gmane.comp.web.zope.zodb archive

925 archived articles, newest first (page 10 of 10). Latest articles →

Re: ZEO SSL support and Daft docs
Thu, 23 Jun 2016 10:35:13 -0400
Jim Fulton <[email protected]> • #13275
Re: How can I reduce locking at storage level
Thu, 23 Jun 2016 08:46:27 -0400
Jim Fulton <[email protected]> • #13274
Re: How can I reduce locking at storage level
Thu, 23 Jun 2016 03:53:30 -0700 (PDT)
Sanjay Rao <[email protected]> • #13273
Re: ZEO SSL support and Daft docs
Thu, 23 Jun 2016 05:29:18 +0200
Vincent Pelletier <[email protected]> • #13272
Re: ZEO SSL support and Daft docs
Wed, 22 Jun 2016 17:38:03 -0700
Patrick Strawderman <[email protected]> • #13271
Re: ZEO SSL support and Daft docs
Wed, 22 Jun 2016 22:30:24 +0000
Vincent Pelletier <[email protected]> • #13270
Re: ZEO SSL support and Daft docs
Wed, 22 Jun 2016 17:07:00 -0400
Jim Fulton <[email protected]> • #13269
Re: ZEO SSL support and Daft docs
Wed, 22 Jun 2016 13:43:51 -0700
Patrick Strawderman <[email protected]> • #13268
New API to update _p_changed/_p_serial after a commit (was Re: [dev] Better tpc_finish)
Wed, 22 Jun 2016 18:36:48 +0200
Julien Muchembled <[email protected]> • #13267
ZEO SSL support and Daft docs
Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:02:40 -0400
Jim Fulton <[email protected]> • #13266
Re: Re: asyncio-based ZEO implementation implemented
Tue, 21 Jun 2016 08:32:52 -0400
Jim Fulton <[email protected]> • #13265
Re: asyncio-based ZEO implementation implemented
Tue, 21 Jun 2016 01:10:31 -0700 (PDT)
Christopher Lozinski <[email protected]> • #13264
ZEO 5 does not enable async apps
Mon, 20 Jun 2016 11:06:08 -0400
Jim Fulton <[email protected]> • #13263
Re: Re: asyncio-based ZEO implementation implemented
Mon, 20 Jun 2016 10:31:35 -0400
Jim Fulton <[email protected]> • #13262
Re: [dev] IStorage.lastOID() proposal (was Re: [dev] RFC IMVCCStorage everywhere (Move ZODB's MVCC to storage layer))
Mon, 20 Jun 2016 04:43:33 +0200
Vincent Pelletier <[email protected]> • #13261
Re: asyncio-based ZEO implementation implemented
Sun, 19 Jun 2016 19:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
Christopher Lozinski <[email protected]> • #13260
asyncio-based ZEO implementation implemented
Sun, 19 Jun 2016 15:12:25 -0400
Jim Fulton <[email protected]> • #13259
Re: [dev] Better tpc_finish (was Re: [dev] RFC IMVCCStorage everywhere (Move ZODB's MVCC to storage layer))
Fri, 17 Jun 2016 09:40:21 -0400
Jim Fulton <[email protected]> • #13258
Re: [dev] IStorage.lastOID() proposal (was Re: [dev] RFC IMVCCStorage everywhere (Move ZODB's MVCC to storage layer))
Fri, 17 Jun 2016 07:47:22 -0400
Jim Fulton <[email protected]> • #13257
Re: [dev] Better tpc_finish (was Re: [dev] RFC IMVCCStorage everywhere (Move ZODB's MVCC to storage layer))
Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:31:53 +0200
Julien Muchembled <[email protected]> • #13256
Re: [dev] RFC IMVCCStorage everywhere (Move ZODB's MVCC to storage layer)
Fri, 17 Jun 2016 07:17:42 +0200
Vincent Pelletier <[email protected]> • #13255
Re: [dev] IStorage.lastOID() proposal (was Re: [dev] RFC IMVCCStorage everywhere (Move ZODB's MVCC to storage layer))
Fri, 17 Jun 2016 07:53:07 +0200
Vincent Pelletier <[email protected]> • #13254
Re: [dev] IStorage.lastOID() proposal (was Re: [dev] RFC IMVCCStorage everywhere (Move ZODB's MVCC to storage layer))
Thu, 16 Jun 2016 23:04:55 +0200
Julien Muchembled <[email protected]> • #13253
Re: [dev] Better tpc_finish (was Re: [dev] RFC IMVCCStorage everywhere (Move ZODB's MVCC to storage layer))
Thu, 16 Jun 2016 22:37:03 +0200
Julien Muchembled <[email protected]> • #13252
[dev] Better tpc_finish (was Re: [dev] RFC IMVCCStorage everywhere (Move ZODB's MVCC to storage layer))
Thu, 16 Jun 2016 16:29:48 -0400
Jim Fulton <[email protected]> • #13251
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.