gmane.comp.voip.ser archive

980 archived articles, newest first (page 5 of 10). Latest articles →

Re: Intermittent TLS inbound failure behind HAProxy, Kamailio opens new TCP to HAProxy ephemeral port and gets RST
Mon, 23 Feb 2026 16:14:07 -0000
Joey via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92122
Re: db_text module and deb packages
Mon, 23 Feb 2026 13:55:53 +0000
Henning Westerholt via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92121
Re: db_text module and deb packages
Mon, 23 Feb 2026 14:26:12 +0100
Ihor Olkhovskyi via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92120
Re: Mobile App Development Company in USA
Mon, 23 Feb 2026 11:20:22 -0000
alexs--- via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92119
db_text module and deb packages
Mon, 23 Feb 2026 11:07:43 +0100
Federico Cabiddu via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92118
Re: Multiple double record routes in one BYE message
Fri, 20 Feb 2026 15:06:32 +0000
Henning Westerholt via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92117
Re: Multiple double record routes in one BYE message
Fri, 20 Feb 2026 14:35:30 +0000
James Browne via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92116
Re: Multiple double record routes in one BYE message
Fri, 20 Feb 2026 13:21:38 +0000
Ibe Van de Veire via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92115
Re: Multiple double record routes in one BYE message
Thu, 19 Feb 2026 17:33:45 +0000
Henning Westerholt via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92114
Multiple double record routes in one BYE message
Thu, 19 Feb 2026 15:44:04 +0000
Ibe Van de Veire via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92113
Mobile App Development Company in USA
Thu, 19 Feb 2026 11:35:44 -0000
"michael.july82--- via sr-users" <[email protected]> • #92112
Re: Is AI the Future of Construction or Just Another Tech Trend?
Thu, 19 Feb 2026 09:51:30 -0000
alexs--- via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92111
Is AI the Future of Construction or Just Another Tech Trend?
Thu, 19 Feb 2026 09:49:26 -0000
alexs--- via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92110
Re: sdp_remove_media() always uses the original message, right?
Thu, 19 Feb 2026 08:12:40 +0000
Henning Westerholt via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92109
Re: sdp_remove_media() always uses the original message, right?
Thu, 19 Feb 2026 08:42:50 +0100
Benoit Panizzon via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92108
Re: Intermittent TLS inbound failure behind HAProxy, Kamailio opens new TCP to HAProxy ephemeral port and gets RST
Thu, 19 Feb 2026 06:59:59 -0000
Joey via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92107
Re: UDP buffer increase
Wed, 18 Feb 2026 23:09:27 +0000
arinjay Garg via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92106
Re: [Kamailio-Business] Kamailio v6.1.0 Released - new major version is out
Wed, 18 Feb 2026 19:05:58 +0100
Daniel-Constantin Mierla via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92105
Re: [Kamailio-Business] Kamailio v6.1.0 Released - new major version is out
Wed, 18 Feb 2026 16:49:38 +0000
Henning Westerholt via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92104
Re: Database connections
Wed, 18 Feb 2026 11:48:04 -0000
technovisers--- via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92103
Kamailio v6.1.0 Released - new major version is out
Wed, 18 Feb 2026 11:44:23 +0100
Daniel-Constantin Mierla via sr-dev <[email protected]> • #92102
Re: sdp_remove_media() always uses the original message, right?
Wed, 18 Feb 2026 11:03:44 +0100
Ihor Olkhovskyi via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92101
Re: Planing the release of Kamailio v6.1.0
Wed, 18 Feb 2026 08:51:14 +0100
Daniel-Constantin Mierla via sr-dev <[email protected]> • #92100
Re: UDP buffer increase
Wed, 18 Feb 2026 07:20:24 +0000
Henning Westerholt via sr-dev <[email protected]> • #92099
Re: Intermittent TLS inbound failure behind HAProxy, Kamailio opens new TCP to HAProxy ephemeral port and gets RST
Tue, 17 Feb 2026 17:58:29 -0000
Joey via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92098
Re: Intermittent TLS inbound failure behind HAProxy, Kamailio opens new TCP to HAProxy ephemeral port and gets RST
Tue, 17 Feb 2026 15:57:05 +0100
Daniel-Constantin Mierla via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92097
Re: Intermittent TLS inbound failure behind HAProxy, Kamailio opens new TCP to HAProxy ephemeral port and gets RST
Tue, 17 Feb 2026 13:42:34 -0000
Joey via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92096
Re: Planing the release of Kamailio v6.1.0
Tue, 17 Feb 2026 09:36:48 +0100
Daniel-Constantin Mierla via sr-dev <[email protected]> • #92095
Re: Info: Kamailio World 2026 - Call for presentations
Mon, 16 Feb 2026 19:38:46 +0100
Daniel-Constantin Mierla via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92094
Re: Build intersection of two comma separated lists?
Mon, 16 Feb 2026 18:32:15 +0100
Sergio Charrua via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92093
sdp_remove_media() always uses the original message, right?
Mon, 16 Feb 2026 15:48:59 +0100
Benoit Panizzon via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92092
Is it possible to use a variable as dlg_var key?
Mon, 16 Feb 2026 15:12:19 +0100
Benoit Panizzon via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92091
Re: Build intersection of two comma separated lists?
Mon, 16 Feb 2026 14:39:11 +0100
Benoit Panizzon via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92090
Re: SDPOPS - valid codec names?
Mon, 16 Feb 2026 13:26:35 +0000
Henning Westerholt via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92089
Build intersection of two comma separated lists?
Mon, 16 Feb 2026 13:40:13 +0100
Benoit Panizzon via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92088
SDPOPS - valid codec names?
Mon, 16 Feb 2026 13:23:57 +0100
Benoit Panizzon via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92087
Re: Intermittent TLS inbound failure behind HAProxy, Kamailio opens new TCP to HAProxy ephemeral port and gets RST
Mon, 16 Feb 2026 12:20:05 -0000
Joey via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92086
Re: Database connections
Fri, 13 Feb 2026 08:12:18 +0000
Martin Nyström via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92085
Re: Database connections
Fri, 13 Feb 2026 08:59:04 +0100
Daniel-Constantin Mierla via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92084
Re: Intermittent TLS inbound failure behind HAProxy, Kamailio opens new TCP to HAProxy ephemeral port and gets RST
Fri, 13 Feb 2026 07:05:25 -0000
13715209697--- via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92083
Re: Intermittent TLS inbound failure behind HAProxy, Kamailio opens new TCP to HAProxy ephemeral port and gets RST
Fri, 13 Feb 2026 06:52:00 -0000
13715209697--- via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92082
Re: Database connections
Wed, 11 Feb 2026 21:44:58 +0000
Martin Nyström via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92081
Re: Best way to descrypt/inspect SIP TLSv1.3 traffic
Thu, 12 Feb 2026 11:17:13 -0800
"Calvin E. via sr-users" <[email protected]> • #92080
Intermittent TLS inbound failure behind HAProxy, Kamailio opens new TCP to HAProxy ephemeral port and gets RST
Thu, 12 Feb 2026 19:17:25 -0000
Joey via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92079
Re: Database connections
Wed, 11 Feb 2026 22:59:41 +0100
Denys Pozniak via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92078
Re: Database connections
Wed, 11 Feb 2026 22:39:36 +0100
Denys Pozniak via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92077
Re: Best way to descrypt/inspect SIP TLSv1.3 traffic
Wed, 11 Feb 2026 14:12:41 -0300
Benedito Marques via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92076
Database connections
Wed, 11 Feb 2026 14:54:54 +0000
Martin Nyström via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92075
Re: Best way to descrypt/inspect SIP TLSv1.3 traffic
Wed, 11 Feb 2026 07:26:33 +0200
Sergey Safarov via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92074
Re: Best way to descrypt/inspect SIP TLSv1.3 traffic
Tue, 10 Feb 2026 13:26:07 -0500
Ovidiu Sas via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92073
Re: Best way to descrypt/inspect SIP TLSv1.3 traffic
Tue, 10 Feb 2026 14:30:15 -0300
Benedito Marques via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92072
Re: Best way to descrypt/inspect SIP TLSv1.3 traffic
Tue, 10 Feb 2026 17:51:38 +0100
Daniel-Constantin Mierla via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92071
Best way to descrypt/inspect SIP TLSv1.3 traffic
Tue, 10 Feb 2026 09:56:53 -0300
Benedito Marques via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92070
Re: [EXT] Possible bug introduced in 5.8.5
Mon, 9 Feb 2026 10:29:07 +0000
Henning Westerholt via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92069
Re: [EXT] Possible bug introduced in 5.8.5
Mon, 9 Feb 2026 10:01:09 +0000
Andreas Heil via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92068
Re: [EXT] Possible bug introduced in 5.8.5
Mon, 9 Feb 2026 10:46:32 +0100
Ihor Olkhovskyi via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92067
Re: [EXT] Possible bug introduced in 5.8.5
Fri, 6 Feb 2026 16:49:05 +0000
Henning Westerholt via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92066
Re: [EXT] Possible bug introduced in 5.8.5
Fri, 6 Feb 2026 08:13:03 +0000
Andreas Heil via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92065
Re: Question about iFC support for SIP response-code based voicemail forwarding
Thu, 5 Feb 2026 17:29:10 +0800
高秉寬 via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92064
Re: Assistance on WebRTC implementation with Kamilio, RTPengine and FS on a 1:1 NAT Cloud VM
Thu, 5 Feb 2026 12:05:09 +0100
David Villasmil via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92063
Re: [EXT] Possible bug introduced in 5.8.5
Thu, 5 Feb 2026 11:03:36 +0100
Ihor Olkhovskyi via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92062
Re: sip compact headers
Thu, 05 Feb 2026 09:24:32 -0000
13715209697--- via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92061
Re: [EXT] Possible bug introduced in 5.8.5
Thu, 5 Feb 2026 09:21:43 +0000
Andreas Heil via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92060
Re: sip compact headers
Thu, 5 Feb 2026 10:13:03 +0100
Sergio Charrua via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92059
Re: [EXT] Possible bug introduced in 5.8.5
Thu, 5 Feb 2026 09:59:52 +0100
Ihor Olkhovskyi via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92058
Re: sip compact headers
Thu, 05 Feb 2026 08:52:47 -0000
13715209697--- via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92057
Re: [EXT] Possible bug introduced in 5.8.5
Thu, 5 Feb 2026 08:26:33 +0000
Andreas Heil via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92056
Re: sip compact headers
Wed, 4 Feb 2026 23:22:16 -0800
Alex Balashov via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92055
sip compact headers
Thu, 05 Feb 2026 06:46:33 -0000
13715209697--- via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92054
Re: [EXT] Possible bug introduced in 5.8.5
Wed, 4 Feb 2026 19:56:16 +0000
Henning Westerholt via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92053
Re: [EXT] Possible bug introduced in 5.8.5
Wed, 4 Feb 2026 13:29:58 +0000
Andreas Heil via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92052
Re: [EXT] Possible bug introduced in 5.8.5
Wed, 4 Feb 2026 14:12:18 +0100
Ihor Olkhovskyi via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92051
Re: [EXT] Possible bug introduced in 5.8.5
Wed, 4 Feb 2026 13:58:04 +0100
Daniel-Constantin Mierla via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92050
Re: [EXT] Possible bug introduced in 5.8.5
Wed, 4 Feb 2026 12:21:11 +0000
Andreas Heil via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92049
Re: [EXT] Possible bug introduced in 5.8.5
Wed, 4 Feb 2026 11:20:46 +0000
Andreas Heil via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92048
Re: [EXT] Possible bug introduced in 5.8.5
Wed, 4 Feb 2026 12:05:27 +0100
Ihor Olkhovskyi via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92047
Re: [EXT] Possible bug introduced in 5.8.5
Wed, 4 Feb 2026 10:27:56 +0000
Andreas Heil via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92046
Re: [EXT] Re: Possible bug introduced in 5.8.5
Wed, 4 Feb 2026 11:13:04 +0100
Ihor Olkhovskyi via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92045
Re: [EXT] Re: Possible bug introduced in 5.8.5
Wed, 4 Feb 2026 09:42:30 +0000
Andreas Heil via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92044
Planing the release of Kamailio v6.1.0
Wed, 4 Feb 2026 08:48:20 +0100
Daniel-Constantin Mierla via sr-dev <[email protected]> • #92043
Re: Assistance on WebRTC implementation with Kamilio, RTPengine and FS on a 1:1 NAT Cloud VM
Tue, 03 Feb 2026 21:00:15 -0000
Goons via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92042
Re: Assistance on WebRTC implementation with Kamilio, RTPengine and FS on a 1:1 NAT Cloud VM
Tue, 03 Feb 2026 20:45:28 -0000
Goons via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92041
Re: Assistance on WebRTC implementation with Kamilio, RTPengine and FS on a 1:1 NAT Cloud VM
Tue, 3 Feb 2026 21:15:23 +0100
David Villasmil via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92040
Re: Assistance on WebRTC implementation with Kamilio, RTPengine and FS on a 1:1 NAT Cloud VM
Tue, 03 Feb 2026 18:20:58 -0000
Goons via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92039
Re: Assistance on WebRTC implementation with Kamilio, RTPengine and FS on a 1:1 NAT Cloud VM
Tue, 03 Feb 2026 17:27:40 -0000
Goons via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92038
Re: Possible bug introduced in 5.8.5
Tue, 3 Feb 2026 17:55:41 +0100
Daniel-Constantin Mierla via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92037
Re: Possible bug introduced in 5.8.5
Tue, 3 Feb 2026 17:30:16 +0100
Daniel-Constantin Mierla via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92036
Re: Possible bug introduced in 5.8.5
Tue, 3 Feb 2026 17:25:24 +0100
Björn Klasen via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92035
Possible bug introduced in 5.8.5
Tue, 3 Feb 2026 15:26:23 +0000
Andreas Heil via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92034
Re: apt download does not work anymore
Tue, 03 Feb 2026 10:46:00 -0000
Johannes Westhuis via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92033
Re: apt download does not work anymore
Tue, 03 Feb 2026 08:44:24 +0000
Victor Seva via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92032
(no subject)
Mon, 2 Feb 2026 15:27:54 +0100
Gbenga Daramola via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92031
apt download does not work anymore
Tue, 03 Feb 2026 04:53:05 -0000
Johannes Westhuis via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92030
Re: Assistance on WebRTC implementation with Kamilio, RTPengine and FS on a 1:1 NAT Cloud VM
Mon, 2 Feb 2026 17:20:11 +0000
Sergio Charrua via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92029
Re: Assistance on WebRTC implementation with Kamilio, RTPengine and FS on a 1:1 NAT Cloud VM
Mon, 02 Feb 2026 17:01:02 -0000
Goons via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92028
Re: Assistance on WebRTC implementation with Kamilio, RTPengine and FS on a 1:1 NAT Cloud VM
Mon, 2 Feb 2026 17:49:37 +0100
Sergio Charrua via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92027
Assistance on WebRTC implementation with Kamilio, RTPengine and FS on a 1:1 NAT Cloud VM
Mon, 2 Feb 2026 15:32:36 +0100
Gbenga Daramola via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92026
Re: Testing the Kamailio Outbound Module
Mon, 02 Feb 2026 04:15:41 -0000
13715209697--- via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92025
Re: [EXTERNAL] rtpengine: Reduce lock contention during ping timer
Sun, 1 Feb 2026 14:37:11 +0530
Rajneesh Soni via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92024
Re: [EXTERNAL] rtpengine: Reduce lock contention during ping timer
Sun, 1 Feb 2026 08:36:48 +0000
Henning Westerholt via sr-users <[email protected]> • #92023
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.