gmane.comp.python.mime.devel archive

402 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 5). Latest articles →

email6 and Python 3.3
Mon, 28 Feb 2011 15:11:33 -0500
"R. David Murray" <[email protected]> • #1344
Re: email breakage in 3.2 alpha
Tue, 09 Nov 2010 13:03:12 -0000
[email protected] • #1343
Re: email breakage in 3.2 alpha
Mon, 08 Nov 2010 15:35:32 -0500
"R. David Murray" <[email protected]> • #1342
Re: email breakage in 3.2 alpha
Thu, 04 Nov 2010 12:56:34 -0000
[email protected] • #1341
Making emil5 more functional
Wed, 22 Sep 2010 21:12:38 -0400
"R. David Murray" <[email protected]> • #1340
Re: Question about Multi-part message
Wed, 7 Jul 2010 21:52:17 -0400
Joe Hughes <[email protected]> • #1339
Re: Question about Multi-part message
Wed, 07 Jul 2010 17:33:25 -0700
Mark Sapiro <[email protected]> • #1338
Question about Multi-part message
Wed, 7 Jul 2010 16:53:54 -0400
Joe Hughes <[email protected]> • #1337
Re: [Python-Dev] email package status in 3.X
Sat, 19 Jun 2010 12:07:43 -0400
"P.J. Eby" <[email protected]> • #1336
Re: [Python-Dev] email package status in 3.X
Sat, 19 Jun 2010 22:55:29 +0900
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[email protected]> • #1335
Re: email package status in 3.X
Sat, 19 Jun 2010 08:31:40 +1000
Neil Hodgson <[email protected]> • #1334
Re: email package status in 3.X
Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:02:09 -0400
Jesse Noller <[email protected]> • #1333
Re: email package status in 3.X
Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:48:21 -0400
"P.J. Eby" <[email protected]> • #1332
Re: [Python-Dev] email package status in 3.X
Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:22:10 -0000
[email protected] • #1331
Re: email package status in 3.X
Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:31:09 +0100
Michael Foord <[email protected]> • #1330
Re: [Python-Dev] email package status in 3.X
Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:09:40 -0000
[email protected] • #1329
Re: [Email-SIG] email package status in 3.X
Fri, 18 Jun 2010 09:45:57 -0400
Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> • #1328
Re: [Python-Dev] email package status in 3.X
Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:52:17 +0900
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[email protected]> • #1327
Re: email package status in 3.X
Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:16:47 -0400
Arc Riley <[email protected]> • #1326
Re: email package status in 3.X
Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:32:51 +0900
Steve Holden <[email protected]> • #1325
Re: email package status in 3.X
Thu, 17 Jun 2010 12:24:54 -0700
Brett Cannon <[email protected]> • #1324
Re: [Python-Dev] email package status in 3.X
Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:43:29 -0400
Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> • #1323
Re: email package status in 3.X
Thu, 17 Jun 2010 07:47:27 +1000
Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> • #1322
Re: email package status in 3.X
Wed, 16 Jun 2010 20:48:49 -0000
[email protected] • #1321
Re: email package status in 3.X
Sun, 13 Jun 2010 15:30:06 -0000
[email protected] • #1320
Re: email package status in 3.X
Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:52:32 -0000
[email protected] • #1319
Re: email package status in 3.X
Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:35:07 -0400
"R. David Murray" <[email protected]> • #1318
Re: email package status in 3.X
Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:42:14 -0400
Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> • #1317
Re: email package status in 3.X
Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:18:48 -0400
"R. David Murray" <[email protected]> • #1316
Re: email package status in 3.X
Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:21:52 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
[email protected] • #1315
email package status in 3.X
Fri, 04 Jun 2010 12:39:50 -0400
"R. David Murray" <[email protected]> • #1314
Fw: mime stuff :)
Wed, 12 May 2010 16:42:12 +0200
Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> • #1313
Re: email package status in 3.X?
Mon, 10 May 2010 14:51:46 -0500 (CDT)
Matthew Dixon Cowles <[email protected]> • #1312
Re: email package status in 3.X?
Mon, 10 May 2010 15:21:42 -0400
"R. David Murray" <[email protected]> • #1311
Re: email package status in 3.X?
Mon, 10 May 2010 14:02:46 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] • #1310
Re: email package status in 3.X?
Sun, 09 May 2010 17:31:25 -0400
"R. David Murray" <[email protected]> • #1309
email package status in 3.X?
Fri, 7 May 2010 07:15:19 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] • #1308
Re: email6 project funding and GSoC
Tue, 27 Apr 2010 07:57:20 -0400
Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> • #1307
Re: email6 project funding and GSoC
Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:37:51 +0530
Shashwat Anand <[email protected]> • #1306
Re: email6 project funding and GSoC
Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:29:14 +0530
Senthil Kumaran <[email protected]> • #1305
Re: email6 project funding and GSoC
Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:18:39 +0530
Shashwat Anand <[email protected]> • #1304
Re: email6 project funding and GSoC
Sat, 10 Apr 2010 16:56:10 -0400
Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> • #1303
Re: email6 project funding and GSoC
Sun, 11 Apr 2010 01:36:03 +0530
Shashwat Anand <[email protected]> • #1302
email6 project funding and GSoC
Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:48:59 -0400
"R. David Murray" <[email protected]> • #1301
Fw: MIME objects
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:21:48 -0500
Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> • #1300
Re: More API thoughts (policy objects)
Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:16:54 -0500
"R. David Murray" <[email protected]> • #1299
Re: More API thoughts (policy objects)
Mon, 8 Mar 2010 22:07:48 -0500
Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> • #1298
More API thoughts (policy objects)
Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:27:41 -0500
"R. David Murray" <[email protected]> • #1297
Re: Thoughts on the general API, and the Header API.
Sun, 21 Feb 2010 23:47:54 -0500
"R. David Murray" <[email protected]> • #1296
Re: Thoughts on the general API, and the Header API.
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 00:50:38 -0500
"R. David Murray" <[email protected]> • #1295
Re: Thoughts on the general API, and the Header API.
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:34:26 -0800
Glenn Linderman <[email protected]> • #1294
Re: Thoughts on the general API, and the Header API.
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:23:52 -0500
Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> • #1293
Re: memory counsumption
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:26:08 -0800
Mark Sapiro <[email protected]> • #1292
memory counsumption
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:12:52 +0200
Vitaliyi <[email protected]> • #1291
DJANGO 111  manage.py syncdb   (no module named mime)
Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:14:47 +0100 (CET)
Chr GAILLARD <[email protected]> • #1290
DJANGO 111 manage.py syncdb (no module named mime)
Sat, 6 Feb 2010 17:37:14 +0100 (CET)
Chr GAILLARD <[email protected]> • #1289
Re: Thoughts on the general API, and the Header API.
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:05:33 -0500
"R. David Murray" <[email protected]> • #1288
Re: Thoughts on the general API, and the Header API.
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 11:06:34 -0800
Glenn Linderman <[email protected]> • #1287
Re: Thoughts on the general API, and the Header API.
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:20:24 -0800
Glenn Linderman <[email protected]> • #1286
Re: Thoughts on the general API, and the Header API.
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:10:01 -0800
Glenn Linderman <[email protected]> • #1285
Re: Thoughts on the general API, and the Header API.
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:10:47 -0800
Glenn Linderman <[email protected]> • #1284
Re: Thoughts on the general API, and the Header API.
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:51:46 -0500
"R. David Murray" <[email protected]> • #1283
Re: Thoughts on the general API, and the Header API.
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:55:15 -0800
Glenn Linderman <[email protected]> • #1282
Thoughts on the general API, and the Header API.
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:10:34 -0500
"R. David Murray" <[email protected]> • #1281
Re: Kick starting email 6.0 development
Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:35:29 -0500
Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> • #1280
Re: Kick starting email 6.0 development
Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:14:11 -0500
"R. David Murray" <[email protected]> • #1279
Re: Kick starting email 6.0 development
Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:10:12 -0500
Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> • #1278
Re: Kick starting email 6.0 development
Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:04:33 -0500
"R. David Murray" <[email protected]> • #1277
Re: Kick starting email 6.0 development
Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:45:59 -0500
Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> • #1276
Re: Kick starting email 6.0 development
Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:36:59 -0500
"R. David Murray" <[email protected]> • #1275
Re: Kick starting email 6.0 development
Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:30:15 -0500
Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> • #1274
Re: Kick starting email 6.0 development
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:45:25 -0500
"R. David Murray" <[email protected]> • #1273
Re: Kick starting email 6.0 development
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 07:02:26 +0530
Senthil Kumaran <[email protected]> • #1272
Re: Kick starting email 6.0 development
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:24:20 -0500
Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> • #1271
Kick starting email 6.0 development
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:44:51 -0500
"R. David Murray" <[email protected]> • #1270
Re: smtp question
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:54:39 +0100
Stef Mientki <[email protected]> • #1269
Re: smtp question
Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:54:36 +0100
Adrian von Bidder <[email protected]> • #1268
Re: smtp question
Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:55:07 -0800
Mark Sapiro <[email protected]> • #1267
Re: smtp question
Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:22:08 -0600 (CST)
Matthew Dixon Cowles <[email protected]> • #1266
smtp question
Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:54:58 -0500
"Sypniewski, Bernard Paul" <[email protected]> • #1265
Re: Design Thoughts Summary
Mon, 4 Jan 2010 09:45:43 PST
Bill Janssen <[email protected]> • #1264
Re: Design Thoughts Summary
Mon, 4 Jan 2010 09:57:55 -0500
Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> • #1263
Re: Design Thoughts Summary
Sun, 03 Jan 2010 21:25:56 -0500
"Eric S. Johansson" <[email protected]> • #1262
Re: Design Thoughts Summary
Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:01:21 -0600
Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> • #1261
Re: Design Thoughts Summary
Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:12:36 -0600 (CST)
Matthew Dixon Cowles <[email protected]> • #1260
Design Thoughts Summary
Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:01:49 -0500 (EST)
"R. David Murray" <[email protected]> • #1259
Re: RFC list page added to wiki
Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:07:21 -0500
Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> • #1258
RFC list page added to wiki
Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:17:45 -0500 (EST)
"R. David Murray" <[email protected]> • #1257
Re: invertability and idempotence
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:09:43 +0900
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[email protected]> • #1256
Re: invertability and idempotence
Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:36:12 -0400
Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> • #1255
Re: invertability and idempotence
Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:42:43 +1100
Andrew McNamara <[email protected]> • #1254
Re: invertability and idempotence
Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:00:13 +0900
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[email protected]> • #1253
Re: invertability and idempotence
Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:58:24 +1100
Andrew McNamara <[email protected]> • #1252
invertability and idempotence
Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:58:42 -0400 (EDT)
"R. David Murray" <[email protected]> • #1251
Re: fixing the current email module
Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:05:10 +1100
Andrew McNamara <[email protected]> • #1250
Re: fixing the current email module
Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:50:26 +1100
Andrew McNamara <[email protected]> • #1249
Re: fixing the current email module
Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:39:06 +1100
Andrew McNamara <[email protected]> • #1248
Re: fixing the current email module
Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:07:00 +0900
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[email protected]> • #1247
Re: fixing the current email module
Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:54:17 -0400
Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> • #1246
Re: fixing the current email module
Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:47:31 -0400
Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> • #1245
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.