gmane.comp.lang.concatenative archive

1298 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 13). Latest articles →

Re: [stack] peg: a lazy, non-deterministic concatenative language
Sun, 22 Apr 2012 21:09:07 -0000
"dustin.deweese" <[email protected]> • #3686
Re: [stack] peg: a lazy, non-deterministic concatenative language
Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:21:38 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #3685
Re: [stack] peg: a lazy, non-deterministic concatenative language
Thu, 19 Apr 2012 08:53:39 -0000
"dustin.deweese" <[email protected]> • #3684
Re: [stack] peg: a lazy, non-deterministic concatenative language
Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:49:57 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #3683
Re: [stack] peg: a lazy, non-deterministic concatenative language
Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:46:08 +0100
Stephen De Gabrielle <[email protected]> • #3682
Re: [stack] peg: a lazy, non-deterministic concatenative language
Tue, 17 Apr 2012 07:48:21 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #3681
Re: [stack] peg: a lazy, non-deterministic concatenative language
Tue, 17 Apr 2012 08:48:39 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #3680
Re: [stack] peg: a lazy, non-deterministic concatenative language
Tue, 17 Apr 2012 05:36:20 -0700
Don Groves <[email protected]> • #3679
Re: [stack] peg: a lazy, non-deterministic concatenative language
Tue, 17 Apr 2012 05:26:43 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #3678
[stack] peg: a lazy, non-deterministic concatenative language
Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:47:27 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #3677
Re: [stack] Re: Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Sun, 25 Mar 2012 10:03:10 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #3676
[stack] Re: Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Sun, 25 Mar 2012 09:59:36 -0000
"Ruurd" <[email protected]> • #3675
Re: [stack] Re: Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:14:36 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #3674
Re: [stack] Re: Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Sat, 24 Mar 2012 13:51:05 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #3673
Re: [stack] Re: Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Sat, 24 Mar 2012 20:57:16 +0100
Robbert van Dalen <[email protected]> • #3672
Re: [stack] Re: Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Sat, 24 Mar 2012 09:35:22 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #3671
[stack] Re: Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Sat, 24 Mar 2012 09:12:16 -0000
"Ruurd" <[email protected]> • #3670
Re: [stack] Re: Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Sat, 24 Mar 2012 08:11:49 +0100
Robbert van Dalen <[email protected]> • #3669
Re: [stack] Re: Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:27:59 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #3668
Re: [stack] Re: Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Thu, 22 Mar 2012 18:43:37 +0100
Robbert van Dalen <[email protected]> • #3667
Re: [stack] Re: Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:35:36 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #3666
Re: [stack] Re: Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:26:08 +0100
Robbert van Dalen <[email protected]> • #3665
Re: [stack] Re: Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Mon, 19 Mar 2012 19:42:12 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #3664
Re: [stack] Re: Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Mon, 19 Mar 2012 15:38:05 -0400
stevan apter <[email protected]> • #3663
Re: [stack] Re: Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Mon, 19 Mar 2012 20:36:13 +0100
Robbert van Dalen <[email protected]> • #3662
Re: [stack] Re: Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Mon, 19 Mar 2012 20:33:25 +0100
Robbert van Dalen <[email protected]> • #3661
Re: [stack] Re: Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Mon, 19 Mar 2012 10:38:18 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #3660
Re: [stack] Re: Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:52:55 -0400
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #3659
Re: [stack] Re: Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Mon, 19 Mar 2012 10:29:00 +0200
eas lab <[email protected]> • #3658
Re: [stack] Re: Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Fri, 24 Feb 2012 20:01:52 +0200
eas lab <[email protected]> • #3657
[stack] Re: Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:13:07 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #3656
Re: [stack] Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:10:30 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #3655
Re: [stack] Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:05:02 +0200
eas lab <[email protected]> • #3654
Re: [stack] Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:01:36 +0200
eas lab <[email protected]> • #3653
Re: [stack] Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:05:32 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #3652
Re: [stack] Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:25:27 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #3651
Re: [stack] Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:23:17 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #3650
Re: [stack] Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:20:57 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #3649
Re: [stack] Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:05:03 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #3648
Re: [stack] Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:27:06 +0200
eas lab <[email protected]> • #3647
Re: [stack] Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:08:18 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #3646
[stack] Jon Purdy: Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:37:49 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #3645
[stack] Concatenative scripting language in Bitcoin
Sat, 31 Dec 2011 14:23:04 +1300
Chris Double <[email protected]> • #3644
Re: [stack] Sieve of Eratosthenes
Sat, 10 Dec 2011 10:04:36 -0000
"Ruurd" <[email protected]> • #3643
Re: [stack] Sieve of Eratosthenes
Fri, 9 Dec 2011 17:05:11 +0000
Simon Kongshøj <[email protected]> • #3642
Re: [stack] Sieve of Eratosthenes
Fri, 9 Dec 2011 07:57:45 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #3641
[stack] Sieve of Eratosthenes
Fri, 09 Dec 2011 10:32:19 -0000
"Ruurd" <[email protected]> • #3640
[stack] Sieve of Eratosthenes
Fri, 09 Dec 2011 10:20:47 -0000
"Ruurd" <[email protected]> • #3639
[stack] 5th's type system
Wed, 7 Dec 2011 00:18:53 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #3638
Re: [stack] Tribute to Slava Pestov
Sat, 08 Oct 2011 13:29:57 -0000
"pml060912" <[email protected]> • #3637
Re: [stack] Tribute to Slava Pestov
Tue, 4 Oct 2011 18:45:49 +1300
John Carter <[email protected]> • #3636
[stack] Tribute to Slava Pestov
Mon, 03 Oct 2011 07:34:05 -0000
"maggethun" <[email protected]> • #3635
Re: [stack] Canonical LLVM starter language is concatenative...
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 16:24:30 +0200
chris glur <[email protected]> • #3634
Re: [stack] Anyone know where von Thun's Joy pages have gone?
Wed, 11 May 2011 18:36:12 +1200
Chris Double <[email protected]> • #3633
Re: [stack] Anyone know where von Thun's Joy pages have gone?
Mon, 9 May 2011 11:23:07 +1200
Chris Double <[email protected]> • #3632
[stack] Anyone know where von Thun's Joy pages have gone?
Sun, 08 May 2011 23:15:49 -0000
"cpcogan" <[email protected]> • #3631
Re: [stack] Canonical LLVM starter language is concatenative...
Sun, 24 Apr 2011 20:17:20 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #3630
Re: [stack] Canonical LLVM starter language is concatenative...
Sun, 24 Apr 2011 15:31:03 +0200
eas lab <[email protected]> • #3629
[stack] Canonical LLVM starter language is concatenative...
Sat, 23 Apr 2011 10:50:16 -0700
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #3628
Re: [stack] Wikipedia page being deleted
Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:04:39 +1300
Chris Double <[email protected]> • #3627
Re: [stack] Wikipedia page being deleted
Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:03:29 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #3626
Re: [stack] Wikipedia page being deleted
Sun, 13 Feb 2011 16:01:15 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #3625
Re: [stack] Wikipedia page being deleted
Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:00:59 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #3624
Re: [stack] Thread, a vaguely related query language (and hello!)
Mon, 1 Nov 2010 04:18:57 +0200
chris glur <[email protected]> • #3623
Re: [stack] Concatenative Research
Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:30:36 +0200
chris glur <[email protected]> • #3622
Re: [stack] Re: Can't View Factor Talk Slides on Vista
Mon, 1 Nov 2010 05:08:48 +0200
chris glur <[email protected]> • #3621
[stack] Wikipedia page being deleted
Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:15:04 +1300
Chris Double <[email protected]> • #3620
[stack] Re: Concatenative Research
Mon, 07 Feb 2011 21:54:36 -0000
"Ruurd" <[email protected]> • #3619
Re: [stack] Re: Concatenative Research
Tue, 8 Feb 2011 09:51:05 +1300
Chris Double <[email protected]> • #3618
Re: [stack] Re: Concatenative Research
Mon, 7 Feb 2011 00:23:07 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #3617
Re: [stack] Re: Concatenative Research
Mon, 7 Feb 2011 00:02:30 -0500
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #3616
Re: [stack] Re: Concatenative Research
Sun, 6 Feb 2011 23:53:30 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #3615
Re: [stack] Re: Concatenative Research
Sun, 6 Feb 2011 23:45:31 -0500
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #3614
Re: [stack] Re: Concatenative Research
Sun, 6 Feb 2011 23:40:52 -0500
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #3613
Re: [stack] Re: Concatenative Research
Sun, 6 Feb 2011 23:15:06 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #3612
Re: [stack] Re: Concatenative Research
Sun, 6 Feb 2011 23:08:29 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #3611
Re: [stack] Re: Concatenative Research
Sun, 6 Feb 2011 22:56:40 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #3610
Re: [stack] Re: Concatenative Research
Sun, 6 Feb 2011 22:42:25 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #3609
Re: [stack] Re: Concatenative Research
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 20:38:57 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #3608
Re: [stack] Re: Concatenative Research
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 19:51:32 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #3607
Re: [stack] Re: Concatenative Research
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 15:53:40 -0500
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #3606
Re: [stack] Re: Concatenative Research
Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:25:44 -0500
stevan apter <[email protected]> • #3605
[stack] Re: Concatenative Research
Thu, 03 Feb 2011 19:18:38 -0000
"Justin" <[email protected]> • #3604
Re: [stack] Re: Concatenative Research
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 13:41:11 -0500
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #3603
Re: [stack] Re: Concatenative Research
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:39:58 -0500
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #3602
Re: [stack] Re: Concatenative Research
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 07:26:46 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #3601
[stack] Re: Concatenative Research
Thu, 03 Feb 2011 10:52:05 -0000
"Justin" <[email protected]> • #3600
Re: [stack] Concatenative Research
Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:47:04 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #3599
Re: [stack] Concatenative Research
Wed, 2 Feb 2011 05:02:57 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #3598
Re: [stack] Re: Concatenative Research
Wed, 2 Feb 2011 04:41:37 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #3597
Re: [stack] Concatenative Research
Tue, 1 Feb 2011 20:20:48 -0800
Don Groves <[email protected]> • #3596
Re: [stack] Re: Concatenative Research
Tue, 1 Feb 2011 20:17:23 -0800
Don Groves <[email protected]> • #3595
[stack] Re: Concatenative Research
Wed, 02 Feb 2011 02:25:16 -0000
"Justin" <[email protected]> • #3594
[stack] Re: Concatenative Research
Wed, 02 Feb 2011 02:22:23 -0000
"Justin" <[email protected]> • #3593
Re: [stack] Concatenative Research
Tue, 1 Feb 2011 17:56:07 -0500
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #3592
Re: [stack] Concatenative Research
Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:02:22 +1300
John Carter <[email protected]> • #3591
Re: [stack] Re: Concatenative Research
Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:31:11 -0800
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]> • #3590
Re: [stack] Concatenative Research
Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:16:59 -0500
John Nowak <[email protected]> • #3589
[stack] Re: Concatenative Research
Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:36:11 -0000
"Justin" <[email protected]> • #3588
Re: [stack] Concatenative Research
Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:36:01 -0000
"Justin" <[email protected]> • #3587
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.