gmane.linux.debian.devel.lsb archive

594 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 6). Latest articles →

Bug#714634: [lsb-discuss] Clarification of general LSB requirements
Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:53:52 +0200
Aaron Sowry <[email protected]> • #996
Bug#714634: [lsb-discuss] Clarification of general LSB requirements
Thu, 11 Jul 2013 08:22:07 +0200
"Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" <[email protected]> • #995
Bug#714634: [lsb-discuss] Clarification of general LSB requirements
Thu, 11 Jul 2013 08:16:25 +0200
"Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" <[email protected]> • #994
Bug#714634: [lsb-discuss] Clarification of general LSB requirements
Wed, 10 Jul 2013 17:27:52 -0700
Russ Allbery <[email protected]> • #993
Bug#714634: [lsb-discuss] Clarification of general LSB requirements
Wed, 10 Jul 2013 17:25:40 -0700
Steve Langasek <[email protected]> • #992
Bug#714634: [lsb-discuss] Clarification of general LSB requirements
Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:08:00 -0700
Russ Allbery <[email protected]> • #991
Bug#714634: [lsb-discuss] Clarification of general LSB requirements
Wed, 10 Jul 2013 11:20:21 -0700
Steve Langasek <[email protected]> • #990
Bug#714634: lsb-core: Remove lsb-invalid-mta as a dependency of lsb-core; require an actual MTA instead
Mon, 08 Jul 2013 15:18:08 +0200
Aaron Sowry <[email protected]> • #989
Bug#714634: lsb-core: Remove lsb-invalid-mta as a dependency of lsb-core; require an actual MTA instead
Mon, 8 Jul 2013 10:46:40 +0200
"Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" <[email protected]> • #988
Bug#714634: lsb-core: Remove lsb-invalid-mta as a dependency of lsb-core; require an actual MTA instead
Mon, 08 Jul 2013 09:38:21 +0200
Aaron Sowry <[email protected]> • #987
Bug#714634: lsb-core: Remove lsb-invalid-mta as a dependency of lsb-core; require an actual MTA instead
Mon, 8 Jul 2013 08:31:51 +0200
"Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" <[email protected]> • #986
Bug#714634: lsb-core: Remove lsb-invalid-mta as a dependency of lsb-core; require an actual MTA instead
Sun, 07 Jul 2013 23:01:59 -0400
Jeff Licquia <[email protected]> • #985
Bug#714634: lsb-core: Remove lsb-invalid-mta as a dependency of lsb-core; require an actual MTA instead
Sun, 07 Jul 2013 10:09:44 +0200
Aaron Sowry <[email protected]> • #984
Bug#714634: lsb-core: Remove lsb-invalid-mta as a dependency of lsb-core; require an actual MTA instead
Sat, 06 Jul 2013 14:58:15 -0400
Jeff Licquia <[email protected]> • #983
Bug#714634: lsb-core: Remove lsb-invalid-mta as a dependency of lsb-core; require an actual MTA instead
Sat, 06 Jul 2013 14:39:03 +0200
Aaron Sowry <[email protected]> • #982
Bug#714634: lsb-core: Remove lsb-invalid-mta as a dependency of lsb-core; require an actual MTA instead
Sat, 6 Jul 2013 12:33:15 +0200
"Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" <[email protected]> • #981
Processed: Re: Bug#714634: lsb-core: Remove lsb-invalid-mta as a dependency of lsb-core; require an actual MTA instead
Sat, 06 Jul 2013 10:36:06 +0000
[email protected] (Debian Bug Tracking System) • #980
Re: Questions regarding lsb-invalid-mta
Mon, 01 Jul 2013 15:58:04 +0200
Aaron Sowry <[email protected]> • #979
Bug#714634: lsb-core: Remove lsb-invalid-mta as a dependency of lsb-core; require an actual MTA instead
Mon, 01 Jul 2013 14:54:35 +0200
Aaron Sowry <[email protected]> • #978
Re: Questions regarding lsb-invalid-mta
Sun, 30 Jun 2013 13:37:32 -0400
Jeff Licquia <[email protected]> • #977
Re: Questions regarding lsb-invalid-mta
Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:50:45 +0200
Aaron Sowry <[email protected]> • #976
Re: Questions regarding lsb-invalid-mta
Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:19:32 -0400
Jeff Licquia <[email protected]> • #975
Re: Questions regarding lsb-invalid-mta
Mon, 24 Jun 2013 11:01:02 +0200
Aaron Sowry <[email protected]> • #974
Re: Questions regarding lsb-invalid-mta
Sun, 23 Jun 2013 22:40:04 -0400
Jeff Licquia <[email protected]> • #973
Re: Questions regarding lsb-invalid-mta
Sun, 23 Jun 2013 21:03:14 +0200
Aaron Sowry <[email protected]> • #972
Re: Questions regarding lsb-invalid-mta
Sun, 23 Jun 2013 09:40:01 -0400
Jeff Licquia <[email protected]> • #971
Re: Questions regarding lsb-invalid-mta
Sun, 23 Jun 2013 13:25:54 +0200
Aaron Sowry <[email protected]> • #970
Re: Questions regarding lsb-invalid-mta
Sat, 22 Jun 2013 16:58:05 -0400
Jeff Licquia <[email protected]> • #969
Re: Questions regarding lsb-invalid-mta
Fri, 21 Jun 2013 08:10:04 +0200
Aaron Sowry <[email protected]> • #968
Re: Questions regarding lsb-invalid-mta
Thu, 20 Jun 2013 22:19:51 +0200
"Jeremiah C. Foster" <[email protected]> • #967
Questions regarding lsb-invalid-mta
Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:54:19 +0200
Aaron Sowry <[email protected]> • #966
Bug#644285: lsb-base: Disabled escape sequences
Sun, 16 Jun 2013 14:46:01 +0200
Didier Raboud <[email protected]> • #965
Processed: Re: Bug#644285: lsb-base: Disabled escape sequences
Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:51:08 +0000
[email protected] (Debian Bug Tracking System) • #964
Processed: forcibly merging 710569 710519
Fri, 14 Jun 2013 18:57:14 +0000
[email protected] (Debian Bug Tracking System) • #963
Benvenuto a Cliccaraffinato
Mon, 10 Jun 2013 04:21:31 +0000
"Cliccaraffinato" <[email protected]> • #962
Re: lsbcc help needed
Fri, 7 Jun 2013 07:26:43 -0400
LM <[email protected]> • #961
Re: lsbcc help needed
Thu, 06 Jun 2013 06:15:23 -0600
Mats Wichmann <[email protected]> • #960
lsbcc help needed
Thu, 6 Jun 2013 07:51:16 -0400
LM <[email protected]> • #959
lsb_4.1+Debian8+deb7u1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates->stable-new, proposed-updates
Wed, 05 Jun 2013 22:47:08 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #958
Bug#711174: marked as done (base-files: changes in 7.1wheezy1 break lsb-release on stable)
Wed, 05 Jun 2013 22:48:29 +0000
[email protected] (Debian Bug Tracking System) • #957
lsb_4.1+Debian8+deb7u1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates->stable-new
Wed, 05 Jun 2013 21:20:00 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #956
Processing of lsb_4.1+Debian8+deb7u1_amd64.changes
Wed, 05 Jun 2013 20:44:18 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #955
Bug#711211: pu: package lsb/4.1+Debian8+deb7u1
Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:09:43 +0200
Didier Raboud <[email protected]> • #954
Bug#711174: base-files: changes in 7.1wheezy1 break lsb-release on stable
Wed, 05 Jun 2013 14:08:00 +0200
Santiago Vila <[email protected]> • #953
lsb_4.1+Debian12_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Wed, 05 Jun 2013 10:49:00 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #952
Processing of lsb_4.1+Debian12_amd64.changes
Wed, 05 Jun 2013 10:45:33 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #951
Bug#711174: marked as done (base-files: changes in 7.1wheezy1 break lsb-release on stable)
Wed, 05 Jun 2013 10:51:16 +0000
[email protected] (Debian Bug Tracking System) • #950
Bug#711174: base-files: changes in 7.1wheezy1 break lsb-release on stable
Wed, 5 Jun 2013 12:44:37 +0200
Didier Raboud <[email protected]> • #949
Processed: Re: Bug#711174: base-files: changes in 7.1wheezy1 break lsb-release on stable
Wed, 05 Jun 2013 10:45:09 +0000
[email protected] (Debian Bug Tracking System) • #948
Processed: Re: Bug#711174: base-files: changes in 7.1wheezy1 break lsb-release on stable
Wed, 05 Jun 2013 09:03:18 +0000
[email protected] (Debian Bug Tracking System) • #947
Bug#711174: base-files: changes in 7.1wheezy1 break lsb-release on stable
Wed, 5 Jun 2013 11:00:06 +0200 (CEST)
Santiago Vila <[email protected]> • #946
Bug#710571: Patch for /lib/lsb/init-functions
Tue, 4 Jun 2013 17:23:12 +0300
Teodor MICU <[email protected]> • #945
Processed: block 701559 with 710571, block 710569 with 710571, block 710559 with 710571
Mon, 03 Jun 2013 06:36:12 +0000
[email protected] (Debian Bug Tracking System) • #944
Processed: forcibly merging 683654 710571, tagging 683654
Mon, 03 Jun 2013 06:06:19 +0000
[email protected] (Debian Bug Tracking System) • #943
Bug#710571: Patch for /lib/lsb/init-functions
Sun, 2 Jun 2013 23:02:51 +0200
"Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" <[email protected]> • #942
Processed (with 2 errors): Re: Bug#710571: Patch for /lib/lsb/init-functions
Sun, 02 Jun 2013 21:06:05 +0000
[email protected] (Debian Bug Tracking System) • #941
Processed: Re: Bug#696332: lsb-release: release/codename depend on a successful apt-get
Sat, 01 Jun 2013 08:03:06 +0000
[email protected] (Debian Bug Tracking System) • #940
Bug#696332: lsb-release: release/codename depend on a successful apt-get
Sat, 1 Jun 2013 11:01:09 +0300
Teodor MICU <[email protected]> • #939
Bug#710571: Patch for /lib/lsb/init-functions
Sat, 1 Jun 2013 10:41:00 +0300
Teodor MICU <[email protected]> • #938
Bug#710571: Patch for /lib/lsb/init-functions
Fri, 31 May 2013 17:28:24 -0700
Josh Triplett <[email protected]> • #937
Processed: Patch for /etc/init.d/skeleton; more bug twiddling
Fri, 31 May 2013 23:09:19 +0000
[email protected] (Debian Bug Tracking System) • #936
Bug#684788: This is a golden opportunity
Sat, 25 May 2013 01:13:42 +0200
luigi paolo <[email protected]> • #935
LSB Ubuntu merge (was Re: Bug#673586: FTBFS if Python 3.2 is installed in chroot)
Tue, 21 May 2013 19:02:08 +0200
"Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" <[email protected]> • #934
Bug#696332: lsb-release: release/codename depend on a successful apt-get
Tue, 21 May 2013 19:22:09 +0200
"Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" <[email protected]> • #933
Processed: Re: Bug#696332: lsb-release: release/codename depend on a successful apt-get
Tue, 21 May 2013 17:27:09 +0000
[email protected] (Debian Bug Tracking System) • #932
Re: Bug#673586: FTBFS if Python 3.2 is installed in chroot
Sat, 18 May 2013 18:44:04 -0700
Steve Langasek <[email protected]> • #931
lsb_4.1+Debian11_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Wed, 15 May 2013 21:19:28 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #930
Re: Bug#673586: FTBFS if Python 3.2 is installed in chroot
Wed, 15 May 2013 23:31:03 +0200
"Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" <[email protected]> • #929
Bug#703677: marked as done (lsb-release is not derivative friendly)
Wed, 15 May 2013 21:21:25 +0000
[email protected] (Debian Bug Tracking System) • #928
Processing of lsb_4.1+Debian11_amd64.changes
Wed, 15 May 2013 20:36:09 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #927
Re: Bug#673586: FTBFS if Python 3.2 is installed in chroot
Wed, 15 May 2013 14:46:39 -0500
Steve Langasek <[email protected]> • #926
Re: Bug#673586: FTBFS if Python 3.2 is installed in chroot
Wed, 15 May 2013 18:11:12 +0200
"Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" <[email protected]> • #925
lsb_4.1+Debian10_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Wed, 15 May 2013 11:18:29 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #924
Bug#708337: marked as done (lsb: Please revert unnecessary use of /bin/echo -n)
Wed, 15 May 2013 11:21:25 +0000
[email protected] (Debian Bug Tracking System) • #923
Bug#699589: marked as done (FTBFS if Python 3.2 is installed in chroot)
Wed, 15 May 2013 11:21:21 +0000
[email protected] (Debian Bug Tracking System) • #922
Bug#673586: marked as done (FTBFS if Python 3.2 is installed in chroot)
Wed, 15 May 2013 11:21:20 +0000
[email protected] (Debian Bug Tracking System) • #921
Processing of lsb_4.1+Debian10_amd64.changes
Wed, 15 May 2013 11:04:07 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #920
Bug#673586: FTBFS if Python 3.2 is installed in chroot
Wed, 15 May 2013 03:03:38 -0500
Steve Langasek <[email protected]> • #919
Bug#708337: lsb: Please revert unnecessary use of /bin/echo -n
Wed, 15 May 2013 02:47:09 -0500
Steve Langasek <[email protected]> • #918
Freight forwarder & logistics provider shared an album with you.
Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:58:45 +0000
"Freight forwarder & logistics provider" <[email protected]> • #917
Re: Bug#704285: release-notes: Debian doesn't support LSB 3.2
Fri, 5 Apr 2013 15:02:39 +0200
Julien Cristau <[email protected]> • #916
Re: Bug#704285: release-notes: Debian doesn't support LSB 3.2
Fri, 5 Apr 2013 16:30:49 +0200
Julien Cristau <[email protected]> • #915
Re: Bug#704285: release-notes: Debian doesn't support LSB 3.2
Fri, 5 Apr 2013 16:11:13 +0200
"Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" <[email protected]> • #914
Bug#703677: lsb-release is not derivative friendly
Sat, 23 Mar 2013 01:30:05 +0100
Raphael Hertzog <[email protected]> • #912
Processed: Re: Bug#703677: lsb-release is not derivative friendly
Fri, 22 Mar 2013 15:45:05 +0000
[email protected] (Debian Bug Tracking System) • #911
Bug#703677: lsb-release is not derivative friendly
Fri, 22 Mar 2013 15:35:06 +0100
"Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" <[email protected]> • #910
Bug#703677: lsb-release is not derivative friendly
Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:11:20 +0100
RaphaĆ«l Hertzog <[email protected]> • #909
Processed: Re: lsb ftbfs in wheezy, testsuite problems.
Sun, 03 Feb 2013 10:21:07 +0000
[email protected] (Debian Bug Tracking System) • #908
Bug#699589: lsb ftbfs in wheezy, testsuite problems.
Sun, 3 Feb 2013 11:03:22 +0100
"Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" <[email protected]> • #907
Bug#699589: lsb ftbfs in wheezy, testsuite problems.
Sat, 2 Feb 2013 18:40:44 -0500
Michael Gilbert <[email protected]> • #906
Processed: re: lsb ftbfs in wheezy, testsuite problems.
Sat, 02 Feb 2013 23:45:06 +0000
[email protected] (Debian Bug Tracking System) • #905
Processed: re: lsb ftbfs in wheezy, testsuite problems.
Sat, 02 Feb 2013 23:45:04 +0000
[email protected] (Debian Bug Tracking System) • #904
Bug#699589: lsb ftbfs in wheezy, testsuite problems.
Sat, 02 Feb 2013 07:23:19 +0000
peter green <[email protected]> • #903
Processed: re: lsb ftbfs in wheezy, testsuite problems.
Sat, 02 Feb 2013 07:30:09 +0000
[email protected] (Debian Bug Tracking System) • #902
Bug#699589: lsb ftbfs in wheezy, testsuite problems.
Sat, 02 Feb 2013 07:12:49 +0000
peter green <[email protected]> • #901
Bug#696332: lsb-release: release/codename depend on a successful apt-get
Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:20:27 +0100
varacanero <[email protected]> • #900
Processed: reassign 691794 to plymouth
Tue, 20 Nov 2012 08:09:07 +0000
[email protected] (Debian Bug Tracking System) • #899
Processed: Re: Bug#691794: Pretty LSB logging overriden by plymouth
Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:09:05 +0000
[email protected] (Debian Bug Tracking System) • #898
Bug#691794: Pretty LSB logging overriden by plymouth
Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:35:49 +0100
"Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" <[email protected]> • #897
Processed: cloning 693688, reassign -1 to exim4-base, retitle -1 to /etc/init.d/exim4 uses pidofproc wrongly ...
Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:39:10 +0000
[email protected] (Debian Bug Tracking System) • #896
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.