gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs archive

514 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 6). Latest articles →

Re: [PATCH v2] man/man3/mem*(): SYNOPSIS: Document non-standard mem*() functions as provided by <memory.h>
Sun, 02 Aug 2026 00:55:46 +0200
Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list <[email protected]> • #56807
Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform
Sun, 2 Aug 2026 00:44:41 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56806
Re: [PATCH v2] man/man3/mem*(): SYNOPSIS: Document non-standard mem*() functions as provided by <memory.h>
Sun, 2 Aug 2026 00:38:48 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56805
Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform
Sun, 2 Aug 2026 00:26:46 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56804
Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 15:22:49 -0700
Keith Bostic <[email protected]> • #56803
Re: [PATCH v2] man/man3/mem*(): SYNOPSIS: Document non-standard mem*() functions as provided by <memory.h>
Sun, 02 Aug 2026 00:22:34 +0200
Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list <[email protected]> • #56802
Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform
Sun, 2 Aug 2026 00:22:32 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56801
Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 16:34:21 -0500
"G. Branden Robinson" <[email protected]> • #56800
Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 23:12:21 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56799
Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 15:52:26 -0500
"G. Branden Robinson" <[email protected]> • #56798
Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 22:45:06 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56797
Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 22:42:09 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56796
Re: test-free failure
Sat, 01 Aug 2026 22:19:23 +0200
Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list <[email protected]> • #56795
Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform (was: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem,strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>)
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 22:35:48 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56794
Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 15:18:49 -0500
"G. Branden Robinson" <[email protected]> • #56793
Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform (was: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem,strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>)
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 14:54:35 -0500
"G. Branden Robinson" <[email protected]> • #56792
Re: test-free failure
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 13:18:58 -0600
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #56791
NetBSD 11.0 released
Sat, 01 Aug 2026 10:40:27 -0700
Collin Funk <[email protected]> • #56790
Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 19:09:36 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56789
Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform
Sat, 01 Aug 2026 17:10:30 +0100
Sam James <[email protected]> • #56788
Re: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem,strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>)
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 17:29:33 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56787
Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 17:15:19 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56786
Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform
Sat, 01 Aug 2026 15:52:13 +0100
Sam James <[email protected]> • #56785
Re: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem,strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>
Sat, 01 Aug 2026 15:43:03 +0100
Sam James <[email protected]> • #56784
Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform
Sat, 01 Aug 2026 15:38:42 +0100
Sam James <[email protected]> • #56783
Re: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem, strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>)
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 15:26:05 +0100
Christopher Bazley <[email protected]> • #56782
Re: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem,strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>)
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 14:39:45 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56781
Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform (was: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem,strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>)
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 08:39:08 -0400
Douglas McIlroy <[email protected]> • #56780
Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 14:04:47 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56779
Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 14:01:33 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56778
test-free failure
Sat, 01 Aug 2026 09:08:17 +0200
Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list <[email protected]> • #56777
Re: N3322 functionality tests
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 21:50:01 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #56776
[PATCH v2] man/man3/mem*(): SYNOPSIS: Document non-standard mem*() functions as provided by <memory.h>
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 02:25:02 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56775
Re: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem,strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 02:12:49 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56774
Re: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem,strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 02:06:50 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56773
Re: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem, strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 02:01:27 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56772
Re: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem,strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 18:57:47 -0500
"G. Branden Robinson" <[email protected]> • #56771
Re: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem, strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 01:52:32 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56770
Re: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem, strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 16:48:38 -0700
Collin Funk <[email protected]> • #56769
Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform (was: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem,strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>)
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 01:45:04 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56768
Re: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem,strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>)
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 18:32:53 -0500
"G. Branden Robinson" <[email protected]> • #56767
Re: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem, strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 23:28:19 +0000 (UTC)
Joseph Myers via Gnulib discussion list <[email protected]> • #56766
Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 01:19:42 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56765
Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform (was: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem,strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>)
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 23:11:56 +0000 (UTC)
Joseph Myers <[email protected]> • #56764
Re: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem,strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 18:08:47 -0500
"G. Branden Robinson" <[email protected]> • #56763
Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform (was: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem,strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>)
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 00:52:39 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56762
Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform (was: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem,strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>)
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 22:42:00 +0000 (UTC)
Joseph Myers <[email protected]> • #56761
Re: readutmp and wtmpdb
Sat, 01 Aug 2026 00:39:24 +0200
Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list <[email protected]> • #56760
Re: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem,strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 00:33:12 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56759
Re: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem,strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 17:28:36 -0500
"G. Branden Robinson" <[email protected]> • #56758
Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 17:24:17 -0500
"G. Branden Robinson" <[email protected]> • #56757
Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform (was: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem,strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>)
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 00:21:34 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56756
Re: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem,strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 00:18:58 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56755
Re: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem,strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 22:16:14 +0000 (UTC)
Joseph Myers <[email protected]> • #56754
Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform (was: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem,strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>)
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 22:10:13 +0000 (UTC)
Joseph Myers <[email protected]> • #56753
Re: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem,strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>
Sat, 1 Aug 2026 00:05:44 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56752
Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 22:59:47 +0100
Sam James <[email protected]> • #56751
Re: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem,strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 22:54:27 +0100
Sam James <[email protected]> • #56750
on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform (was: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem,strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>)
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 16:51:22 -0500
"G. Branden Robinson" <[email protected]> • #56749
Re: [SC22WG14.37362] alx-0097r0 - <memory.h>, the legitimate header for memcpy(3) et al.
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 22:27:36 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56748
Re: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem, strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 16:37:12 -0500
Nevin Liber <[email protected]> • #56747
Re: N3322 functionality tests
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 23:34:10 +0200
Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list <[email protected]> • #56746
Re: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem,strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 23:28:31 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56745
Re: [PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem, strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 21:23:35 +0000 (UTC)
Joseph Myers via Gnulib discussion list <[email protected]> • #56744
Re: [PATCH 0/2] alx-0097r1 - <memory.h>, the legitimate header for memcpy(3) et al.
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 23:20:33 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56743
[PATCH 0/2] alx-0097r1 - <memory.h>, the legitimate header for memcpy(3) et al.
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 23:18:54 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56742
[PATCH 1/2] man/man3/{mem,strn}*(): SYNOPSIS, STANDARDS: Document these as provided by <memory.h>
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 23:18:59 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56741
[PATCH 2/2] man/man*/{string.3,memory.h.3head}: Move functions to a new page memory.h(3head)
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 23:19:04 +0200
Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> • #56740
Re: parallel builds
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 19:42:39 +0200
Bruno Haible via discussion of the GNU roff typesetting system and related software <[email protected]> • #56739
Re: [PATCH 1/9] string-h: Fix inconsistent nonnull attributes in strncpy
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 21:47:03 +0200
Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list <[email protected]> • #56738
Re: N3322 functionality tests
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 11:13:12 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #56737
[PATCH] link, symlink: more errno portability issues
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 10:56:13 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #56736
Re: parallel builds
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:16:15 -0400
Paul Smith <[email protected]> • #56735
Re: N3322 functionality tests
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 17:42:24 +0200
Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list <[email protected]> • #56734
[PATCH 4/9] string-h: Use _GL_ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL_IF_NONZERO in mempcpy
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 18:33:38 +0300
Lasse Collin <[email protected]> • #56733
[PATCH 8/9] mbsnlen-tests: Test mbsnlen(NULL, 0)
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 18:33:42 +0300
Lasse Collin <[email protected]> • #56732
[PATCH 7/9] string-h: Use _GL_ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL_IF_NONZERO in mbsncasecmp
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 18:33:41 +0300
Lasse Collin <[email protected]> • #56731
[PATCH 6/9] string-h: Use _GL_ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL_IF_NONZERO in mbsnlen
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 18:33:40 +0300
Lasse Collin <[email protected]> • #56730
[PATCH 1/9] string-h: Fix inconsistent nonnull attributes in strncpy
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 18:33:35 +0300
Lasse Collin <[email protected]> • #56729
[PATCH 2/9] string-h: Use _GL_ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL_IF_NONZERO in stpncpy
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 18:33:36 +0300
Lasse Collin <[email protected]> • #56728
[PATCH 9/9] mbsncasecmp-tests: Test mbsncasecmp with NULL arguments
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 18:33:43 +0300
Lasse Collin <[email protected]> • #56727
[PATCH 5/9] string-h: Use _GL_ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL_IF_NONZERO in explicit_bzero
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 18:33:39 +0300
Lasse Collin <[email protected]> • #56726
[PATCH 3/9] string-h: Use _GL_ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL_IF_NONZERO in strnlen
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 18:33:37 +0300
Lasse Collin <[email protected]> • #56725
Re: N3322 functionality tests
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 18:26:28 +0300
Lasse Collin <[email protected]> • #56724
Re: N3322 functionality tests
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 18:26:08 +0300
Lasse Collin <[email protected]> • #56723
Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] modules: add sd-dlopen-tests module
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 16:09:35 +0100
Luca Boccassi <[email protected]> • #56722
Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] modules: add sd-dlopen-tests module
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 17:06:32 +0200
Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list <[email protected]> • #56721
Re: parallel builds
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 14:49:55 +0100
Richard Purdie <[email protected]> • #56720
Re: parallel builds
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 14:48:17 +0200
Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list <[email protected]> • #56719
Re: test-strndup failure on AIX
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 10:51:10 +0200
Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list <[email protected]> • #56718
Re: how to manage make(1) dependencies on gnulib-generated header files
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 09:49:20 +0100
Richard Purdie <[email protected]> • #56717
Re: parallel builds
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 09:44:25 +0100
Richard Purdie <[email protected]> • #56716
Re: Unfortunate interaction of glibc-2.44 and gnulib regarding posix_spawn_file_actions_addchdir => infinite recursion
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:37:52 +0800
Xi Ruoyao <[email protected]> • #56715
Re: Unfortunate interaction of glibc-2.44 and gnulib regarding posix_spawn_file_actions_addchdir => infinite recursion
Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:26:00 +0900
"Andreas K. Huettel" <[email protected]> • #56714
Re: [PATCH 2/3] selinux: load libselinux with dlopen instead of linking
Thu, 30 Jul 2026 14:53:51 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #56713
Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] modules: add sd-dlopen-tests module
Thu, 30 Jul 2026 22:25:54 +0100
Luca Boccassi <[email protected]> • #56712
[PATCH v3 4/5] selinux: load libselinux with dlopen instead of linking
Thu, 30 Jul 2026 22:22:57 +0100
[email protected] • #56711
[PATCH v3 2/5] modules: add sd-dlopen-tests module
Thu, 30 Jul 2026 22:22:55 +0100
[email protected] • #56710
[PATCH v3 1/5] modules: add sd-dlopen module
Thu, 30 Jul 2026 22:22:54 +0100
[email protected] • #56709
[PATCH v3 5/5] readutmp: load libsystemd with dlopen instead of linking
Thu, 30 Jul 2026 22:22:58 +0100
[email protected] • #56708
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.