gmane.comp.licenses.open-source.general archive

373 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: [DISCUSS] PUWL v1.0 – P-EADCA Universal Waiver License
Wed, 1 Oct 2025 12:46:13 -0400
Richard Fontana via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16281
Re: [EXTERNAL] [DISCUSS] PUWL v1.0 – P-EADCA Universal Waiver License
Wed, 1 Oct 2025 16:30:09 +0000
"Mary Hardy (CELA) via License-discuss" <[email protected]> • #16280
Re: [DISCUSS] PUWL v1.0 – P-EADCA Universal Waiver License
Wed, 1 Oct 2025 06:57:47 -0700
McCoy Smith <[email protected]> • #16279
Re: [DISCUSS] PUWL v1.0 – P-EADCA Universal Waiver License
Wed, 01 Oct 2025 09:08:38 -0400
"Kevin P. Fleming" <[email protected]> • #16278
[DISCUSS] PUWL v1.0 – P- EADCA Universal Waiver License
Tue, 30 Sep 2025 18:40:02 +0200
Balázs Hámorszky <[email protected]> • #16277
Re: Is the IPA Font License truly open source?
Wed, 17 Sep 2025 11:33:22 -0700
Josh Berkus <[email protected]> • #16276
Re: Is the IPA Font License truly open source?
Wed, 17 Sep 2025 10:00:46 +0900
Shuji Sado <[email protected]> • #16275
Re: Is the IPA Font License truly open source?
Sun, 7 Sep 2025 15:30:36 -0700
Josh Berkus <[email protected]> • #16274
Is the IPA Font License truly open source?
Fri, 5 Sep 2025 01:55:49 +0900
[email protected] • #16273
Re: License-discuss Digest, Vol 148, Issue 4
Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:39:39 +0000 (UTC)
Crystal Enriquez via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16272
Re: OpenMDW license
Thu, 17 Jul 2025 16:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> • #16271
Re: License-discuss Digest, Vol 148, Issue 5
Fri, 18 Jul 2025 02:17:51 +0000 (UTC)
Crystal Enriquez via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16270
Re: OpenMDW license
Fri, 18 Jul 2025 08:35:34 +0900
Shuji Sado <[email protected]> • #16269
Re: A new kind of badgeware license?
Mon, 14 Jul 2025 22:46:49 +0800
Moming Duan <[email protected]> • #16268
Re: OpenMDW license
Tue, 24 Jun 2025 10:16:30 -0400
Steve Winslow <[email protected]> • #16267
Re: Better Attribution License (Formerly Berkeley-Artistic License)
Tue, 01 Jul 2025 08:37:02 +0000
Lucy Brown via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16266
[License-Discuss] For Review: New strong copyleft license draft with transparency and user rights provisions
Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:59:12 +0000
BonzuPII via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16265
PHP License change
Wed, 16 Jul 2025 09:21:38 -0300
Nick Vidal <[email protected]> • #16264
Re: A new kind of badgeware license?
Mon, 14 Jul 2025 19:49:50 -0500
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #16263
Re: A new kind of badgeware license?
Mon, 14 Jul 2025 08:41:50 -0700
Josh Berkus <[email protected]> • #16262
Re: A new kind of badgeware license?
Mon, 14 Jul 2025 09:28:42 -0400
Richard Fontana via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16261
Re: A new kind of badgeware license?
Mon, 14 Jul 2025 06:01:39 -0400
"Kevin P. Fleming" <[email protected]> • #16260
A new kind of badgeware license?
Mon, 14 Jul 2025 11:39:39 +0200
Stefano Maffulli <[email protected]> • #16259
Re: OpenMDW license
Sat, 21 Jun 2025 21:13:23 -0400
Richard Fontana <[email protected]> • #16258
OpenMDW license
Fri, 20 Jun 2025 16:10:28 -0700 (PDT)
Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> • #16257
Re: License-discuss Digest, Vol 146, Issue 1
Tue, 13 May 2025 12:44:12 +0100
Eseosa Eric Ehioghiren <[email protected]> • #16256
Re: Submission of PFSSL v1.0 for OSI Review and Approval
Wed, 14 May 2025 00:56:13 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] • #16255
Re: Submission of PFSSL v1.0 for OSI Review and Approval
Tue, 13 May 2025 16:46:25 -0700
Josh Berkus <[email protected]> • #16254
Re: Submission of PFSSL v1.0 for OSI Review and Approval
Tue, 13 May 2025 07:39:00 -0400
"Kevin P. Fleming" <[email protected]> • #16253
Submission of PFSSL v1.0 for OSI Review and Approval
Mon, 12 May 2025 17:18:11 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] • #16252
Re: Better Attribution License (Formerly Berkeley-Artistic License)
Tue, 15 Apr 2025 03:18:55 +0000
Lucy Ada Randall via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16251
Re: Better Attribution License (Formerly Berkeley-Artistic License)
Tue, 15 Apr 2025 03:15:29 +0000
Lucy Ada Randall via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16250
Re: Better Attribution License (Formerly Berkeley-Artistic License)
Mon, 14 Apr 2025 17:15:54 -0700
Josh Berkus <[email protected]> • #16249
Re: Better Attribution License (Formerly Berkeley-Artistic License)
Sun, 23 Mar 2025 06:15:51 +0000
Lucy Ada Randall via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16248
Better Attribution License (Formerly Berkeley-Artistic License)
Sun, 23 Mar 2025 06:14:55 +0000
Lucy Ada Randall via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16247
Re: Pre-Advice for ModelGo Licenses Review
Thu, 13 Feb 2025 10:18:58 +0800
Moming Duan <[email protected]> • #16246
Re: Pre-Advice for ModelGo Licenses Review
Tue, 11 Feb 2025 20:47:50 +0800
"D 莫名 (dewitt)" <[email protected]> • #16245
Re: Pre-Advice for ModelGo Licenses Review
Tue, 11 Feb 2025 16:17:43 -0800
Josh Berkus <[email protected]> • #16244
Re: Pre-Advice for ModelGo Licenses Review
Tue, 11 Feb 2025 13:18:47 +0000
David Woolley <[email protected]> • #16243
Re: Pre-Advice for ModelGo Licenses Review
Tue, 11 Feb 2025 11:41:59 +0100
Stefano Maffulli <[email protected]> • #16242
Re: Pre-Advice for ModelGo Licenses Review
Tue, 11 Feb 2025 08:27:34 +0800
"D 莫名 (dewitt)" <[email protected]> • #16241
Re: Pre-Advice for ModelGo Licenses Review
Mon, 10 Feb 2025 09:23:33 -0800
McCoy Smith <[email protected]> • #16240
Pre-Advice for ModelGo Licenses Review
Mon, 10 Feb 2025 15:15:22 +0800
"D 莫名 (dewitt)" <[email protected]> • #16239
Re: License approval question
Sat, 8 Feb 2025 11:18:15 +0800
Roland Turner via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16238
Re: License approval question
Fri, 07 Feb 2025 06:19:56 -0500
"Kevin P. Fleming" <[email protected]> • #16237
License approval question
Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:48:39 -0500
Tiffany Cappellari <[email protected]> • #16236
Re: Protection of Academic Medical Center Patent Portfolio via MGBopensource Proposed License
Sun, 24 Nov 2024 11:08:33 -0800
Pamela Chestek <[email protected]> • #16235
Re: Protection of Academic Medical Center Patent Portfolio via MGBopensource Proposed License
Thu, 21 Nov 2024 11:45:34 +0000
Lukas Atkinson <[email protected]> • #16234
Protection of Academic Medical Center Patent Portfolio via MGBopensource Proposed License
Mon, 18 Nov 2024 14:27:21 +0000
"Barksdale, Marvin" <[email protected]> • #16233
(no subject)
Wed, 23 Oct 2024 19:50:29 +0300
Noof Al soud <[email protected]> • #16232
R: Request for Evaluation of Lachesis Open License
Fri, 11 Oct 2024 09:33:10 +0000
PEPPÈ Santarsiero <[email protected]> • #16231
Re: Question: is the following paragraph in violation of OSD6
Sat, 5 Oct 2024 22:04:36 -0700
Bruce Perens via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16230
Re: Request Discussion Pre-Reviews For New Licenses (chewkeanho-rlos, chewkeanho-cos, chewkeanho-gpos)
Sat, 5 Oct 2024 13:50:39 -0700
Bruce Perens via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16229
Re: Question: is the following paragraph in violation of OSD6
Sun, 6 Oct 2024 12:07:00 +0800
Roland Turner via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16228
Re: Question: is the following paragraph in violation of OSD6
Sat, 5 Oct 2024 10:05:13 -0400
Pamela Chestek <[email protected]> • #16227
Re: Request Discussion Pre-Reviews For New Licenses (chewkeanho-rlos, chewkeanho-cos, chewkeanho-gpos)
Sat, 5 Oct 2024 09:51:01 -0400
Pamela Chestek <[email protected]> • #16226
Re: Question: is the following paragraph in violation of OSD6
Fri, 4 Oct 2024 12:15:50 -0700
Lucy Brown via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16225
Re: Question: is the following paragraph in violation of OSD6
Fri, 4 Oct 2024 16:15:09 -0700
Bruce Perens via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16224
Re: Question: is the following paragraph in violation of OSD6
Sat, 5 Oct 2024 00:50:33 +0200
"Johnny A. Solbu" <[email protected]> • #16223
Re: Question: is the following paragraph in violation of OSD6
Fri, 4 Oct 2024 22:08:59 +0100
David Woolley <[email protected]> • #16222
Re: Question: is the following paragraph in violation of OSD6
Fri, 4 Oct 2024 11:32:12 -0700
McCoy Smith <[email protected]> • #16221
Re: Question: is the following paragraph in violation of OSD6
Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:22:58 -0700
Lucy Brown via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16220
Re: Question: is the following paragraph in violation of OSD6
Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:10:54 -0700
Josh Berkus <[email protected]> • #16219
Question: is the following paragraph in violation of OSD6
Thu, 3 Oct 2024 13:12:41 -0700
Lucy Brown via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16218
Re: Request Discussion Pre-Reviews For New Licenses (chewkeanho-rlos, chewkeanho-cos, chewkeanho-gpos)
Thu, 3 Oct 2024 09:03:16 +0800
"\(Holloway\) Chew, Kean Ho via License-discuss" <[email protected]> • #16217
Re: Request Discussion Pre-Reviews For New Licenses (chewkeanho-rlos, chewkeanho-cos, chewkeanho-gpos)
Wed, 2 Oct 2024 12:54:55 -0700
Bruce Perens via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16216
Re: Request Discussion Pre-Reviews For New Licenses (chewkeanho-rlos, chewkeanho-cos, chewkeanho-gpos)
Wed, 2 Oct 2024 11:07:42 -0700
Bruce Perens via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16215
Re: Thoughts on the Pretix License?
Thu, 3 Oct 2024 15:33:27 +0800
Roland Turner via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16214
Re: Request Discussion Pre-Reviews For New Licenses (chewkeanho-rlos, chewkeanho-cos, chewkeanho-gpos)
Wed, 2 Oct 2024 15:25:32 -0700
Josh Berkus <[email protected]> • #16213
Re: Request Discussion Pre-Reviews For New Licenses (chewkeanho-rlos, chewkeanho-cos, chewkeanho-gpos)
Wed, 2 Oct 2024 12:35:55 -0700
McCoy Smith <[email protected]> • #16212
Re: Request Discussion Pre-Reviews For New Licenses (chewkeanho-rlos, chewkeanho-cos, chewkeanho-gpos)
Wed, 2 Oct 2024 13:48:37 -0400
Aaron Williamson <[email protected]> • #16211
Re: Request Discussion Pre-Reviews For New Licenses (chewkeanho-rlos, chewkeanho-cos, chewkeanho-gpos)
Wed, 2 Oct 2024 10:52:05 +0800
"\(Holloway\) Chew, Kean Ho via License-discuss" <[email protected]> • #16210
Re: Request Discussion Pre-Reviews For New Licenses (chewkeanho-rlos, chewkeanho-cos, chewkeanho-gpos)
Tue, 1 Oct 2024 10:28:01 -0700
Bruce Perens via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16209
Re: Request Discussion Pre-Reviews For New Licenses (chewkeanho-rlos, chewkeanho-cos, chewkeanho-gpos)
Tue, 1 Oct 2024 11:57:41 -0400
Pamela Chestek <[email protected]> • #16208
Re: Request Discussion Pre-Reviews For New Licenses (chewkeanho-rlos, chewkeanho-cos, chewkeanho-gpos)
Tue, 1 Oct 2024 08:47:38 -0700
Josh Berkus <[email protected]> • #16207
Re: Request Discussion Pre-Reviews For New Licenses (chewkeanho-rlos, chewkeanho-cos, chewkeanho-gpos)
Tue, 1 Oct 2024 07:45:23 +0800
"\(Holloway\) Chew, Kean Ho via License-discuss" <[email protected]> • #16206
Re: Request Discussion Pre-Reviews For New Licenses (chewkeanho-rlos, chewkeanho-cos, chewkeanho-gpos)
Mon, 30 Sep 2024 08:11:33 -0700
McCoy Smith <[email protected]> • #16205
Request Discussion Pre-Reviews For New Licenses (chewkeanho-rlos, chewkeanho-cos, chewkeanho-gpos)
Mon, 30 Sep 2024 14:58:41 +0800
"\(Holloway\) Chew, Kean Ho via License-discuss" <[email protected]> • #16204
Some+startups+are+going+'fair+source'+to+avoid+the+pitfalls+of+open+source+licensing
Tue, 24 Sep 2024 10:22:50 -0700
<[email protected]> • #16203
Re: Thoughts on the Pretix License?
Mon, 23 Sep 2024 14:43:53 -0700
McCoy Smith <[email protected]> • #16202
Re: Thoughts on the Pretix License?
Mon, 23 Sep 2024 13:29:31 -0700
Josh Berkus <[email protected]> • #16201
Re: Thoughts on the Pretix License?
Mon, 23 Sep 2024 15:15:27 -0400
Richard Fontana <[email protected]> • #16200
Re: Thoughts on the Pretix License?
Mon, 23 Sep 2024 15:10:36 -0400
James <[email protected]> • #16199
Re: Thoughts on the Pretix License?
Mon, 23 Sep 2024 11:56:56 -0700
Josh Berkus <[email protected]> • #16198
Re: Thoughts on the Pretix License?
Mon, 23 Sep 2024 14:28:30 -0400
"Kevin P. Fleming" <[email protected]> • #16197
Thoughts on the Pretix License?
Mon, 23 Sep 2024 11:18:44 -0700
Josh Berkus <[email protected]> • #16196
Request for Feedback on the Lone Dynamics Open License
Mon, 9 Sep 2024 12:26:34 +0200
Philip Lalone <[email protected]> • #16195
Re: Retroactively specifying `-only` or `-or-later` for GPLv2 in an adopted project
Fri, 23 Aug 2024 01:30:40 -0500
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #16194
Re: Retroactively specifying `-only` or `-or-later` for GPLv2 in an adopted project
Thu, 22 Aug 2024 10:04:13 -0400
Aaron Williamson <[email protected]> • #16193
Retroactively specifying `-only` or `-or-later` for GPLv2 in an adopted project
Wed, 21 Aug 2024 08:42:19 +0000
[email protected] • #16192
Re: Request for clarification: OSI approved GPLV2 SPDX identifiers
Fri, 9 Aug 2024 15:24:49 -0500
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #16191
Re: Request for clarification: OSI approved GPLV2 SPDX identifiers
Fri, 9 Aug 2024 14:53:56 -0400
Richard Fontana <[email protected]> • #16190
Request for clarification: OSI approved GPLV2 SPDX identifiers
Thu, 8 Aug 2024 09:38:57 +0000
Erwan LE-RAY - foss <[email protected]> • #16189
Re: Request for feedback: public specification licensing
Tue, 16 Jul 2024 10:12:55 -0700
Bruce Perens via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16188
Re: Request for feedback: public specification licensing
Wed, 17 Jul 2024 03:12:57 -0500
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #16187
Re: Request for feedback: public specification licensing
Wed, 17 Jul 2024 03:08:31 -0500
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #16186
Re: Request for feedback: public specification licensing
Tue, 16 Jul 2024 12:52:01 -0400
Roland Turner via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16185
Re: Request for feedback: public specification licensing
Tue, 16 Jul 2024 17:38:26 +0100
Simon Phipps <[email protected]> • #16184
Re: Request for feedback: public specification licensing
Tue, 16 Jul 2024 12:08:56 -0400
Roland Turner via License-discuss <[email protected]> • #16183
Re: Request for feedback: public specification licensing
Tue, 16 Jul 2024 17:35:57 +0200
Giacomo Catenazzi <[email protected]> • #16182
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.