gmane.comp.kde.users.pim archive

12407 archived articles, newest first (page 27 of 125). Latest articles →

Re: Lock out kmail when trying to delete text in a 25000 line email
Fri, 15 Sep 2017 11:39:42 +0200
René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> • #24119
Lock out kmail when trying to delete text in a 25000 line email
Fri, 15 Sep 2017 10:17:35 +0100
ianseeks <[email protected]> • #24118
Re: KMail is irretrievably broken
Thu, 14 Sep 2017 23:58:00 +0100
Peter Humphrey <[email protected]> • #24117
Re: KMail is irretrievably broken
Thu, 14 Sep 2017 23:09:06 +0200
Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]> • #24116
Re: Goodbye for now, kmail
Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:29:48 -0700
Dave Stevens <[email protected]> • #24115
Re: Goodbye for now, kmail
Thu, 14 Sep 2017 21:12:51 +0200
solitone <[email protected]> • #24114
Re: Goodbye for now, kmail
Thu, 14 Sep 2017 19:14:13 +0200
Kai Bojens <[email protected]> • #24113
Re: KMail is irretrievably broken
Thu, 14 Sep 2017 19:11:28 +0200
Martin Steigerwald <[email protected]> • #24112
Re: Goodbye for now, kmail
Thu, 14 Sep 2017 19:02:58 +0200
solitone <[email protected]> • #24111
Re: KMail is irretrievably broken
Thu, 14 Sep 2017 15:07:18 +0100
Peter Humphrey <[email protected]> • #24110
Re: KMail is irretrievably broken
Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:04:05 +0200
René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> • #24109
Re: KMail is irretrievably broken
Thu, 14 Sep 2017 09:30:50 +0100
Peter Humphrey <[email protected]> • #24108
Re: KMail is irretrievably broken
Wed, 13 Sep 2017 23:44:27 +0200
Martin Steigerwald <[email protected]> • #24107
Re: certificate problems - upstream problems?
Tue, 12 Sep 2017 21:41:46 +0530
Vishnu V K <[email protected]> • #24106
Re: certificate problems - upstream problems?
Tue, 12 Sep 2017 11:36:21 +0200
René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> • #24105
Re: KMail is irretrievably broken
Wed, 13 Sep 2017 12:42:52 -0600
Jerome Yuzyk <[email protected]> • #24104
Re: KMail is irretrievably broken
Wed, 13 Sep 2017 17:37:10 +0200
Luis Felipe Tabera Alonso <[email protected]> • #24103
Re: My experience with kmail (was:Goodbye for now, kmail)
Wed, 13 Sep 2017 16:53:22 +0100
Sérgio Basto <[email protected]> • #24102
Re: KMail is irretrievably broken
Wed, 13 Sep 2017 17:18:50 +0200
René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> • #24101
KMail is irretrievably broken
Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:52:52 +0100
Peter Humphrey <[email protected]> • #24100
Re: certificate problems - upstream problems?
Tue, 12 Sep 2017 14:38:17 +0530
Vishnu V K <[email protected]> • #24099
certificate problems - upstream problems?
Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:53:10 +0200
René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> • #24098
Re: silly question
Sat, 09 Sep 2017 22:12:32 -0500
"E. Hakan Duran" <[email protected]> • #24097
Re: silly question
Sat, 09 Sep 2017 19:16:04 +0200
Daniel Vrátil <[email protected]> • #24096
Re: silly question
Sat, 09 Sep 2017 11:24:09 -0500
"E. Hakan Duran" <[email protected]> • #24095
Re: Retrieving Folders..
Fri, 8 Sep 2017 15:59:23 +0000 (UTC)
Maurice <[email protected]> • #24094
Re: Retrieving Folders..
Fri, 08 Sep 2017 12:31:48 +0100
ianseeks <[email protected]> • #24093
Re: Retrieving Folders..
Fri, 8 Sep 2017 10:47:13 +0000 (UTC)
Maurice <[email protected]> • #24092
Re: Kmail 5.4.3: Print wants to use 'WebEngine' via browser
Thu, 07 Sep 2017 17:34:35 +0200
Sandro Knauß <[email protected]> • #24091
Re: Kmail 5.4.3: Print wants to use 'WebEngine' via browser
Thu, 07 Sep 2017 17:00:42 +0200
René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> • #24090
Re: Kmail 5.4.3: Print wants to use 'WebEngine' via browser
Thu, 07 Sep 2017 16:22:10 +0200
Sandro Knauß <[email protected]> • #24089
Re: Kmail 5.4.3: Print wants to use 'WebEngine' via browser
Wed, 6 Sep 2017 15:16:04 +0000 (UTC)
Maurice <[email protected]> • #24088
Re: Kmail 5.4.3: Print wants to use 'WebEngine' via browser
Wed, 06 Sep 2017 16:45:26 +0200
René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> • #24087
Re: Kmail 5.4.3: Print wants to use 'WebEngine' via browser
Wed, 06 Sep 2017 14:55:11 +0100
ianseeks <[email protected]> • #24086
Re: Kmail 5.4.3: Print wants to use 'WebEngine' via browser
Wed, 6 Sep 2017 13:48:01 +0000 (UTC)
Maurice <[email protected]> • #24085
Re: Kmail 5.4.3: Print wants to use 'WebEngine' via browser
Wed, 06 Sep 2017 14:49:53 +0100
ianseeks <[email protected]> • #24084
Re: Kmail 5.4.3: Print wants to use 'WebEngine' via browser
Wed, 6 Sep 2017 13:44:07 +0000 (UTC)
Maurice <[email protected]> • #24083
Re: Worth a read regarding kontact UI? - corrected
Wed, 06 Sep 2017 14:16:13 +0100
ianseeks <[email protected]> • #24082
Re: Worth a read regarding kontact UI? - correcte d
Wed, 06 Sep 2017 14:53:23 +0200
Quazgar <[email protected]> • #24081
Re: Worth a read regarding kontact UI? - corrected
Wed, 06 Sep 2017 14:51:41 +0200
René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> • #24080
Re: Worth a read regarding kontact UI? - corrected
Wed, 06 Sep 2017 14:49:56 +0200
René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> • #24079
Re: Kmail 5.4.3: Print wants to use 'WebEngine' via browser
Wed, 06 Sep 2017 14:46:58 +0200
René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> • #24078
Re: Kmail 5.4.3: Print wants to use 'WebEngine' via browser
Wed, 06 Sep 2017 13:44:27 +0100
ianseeks <[email protected]> • #24077
Re: Worth a read regarding kontact UI? - corrected
Wed, 06 Sep 2017 13:31:13 +0100
ianseeks <[email protected]> • #24076
Kmail 5.4.3: Print wants to use 'WebEngine' via browser
Wed, 6 Sep 2017 12:26:59 +0000 (UTC)
Maurice <[email protected]> • #24075
Re: Worth a read regarding kontact UI? - corrected
Wed, 6 Sep 2017 14:13:58 +0200
Anders Lund <[email protected]> • #24074
Re: Worth a read regarding kontact UI? - corrected
Wed, 6 Sep 2017 15:04:48 +0300
Shlomi Fish <[email protected]> • #24073
Re: Worth a read regarding kontact UI? - corrected
Wed, 06 Sep 2017 12:22:04 +0100
ianseeks <[email protected]> • #24072
Re: Worth a read regarding kontact UI?
Wed, 06 Sep 2017 12:20:45 +0100
ianseeks <[email protected]> • #24071
Re: Worth a read regarding kontact UI?
Wed, 6 Sep 2017 13:01:03 +0300
Shlomi Fish <[email protected]> • #24070
Worth a read regarding kontact UI?
Wed, 06 Sep 2017 09:24:17 +0100
ianseeks <[email protected]> • #24069
Re: silly question
Tue, 5 Sep 2017 22:33:52 +0300
Ovidiu-Florin BOGDAN <[email protected]> • #24068
akonadi_ical_resource_* consume huge space
Tue, 05 Sep 2017 21:28:52 +0200
Vojtěch Zeisek <[email protected]> • #24067
silly question
Mon, 04 Sep 2017 11:16:18 -0500
"E. Hakan Duran" <[email protected]> • #24066
Re: KMail is driving me mad!
Sun, 03 Sep 2017 12:44:44 +0100
ianseeks <[email protected]> • #24065
Re: [Akregator] Data Loss upon Shutting-down without Quitting
Sun, 03 Sep 2017 14:58:42 +0530
Vishnu V K <[email protected]> • #24064
Re: KMail is driving me mad!
Sat, 02 Sep 2017 07:45:34 -0700
John White <[email protected]> • #24063
Re: Date range of upcoming events in Summary not being obeyed
Sat, 02 Sep 2017 16:17:18 +0100
ianseeks <[email protected]> • #24062
Re: KMail is driving me mad!
Sat, 02 Sep 2017 15:00:55 +0100
Peter Humphrey <[email protected]> • #24061
Date range of upcoming events in Summary not being obeyed
Sat, 02 Sep 2017 12:12:17 +0100
ianseeks <[email protected]> • #24060
Re: How to disable Google's akonadi message
Sat, 02 Sep 2017 09:41:30 +0200
René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> • #24059
Re: How to disable Google's akonadi message
Sat, 02 Sep 2017 09:35:54 +0530
Vishnu V K <[email protected]> • #24058
Re: [Akregator] Data Loss upon Shutting-down without Quitting
Fri, 01 Sep 2017 22:59:45 +0200
Matthias Müller <[email protected]> • #24057
How to disable Google's akonadi message
Fri, 01 Sep 2017 18:30:55 +0200
Andreas Jung <[email protected]> • #24056
Re: [Akregator] Data Loss upon Shutting-down without Quitting
Fri, 01 Sep 2017 17:02:49 +0200
Vojtěch Zeisek <[email protected]> • #24055
[Akregator] Data Loss upon Shutting-down without Quitting
Fri, 01 Sep 2017 20:28:44 +0530
Vishnu V K <[email protected]> • #24054
Re: KMail is driving me mad!
Thu, 31 Aug 2017 10:03:09 +0100
Peter Humphrey <[email protected]> • #24053
Re: KMail is driving me mad!
Mon, 28 Aug 2017 21:37:59 +0200
Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]> • #24052
Re: KMail is driving me mad!
Mon, 28 Aug 2017 20:17:44 +0200
René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> • #24051
Re: KMail is driving me mad!
Mon, 28 Aug 2017 19:25:07 +0200
Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]> • #24050
KMail is driving me mad!
Mon, 28 Aug 2017 10:12:35 +0100
Peter Humphrey <[email protected]> • #24049
Re: Upgrade woes
Sat, 26 Aug 2017 16:17:06 +0200
René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> • #24048
Re: Upgrade woes
Sat, 26 Aug 2017 13:46:32 +0200
René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> • #24047
Re: Upgrade woes
Sat, 26 Aug 2017 11:46:01 +0200
Daniel Vrátil <[email protected]> • #24046
Re: Upgrade woes
Sat, 26 Aug 2017 11:40:14 +0200
René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> • #24045
Re: Upgrade woes
Sat, 26 Aug 2017 10:02:27 +0100
Peter Humphrey <[email protected]> • #24044
Re: Upgrade woes
Sat, 26 Aug 2017 01:55:33 +0200
René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> • #24043
Re: My experience with kmail (was:Goodbye for now, kmail)
Sat, 26 Aug 2017 00:27:45 +0100
Sérgio Basto <[email protected]> • #24042
Re: Upgrade woes
Fri, 25 Aug 2017 23:33:47 +0100
Peter Humphrey <[email protected]> • #24041
Re: Upgrade woes
Sat, 26 Aug 2017 00:12:34 +0200
Daniel Vrátil <[email protected]> • #24040
Re: Upgrade woes
Fri, 25 Aug 2017 23:11:56 +0100
Peter Humphrey <[email protected]> • #24039
Re: Upgrade woes
Fri, 25 Aug 2017 23:33:08 +0200
René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> • #24038
Re: franKenMail? :)
Fri, 25 Aug 2017 22:25:47 +0200
Daniel Vrátil <[email protected]> • #24037
Re: Upgrade woes
Fri, 25 Aug 2017 22:40:06 +0200
Daniel Vrátil <[email protected]> • #24036
Re: Upgrade woes
Fri, 25 Aug 2017 17:56:56 +0200
René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> • #24035
Re: Upgrade woes
Fri, 25 Aug 2017 16:25:49 +0100
Peter Humphrey <[email protected]> • #24034
Re: Upgrade woes
Fri, 25 Aug 2017 15:41:37 +0100
Peter Humphrey <[email protected]> • #24033
Re: Upgrade woes
Fri, 25 Aug 2017 15:32:23 +0100
Peter Humphrey <[email protected]> • #24032
Re: Upgrade woes
Fri, 25 Aug 2017 15:29:05 +0100
Peter Humphrey <[email protected]> • #24031
Re: Upgrade woes
Fri, 25 Aug 2017 12:52:27 +0200
René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> • #24030
Re: franKenMail? :)
Fri, 25 Aug 2017 12:45:53 +0200
René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> • #24029
Re: kde 4 kmail filter definition location
Fri, 25 Aug 2017 12:37:18 +0200
Erik Quaeghebeur <[email protected]> • #24028
Re: Upgrade woes
Fri, 25 Aug 2017 12:34:09 +0200
Erik Quaeghebeur <[email protected]> • #24027
Re: kde 4 kmail filter definition location
Fri, 25 Aug 2017 12:29:18 +0200
René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> • #24026
Re: Upgrade woes
Fri, 25 Aug 2017 11:22:11 +0100
Peter Humphrey <[email protected]> • #24025
Re: franKenMail? :)
Fri, 25 Aug 2017 12:19:44 +0200
Martin Steigerwald <[email protected]> • #24024
Re: kde 4 kmail filter definition location
Fri, 25 Aug 2017 11:08:47 +0100
Peter Humphrey <[email protected]> • #24023
kde 4 kmail filter definition location
Fri, 25 Aug 2017 12:02:57 +0200
Erik Quaeghebeur <[email protected]> • #24022
franKenMail? :)
Fri, 25 Aug 2017 11:54:54 +0200
René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> • #24021
Re: Upgrade woes
Fri, 25 Aug 2017 11:37:49 +0200
René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> • #24020
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.