gmane.comp.java.enhydra.xmlc archive

513 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 6). Latest articles →

Re: import html in a document
Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:31:02 -0500
Jeremy Ferry <[email protected]> • #798
Re: import html in a document
Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:51:02 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #797
Re: import html in a document
Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:50:42 -0400
David Corbin <[email protected]> • #796
import html in a document
Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:40:39 +0200
"Thorsten M?ller" <[email protected]> • #795
Re: XMLC and Struts
Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:14:20 -0400
David Corbin <[email protected]> • #794
XMLC and Struts
Mon, 22 Sep 2003 21:23:57 +0900
David Li <[email protected]> • #793
Re: about setSelect of HTMLOptionElement?
Sun, 21 Sep 2003 22:40:55 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #792
about setSelect of HTMLOptionElement?
Mon, 22 Sep 2003 09:23:20 +0800
"Su Baochen" <[email protected]> • #791
xmlc.enhydra.org / xmlc.org updated
Fri, 19 Sep 2003 09:26:17 -0600
"David H. Young" <[email protected]> • #790
Re: question(bug) about setNodeValue
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 23:38:05 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #789
Re: question(bug) about setNodeValue
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 16:57:47 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #788
Re: [Ann] Jivan 1.0 RC 1
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 23:37:53 +0200
Arno Schatz <[email protected]> • #787
Re: Convert String to XML safe String
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 21:11:12 +0200
merg <[email protected]> • #786
Re: pretty printing page output
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 15:06:51 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #785
Re: pretty printing page output
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:23:20 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #784
Re: pretty printing page output
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 21:06:40 +0200
Petr Stehlik <[email protected]> • #783
Re: Convert String to XML safe String
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 13:17:03 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #782
Re: pretty printing page output
Mon, 31 Dec 2001 23:27:31 -0600
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #781
Convert String to XML safe String
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 19:50:36 +0200
merg <[email protected]> • #780
Re: pretty printing page output
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 10:21:36 -0700
Matthew Hixson <[email protected]> • #779
Re: pretty printing page output
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 10:39:25 +0200
Petr Stehlik <[email protected]> • #778
question(bug) about setNodeValue
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:25:10 +0800
linuxman <[email protected]> • #777
Re: pretty printing page output
Wed, 17 Sep 2003 23:15:34 -0700
Matthew Hixson <[email protected]> • #776
Re: pretty printing page output
Wed, 17 Sep 2003 23:50:24 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #775
Re: [Ann] Jivan 1.0 RC 1
18 Sep 2003 04:44:40 -0000
Mark Diekhans <[email protected]> • #774
Re: XMLC 2.2.1 release
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 10:12:48 +0900
David Li <[email protected]> • #773
Re: XMLC 2.2.1 release
Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:02:22 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #772
RE: Case Study: XMLC vs. Velocity
Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:51:28 -0400
"Christian Cryder" <[email protected]> • #771
RE: Case Study: XMLC vs. Velocity
Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:40:09 -0400
"Christian Cryder" <[email protected]> • #770
Re: Case Study: XMLC vs. Velocity
Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:35:10 -0400
David Corbin <[email protected]> • #769
Re: Case Study: XMLC vs. Velocity
Wed, 17 Sep 2003 09:11:33 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #768
Re: Case Study: XMLC vs. Velocity
Wed, 17 Sep 2003 23:05:45 +0900
David Li <[email protected]> • #767
XMLC 2.2.1 release
Wed, 17 Sep 2003 23:04:40 +0900
David Li <[email protected]> • #766
Re: Case Study: XMLC vs. Velocity
Wed, 17 Sep 2003 08:44:45 -0400
David Corbin <[email protected]> • #765
RE: Case Study: XMLC vs. Velocity
Wed, 17 Sep 2003 08:22:56 -0400
"Christian Cryder" <[email protected]> • #764
Re: Re: Xmlc: [Ann] Jivan 1.0 RC 1
Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:37:30 +0200
Arno Schatz <[email protected]> • #763
Re: Case Study: XMLC vs. Velocity
Wed, 17 Sep 2003 18:17:52 +0900
David Li <[email protected]> • #762
Re: Xmlc: [Ann] Jivan 1.0 RC 1
Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:00:41 +0900
David Li <[email protected]> • #761
re: Case Study: XMLC vs. Velocity
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 00:51:52 +0200
"Stefan Flick" <[email protected]> • #760
Re: [Ann] Jivan 1.0 RC 1
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 21:32:47 +0200
Arno Schatz <[email protected]> • #759
Re: cloning nodes vs. creating new() ones
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 13:34:01 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #758
Re: cloning nodes vs. creating new() ones
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 10:59:20 -0700
Matthew Hixson <[email protected]> • #757
Re: cloning nodes vs. creating new() ones
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 10:57:46 -0700
Matthew Hixson <[email protected]> • #756
Re: [Ann] Jivan 1.0 RC 1
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 08:59:29 -0600
"David H. Young" <[email protected]> • #755
Re: cloning nodes vs. creating new() ones
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 09:55:09 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #754
[Ann] Jivan 1.0 RC 1
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 13:08:34 +0200
Arno Schatz <[email protected]> • #753
Re: some bug fixes committed...
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 19:07:28 +0900
David Li <[email protected]> • #752
Re: cloning nodes vs. creating new() ones
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 10:44:02 +0200
Petr Stehlik <[email protected]> • #751
Re: cloning nodes vs. creating new() ones
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 10:43:50 +0200
Richard Kunze <[email protected]> • #750
Re: cloning nodes vs. creating new() ones
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 01:20:33 -0700
Matthew Hixson <[email protected]> • #749
Re: Backwards compatability
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 18:44:13 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #748
Re: Case Study: XMLC vs. Velocity
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 17:44:30 -0400
David Corbin <[email protected]> • #747
pretty printing page output
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 14:21:58 -0700
Matthew Hixson <[email protected]> • #746
Re: some bug fixes committed...
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 15:21:28 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #745
Backwards compatability
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 16:11:57 -0400
David Corbin <[email protected]> • #744
Re: cloning nodes vs. creating new() ones
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 15:11:11 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #743
Re: some bug fixes committed...
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 21:49:59 +0200
Petr Stehlik <[email protected]> • #742
Re: some bug fixes committed...
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 13:43:20 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #741
Re: some bug fixes committed...
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 11:32:33 -0700
Matthew Hixson <[email protected]> • #740
Re: some bug fixes committed...
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 11:17:26 -0700
Matthew Hixson <[email protected]> • #739
cloning nodes vs. creating new() ones
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 11:03:29 -0700
Matthew Hixson <[email protected]> • #738
some bug fixes committed...
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 12:35:06 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #737
Re: Problems when compiling HTML files
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 11:36:51 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #736
Re: parsing xHTML
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 09:26:18 -0700
Matthew Hixson <[email protected]> • #735
Re: no setters for page elements?
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 08:57:14 -0700
Matthew Hixson <[email protected]> • #734
Re: [news] Case Study: XMLC vs. Velocity
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:53:31 -0500
"Douglas Harris" <[email protected]> • #733
Re: Case Study: XMLC vs. Velocity
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 08:38:33 -0600
"David H. Young" <[email protected]> • #732
Re: no setters for page elements?
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 07:58:15 -0400
David Corbin <[email protected]> • #731
Re: Case Study: XMLC vs. Velocity
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 07:56:04 -0400
David Corbin <[email protected]> • #730
Problems when compiling HTML files
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:38:30 +0200
Thorsten Möller <[email protected]> • #729
no setters for page elements?
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 00:46:49 -0700
Matthew Hixson <[email protected]> • #728
Re: for what it's worth: xml-apis.jar placement
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 02:05:17 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #727
Re: parsing xHTML
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 02:10:16 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #726
Re: parsing xHTML
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 02:03:15 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #725
Re: parsing xHTML
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 09:00:52 +0200
Petr Stehlik <[email protected]> • #724
Re: parsing xHTML
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 08:59:28 +0200
Petr Stehlik <[email protected]> • #723
Case Study: XMLC vs. Velocity
Sun, 14 Sep 2003 23:58:20 -0700
Matthew Hixson <[email protected]> • #722
Re: parsing xHTML
Sun, 14 Sep 2003 23:01:14 -0700
Matthew Hixson <[email protected]> • #721
Re: for what it's worth: xml-apis.jar placement
Sun, 14 Sep 2003 22:42:51 -0700
Matthew Hixson <[email protected]> • #720
Re: parsing xHTML
Sun, 14 Sep 2003 22:39:05 -0700
Matthew Hixson <[email protected]> • #719
Re: for what it's worth: xml-apis.jar placement
Sun, 14 Sep 2003 23:57:14 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #718
for what it's worth: xml-apis.jar placement
Sun, 14 Sep 2003 21:32:17 -0600
"David H. Young" <[email protected]> • #717
Re: parsing xHTML
Sun, 14 Sep 2003 20:02:48 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #716
parsing xHTML
Sun, 14 Sep 2003 15:35:44 -0700
Matthew Hixson <[email protected]> • #715
Re: Re: Problem with implementation of getChildNodes on HTMLFormElement?
Sun, 14 Sep 2003 21:01:02 +0200
Petr Stehlik <[email protected]> • #714
Re: Re: Problem with implementation of getChildNodes on HTMLFormElement?
Sun, 14 Sep 2003 00:05:40 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #713
Re: Re: Problem with implementation of getChildNodes on HTMLFormElement?
Sat, 13 Sep 2003 22:26:50 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #712
Re: Re: Problem with implementation of getChildNodes on HTMLFormElement?
Sat, 13 Sep 2003 22:14:32 +0200
Petr Stehlik <[email protected]> • #711
Re: Re: Problem with implementation of getChildNodes on HTMLFormElement?
Sat, 13 Sep 2003 13:00:54 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #710
Re: Problem with implementation of getChildNodes on HTMLFormElement?
Sat, 13 Sep 2003 09:10:00 -0500
Aaron Kardell <[email protected]> • #709
Re: Problem with implementation of getChildNodes on HTMLFormElement?
Sat, 13 Sep 2003 13:39:49 +0200
Petr Stehlik <[email protected]> • #708
Re: Problem with implementation of getChildNodes on HTMLFormElement?
Sat, 13 Sep 2003 01:48:09 +0200
Petr Stehlik <[email protected]> • #707
Re: HMLObjectImpl#toDocument() issue
Sat, 13 Sep 2003 01:37:51 +0200
Petr Stehlik <[email protected]> • #706
Re: biting the tomcat bullet and xmlc
Fri, 12 Sep 2003 20:23:30 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #705
Re: biting the tomcat bullet and xmlc
Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:16:04 -0600
"David H. Young" <[email protected]> • #704
Re: biting the tomcat bullet and xmlc
Fri, 12 Sep 2003 14:19:08 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #703
Enhydra 5.1
Fri, 12 Sep 2003 21:18:24 +0200
"Madl Alfred" <[email protected]> • #702
Re: Problem with implementation of getChildNodes on HTMLFormElement?
Fri, 12 Sep 2003 14:11:05 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #701
Re: HMLObjectImpl#toDocument() issue
Fri, 12 Sep 2003 14:03:03 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #700
Re: Problem with implementation of getChildNodes on HTMLFormElement?
Fri, 12 Sep 2003 19:06:18 +0200
Petr Stehlik <[email protected]> • #699
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.