gmane.comp.python.import archive

678 archived articles, newest first (page 5 of 7). Latest articles →

Re: Round 2 for "A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System"
Wed, 28 Aug 2013 13:27:12 -0400
Brett Cannon <[email protected]> • #279
Re: Round 2 for "A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System"
Wed, 28 Aug 2013 13:25:15 -0400
Brett Cannon <[email protected]> • #278
Re: Round 2 for "A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System"
Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:06:04 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #277
Re: Round 2 for "A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System"
Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:04:39 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #276
Re: Round 2 for "A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System"
Wed, 28 Aug 2013 08:43:16 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #275
PEP 451 (ModuleSpec) round 3
Wed, 28 Aug 2013 02:50:55 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #274
Re: Round 2 for "A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System"
Wed, 28 Aug 2013 05:49:33 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #273
Re: Round 2 for "A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System"
Wed, 28 Aug 2013 19:26:43 +1000
Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> • #272
Re: Round 2 for "A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System"
Wed, 28 Aug 2013 02:53:19 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #271
Re: Round 2 for "A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System"
Sat, 24 Aug 2013 21:50:24 +1000
Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> • #270
Re: Round 2 for "A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System"
Thu, 15 Aug 2013 16:15:57 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #269
Re: Round 2 for "A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System"
Thu, 15 Aug 2013 10:59:43 -0500
Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> • #268
Re: Round 2 for "A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System"
Thu, 15 Aug 2013 10:23:45 -0500
Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> • #267
Re: Round 2 for "A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System"
Thu, 15 Aug 2013 01:38:11 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #266
Re: Round 2 for "A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System"
Wed, 14 Aug 2013 20:27:40 -0400
PJ Eby <[email protected]> • #265
Re: Round 2 for "A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System"
Tue, 13 Aug 2013 21:18:35 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #264
Re: Round 2 for "A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System"
Tue, 13 Aug 2013 21:16:07 -0400
Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> • #263
Re: Round 2 for "A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System"
Tue, 13 Aug 2013 17:47:53 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #262
Re: Round 2 for "A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System"
Tue, 13 Aug 2013 09:21:42 -0400
Brett Cannon <[email protected]> • #261
Re: Round 2 for "A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System"
Mon, 12 Aug 2013 22:17:58 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #260
Re: Round 2 for "A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System"
Mon, 12 Aug 2013 21:47:27 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #259
Re: Round 2 for "A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System"
Mon, 12 Aug 2013 21:35:14 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #258
Re: Round 2 for "A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System"
Sun, 11 Aug 2013 16:08:26 -0400
Brett Cannon <[email protected]> • #257
Re: Round 2 for "A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System"
Sun, 11 Aug 2013 09:03:00 -0400
Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> • #256
Round 2 for "A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System"
Fri, 9 Aug 2013 16:58:09 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #255
Re: Rough PEP: A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System
Fri, 9 Aug 2013 14:20:45 -0400
Brett Cannon <[email protected]> • #254
Re: Rough PEP: A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System
Fri, 9 Aug 2013 10:40:10 -0400
Brett Cannon <[email protected]> • #253
Re: PEP proposal: Per-Module Import Path
Wed, 31 Jul 2013 14:37:38 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #252
Re: 40k limit on this list
Sat, 10 Aug 2013 11:57:18 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #251
Re: Rough PEP: A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System
Sat, 10 Aug 2013 21:02:44 +1000
Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> • #250
Re: Rough PEP: A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System
Sat, 10 Aug 2013 20:50:25 +1000
Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> • #249
Re: 40k limit on this list
Sat, 10 Aug 2013 06:58:01 +0200
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #248
40k limit on this list
Fri, 9 Aug 2013 17:19:21 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #247
Re: Rough PEP: A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System
Fri, 9 Aug 2013 16:44:55 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #246
Re: Rough PEP: A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System
Fri, 9 Aug 2013 16:36:49 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #245
Re: Rough PEP: A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System
Fri, 9 Aug 2013 16:28:06 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #244
Re: Rough PEP: A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System
Fri, 9 Aug 2013 21:22:49 +0200
Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> • #243
Re: Rough PEP: A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System
Fri, 9 Aug 2013 14:23:39 -0400
Brett Cannon <[email protected]> • #242
Re: Rough PEP: A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System
Fri, 9 Aug 2013 12:15:32 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #241
Re: Rough PEP: A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System
Fri, 9 Aug 2013 12:03:32 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #240
Re: Rough PEP: A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System
Fri, 9 Aug 2013 10:45:22 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #239
Re: Rough PEP: A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System
Fri, 9 Aug 2013 10:43:10 -0400
Brett Cannon <[email protected]> • #238
Re: Rough PEP: A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System
Fri, 9 Aug 2013 10:28:03 +0200
Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> • #237
Re: PEP proposal: Per-Module Import Path
Fri, 9 Aug 2013 00:38:18 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #236
Rough PEP: A ModuleSpec Type for the Import System
Fri, 9 Aug 2013 00:34:34 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #235
Re: PEP proposal: Per-Module Import Path
Thu, 8 Aug 2013 08:18:16 -0400
Brett Cannon <[email protected]> • #234
Re: PEP proposal: Per-Module Import Path
Wed, 7 Aug 2013 19:08:01 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #233
Re: PEP proposal: Per-Module Import Path
Sun, 4 Aug 2013 15:07:47 +1000
Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> • #232
Re: PEP proposal: Per-Module Import Path
Fri, 2 Aug 2013 19:32:45 +1000
Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> • #231
Re: PEP proposal: Per-Module Import Path
Thu, 1 Aug 2013 21:34:38 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #230
Re: PEP proposal: Per-Module Import Path
Fri, 2 Aug 2013 10:56:41 +1000
Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> • #229
Re: PEP proposal: Per-Module Import Path
Thu, 1 Aug 2013 08:44:28 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #228
Re: PEP proposal: Per-Module Import Path
Thu, 1 Aug 2013 10:35:57 -0400
Brett Cannon <[email protected]> • #227
Re: PEP proposal: Per-Module Import Path
Thu, 1 Aug 2013 08:36:20 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #226
Re: PEP proposal: Per-Module Import Path
Fri, 2 Aug 2013 00:00:24 +1000
Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> • #225
Re: PEP proposal: Per-Module Import Path
Thu, 1 Aug 2013 09:18:33 -0400
Brett Cannon <[email protected]> • #224
Re: PEP proposal: Per-Module Import Path
Wed, 31 Jul 2013 14:40:00 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #223
Re: PEP proposal: Per-Module Import Path
Wed, 31 Jul 2013 08:29:37 -0400
Brett Cannon <[email protected]> • #222
Re: PEP proposal: Per-Module Import Path
Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:41:20 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #221
Re: PEP proposal: Per-Module Import Path
Mon, 29 Jul 2013 21:11:59 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #220
Re: PEP proposal: Per-Module Import Path
Sun, 21 Jul 2013 01:38:39 +1000
Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> • #219
Re: PEP proposal: Per-Module Import Path
Sat, 20 Jul 2013 09:55:00 -0400
Brett Cannon <[email protected]> • #218
Re: PEP proposal: Per-Module Import Path
Sat, 20 Jul 2013 17:32:01 +1000
Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> • #217
Re: PEP proposal: Per-Module Import Path
Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:51:05 -0400
Brett Cannon <[email protected]> • #216
Re: deprecation of pkgutil.extend_path()?
Fri, 19 Jul 2013 08:37:04 -0400
Brett Cannon <[email protected]> • #215
Re: deprecation of pkgutil.extend_path()?
Thu, 18 Jul 2013 18:28:41 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #214
deprecation of pkgutil.extend_path()?
Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:20:26 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #213
PEP proposal: Per-Module Import Path
Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:10:21 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #212
Biggest Fake Conference in Computer Science
Tue, 30 Apr 2013 18:17:31 -0400
[email protected] • #210
Re: PEP 420 status
Wed, 16 May 2012 15:47:43 -0700
Guido van Rossum <[email protected]> • #209
PEP 420 status
Tue, 15 May 2012 22:44:54 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #208
Re: pkgutil.extend_path
Tue, 15 May 2012 21:40:43 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #207
Re: pkgutil.extend_path
Tue, 15 May 2012 18:04:06 -0400
PJ Eby <[email protected]> • #206
pkgutil.extend_path
Tue, 15 May 2012 13:26:31 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #205
Re: Fwd: Re: Proposal and questions about PEP 420
Sun, 13 May 2012 22:10:05 +0200
Benoît Bryon <[email protected]> • #204
Re: Proposal and questions about PEP 420
Sun, 13 May 2012 21:15:30 +0200
Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> • #203
Re: Fwd: Re: Proposal and questions about PEP 420
Sun, 13 May 2012 20:58:41 +0200
"Martin v. Löwis" <[email protected]> • #202
Re: Fwd: Re: Proposal and questions about PEP 420
Sun, 13 May 2012 20:56:03 +0200
"Martin v. Löwis" <[email protected]> • #201
Re: Fwd: Re: Proposal and questions about PEP 420
Sun, 13 May 2012 13:25:58 -0400
PJ Eby <[email protected]> • #200
Re: Fwd: Re: Proposal and questions about PEP 420
Sun, 13 May 2012 08:33:02 -0700
Guido van Rossum <[email protected]> • #199
Fwd: Re: Proposal and questions about PEP 420
Sun, 13 May 2012 15:18:17 +0200
Benoît Bryon <[email protected]> • #198
Re: PEP 420 outstanding issues
Fri, 11 May 2012 23:58:11 -0400
Brett Cannon <[email protected]> • #197
Re: PEP 420 outstanding issues
Fri, 11 May 2012 22:41:10 -0400
PJ Eby <[email protected]> • #196
Re: PEP 420 outstanding issues
Fri, 11 May 2012 20:46:44 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #195
Re: PEP 420 outstanding issues
Sat, 12 May 2012 10:14:33 +1000
Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> • #194
Re: PEP 420 outstanding issues
Fri, 11 May 2012 16:11:24 -0400
PJ Eby <[email protected]> • #193
Re: Dynamic path calculation in PEP 420
Fri, 11 May 2012 15:20:37 -0400
PJ Eby <[email protected]> • #192
PEP 420 outstanding issues
Fri, 11 May 2012 14:20:18 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #191
Re: Dynamic path calculation in PEP 420
Fri, 11 May 2012 12:58:45 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #190
Re: PEP 420 issue: extend_path
Fri, 11 May 2012 12:48:07 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #189
Re: Dynamic path calculation in PEP 420
Fri, 11 May 2012 12:19:03 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #188
Re: Dynamic path calculation in PEP 420
Fri, 11 May 2012 08:58:19 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #187
Dynamic path calculation in PEP 420
Fri, 11 May 2012 08:54:41 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #186
Re: PEP 420 issue: extend_path
Fri, 11 May 2012 04:38:15 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #185
Re: PEP 420 issue: extend_path
Fri, 11 May 2012 14:50:28 +1000
Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> • #184
Re: PEP 420 issue: extend_path
Thu, 10 May 2012 23:13:43 -0400
Brett Cannon <[email protected]> • #183
Re: PEP 420 issue: extend_path
Thu, 10 May 2012 20:44:00 -0600
Eric Snow <[email protected]> • #182
Re: PEP 420 issue: extend_path
Fri, 11 May 2012 11:56:40 +1000
Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> • #181
Re: PEP 420 issue: extend_path
Thu, 10 May 2012 21:02:10 -0400
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]> • #180
Re: PEP 420 issue: extend_path
Fri, 11 May 2012 10:48:55 +1000
Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> • #179
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.