gmane.comp.java.enhydra.xmlc archive

513 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 6). Latest articles →

Re: How to supress the *.java.optionCheck files?
Wed, 19 Nov 2003 10:52:56 +0100
Boris Klug <[email protected]> • #898
Re: How to supress the *.java.optionCheck files?
Tue, 18 Nov 2003 22:47:46 -0600
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #897
How to supress the *.java.optionCheck files?
Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:45:02 +0100
Boris Klug <[email protected]> • #896
Re: writers need buffering too
Mon, 17 Nov 2003 18:46:23 -0600
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #895
writers need buffering too
Mon, 17 Nov 2003 00:27:12 +0100
"Pieter Schoenmakers" <[email protected]> • #894
Re: Enhydra copyrights and trademarks
Sun, 16 Nov 2003 13:38:07 +0100
Arno Schatz <[email protected]> • #893
AW: Xmlc: Compiler problem
Fri, 14 Nov 2003 18:23:08 +0100
"Madl Alfred" <[email protected]> • #892
Re: Compiler problem
Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:48:05 -0600
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #891
Re: Compiler problem
Fri, 14 Nov 2003 08:39:26 -0700
"Kyle Aaron" <[email protected]> • #890
Compiler problem
Thu, 13 Nov 2003 19:19:03 -0000
"Chris Midwood" <[email protected]> • #889
Dods: A love affair between a bison and an otter - Enhydra is free !
Wed, 12 Nov 2003 14:46:02 +0100
"Madl Alfred" <[email protected]> • #888
Dods: Enhydra copyrights and trademarks
Wed, 12 Nov 2003 14:44:38 +0100
"Madl Alfred" <[email protected]> • #887
Re: Re: Xmlc: Class not found
Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:01:32 -0600
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #886
Re: Xmlc: Class not found
Mon, 10 Nov 2003 10:12:21 +0100
Boris Klug <[email protected]> • #885
Re: Xmlc: Re: Xmlc:  Class not found exception: Please help!
Fri, 07 Nov 2003 08:43:38 -0600
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #884
Re: Xmlc:  Class not found exception: Please help!
Fri, 7 Nov 2003 09:24:10 +0100
Boris Klug <[email protected]> • #883
Re: Class not found exception: Please help!
Thu, 06 Nov 2003 10:58:02 -0600
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #882
Re: Class not found exception: Please help!
Thu, 06 Nov 2003 10:35:58 -0600
jeremy <[email protected]> • #881
Re: Class not found exception: Please help!
Thu, 06 Nov 2003 09:33:12 -0600
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #880
Class not found exception: Please help!
Thu, 6 Nov 2003 15:06:48 +0100
Boris Klug <[email protected]> • #879
Re: Re: XMLC Command
Thu, 06 Nov 2003 05:26:43 -0600
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #878
Re: XMLC Command
Wed, 5 Nov 2003 15:48:37 +0100
Thorsten Möller <[email protected]> • #877
Re: XMLC Command
Thu, 06 Nov 2003 09:50:29 +0100
Mark van Leeuwen <[email protected]> • #876
Re: XMLC Command
Wed, 05 Nov 2003 13:08:58 -0600
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #875
Re: XMLC Command
Wed, 05 Nov 2003 17:24:45 +0100
Mark van Leeuwen <[email protected]> • #874
Re: XMLC Command
Wed, 05 Nov 2003 09:09:11 -0600
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #873
XMLC Command
Wed, 5 Nov 2003 10:16:34 +0100
"Stefan Koulouris" <[email protected]> • #872
Re: Does XMLC Remove 'id' tag
Tue, 04 Nov 2003 22:41:21 -0600
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #871
Does XMLC Remove 'id' tag
Tue, 4 Nov 2003 14:53:37 -1000
"Mike Warne" <[email protected]> • #870
Re: Double Semicolon in generated Code
Thu, 30 Oct 2003 11:03:26 -0600
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #869
Re: Double Semicolon in generated Code
Thu, 30 Oct 2003 07:35:51 -0500
David Corbin <[email protected]> • #868
Re: Double Semicolon in generated Code
Thu, 30 Oct 2003 09:25:20 +0100
"Daniel Potysch" <[email protected]> • #867
Re: Double Semicolon in generated Code
Wed, 29 Oct 2003 11:26:34 -0600
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #866
Re: international signs and entitys
Wed, 29 Oct 2003 16:39:37 +0100
Richard Kunze <[email protected]> • #865
international signs and entitys
Wed, 29 Oct 2003 14:14:59 +0100
Thorsten Möller <[email protected]> • #864
Double Semicolon in generated Code
Wed, 29 Oct 2003 09:37:29 +0100
"Daniel Potysch" <[email protected]> • #863
Double Semicolon in generated Code
Wed, 29 Oct 2003 09:56:05 +0100
"Daniel Potysch" <[email protected]> • #862
Re: setForceCloseTags???
Tue, 28 Oct 2003 08:54:53 -0700
"David H. Young" <[email protected]> • #861
Re: setForceCloseTags???
Mon, 27 Oct 2003 22:22:12 -0400
David Corbin <[email protected]> • #860
Re: setForceCloseTags???
Mon, 27 Oct 2003 22:37:51 -0400
David Corbin <[email protected]> • #859
setForceCloseTags???
Mon, 27 Oct 2003 18:54:23 -0700
"David H. Young" <[email protected]> • #858
Re: trying to use SSI
Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:33:04 -0700
Matthew Hixson <[email protected]> • #857
trying to use SSI
Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:19:17 -0700
Matthew Hixson <[email protected]> • #856
test
Mon, 20 Oct 2003 12:25:00 -0700
Matthew Hixson <[email protected]> • #855
XMLC 2.2.3 Release
Mon, 13 Oct 2003 16:23:33 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #854
Re: Content-type for XHTML (was: XMLC, setEnableXTHMLCompatibilty)
Wed, 8 Oct 2003 18:53:46 -0400
David Corbin <[email protected]> • #853
Re: Content-type for XHTML (was: XMLC, setEnableXTHMLCompatibilty)
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 14:06:20 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #852
Re: Content-type for XHTML (was: XMLC, setEnableXTHMLCompatibilty)
Wed, 8 Oct 2003 13:44:21 -0400
David Corbin <[email protected]> • #851
Re: Content-type for XHTML (was: XMLC, setEnableXTHMLCompatibilty)
Wed, 8 Oct 2003 13:43:02 -0400
David Corbin <[email protected]> • #850
Re: Content-type for XHTML (was: XMLC, setEnableXTHMLCompatibilty)
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 19:03:57 +0200
Petr Stehlik <[email protected]> • #849
Re: Content-type for XHTML (was: XMLC, setEnableXTHMLCompatibilty)
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 11:38:01 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #848
Re: Content-type for XHTML (was: XMLC, setEnableXTHMLCompatibilty)
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 09:15:30 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #847
Re: Content-type for XHTML (was: XMLC, setEnableXTHMLCompatibilty)
Wed, 8 Oct 2003 08:58:07 -0400
David Corbin <[email protected]> • #846
Re: Content-type for XHTML (was: XMLC, setEnableXTHMLCompatibilty)
Wed, 08 Oct 2003 01:15:45 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #845
Re: XMLC, setEnableXTHMLCompatibilty
Tue, 7 Oct 2003 16:53:46 -0400
David Corbin <[email protected]> • #844
Re: Content-type for XHTML (was: XMLC, setEnableXTHMLCompatibilty)
Tue, 7 Oct 2003 16:07:35 -0400
David Corbin <[email protected]> • #843
Re: XMLC, setEnableXTHMLCompatibilty
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 11:39:57 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #842
Re: XMLC, setEnableXTHMLCompatibilty
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 09:15:15 -0700
Justin Akehurst <[email protected]> • #841
Re: Content-type for XHTML (was: XMLC, setEnableXTHMLCompatibilty)
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 11:14:14 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #840
Re: XMLC, setEnableXTHMLCompatibilty
Tue, 7 Oct 2003 11:28:08 -0400
David Corbin <[email protected]> • #839
Re: Content-type for XHTML (was: XMLC, setEnableXTHMLCompatibilty)
Tue, 7 Oct 2003 11:14:22 -0400
David Corbin <[email protected]> • #838
Re: XMLC, setEnableXTHMLCompatibilty
Mon, 06 Oct 2003 18:14:28 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #837
XMLC, setEnableXTHMLCompatibilty
Mon, 6 Oct 2003 15:43:42 -0400
David Corbin <[email protected]> • #836
Re: Xerces 1.4.4
Mon, 06 Oct 2003 10:31:33 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #835
Re: Xerces 1.4.4
Mon, 6 Oct 2003 10:19:00 +0900
David Li <[email protected]> • #834
Re: Xerces 1.4.4
Sun, 5 Oct 2003 20:18:45 -0400
David Corbin <[email protected]> • #833
Re: Xerces 1.4.4
Mon, 6 Oct 2003 09:04:17 +0900
David Li <[email protected]> • #832
Error handling
Sun, 5 Oct 2003 13:06:38 -0400
David Corbin <[email protected]> • #831
Xerces 1.4.4
Sun, 5 Oct 2003 11:33:24 -0400
David Corbin <[email protected]> • #830
xmlc.org
Thu, 2 Oct 2003 09:42:15 -0400
David Corbin <[email protected]> • #829
Re: migrating from custom tags
Wed, 1 Oct 2003 20:24:32 -0700
Matthew Hixson <[email protected]> • #828
Re: migrating from custom tags
Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:46:37 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #827
Re: Re: Migrating away from JSP, etc.
Wed, 1 Oct 2003 19:45:53 -0400
David Corbin <[email protected]> • #826
Re: Re: Migrating away from JSP, etc.
Wed, 1 Oct 2003 16:34:18 -0700 (PDT)
Justin Akehurst <[email protected]> • #825
Re: Re: Migrating away from JSP, etc.
Wed, 1 Oct 2003 19:25:58 -0400
David Corbin <[email protected]> • #824
migrating from custom tags
Wed, 1 Oct 2003 15:27:44 -0700
Matthew Hixson <[email protected]> • #823
Re: Migrating away from JSP, etc.
Wed, 1 Oct 2003 15:19:37 -0700 (PDT)
Justin Akehurst <[email protected]> • #822
Re: XHTML: <?xml?> shouldn't be required or a workaround needed for Microsoft stupidity
Wed, 01 Oct 2003 14:15:55 +0200
Petr Stehlik <[email protected]> • #821
Migrating away from JSP, etc.
Tue, 30 Sep 2003 19:46:58 -0400
David Corbin <[email protected]> • #820
Re: XHTML: <?xml?> shouldn't be required or a workaround needed for Microsoft stupidity
Tue, 30 Sep 2003 14:32:14 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #819
Re: XHTML: <?xml?> shouldn't be required or a workaround needed for Microsoft stupidity
Tue, 30 Sep 2003 21:17:20 +0200
Petr Stehlik <[email protected]> • #818
Re: XHTML: <?xml?> shouldn't be required or a workaround needed for Microsoft stupidity
Tue, 30 Sep 2003 12:47:11 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #817
XHTML: <?xml?> shouldn't be required or a workaround needed for Microsoft stupidity
Tue, 30 Sep 2003 17:42:16 +0200
Petr Stehlik <[email protected]> • #816
Re: Is the XMLC book still relevant?
Mon, 29 Sep 2003 22:37:16 -0600
"David H. Young" <[email protected]> • #815
Re: Is the XMLC book still relevant?
Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
Justin Akehurst <[email protected]> • #814
Re: Is the XMLC book still relevant?
Mon, 29 Sep 2003 22:09:35 -0600
"David H. Young" <[email protected]> • #813
Re: Is the XMLC book still relevant?
Mon, 29 Sep 2003 22:04:56 -0600
"David H. Young" <[email protected]> • #812
Re: Is the XMLC book still relevant?
Mon, 29 Sep 2003 22:48:46 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #811
Is the XMLC book still relevant?
Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
Justin Akehurst <[email protected]> • #810
Enhydra/DODS/Kelp/Director 5.1 FINAL available !
Fri, 26 Sep 2003 22:47:42 +0200
"Madl Alfred" <[email protected]> • #809
XMLC 2.2.2 Release
Wed, 24 Sep 2003 21:19:55 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #808
XMLC used at schools :)
Wed, 24 Sep 2003 11:45:43 +0200
[email protected] • #807
Re: to </p> or not to </p>
23 Sep 2003 00:53:30 -0000
Mark Diekhans <[email protected]> • #806
Re: to </p> or not to </p>
23 Sep 2003 00:53:55 -0000
Mark Diekhans <[email protected]> • #805
Re: to </p> or not to </p>
23 Sep 2003 01:43:59 -0000
Mark Diekhans <[email protected]> • #804
Re: to </p> or not to </p>
Mon, 22 Sep 2003 17:57:30 -0400
David Corbin <[email protected]> • #803
Re: to </p> or not to </p>
Mon, 22 Sep 2003 14:52:27 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #802
Re: to </p> or not to </p>
Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:52:36 -0700
Matthew Hixson <[email protected]> • #801
Re: to </p> or not to </p>
Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:47:14 -0700
Mark Diekhans <[email protected]> • #800
to </p> or not to </p>
Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:45:00 -0500
Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> • #799
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.