected]> • #8885
Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
Sat, 10 Apr 2021 18:36:54 -0400
Trampas Stern <[email protected]> • #8884
Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
Sat, 10 Apr 2021 16:12:45 -0500
David Kelly <[email protected]> • #8883
Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
Sat, 10 Apr 2021 22:11:35 +0200
Klaus via Gcc-help <[email protected]> • #8882
Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
Sat, 10 Apr 2021 15:36:18 -0400
Trampas Stern <[email protected]> • #8881
Re: static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
Sat, 10 Apr 2021 16:26:44 +0100
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-help <[email protected]> • #8880
static class member as interrupt handler works, but not if class is templated
Sat, 10 Apr 2021 15:33:30 +0200
Klaus Rudolph via Gcc-help <[email protected]> • #8879
Re: Partial libstdc++ Support
Thu, 4 Feb 2021 07:47:28 +0100
Grzegorz Gajoch <[email protected]> • #8878
Re: Partial libstdc++ Support
Tue, 2 Feb 2021 10:04:25 +0100
Klaus <[email protected]> • #8877
Re: Partial libstdc++ Support
Tue, 2 Feb 2021 13:27:08 +0100
Matthijs Kooijman <[email protected]> • #8876
Re: Partial libstdc++ Support
Tue, 2 Feb 2021 11:17:12 +0100
Klaus Rudolph <[email protected]> • #8875
Re: Partial libstdc++ Support
Mon, 01 Feb 2021 20:34:22 -0300
Ricardo Cosme <[email protected]> • #8874
Partial libstdc++ Support
Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:20:01 -0500
"John A. Leuenhagen" <[email protected]> • #8873
Re: odd optimization differences of shift between C andC++
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 18:50:29 +0100
David Brown <[email protected]> • #8872
Re: odd optimization differences of shift between C andC++
Thu, 31 Dec 2020 18:18:08 +0100
Jochen Barth <[email protected]> • #8871
Re: odd optimization differences of shift between C andC++
Wed, 30 Dec 2020 12:19:57 +0100
David Brown <[email protected]> • #8870
RE: RE: odd optimization differences of shift between C andC++
Tue, 29 Dec 2020 21:00:59 +0100
Jochen Barth <[email protected]> • #8869
Re: error in make
Sat, 26 Sep 2020 20:14:45 +0530
Royce Pereira <[email protected]> • #8868
Re: error in make
Sat, 26 Sep 2020 07:33:15 -0700
Dave Hylands <[email protected]> • #8867
Re: error in make
Sat, 26 Sep 2020 09:52:24 +0100
Nigel Winterbottom <[email protected]> • #8866
Re: error in make
Fri, 25 Sep 2020 12:47:23 +0200
Georg-Johann Lay <[email protected]> • #8865
Re: error in make
Fri, 25 Sep 2020 11:39:58 +0200
Peter C++ <[email protected]> • #8864
Re: error in make
Fri, 25 Sep 2020 14:19:09 +0530
Royce Pereira <[email protected]> • #8863
Re: error in make
Tue, 22 Sep 2020 15:13:24 +0530
Royce Pereira <[email protected]> • #8862
error in make
Tue, 22 Sep 2020 15:08:54 +0530
Royce Pereira <[email protected]> • #8861
Re: cross compile gcc 10.1.0 on linux for avr fails
Thu, 16 Jul 2020 19:48:50 +0530
Senthil Kumar <[email protected]> • #8860
cross compile gcc 10.1.0 on linux for avr fails
Thu, 16 Jul 2020 10:38:52 +0200
Klaus Rudolph <[email protected]> • #8859
Re: Saving & retreiving a structure in eeprom
Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:50:58 +0530
Royce Pereira <[email protected]> • #8858
Re: Saving & retreiving a structure in eeprom
Tue, 9 Jun 2020 18:57:26 +0000
Dave Hansen <[email protected]> • #8857
Saving & retreiving a structure in eeprom
Tue, 9 Jun 2020 18:48:45 +0530
Royce Pereira <[email protected]> • #8856
[solved] Re: Something I don't understand (loops and interrupts)
Fri, 3 Apr 2020 17:56:53 +0200
BERTRAND Joël <[email protected]> • #8855
Re: Something I don't understand (loops and interrupts)
Fri, 3 Apr 2020 14:23:29 +0200
BERTRAND Joël <[email protected]> • #8854
Re: Something I don't understand (loops and interrupts)
Fri, 3 Apr 2020 11:38:18 +0100 (BST)
Jim Jackson <[email protected]> • #8853
Something I don't understand (loops and interrupts)
Fri, 3 Apr 2020 10:28:28 +0200
BERTRAND Joël <[email protected]> • #8852
Re: Why are switch statement tables in section .rodata which gets copied to RAM with avr-gcc?
Thu, 2 Apr 2020 11:06:14 +0200
Georg-Johann Lay <[email protected]> • #8851
Re: Why are switch statement tables in section .rodata which gets copied to RAM with avr-gcc?
Tue, 31 Mar 2020 16:59:37 +0200
Matthijs Kooijman <[email protected]> • #8850
Why are switch statement tables in section .rodata which gets copied to RAM with avr-gcc?
Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:50:57 +0200
"Peter Sommerlad (C++)" <[email protected]> • #8849
Re: AVR-GCC-list Digest, Vol 157, Issue 2
Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:31:58 +0100
Bob von Knobloch <[email protected]> • #8848
Re: Where is the error (stdout)
Fri, 7 Feb 2020 18:56:41 -0600
David Kelly <[email protected]> • #8847
Re: Where is the error (stdout)
Sat, 8 Feb 2020 12:58:19 +1300
Col <[email protected]> • #8846
Where is the error (stdout)
Fri, 7 Feb 2020 16:38:20 +0530
Royce Pereira <[email protected]> • #8845
Fyi: this list, avr-gcc-list, just had it's subject [tag] and footer removed
Wed, 23 Oct 2019 12:51:14 -0400
[email protected] • #8844
Re: atm32u4df and avrdude
Fri, 20 Sep 2019 09:26:16 +0200
martijn <[email protected]> • #8843
Re: atm32u4df and avrdude
Fri, 20 Sep 2019 11:21:16 +0200
Lukas Dzunko <[email protected]> • #8842
Re: atm32u4df and avrdude
Wed, 18 Sep 2019 22:39:35 +0000
Phillip Vogel <[email protected]> • #8841
Re: atm32u4df and avrdude
Wed, 18 Sep 2019 16:03:48 -0500
Dave Harper <[email protected]> • #8840
atm32u4df and avrdude
Wed, 18 Sep 2019 11:26:44 -0700
Bruce Byfield <[email protected]> • #8839
Re: Optimisation mixes up registers in inline assembly
Thu, 25 Jul 2019 09:31:49 +0200
David Brown <[email protected]> • #8838
Re: Optimisation mixes up registers in inline assembly
Wed, 24 Jul 2019 23:53:27 +0200
Michael Kwasnicki <[email protected]> • #8837
Re: Optimisation mixes up registers in inline assembly
Wed, 24 Jul 2019 23:30:00 +0200
David Brown <[email protected]> • #8836
Re: Optimisation mixes up registers in inline assembly
Wed, 24 Jul 2019 23:00:07 +0200
David Brown <[email protected]> • #8835
Re: Optimisation mixes up registers in inline assembly
Wed, 24 Jul 2019 16:44:29 -0400
"Joseph C. Sible" <[email protected]> • #8834
Re: Optimisation mixes up registers in inline assembly
Wed, 24 Jul 2019 21:41:18 +0200
Michael Kwasnicki <[email protected]> • #8833
Re: Optimisation mixes up registers in inline assembly
Wed, 24 Jul 2019 13:17:53 -0400
"Joseph C. Sible" <[email protected]> • #8832
Optimisation mixes up registers in inline assembly
Wed, 24 Jul 2019 18:55:00 +0200
Michael Kwasnicki <[email protected]> • #8831
Re: SPI pinout in avrlibc
Thu, 22 Nov 2018 10:13:01 +0800
Aurélien Vallée <[email protected]> • #8830
SPI pinout in avrlibc
Wed, 21 Nov 2018 11:59:05 +0800
Aurélien Vallée <[email protected]> • #8829
Re: avr problem
Mon, 3 Sep 2018 19:09:18 -0700
Jim Wagner <[email protected]> • #8828
avr problem
Tue, 4 Sep 2018 01:34:09 +0000 (UTC)
gholam hossein <[email protected]> • #8827
Re: Bug with -flto optimization, omits check for variable if weak/zero symbol is present...
Fri, 13 Jul 2018 17:10:10 +0530
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj <[email protected]> • #8826
Re: Bug with -flto optimization, omits check for variable if weak/zero symbol is present...
Sun, 8 Jul 2018 01:53:32 -0700
Bill Westfield <[email protected]> • #8825
Bug with -flto optimization, omits check for variable if weak/zero symbol is present...
Fri, 6 Jul 2018 18:10:47 -0700
Bill Westfield <[email protected]> • #8824
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.