gmane.comp.kde.devel.optimize archive

397 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: some test apps
Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:59:42 +0200
Juergen Pfennig <[email protected]> • #963
some test apps
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:36:56 -0400
Benjamin Meyer <[email protected]> • #962
Re: icefox tests issues
Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:29:51 +0000
Raul Fernandes <[email protected]> • #961
Re: icefox tests issues
Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:02:21 +0200
Lubos Lunak <[email protected]> • #960
Re: icefox tests issues
Fri, 22 Oct 2004 02:00:32 +0000
Raul Fernandes <[email protected]> • #959
Re: icefox tests issues
Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:28:12 +0000
Dario Massarin <[email protected]> • #958
Re: icefox tests issues
Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:21:47 -0500
Matt Rogers <[email protected]> • #957
Re: icefox tests issues
Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:32:59 +0200
Lubos Lunak <[email protected]> • #956
Re: icefox tests issues
Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:26:59 +0200
Lubos Lunak <[email protected]> • #955
Re: icefox tests issues
Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:45:40 +0000
Raul Fernandes <[email protected]> • #954
Re: icefox tests issues
Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:12:55 +0200
Luciano Montanaro <[email protected]> • #953
Re: icefox tests issues
Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:46:40 +0200
Lubos Lunak <[email protected]> • #952
Re: icefox tests issues
Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:27:26 +0200
Juergen Pfennig <[email protected]> • #951
Re: stripping kde libs and binaries
Thu, 21 Oct 2004 07:43:51 +0000 (UTC)
Karl Vogel <karl.vogel-/[email protected]> • #950
RE: stripping kde libs and binaries
Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:16:20 +0200
Karl Vogel <[email protected]> • #949
Re: icefox tests issues
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:25:49 -0400
Zack Rusin <[email protected]> • #948
Re: icefox tests issues
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:21:56 -0400
Zack Rusin <[email protected]> • #947
Re: icefox tests issues
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:52:25 -0400
Simon Perreault <[email protected]> • #946
Re: icefox tests issues
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:47:17 -0400
Simon Perreault <[email protected]> • #945
Re: stripping kde libs and binaries
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:39:28 +0200
Simon Hausmann <[email protected]> • #944
Re: icefox tests issues
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:35:48 -0500
Matt Rogers <[email protected]> • #943
Re: icefox tests issues
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:26:51 +0200
Juergen Pfennig <[email protected]> • #942
Re: stripping kde libs and binaries
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:03:13 +0200
Luciano Montanaro <[email protected]> • #941
Re: stripping kde libs and binaries
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:55:55 +0200
Alexander Neundorf <[email protected]> • #940
icefox tests issues
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:42:13 -0300
"rgfernandes" <[email protected]> • #939
Re: stripping kde libs and binaries
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:41:23 +0000 (UTC)
Karl Vogel <karl.vogel-/[email protected]> • #938
Re: stripping kde libs and binaries
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:43:40 +0200
Stefan Heimers <[email protected]> • #937
Re: stripping kde libs and binaries
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:20:35 +0200
Lubos Lunak <[email protected]> • #936
Re: stripping kde libs and binaries
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 19:26:13 +0200
Jan Schäfer <[email protected]> • #935
Re: stripping kde libs and binaries
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 19:47:54 +0300
Andras Mantia <[email protected]> • #934
Re: stripping kde libs and binaries
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:21:14 +0000 (UTC)
Karl Vogel <karl.vogel-/[email protected]> • #933
Re: stripping kde libs and binaries
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 17:02:37 -0400
Simon Perreault <[email protected]> • #932
Re: stripping kde libs and binaries
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:43:12 +0200
Juergen Pfennig <[email protected]> • #931
stripping kde libs and binaries
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 11:53:30 +0100
CPH <[email protected]> • #930
binutils --exclude-libs
Sat, 16 Oct 2004 21:27:22 +0200
Karl Vogel <[email protected]> • #929
RE: Has performance been forgotten?
Wed, 13 Oct 2004 06:47:18 -0700 (PDT)
Bahram Alinezhad <[email protected]> • #928
Re: Performance tips updated
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 21:22:02 +0200
Alexander Neundorf <[email protected]> • #927
Re: Performance tips updated
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:11:16 +0200
Lubos Lunak <[email protected]> • #926
Re: Performance tips updated
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:05:48 +0200
Lubos Lunak <[email protected]> • #925
Re: Performance tips updated
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:03:59 +0200
Lubos Lunak <[email protected]> • #924
Re: Performance tips updated
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:54:33 +0200
Waldo Bastian <[email protected]> • #923
Re: Performance tips updated
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:13:26 +0200
David Faure <[email protected]> • #922
Re: Performance tips updated
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:15:52 +0200
Lubos Lunak <[email protected]> • #921
Re: Performance tips updated
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 19:09:07 +0200
Alexander Neundorf <[email protected]> • #920
Re: Performance tips updated
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 19:01:31 +0200
Lubos Lunak <[email protected]> • #919
Re: Performance tips updated
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 18:51:26 +0200
Alexander Neundorf <[email protected]> • #918
Re: Performance tips updated
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 17:08:01 +0200 (CEST)
Marco Fioretti <[email protected]> • #917
Performance tips updated
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 16:04:22 +0200
Lubos Lunak <[email protected]> • #916
Re: Which workaround for strange KFileDialog behavior (recent files on server)?
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 00:33:11 +0200
Carsten Pfeiffer <[email protected]> • #915
Re: Which workaround for strange KFileDialog behavior (recent files on server)?
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 00:23:13 +0200
David Faure <[email protected]> • #914
Re: Has The performance been forgotten?
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 00:07:55 +0200
David Faure <[email protected]> • #913
Which workaround for strange KFileDialog behavior (recent files on server)?
Sat, 9 Oct 2004 19:43:19 +0200
Juergen Pfennig <[email protected]> • #912
Re: Has The performance been forgotten?
Sat, 9 Oct 2004 16:50:02 +0200
Bellegarde Cédric <[email protected]> • #911
Re: Has The performance been forgotten?
Sat, 9 Oct 2004 10:44:13 +0200
Alexander Kellett <[email protected]> • #910
Re: Has The performance been forgotten?
Sat, 9 Oct 2004 01:22:19 -0700 (PDT)
Bahram Alinezhad <[email protected]> • #909
Has The performance been forgotten?
Sat, 9 Oct 2004 01:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
Bahram Alinezhad <[email protected]> • #908
Has The performance been forgotten?
Sat, 9 Oct 2004 01:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
Bahram Alinezhad <[email protected]> • #907
Re: Has The performance been forgotten?
Fri, 8 Oct 2004 17:32:31 +0000
Frans Englich <[email protected]> • #906
Re: Has The performance been forgotten?
Fri, 8 Oct 2004 18:41:01 +0200
Alexander Neundorf <[email protected]> • #905
[SLE] Has The performance been forgotten?
Fri, 8 Oct 2004 07:46:04 -0700 (PDT)
Bahram Alinezhad <[email protected]> • #904
[SLE] Has The performance been forgotten?
Fri, 8 Oct 2004 07:42:43 -0700 (PDT)
Bahram Alinezhad <[email protected]> • #903
[SLE] RE: Has The performance been forgotten?
Fri, 8 Oct 2004 07:41:50 -0700 (PDT)
Bahram Alinezhad <[email protected]> • #902
[SLE] RE: Has The performance been forgotten?
Fri, 8 Oct 2004 07:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
Bahram Alinezhad <[email protected]> • #901
[SLE] RE: Has The performance been forgotten?
Fri, 8 Oct 2004 07:40:45 -0700 (PDT)
Bahram Alinezhad <[email protected]> • #900
[SLE] RE: Has The performance been forgotten?
Fri, 8 Oct 2004 07:40:31 -0700 (PDT)
Bahram Alinezhad <[email protected]> • #899
[SLE] RE: Has The performance been forgotten?
Fri, 8 Oct 2004 07:40:21 -0700 (PDT)
Bahram Alinezhad <[email protected]> • #898
[SLE] RE: Has The performance been forgotten?
Fri, 8 Oct 2004 07:40:12 -0700 (PDT)
Bahram Alinezhad <[email protected]> • #897
Re: Has The performance been forgotten?
Mon, 4 Oct 2004 17:58:32 +0200
Lubos Lunak <[email protected]> • #896
Re: Has The performance been forgotten?
Mon, 4 Oct 2004 11:24:37 -0400 (EDT)
"Maksim Orlovich" <[email protected]> • #895
Re: Has The performance been forgotten?
Mon, 4 Oct 2004 13:00:15 +0000 (UTC)
Karl Vogel <karl.vogel-/[email protected]> • #894
Re: Has The performance been forgotten?
Mon, 4 Oct 2004 12:44:34 +0000 (UTC)
Karl Vogel <karl.vogel-/[email protected]> • #893
Re: Has The performance been forgotten?
Mon, 4 Oct 2004 12:28:18 +0200
Lubos Lunak <[email protected]> • #892
Re: Has The performance been forgotten?
Mon, 4 Oct 2004 10:17:52 +0000 (UTC)
Karl Vogel <karl.vogel-/[email protected]> • #891
Re: Has The performance been forgotten?
Sun, 3 Oct 2004 19:24:44 +0200
Alexander Neundorf <[email protected]> • #890
Re: Has The performance been forgotten?
Sun, 3 Oct 2004 17:46:51 +0000
Frans Englich <[email protected]> • #889
Re: Has The performance been forgotten?
Sun, 3 Oct 2004 19:28:47 +0200
Alexander Neundorf <[email protected]> • #888
Re: Has The performance been forgotten?
Sun, 3 Oct 2004 15:49:19 +0200
Waldo Bastian <[email protected]> • #887
Has The performance been forgotten?
Sun, 3 Oct 2004 04:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
Bahram Alinezhad <[email protected]> • #886
Re: option to disable kbuildsycoca check during kdeinit startup
Fri, 24 Sep 2004 23:33:57 +0200
Karl Vogel <[email protected]> • #885
Re: option to disable kbuildsycoca check during kdeinit startup
Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:05:34 +0200
Lubos Lunak <[email protected]> • #884
Re: option to disable kbuildsycoca check during kdeinit startup
Thu, 23 Sep 2004 22:36:36 +0200
Alexander Neundorf <[email protected]> • #883
Re: option to disable kbuildsycoca check during kdeinit startup
Fri, 24 Sep 2004 07:46:12 +0000 (UTC)
Karl Vogel <karl.vogel-/[email protected]> • #882
option to disable kbuildsycoca check during kdeinit startup
Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:54:44 +0200
Lubos Lunak <[email protected]> • #881
Re: turning off KDE malloc by default
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 19:43:36 +0200
Lubos Lunak <[email protected]> • #880
Re: turning off KDE malloc by default
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 19:15:38 +0200
"Malte S. Stretz" <[email protected]> • #879
turning off KDE malloc by default
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:40:46 +0200
Lubos Lunak <[email protected]> • #878
Re: KDE performance tips
Thu, 16 Sep 2004 12:08:08 +0200
Allan Sandfeld Jensen <[email protected]> • #877
Re: KDE performance tips
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 20:52:49 +0200
Alexander Neundorf <[email protected]> • #876
Re: new splashscreens "none" and "simple"
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 20:28:16 +0200
Juergen Pfennig <[email protected]> • #875
Re: KDE performance tips
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 12:16:51 -0500 (EST)
"Caleb Tennis" <[email protected]> • #874
KDE performance tips
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 18:03:42 +0200
Lubos Lunak <[email protected]> • #873
Re: avoiding knotify during KDE startup
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 17:16:51 +0200
Lubos Lunak <[email protected]> • #872
Re: avoiding knotify during KDE startup
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 16:26:58 +0200
Lubos Lunak <[email protected]> • #871
Re: avoiding knotify during KDE startup
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 15:56:10 +0200
Waldo Bastian <[email protected]> • #870
new splashscreens "none" and "simple"
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 15:34:33 +0200
Lubos Lunak <[email protected]> • #869
avoiding knotify during KDE startup
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 15:44:38 +0200
Lubos Lunak <[email protected]> • #868
Re: KHTML-Measurement (from my talk at aKademy)
Fri, 27 Aug 2004 18:39:00 +0200 (CEST)
Arend Bayer <[email protected]> • #867
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.