gmane.comp.licenses.open-source.general archive

373 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Request for feedback: public specification licensing
Tue, 16 Jul 2024 17:35:15 +0200
Giacomo Catenazzi <[email protected]> • #16181
Re: Request for feedback: public specification licensing
Mon, 15 Jul 2024 09:43:36 -0700
Bruce Perens via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16180
Re: Request for feedback: public specification licensing
Sun, 14 Jul 2024 19:58:18 +0100
Nathan Willis via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16179
كود البطاقه اي تونز
Sat, 13 Jul 2024 06:29:30 +0300
Noof Al soud <[email protected]> • #16178
Re: Request for feedback: public specification licensing
Thu, 11 Jul 2024 21:56:39 -0400
Richard Fontana <[email protected]> • #16177
Re: Request for feedback: public specification licensing
Thu, 11 Jul 2024 17:04:59 -0700
Josh Berkus <[email protected]> • #16176
Request for feedback: public specification licensing
Tue, 9 Jul 2024 12:58:03 +0100
Nathan Willis via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16175
Re: What's wrong with the AGPL?
Thu, 27 Jun 2024 22:03:51 +0200
Dirk Riehle <[email protected]> • #16174
What's wrong with the AGPL?
Wed, 26 Jun 2024 12:22:22 -0400
Chad Whitacre via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16173
Re: What's wrong with the AGPL?
Wed, 26 Jun 2024 21:29:36 +0200
Dirk Riehle <[email protected]> • #16172
Fw: What's wrong with the AGPL?
Wed, 26 Jun 2024 14:41:49 +0000 (UTC)
stevepyle79--- via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16171
Re: What's wrong with the AGPL?
Wed, 26 Jun 2024 22:19:55 +0800
Roland Turner via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16170
Re: What's wrong with the AGPL?
Wed, 26 Jun 2024 14:42:39 +0200
Dirk Riehle <[email protected]> • #16169
Re: What's wrong with the AGPL?
Wed, 19 Jun 2024 17:35:28 -0700
Josh Berkus <[email protected]> • #16168
Re: What's wrong with the AGPL?
Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:38:07 +0800
Roland Turner via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16167
Re: What's wrong with the AGPL?
Sun, 16 Jun 2024 18:12:15 +0200
Dirk Riehle <[email protected]> • #16166
Re: What's wrong with the AGPL?
Sun, 16 Jun 2024 18:11:59 +0200
Dirk Riehle <[email protected]> • #16165
Re: What's wrong with the AGPL?
Sun, 16 Jun 2024 18:11:35 +0200
Dirk Riehle <[email protected]> • #16164
Re: What's wrong with the AGPL?
Sun, 16 Jun 2024 10:08:33 -0400
Richard Fontana <[email protected]> • #16163
Re: What's wrong with the AGPL?
Thu, 13 Jun 2024 16:48:29 -0700
Matt Wilson <[email protected]> • #16162
Re: What's wrong with the AGPL?
Fri, 14 Jun 2024 07:43:42 +0800
Roland Turner via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16161
Re: What's wrong with the AGPL?
Thu, 13 Jun 2024 15:58:07 -0700
Kate Downing <[email protected]> • #16160
Re: What's wrong with the AGPL?
Thu, 13 Jun 2024 15:42:16 -0700
Kate Downing <[email protected]> • #16159
What's wrong with the AGPL?
Thu, 13 Jun 2024 18:29:51 -0400
Dirk Riehle <[email protected]> • #16158
Re: MIT-CMU license for Python Pillow
Thu, 13 Jun 2024 17:20:55 -0400
Richard Fontana <[email protected]> • #16157
MIT-CMU license for Python Pillow
Wed, 12 Jun 2024 09:36:55 -0400
Jeffrey Clark <[email protected]> • #16156
(no subject)
Sun, 2 Jun 2024 18:06:37 +0600
Hafizul Hafiz <[email protected]> • #16155
Re: Curious about derived works and AI...
Sun, 2 Jun 2024 11:42:09 +0900
Shuji Sado <[email protected]> • #16154
Re: Curious about derived works and AI...
Fri, 31 May 2024 13:14:30 -0700
Bruce Perens via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16153
Re: Curious about derived works and AI...
Fri, 31 May 2024 21:09:23 +0200
Stefano Maffulli <[email protected]> • #16152
Re: Curious about derived works and AI...
Fri, 31 May 2024 09:11:17 -0700
Bruce Perens via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16151
Re: Curious about derived works and AI...
Fri, 31 May 2024 13:33:22 +0200
Stefano Maffulli <[email protected]> • #16150
Re: Curious about derived works and AI...
Thu, 30 May 2024 13:40:43 -0700
Bruce Perens via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16149
Re: Curious about derived works and AI...
Thu, 30 May 2024 12:46:36 -0700
Miles Georgi <[email protected]> • #16148
Re: Curious about derived works and AI...
Mon, 27 May 2024 14:31:50 -0700
Bruce Perens via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16147
Re: Updating the PHP license
Sat, 25 May 2024 10:16:02 -0700
Bruce Perens via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16146
Re: Updating the PHP license
Mon, 27 May 2024 09:57:42 -0500
Ben Ramsey <[email protected]> • #16145
Re: Updating the PHP license
Mon, 27 May 2024 07:17:40 -0700
McCoy Smith <[email protected]> • #16144
Re: Curious about derived works and AI...
Sun, 26 May 2024 09:29:48 +0900
Shuji Sado <[email protected]> • #16143
Re: Curious about derived works and AI...
Sat, 25 May 2024 12:39:25 -0700
Josh Berkus <[email protected]> • #16142
Re: Curious about derived works and AI...
Sat, 25 May 2024 08:31:24 -0700
Bruce Perens via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16141
Re: Updating the PHP license
Sat, 25 May 2024 11:40:23 -0500
Ben Ramsey <[email protected]> • #16140
Updating the PHP License
Mon, 20 May 2024 20:56:59 -0500
Ben Ramsey via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16139
Curious about derived works and AI...
Sat, 18 May 2024 17:06:51 -0700
Miles Georgi <[email protected]> • #16138
Updating the PHP license
Sat, 18 May 2024 14:21:53 -0500
Ben Ramsey via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16137
Re: Open Source license question
Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:03:31 -0400
Richard Fontana <[email protected]> • #16136
Re: Open Source license question
Wed, 10 Apr 2024 19:34:25 -0700
Chris B <[email protected]> • #16135
Re: Open Source license question
Tue, 9 Apr 2024 07:04:40 -0700
Chris B <[email protected]> • #16134
Re: Open Source license question
Wed, 10 Apr 2024 11:56:30 +0200
Philippe Ombredanne <[email protected]> • #16133
Re: Open Source license question
Tue, 9 Apr 2024 14:33:49 +0100
David Woolley <[email protected]> • #16132
Re: Open Source license question
Tue, 9 Apr 2024 13:07:20 +0100
David Woolley <[email protected]> • #16131
Re: the edited CC0 stuff
Mon, 8 Apr 2024 22:25:47 -0700
"public final Stvk;" <[email protected]> • #16130
Re: Question about Blue Oak License
Mon, 8 Apr 2024 22:41:02 +0200
Josh Berkus <[email protected]> • #16129
Fwd: Open Source license question
Sun, 7 Apr 2024 21:59:12 -0500
Bruce Perens via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16128
Re: I edited the CC0 license to solve patent issue, need some advice
Sun, 7 Apr 2024 22:53:57 -0700
"public final Stvk;" <[email protected]> • #16127
Re: Open Source license question
Sun, 07 Apr 2024 13:37:07 +1000
Justin Clift <[email protected]> • #16126
Re: I edited the CC0 license to solve patent issue, need some advice
Sat, 6 Apr 2024 12:57:58 -0700
Bruce Perens via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16125
Open Source license question
Sun, 7 Apr 2024 22:33:31 +0000
"Atwood, Mark via License-discuss" <[email protected]> • #16124
I edited the CC0 license to solve patent issue, need some advice
Sun, 7 Apr 2024 22:25:34 +0000
"Atwood, Mark via License-discuss" <[email protected]> • #16123
Re: Open Source license question
Sat, 06 Apr 2024 07:11:34 -0500
"Kevin P. Fleming" <[email protected]> • #16122
I edited the CC0 license to solve patent issue, need some advice
Fri, 5 Apr 2024 22:58:55 -0700
"public final Stvk;" <[email protected]> • #16121
Open Source license question
Fri, 5 Apr 2024 21:07:00 -0700
Chris B <[email protected]> • #16120
Re: Question about Blue Oak License
Sat, 23 Mar 2024 11:48:20 +0900
Shuji Sado <[email protected]> • #16119
Re: stale link in license terms
Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:11:27 +0100
Philippe Ombredanne <[email protected]> • #16118
Re: Blue OakModel License and the license reinvention dilemma
Sun, 17 Mar 2024 13:01:38 +0100
Tobie Langel <[email protected]> • #16117
stale link in license terms
Fri, 15 Mar 2024 10:33:12 -0400
Geoffrey Coram <[email protected]> • #16116
Blue OakModel License and the license reinvention dilemma
Fri, 15 Mar 2024 11:13:08 -0700
Bruce Perens via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16115
Re: Question about Blue Oak License
Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:04:37 +0900
Shuji Sado <[email protected]> • #16114
Re: Question about Blue Oak License
Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:13:09 +0000
David Woolley <[email protected]> • #16113
Re: Question about Blue Oak License
Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:55:55 +0000
David Woolley <[email protected]> • #16112
Re: Question about Blue Oak License
Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:27:58 +0000
David Woolley <[email protected]> • #16111
Re: Question about Blue Oak License
Thu, 14 Mar 2024 19:48:22 +0900
Shuji Sado <[email protected]> • #16110
Re: Question about Blue Oak License
Thu, 14 Mar 2024 11:46:54 +0100
Matija Šuklje <[email protected]> • #16109
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.