gmane.comp.web.html.general archive

388 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Inline flow of alt text.
Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:37:21 +0000 (UTC)
Ian Hickson <[email protected]> • #8637
Re: Want to use url to post the data in form.
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:02:03 +0000
David Dorward <[email protected]> • #8636
Want to use url to post the data in form.
Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:08:12 +0800
Hongyi Zhao <[email protected]> • #8635
Re: XHTML MIME Types note
Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:38:53 +0100
"Steven Pemberton" <[email protected]> • #8634
[XMLEvents2] A scripting-only alternative to XBL2
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:23:11 +0100
Giovanni Campagna <[email protected]> • #8633
XHTML MIME Types note
Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:45:30 +0000
David Dorward <[email protected]> • #8632
Sorry
Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:29:33 +0100
Giovanni Campagna <[email protected]> • #8631
Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:26:53 +0100
Giovanni Campagna <[email protected]> • #8630
Re: Fwd: HTML5 and XHTML2 combined (a new approach)
Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:51:58 +0000
Philip Taylor <[email protected]> • #8629
Re: Fwd: HTML5 and XHTML2 combined (a new approach)
Tue, 27 Jan 2009 03:24:03 +0100
Lachlan Hunt <[email protected]> • #8628
Re: Fwd: HTML5 and XHTML2 combined (a new approach)
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:22:25 +0000
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <[email protected]> • #8627
Re: Fwd: HTML5 and XHTML2 combined (a new approach)
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:48:04 +0100
Giovanni Campagna <[email protected]> • #8626
Re: Fwd: HTML5 and XHTML2 combined (a new approach)
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 02:53:24 +0000 (UTC)
Ian Hickson <[email protected]> • #8625
Re: Fwd: HTML5 and XHTML2 combined (a new approach)
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:15:40 +0000
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <[email protected]> • #8624
Re: Fwd: HTML5 and XHTML2 combined (a new approach)
Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:16:06 +0000
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <[email protected]> • #8623
Re: HTML5 and XHTML2 combined (a new approach)
Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:51:24 +0000
David Woolley <[email protected]> • #8622
Re: HTML5 and XHTML2 combined (a new approach)
Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:24:09 +0100
Giovanni Campagna <[email protected]> • #8621
Re: Fwd: HTML5 and XHTML2 combined (a new approach)
Sun, 25 Jan 2009 18:14:20 +0000
David Woolley <[email protected]> • #8620
Re: Fwd: HTML5 and XHTML2 combined (a new approach)
Sun, 25 Jan 2009 18:17:01 +0100
Giovanni Campagna <[email protected]> • #8619
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:11:53 +0100
<[email protected]> • #8618
Re: Fwd: HTML5 and XHTML2 combined (a new approach)
Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:30:07 +0000
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <[email protected]> • #8617
Re: Fwd: HTML5 and XHTML2 combined (a new approach)
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 08:10:01 +0000
David Woolley <[email protected]> • #8616
Re: Fwd: HTML5 and XHTML2 combined (a new approach)
Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:59:32 +0000 (UTC)
Ian Hickson <[email protected]> • #8615
Fwd: HTML5 and XHTML2 combined (a new approach)
Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:48:13 +0100
Giovanni Campagna <[email protected]> • #8614
Re: HTML5 and XHTML2 combined (a new approach)
Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:19:02 +0000 (UTC)
Ian Hickson <[email protected]> • #8613
Re: HTML5 and XHTML2 combined (a new approach)
Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:54:20 +0100
Giovanni Campagna <[email protected]> • #8612
Re: HTML5 and XHTML2 combined (a new approach)
Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:42:40 +0000 (UTC)
Ian Hickson <[email protected]> • #8611
Re: HTML5 and XHTML2 combined (a new approach)
Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:36:13 +0100
Giovanni Campagna <[email protected]> • #8610
Re: HTML5 and XHTML2 combined (a new approach)
Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:14:54 +0000 (UTC)
Ian Hickson <[email protected]> • #8609
Re: HTML5 and XHTML2 combined (a new approach)
Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:00:36 +0000
Mark Birbeck <[email protected]> • #8608
Re: HTML5 and XHTML2 combined (a new approach)
Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:22:15 +0000
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <[email protected]> • #8607
Re: HTML5 and XHTML2 combined (a new approach)
Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:51:55 -0500
Brett Patterson <[email protected]> • #8606
Re: HTML5 and XHTML2 combined (a new approach)
Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:46:32 +0000
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <[email protected]> • #8605
Re: HTML5 and XHTML2 combined (a new approach)
Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:08:44 -0500
Brett Patterson <[email protected]> • #8604
Re: HTML5 and XHTML2 combined (a new approach)
Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:55:11 -0500
Brett Patterson <[email protected]> • #8603
Re: HTML5 and XHTML2 combined (a new approach)
Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:38:24 +0000
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <[email protected]> • #8602
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:04:19 +0000
Pete Otaqui <[email protected]> • #8601
HTML5 and XHTML2 combined (a new approach)
Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:30:22 +0100
Giovanni Campagna <[email protected]> • #8600
Re: [WSG] HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:55:33 -0500
"Aryeh Gregor" <[email protected]> • #8599
Re: [WSG] HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:38:45 -0500
Brett Patterson <[email protected]> • #8598
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:16:20 +0100
Molte <[email protected]> • #8597
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:56:51 +0000
Mark Birbeck <[email protected]> • #8596
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:45:13 +0100
Molte <[email protected]> • #8595
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:28:37 -0500
Brett Patterson <[email protected]> • #8594
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:10:37 +0100
<[email protected]> • #8593
Re: [OFF LIST] HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:14:51 +0000
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <[email protected]> • #8592
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:41:57 +0000
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <[email protected]> • #8591
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:09:31 +0000
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <[email protected]> • #8590
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:17:38 +0000
Philip TAYLOR <[email protected]> • #8589
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Sat, 10 Jan 2009 09:53:21 +0000
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <[email protected]> • #8588
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:40:16 +0100
Molte <[email protected]> • #8587
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:42:48 +0000
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <[email protected]> • #8586
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:50:18 +0000
"Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)" <[email protected]> • #8585
Re: mathml to html markup with UTF
Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:13:18 +0100
Dan Brickley <[email protected]> • #8584
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:51:29 +0000
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <[email protected]> • #8583
mathml to html markup with UTF
Fri, 9 Jan 2009 07:50:39 -0800 (PST)
Paul M <[email protected]> • #8582
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:31:37 +0000
"Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)" <[email protected]> • #8581
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Fri, 09 Jan 2009 12:49:31 +0000
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <[email protected]> • #8580
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:23:43 +0000
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <[email protected]> • #8579
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Thu, 8 Jan 2009 16:47:04 -0600
"Dustin Boyd" <[email protected]> • #8578
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:06:36 +0000
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <[email protected]> • #8577
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:01:25 +0000
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <[email protected]> • #8576
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Wed, 7 Jan 2009 22:13:23 +0000
"Mark Birbeck" <[email protected]> • #8575
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:30:46 +0000
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <[email protected]> • #8574
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:28:45 -0500
"Brett Patterson" <[email protected]> • #8573
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:27:53 +0000
David Woolley <[email protected]> • #8572
Re: [OFF LIST] HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:10:14 +0000
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <[email protected]> • #8571
Re: Re[2]: [OFF LIST] HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:24:09 +0100
Molte <[email protected]> • #8570
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:53:08 -0600
Shane McCarron <[email protected]> • #8569
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Mon, 5 Jan 2009 18:42:32 +0100
Molte <[email protected]> • #8568
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Mon, 5 Jan 2009 17:52:21 +0100
"Peter Krantz" <[email protected]> • #8567
Re[2]: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:33:00 +0500
Shavkat Karimov <[email protected]> • #8566
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Mon, 5 Jan 2009 17:25:35 +0100
Molte <[email protected]> • #8565
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:00:32 -0500
"Jim Jewett" <[email protected]> • #8564
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Mon, 5 Jan 2009 09:25:19 +0000 (UTC)
Ian Hickson <[email protected]> • #8563
Re: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Mon, 05 Jan 2009 09:03:23 +0000
David Woolley <[email protected]> • #8562
HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined
Sat, 3 Jan 2009 22:06:17 +0100
Molte <[email protected]> • #8561
Re: Schemas for XHTMLT Modularization 1.1
Wed, 31 Dec 2008 20:56:57 -0600
Shane McCarron <[email protected]> • #8560
Schemas for XHTMLT Modularization 1.1
Wed, 31 Dec 2008 15:21:22 -0800
"Robert C. Leif" <[email protected]> • #8559
Re: less than normal importance/emphasis
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:41:37 +0000
Info <[email protected]> • #8558
Re: less than normal importance/emphasis
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:34:49 +0100
Leif Halvard Silli <[email protected]> • #8557
Re: less than normal importance/emphasis
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:02:41 +0000 (UTC)
Ian Hickson <[email protected]> • #8556
Re: less than normal importance/emphasis
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:53:01 +0000
"Patrick H. Lauke" <[email protected]> • #8555
Re: less than normal importance/emphasis
Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:51:38 -0500
"Jim Jewett" <[email protected]> • #8554
Re: less than normal importance/emphasis
Wed, 17 Dec 2008 22:50:50 +0000 (UTC)
Ian Hickson <[email protected]> • #8553
Re: less than normal importance/emphasis
Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:47:58 -0500
"Jim Jewett" <[email protected]> • #8552
Re: less than normal importance/emphasis
Wed, 17 Dec 2008 22:34:17 +0000
David Woolley <[email protected]> • #8551
Re: less than normal importance/emphasis
Wed, 17 Dec 2008 22:21:22 +0000 (UTC)
Ian Hickson <[email protected]> • #8550
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.