gmane.comp.tex.metapost archive

378 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Beginners question
Tue, 12 Sep 2023 17:18:03 +0200
[email protected] • #3052
Re: Beginners question
Tue, 12 Sep 2023 16:00:04 +0200
Taco Hoekwater <[email protected]> • #3051
Re: Beginners question
Tue, 12 Sep 2023 15:49:48 +0200 (CEST)
Aditya Mahajan <[email protected]> • #3050
Re: Beginners question
Tue, 12 Sep 2023 15:35:44 +0200
Patrick Gundlach <[email protected]> • #3049
Re: Beginners question
Tue, 12 Sep 2023 15:27:21 +0200
[email protected] • #3048
Re: Beginners question
Tue, 12 Sep 2023 15:25:39 +0200
[email protected] • #3047
Re: Beginners question
Tue, 12 Sep 2023 15:24:30 +0200
[email protected] • #3046
Beginners question
Tue, 12 Sep 2023 11:08:38 +0200
Patrick Gundlach <[email protected]> • #3045
Re: jobname in luamplib
Sat, 5 Aug 2023 09:51:30 +0900
Dohyun Kim <[email protected]> • #3044
jobname in luamplib
Fri, 4 Aug 2023 11:02:56 +0100
Toby Thurston <[email protected]> • #3043
Re: Including graphics in MP
Thu, 18 May 2023 15:57:01 +0200
[email protected] • #3042
Re: Including graphics in MP
Thu, 18 May 2023 13:41:36 +0000
ALFREDO DE JESUS NAVARRO ROBLES <[email protected]> • #3041
Including graphics in MP
Thu, 18 May 2023 10:31:24 +0200
[email protected] • #3040
Re: mpsproof fails in TeXLive 2023.
Mon, 10 Apr 2023 11:11:22 +0200
luigi scarso <[email protected]> • #3039
Re: mpsproof fails in TeXLive 2023.
Sun, 9 Apr 2023 15:34:48 -0600
Karl Berry <[email protected]> • #3038
Re: input command
Sun, 9 Apr 2023 11:16:44 +0200
Ernst Reissner <[email protected]> • #3037
Re: input command
Sat, 8 Apr 2023 18:43:06 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] • #3036
mpsproof fails in TeXLive 2023.
Sat, 8 Apr 2023 22:15:50 +0000
"Daniel H. Luecking" <[email protected]> • #3035
Re: input command
Sat, 8 Apr 2023 23:08:53 +0100
Toby Thurston <[email protected]> • #3034
Re: input command
Sat, 8 Apr 2023 23:07:24 +0100
Toby Thurston <[email protected]> • #3033
Re: input command
Sat, 8 Apr 2023 14:48:51 +0200
luigi scarso <[email protected]> • #3032
Re: input command
Sat, 8 Apr 2023 08:15:04 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] • #3031
Re: input command
Sat, 8 Apr 2023 13:30:47 +0200
luigi scarso <[email protected]> • #3030
Re: input command
Fri, 7 Apr 2023 19:44:47 +0100
peter wilson <[email protected]> • #3029
input command
Fri, 7 Apr 2023 15:43:11 +0200
Ernst Reissner <[email protected]> • #3028
Re: Can luamplib inherit the -recorder option from luatex?
Tue, 4 Apr 2023 18:07:05 +0900
Dohyun Kim <[email protected]> • #3027
Can luamplib inherit the -recorder option from luatex?
Mon, 3 Apr 2023 19:53:43 +0100
Toby Thurston <[email protected]> • #3026
Website dedicated to MetaPost (GUTenberg French TeX User Group)
Fri, 10 Feb 2023 21:41:21 +0100
Maxime Chupin <[email protected]> • #3025
Re: memory leak in decimal/binary?
Sat, 4 Feb 2023 16:13:38 +0100
luigi scarso <[email protected]> • #3024
memory leak in decimal/binary?
Fri, 3 Feb 2023 21:00:46 +0100
Martin Budaj <[email protected]> • #3023
Re: Clipped svg output
Fri, 20 Jan 2023 15:43:30 +0100
luigi scarso <[email protected]> • #3022
Re: Clipped svg output
Fri, 20 Jan 2023 10:18:54 +0100
Lutz Haseloff <[email protected]> • #3021
Re: Clipped svg output
Fri, 20 Jan 2023 09:56:26 +0100
luigi scarso <[email protected]> • #3020
Re: Clipped svg output
Fri, 20 Jan 2023 09:49:40 +0100
Lutz Haseloff <[email protected]> • #3019
Re: Clipped svg output
Thu, 19 Jan 2023 09:15:32 +0100
luigi scarso <[email protected]> • #3018
Re: Clipped svg output
Wed, 18 Jan 2023 13:04:25 +0100
luigi scarso <[email protected]> • #3017
Re: Clipped svg output
Wed, 18 Jan 2023 12:53:21 +0100
Lutz Haseloff <[email protected]> • #3016
Re: Clipped svg output
Sun, 15 Jan 2023 20:20:17 +0100
Lutz Haseloff <[email protected]> • #3015
Re: Clipped svg output
Sun, 15 Jan 2023 15:01:16 +0100
luigi scarso <[email protected]> • #3014
Clipped svg output
Mon, 09 Jan 2023 16:30:56 +0100
Lutz Haseloff <[email protected]> • #3013
Re: Problem with clip and svg output
Fri, 4 Nov 2022 18:07:10 +0100
Pétiard François <[email protected]> • #3012
Re: Problem with clip and svg output
Fri, 4 Nov 2022 18:04:58 +0100
luigi scarso <[email protected]> • #3011
Re: Problem with clip and svg output
Fri, 4 Nov 2022 17:16:56 +0100
luigi scarso <[email protected]> • #3010
Re: Problem with clip and svg output
Fri, 4 Nov 2022 16:55:52 +0100
Pétiard François <[email protected]> • #3009
Re: Problem with clip and svg output
Fri, 4 Nov 2022 15:49:24 +0100
luigi scarso <[email protected]> • #3008
Problem with clip and svg output
Fri, 4 Nov 2022 15:30:52 +0100
Pétiard François <[email protected]> • #3007
Re: Graph v New number systems
Fri, 4 Nov 2022 10:09:49 +0100
luigi scarso <[email protected]> • #3006
Re: Graph v New number systems
Fri, 4 Nov 2022 10:04:34 +0100
Hans Hagen <[email protected]> • #3005
Re: Graph v New number systems
Fri, 4 Nov 2022 08:25:04 +0000
Toby Thurston <[email protected]> • #3004
Re: Graph v New number systems
Fri, 4 Nov 2022 07:39:54 +0100
luigi scarso <[email protected]> • #3003
Re: Graph v New number systems
Thu, 3 Nov 2022 21:04:33 -0400
John Kitzmiller <[email protected]> • #3002
Re: Graph v New number systems
Wed, 2 Nov 2022 20:01:04 +0100
luigi scarso <[email protected]> • #3001
Graph v New number systems
Wed, 2 Nov 2022 17:37:52 +0000
Toby Thurston <[email protected]> • #3000
Re: Bug? uncaught overflow with "length"
Tue, 24 May 2022 15:17:34 +0200
Hans Hagen <[email protected]> • #2999
Bug? uncaught overflow with "length"
Tue, 24 May 2022 13:39:33 +0100
Toby Thurston <[email protected]> • #2998
Re: Glyph and display and 3D fonts
Sun, 24 Apr 2022 22:51:49 +0200
Laurence Finston <[email protected]> • #2997
Re: Glyph and display and 3D fonts
Sun, 24 Apr 2022 08:25:56 +0200
Laurence Finston <[email protected]> • #2996
Glyph and display and 3D fonts
Sun, 24 Apr 2022 07:36:58 +0200
Laurence Finston <[email protected]> • #2995
Problem with glyph command
Fri, 15 Apr 2022 20:09:24 +0200
Laurence Finston <[email protected]> • #2994
Re: Possible bug with boxit
Mon, 28 Feb 2022 18:56:39 +0100
Laurence Finston <[email protected]> • #2993
Re: Possible bug with boxit
Mon, 28 Feb 2022 16:45:46 +0000
"Daniel H. Luecking" <[email protected]> • #2992
Re: Possible bug with boxit
Mon, 28 Feb 2022 11:54:35 +0100
luigi scarso <[email protected]> • #2991
Possible bug with boxit
Tue, 22 Feb 2022 23:41:59 +0100
Laurence Finston <[email protected]> • #2990
Re: Problem with showing paths
Fri, 21 Jan 2022 12:13:31 +0100
Laurence Finston <[email protected]> • #2989
Re: Problem with showing paths
Fri, 21 Jan 2022 11:57:49 +0100
luigi scarso <[email protected]> • #2988
Re: Problem with showing paths
Fri, 21 Jan 2022 11:21:19 +0100
Laurence Finston <[email protected]> • #2987
Re: Problem with showing paths
Fri, 21 Jan 2022 11:18:23 +0100
Laurence Finston <[email protected]> • #2986
Re: Problem with showing paths
Fri, 21 Jan 2022 11:15:52 +0100
luigi scarso <[email protected]> • #2985
Re: Problem with showing paths
Fri, 21 Jan 2022 11:02:46 +0100
Laurence Finston <[email protected]> • #2984
Re: Problem with showing paths
Fri, 21 Jan 2022 08:52:18 +0000 (UTC)
Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> • #2983
Re: Problem with showing paths
Fri, 21 Jan 2022 09:20:33 +0100
luigi scarso <[email protected]> • #2982
Re: Problem with showing paths
Fri, 21 Jan 2022 09:07:56 +0100
Laurence Finston <[email protected]> • #2981
Problem with showing paths
Fri, 21 Jan 2022 08:42:53 +0100
Laurence Finston <[email protected]> • #2980
Re: METAFONT: Calligraphic font
Fri, 14 Jan 2022 12:19:53 +0100
luigi scarso <[email protected]> • #2979
METAFONT: Calligraphic font
Fri, 14 Jan 2022 12:17:15 +0100
Laurence Finston <[email protected]> • #2978
Re: Feature request: Addition to functionality of `glyph' primitive
Tue, 11 Jan 2022 19:49:39 +0100
luigi scarso <[email protected]> • #2977
Feature request: Addition to functionality of `glyph' primitive
Tue, 11 Jan 2022 19:45:04 +0100
Laurence Finston <[email protected]> • #2976
Re: Original Euler sources
Mon, 3 Jan 2022 10:31:33 +0100
Laurence Finston <[email protected]> • #2975
Re: Original Euler sources
Sun, 2 Jan 2022 14:21:54 -0700
Karl Berry <[email protected]> • #2974
Re: Bug with in-box test alignment
Fri, 31 Dec 2021 20:19:54 +0100
luigi scarso <[email protected]> • #2973
Re: Bug with in-box test alignment
Fri, 31 Dec 2021 10:55:11 -0800
Sebastiano Vigna <[email protected]> • #2972
Re: Bug with in-box test alignment
Fri, 31 Dec 2021 10:50:22 -0800
Sebastiano Vigna <[email protected]> • #2971
Re: Bug with in-box test alignment
Fri, 31 Dec 2021 10:32:46 -0800
Sebastiano Vigna <[email protected]> • #2970
Re: Bug with in-box test alignment
Fri, 31 Dec 2021 19:09:18 +0100
luigi scarso <[email protected]> • #2969
Re: Bug with in-box test alignment
Fri, 31 Dec 2021 09:51:27 -0800
Sebastiano Vigna <[email protected]> • #2968
Re: Bug with in-box test alignment
Thu, 30 Dec 2021 10:02:57 +0100
luigi scarso <[email protected]> • #2967
Re: Bug with in-box test alignment
Wed, 29 Dec 2021 20:14:22 +0100
Pétiard François <[email protected]> • #2966
Re: Bug with in-box test alignment
Wed, 29 Dec 2021 10:54:40 -0800
Sebastiano Vigna <[email protected]> • #2965
Re: Bug with in-box test alignment
Wed, 29 Dec 2021 19:22:48 +0100
Pétiard François <[email protected]> • #2964
Bug with in-box test alignment
Wed, 29 Dec 2021 07:42:46 -0800
Sebastiano Vigna <[email protected]> • #2963
Re: Bug?
Thu, 23 Dec 2021 20:08:04 +0100
Pétiard François <[email protected]> • #2962
Re: Bug?
Thu, 23 Dec 2021 19:37:11 +0100
luigi scarso <[email protected]> • #2961
Re: Bug?
Thu, 23 Dec 2021 19:17:22 +0100
Pétiard François <[email protected]> • #2960
Re: Bug?
Thu, 23 Dec 2021 15:39:25 +0100
luigi scarso <[email protected]> • #2959
Re: Bug?
Thu, 23 Dec 2021 14:56:22 +0100
luigi scarso <[email protected]> • #2958
Re: Bug?
Thu, 23 Dec 2021 12:22:54 +0100
luigi scarso <[email protected]> • #2957
Re: Bug?
Thu, 23 Dec 2021 11:40:00 +0100
Pétiard François <[email protected]> • #2956
Re: Bug?
Thu, 23 Dec 2021 11:33:23 +0100
luigi scarso <[email protected]> • #2955
Re: Bug?
Thu, 23 Dec 2021 11:18:59 +0100
Pétiard François <[email protected]> • #2954
Re: Bug?
Thu, 23 Dec 2021 11:17:02 +0100
luigi scarso <[email protected]> • #2953
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.