gmane.comp.lang.e.general archive

1526 archived articles, newest first (page 9 of 16). Latest articles →

Re: Some minor bugs (switch and traceln)
Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:27:56 -0500
Kevin Reid <[email protected]> • #4252
New paper: Fine-Grained Privilege Separation for Web Applications
Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:27:07 -0800 (PST)
David Wagner <[email protected]> • #4251
Re: Wiki problems? (was:: Some minor bugs (switch and traceln))
Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:20:22 -0600
James Graves <[email protected]> • #4250
Re: Wiki problems? (was:: Some minor bugs (switch and traceln))
Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:08:40 -0500
Kevin Reid <[email protected]> • #4249
Re: Wiki problems? (was:: Some minor bugs (switch and traceln))
Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:59:31 -0600
James Graves <[email protected]> • #4248
Re: Wiki problems? (was:: Some minor bugs (switch and traceln))
Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:16:12 +0000
Thomas Leonard <tal-v5nx5w6akNyLE8xUarVfuPLx9OUvmyODWmv/[email protected]> • #4247
Wiki problems? (was:: Some minor bugs (switch and traceln))
Mon, 15 Feb 2010 07:55:02 -0600
James Graves <[email protected]> • #4246
Re: Some minor bugs (switch and traceln)
Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:26:01 +0000
Thomas Leonard <tal-v5nx5w6akNyLE8xUarVfuPLx9OUvmyODWmv/[email protected]> • #4245
Draft XML library now available
Sun, 14 Feb 2010 19:38:18 -0500
Kevin Reid <[email protected]> • #4244
Re: DVCS hosting (was Re: Some minor bugs (switch and traceln))
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:05:40 -0500
Kevin Reid <[email protected]> • #4243
DVCS hosting (was Re: Some minor bugs (switch and traceln))
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:58:20 -0600
James Graves <[email protected]> • #4242
Re: Some minor bugs (switch and traceln)
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:04:15 -0500
Kevin Reid <[email protected]> • #4241
Some minor bugs (switch and traceln)
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:25:48 +0000
Thomas Leonard <tal-v5nx5w6akNyLE8xUarVfuPLx9OUvmyODWmv/[email protected]> • #4240
Re: XML library: requirements gathering
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:55:04 +0000
Thomas Leonard <tal-v5nx5w6akNyLE8xUarVfuPLx9OUvmyODWmv/[email protected]> • #4239
Alternative E loader
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:50:27 +0000
Thomas Leonard <tal-v5nx5w6akNyLE8xUarVfuPLx9OUvmyODWmv/[email protected]> • #4238
Re: XML library: requirements gathering
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:49:41 -0500
Kevin Reid <[email protected]> • #4237
Re: XML library: requirements gathering
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:23:41 +0000
Thomas Leonard <tal-v5nx5w6akNyLE8xUarVfuPLx9OUvmyODWmv/[email protected]> • #4236
Re: E + MinorFs + AppArmor: adding Tahoe to the stack ?
Sat, 30 Jan 2010 21:12:47 +0100
Matej Kosik <[email protected]> • #4235
Re: E + MinorFs + AppArmor: adding Tahoe to the stack ?
Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:46:11 +0100
"Rob Meijer" <capibara-qWit8jRvyhVmR6Xm/[email protected]> • #4234
Re: E + MinorFs + AppArmor: adding Tahoe to the stack ?
Sat, 30 Jan 2010 10:39:33 +0100
Matej Kosik <[email protected]> • #4233
Re: E + MinorFs + AppArmor: adding Tahoe to the stack ?
Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:54:37 +0000
"Karp, Alan H" <[email protected]> • #4232
Re: E + MinorFs + AppArmor: adding Tahoe to the stack ?
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:31:29 +0100
Matej Kosik <[email protected]> • #4231
Re: E + MinorFs + AppArmor: adding Tahoe to the stack ?
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:01:25 +0100
"Rob Meijer" <capibara-qWit8jRvyhVmR6Xm/[email protected]> • #4230
Re: E + MinorFs + AppArmor: adding Tahoe to the stack ?
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:37:42 +0100
Matej Kosik <[email protected]> • #4229
Re: E + MinorFs + AppArmor: adding Tahoe to the stack ?
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 07:19:13 +0000
David-Sarah Hopwood <[email protected]> • #4228
Re: E + MinorFs + AppArmor: adding Tahoe to the stack ?
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 06:08:47 +0100
"Rob Meijer" <capibara-qWit8jRvyhVmR6Xm/[email protected]> • #4227
Re: E + MinorFs + AppArmor: adding Tahoe to the stack ?
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:44:23 +0000
"Karp, Alan H" <[email protected]> • #4226
Re: E + MinorFs + AppArmor: adding Tahoe to the stack ?
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:17:46 -0800
Bill Frantz <[email protected]> • #4225
Re: E + MinorFs + AppArmor: adding Tahoe to the stack ?
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:37:48 -0800
Raoul Duke <[email protected]> • #4224
Re: E + MinorFs + AppArmor: adding Tahoe to the stack ?
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:08:29 -0700
"Zooko O'Whielacronx" <[email protected]> • #4223
Re: E + MinorFs + AppArmor: adding Tahoe to the stack ?
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:02:50 -0800
Raoul Duke <[email protected]> • #4222
Re: E + MinorFs + AppArmor: adding Tahoe to the stack ?
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:58:15 +0100
"Rob Meijer" <capibara-qWit8jRvyhVmR6Xm/[email protected]> • #4221
Note: CapTP URL code needs to be prepared for IPv6
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:07:16 -0500
Kevin Reid <[email protected]> • #4220
Re: E + MinorFs + AppArmor: adding Tahoe to the stack ?
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:09:19 -0800 (PST)
David Wagner <[email protected]> • #4219
Re: E + MinorFs + AppArmor: adding Tahoe to the stack ?
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:30:23 -0500
"Dave Chizmadia - Gmail" <[email protected]> • #4218
Re: [e-lang] E + MinorFs + AppArmor: adding Tahoe to the stack ?
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:39:56 -0800
Raoul Duke <[email protected]> • #4217
E + MinorFs + AppArmor: adding Tahoe to the stack ?
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:15:43 +0100
"Rob Meijer" <capibara-qWit8jRvyhVmR6Xm/[email protected]> • #4216
NestedException patch (Re: Embed E in Java)
Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:01:42 -0500
Kevin Reid <[email protected]> • #4215
Formalising the notion of an object-capability language
Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:47:23 +0000
Toby Murray <[email protected]> • #4214
Re: Mirroring synchrona.org E repository
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:51:28 +0000
Thomas Leonard <tal-v5nx5w6akNyLE8xUarVfuPLx9OUvmyODWmv/[email protected]> • #4213
Mirroring synchrona.org E repository
Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:21:14 -0500
Kevin Reid <[email protected]> • #4212
Re: XML library: requirements gathering
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 15:44:30 -0500
Kevin Reid <[email protected]> • #4211
Re: XML library: requirements gathering
Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:03:19 +0000
Thomas Leonard <[email protected]> • #4210
Re: XML support in E
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 18:01:23 -0800
Mark Miller <[email protected]> • #4209
Re: XML support in E
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 20:22:55 -0500
Kevin Reid <[email protected]> • #4208
Re: XML support in E
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 20:19:55 -0500
Kevin Reid <[email protected]> • #4207
XML library: requirements gathering
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 20:11:01 -0500
Kevin Reid <[email protected]> • #4206
Re: XML support in E
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 17:07:03 -0800
Mark Miller <[email protected]> • #4205
Re: XML support in E
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 07:47:52 -0500
Kevin Reid <[email protected]> • #4204
Re: XML support in E
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:12:04 +0000
Thomas Leonard <[email protected]> • #4203
Re: Alternative persistence system
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:05:52 +0000
Thomas Leonard <tal-v5nx5w6akNyLE8xUarVfuPLx9OUvmyODWmv/[email protected]> • #4202
Re: Embed E in Java
Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:55:46 -0500
Kevin Reid <[email protected]> • #4201
Re: XML support in E
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 07:43:49 -0500
Kevin Reid <[email protected]> • #4200
Re: XML support in E
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 07:40:50 -0500
Kevin Reid <[email protected]> • #4199
Re: XML support in E
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:45:38 +0000
Thomas Leonard <tal-v5nx5w6akNyLE8xUarVfuPLx9OUvmyODWmv/[email protected]> • #4198
Re: Joe-E paper available
Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:15:06 +0000
Ben Laurie <[email protected]> • #4197
Re: Bug: NetConfig() incompatible with VatTPMgr
Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:59:52 -0800
Mark Miller <[email protected]> • #4196
Re: Joe-E paper available
Wed, 13 Jan 2010 01:09:44 +0000
"Karp, Alan H" <[email protected]> • #4195
Re: Joe-E paper available
Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:40:58 -0800
Mark Miller <[email protected]> • #4194
Re: Embed E in Java
Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:58:06 -0800 (PST)
David Wagner <[email protected]> • #4193
Re: XML support in E
Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:11:35 -0500
Kevin Reid <[email protected]> • #4192
Re: XML support in E
Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:34:44 -0800
Mark Miller <[email protected]> • #4191
Re: Embed E in Java
Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:25:36 -0800
Mark Miller <[email protected]> • #4190
Re: Embed E in Java
Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:13:47 -0500
Kevin Reid <[email protected]> • #4189
Re: Embed E in Java
Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:08:55 -0800
Mark Miller <[email protected]> • #4188
Re: XML support in E
Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:06:28 -0500
Kevin Reid <[email protected]> • #4187
Re: Embed E in Java
Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:42:52 -0500
Kevin Reid <[email protected]> • #4186
Joe-E paper available
Sat, 9 Jan 2010 00:54:01 -0800 (PST)
David Wagner <[email protected]> • #4185
Bug: NetConfig() incompatible with VatTPMgr
Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:56:07 -0500
Kevin Reid <[email protected]> • #4184
Linux packages for E
Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:50:14 +0000
Thomas Leonard <[email protected]> • #4183
Re: propUtils#testProp/2: not synchronously callable
Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:16:27 +0000
Thomas Leonard <[email protected]> • #4182
propUtils#testProp/2: not synchronously callable
Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:57:04 +0000
Thomas Leonard <[email protected]> • #4181
SVN repositories for my projects moved
Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:40:19 -0500
Kevin Reid <[email protected]> • #4180
Re: [Caja] Functional auditor for Cajita: EQ vs referential transparency
Mon, 14 Dec 2009 02:37:14 +0000
David-Sarah Hopwood <[email protected]> • #4179
Re: [Caja] Functional auditor for Cajita: EQ vs referential transparency
Mon, 14 Dec 2009 02:24:41 +0000
David-Sarah Hopwood <[email protected]> • #4178
Re: [Caja] Functional auditor for Cajita
Sun, 13 Dec 2009 08:46:40 +0000
David-Sarah Hopwood <[email protected]> • #4177
Re: [Caja] Functional auditor for Cajita
Sun, 13 Dec 2009 07:34:28 +0000
David-Sarah Hopwood <[email protected]> • #4176
Re: [Caja] Functional auditor for Cajita
Sat, 12 Dec 2009 16:51:57 -0800 (PST)
David Wagner <[email protected]> • #4175
Re: [Caja] Functional auditor for Cajita
Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:15:50 +0000
David-Sarah Hopwood <[email protected]> • #4174
Re: [Caja] Functional auditor for Cajita
Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:46:35 +0000
David-Sarah Hopwood <[email protected]> • #4173
Re: [Caja] Functional auditor for Cajita
Wed, 09 Dec 2009 05:40:47 +0000
David-Sarah Hopwood <[email protected]> • #4172
Re: [Caja] Functional auditor for Cajita
Wed, 09 Dec 2009 04:29:44 +0000
David-Sarah Hopwood <[email protected]> • #4171
Causeway support for AmbientTalk
Tue, 8 Dec 2009 20:17:04 -0800
Tom Van Cutsem <[email protected]> • #4170
Re: [Caja] Functional auditor for Cajita
Tue, 8 Dec 2009 18:13:01 -0800
Mike Samuel <[email protected]> • #4169
Re: [Caja] Functional auditor for Cajita
Wed, 09 Dec 2009 01:23:45 +0000
David-Sarah Hopwood <[email protected]> • #4168
Re: [Caja] Functional auditor for Cajita
Wed, 09 Dec 2009 00:31:39 +0000
David-Sarah Hopwood <[email protected]> • #4167
Re: [Caja] Functional auditor for Cajita
Tue, 8 Dec 2009 14:26:27 -0800
[email protected] • #4166
Re: [Caja] Functional auditor for Cajita
Tue, 8 Dec 2009 14:23:42 -0800
"Mark S. Miller" <[email protected]> • #4165
Re: [Caja] Functional auditor for Cajita
Tue, 8 Dec 2009 14:06:53 -0800
Mike Samuel <[email protected]> • #4164
Re: [Caja] Functional auditor for Cajita
Tue, 8 Dec 2009 13:33:47 -0800
[email protected] • #4163
Re: [Caja] Functional auditor for Cajita [correction]
Tue, 08 Dec 2009 20:42:29 +0000
David-Sarah Hopwood <[email protected]> • #4162
Re: [Caja] Functional auditor for Cajita
Tue, 08 Dec 2009 20:25:14 +0000
David-Sarah Hopwood <[email protected]> • #4161
Re: [Caja] Functional auditor for Cajita
Tue, 08 Dec 2009 20:05:20 +0000
David-Sarah Hopwood <[email protected]> • #4160
Re: [Caja] Functional auditor for Cajita [minor correction]
Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:17:57 +0000
David-Sarah Hopwood <[email protected]> • #4159
Re: [Caja] Functional auditor for Cajita
Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:04:34 -0800
[email protected] • #4158
Re: [Caja] Functional auditor for Cajita
Tue, 8 Dec 2009 09:58:41 -0800
[email protected] • #4157
Re: [Caja] Functional auditor for Cajita
Tue, 8 Dec 2009 09:45:15 -0800
[email protected] • #4156
Re: [Caja] Functional auditor for Cajita
Tue, 8 Dec 2009 09:28:07 -0800
[email protected] • #4155
Re: [Caja] Functional auditor for Cajita
Tue, 8 Dec 2009 09:22:09 -0800
"Mark S. Miller" <[email protected]> • #4154
Re: [Caja] Functional auditor for Cajita
Tue, 8 Dec 2009 08:49:07 -0800
[email protected] • #4153
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.