gmane.linux.debian.devel.security archive

381 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual
Wed, 11 Jun 2025 10:43:37 -0400
"Dave P." <[email protected]> • #21406
Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual
Wed, 11 Jun 2025 10:05:57 +0000
Holger Levsen <[email protected]> • #21405
Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual
Wed, 11 Jun 2025 06:15:03 +0000
[email protected] • #21404
Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual
Tue, 10 Jun 2025 23:51:59 +0200
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino <[email protected]> • #21403
Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual
Tue, 10 Jun 2025 16:57:43 -0400
Noah Meyerhans <[email protected]> • #21402
Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual
Tue, 10 Jun 2025 21:57:43 +0200
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino <[email protected]> • #21401
Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual
Tue, 10 Jun 2025 17:42:49 +0000
[email protected] • #21400
Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual
Tue, 10 Jun 2025 09:10:14 -0400
"Dave P." <[email protected]> • #21399
Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual
Mon, 09 Jun 2025 21:20:24 +0200
Vladislav Kurz <[email protected]> • #21398
Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual
Mon, 09 Jun 2025 17:17:33 +0000
Rob Ward <[email protected]> • #21397
Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual
Mon, 9 Jun 2025 09:34:44 -0700
Jeffrey Chimene <[email protected]> • #21396
Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual
Mon, 9 Jun 2025 16:43:47 +0000
Holger Levsen <[email protected]> • #21395
Re: Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual
Mon, 9 Jun 2025 12:35:27 -0400
Michael Lazin <[email protected]> • #21394
Resurrecting the Securing Debian Manual
Mon, 9 Jun 2025 12:20:36 -0400
Noah Meyerhans <[email protected]> • #21393
Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped)
Tue, 3 Jun 2025 17:29:03 -0400
Roberto C. Sánchez <[email protected]> • #21392
DebCamp 25 Security Tracker sprint - planning announcement
Thu, 22 May 2025 09:26:31 -0400
Roberto C. Sánchez <[email protected]> • #21391
RE: Clarification Request: Acceptable Scenarios for Submitting CVE Fixes to Debian
Mon, 19 May 2025 06:10:36 +0000
"Fu, Rong (CN)" <[email protected]> • #21390
Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped)
Sun, 18 May 2025 18:43:37 +0200
Salvatore Bonaccorso <[email protected]> • #21389
Re: Clarification Request: Acceptable Scenarios for Submitting CVE Fixes to Debian
Sat, 17 May 2025 22:12:25 +0200
Salvatore Bonaccorso <[email protected]> • #21388
Re: Upcoming stable point release: 12.11
Sat, 17 May 2025 10:29:21 +0100
Jonathan Wiltshire <[email protected]> • #21387
Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped)
Fri, 16 May 2025 15:20:36 -0300
Santiago Ruano Rincón <[email protected]> • #21386
eiärkmýčaež
Wed, 14 May 2025 21:50:38 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] • #21385
Use ~/.ssh/config
Tue, 13 May 2025 12:11:24 +0000
Stephan Verbücheln <[email protected]> • #21384
Re: SHH Cipher recommendations and "prohibitions" from Debian?
Tue, 13 May 2025 11:11:26 +0000
[email protected] • #21383
Re: SHH Cipher recommendations and "prohibitions" from Debian?
Tue, 13 May 2025 11:39:29 +0100
Chris Boot <[email protected]> • #21382
Re: SHH Cipher recommendations and "prohibitions" from Debian?
Tue, 13 May 2025 11:47:51 +0200
Bartosz Fenski <[email protected]> • #21381
SHH Cipher recommendations and "prohibitions" from Debian?
Tue, 13 May 2025 09:35:08 +0000
[email protected] • #21380
Clarification Request: Acceptable Scenarios for Submitting CVE Fixes to Debian
Mon, 12 May 2025 06:09:37 +0000
"Fu, Rong (CN)" <[email protected]> • #21379
Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped)
Sat, 10 May 2025 16:14:40 -0300
Samuel Henrique <[email protected]> • #21378
Upcoming stable point release: 12.11
Sat, 3 May 2025 14:42:14 +0100
Jonathan Wiltshire <[email protected]> • #21377
Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped)
Thu, 1 May 2025 11:23:58 +0200
Salvatore Bonaccorso <[email protected]> • #21376
Re: Open security issues affecting trixie which are not RC (2025-04-29)
Wed, 30 Apr 2025 07:07:02 -0000 (UTC)
Sune Vuorela <[email protected]> • #21375
Re: Open security issues affecting trixie which are not RC (2025-04-29)
Tue, 29 Apr 2025 23:22:31 +0200
NoisyCoil <[email protected]> • #21374
Re: Open security issues affecting trixie which are not RC (2025-04-29)
Tue, 29 Apr 2025 16:12:59 -0400
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #21373
Open security issues affecting trixie which are not RC (2025-04-29)
Tue, 29 Apr 2025 20:12:36 +0200
Moritz Mühlenhoff <[email protected]> • #21372
Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped)
Sun, 13 Apr 2025 16:47:38 +0100
Samuel Henrique <[email protected]> • #21371
Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped)
Sun, 13 Apr 2025 17:32:42 +0200
Salvatore Bonaccorso <[email protected]> • #21370
Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped)
Sun, 13 Apr 2025 16:06:38 +0100
Samuel Henrique <[email protected]> • #21369
FWD: Re: Strange welcome after a testmail
Mon, 24 Mar 2025 19:44:33 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #21368
Re: FWD: FWD: FWD: Re: Strange welcome after a testmail
Mon, 24 Mar 2025 17:13:57 +0100
Lupe Christoph <[email protected]> • #21367
FWD: FWD: FWD: Re: Strange welcome after a testmail
Mon, 24 Mar 2025 17:02:44 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #21366
Re: Strange welcome after a testmail
Mon, 24 Mar 2025 16:37:31 +0100
Pierre-Elliott Bécue <[email protected]> • #21365
Strange welcome after a testmail
Mon, 24 Mar 2025 10:24:29 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #21364
FWD: Re: Testmail
Sun, 23 Mar 2025 08:37:03 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #21363
Re: Testmail
Sat, 22 Mar 2025 15:37:54 -0300
Álesson Nunes <[email protected]> • #21362
Re: Testmail
Sat, 22 Mar 2025 17:47:36 +0000
Meso Security <[email protected]> • #21361
Re: Testmail
Sat, 22 Mar 2025 13:39:29 -0400
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #21360
Re: Testmail
Sat, 22 Mar 2025 11:37:17 -0300
j V <[email protected]> • #21359
Testmail
Sat, 22 Mar 2025 12:12:33 +0100 (GMT+01:00)
Arne Pisch <[email protected]> • #21358
Re: Testmail
Sat, 22 Mar 2025 11:10:00 +0100
sylvain <[email protected]> • #21357
Testmail
Sat, 22 Mar 2025 10:07:15 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #21356
Re: sbuscribe
Wed, 19 Mar 2025 14:00:28 +0100 (CET)
Povl Ole Haarlev Olsen <[email protected]> • #21355
sbuscribe
Wed, 19 Mar 2025 11:05:39 +0000
Francesco Buscaino <[email protected]> • #21354
Upcoming stable point release: 12.10
Fri, 7 Feb 2025 13:32:26 +0000
Jonathan Wiltshire <[email protected]> • #21353
PHISHING ALERT: Re: Email delivery failed
Mon, 27 Jan 2025 08:42:45 +0100
Julien Plissonneau Duquène <[email protected]> • #21352
Re: Bug#1093650: Prebuilt binaries in QEMU source
Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:09:33 +0300
Michael Tokarev <[email protected]> • #21351
Bug#1093650: Prebuilt binaries in QEMU source
Mon, 20 Jan 2025 23:53:47 +0300
Michael Tokarev <[email protected]> • #21350
Bug#1093650: Prebuilt binaries in QEMU source
Mon, 20 Jan 2025 21:49:02 +0100
Heinrich Schuchardt <[email protected]> • #21349
Upcoming stable point release: 12.9
Sun, 29 Dec 2024 17:51:09 +0000
Jonathan Wiltshire <[email protected]> • #21348
Re: Intel Microcode updates
Sat, 07 Dec 2024 21:18:30 -0300
"Henrique de Moraes Holschuh" <[email protected]> • #21347
Re: [DSA 5824-1] chromium security update
Sat, 7 Dec 2024 13:25:20 +0100
Santiago Vila <[email protected]> • #21346
Re: [DSA 5824-1] chromium security update
Sat, 07 Dec 2024 12:31:34 +0100
Bjørn Mork <[email protected]> • #21345
RE: Should Debian ask for a CPE when a CVE in Debian is found?
Mon, 2 Dec 2024 19:51:23 +0000
"Brewer, Tanya L. (Fed)" <[email protected]> • #21344
RE: Should Debian ask for a CPE when a CVE in Debian is found?
Mon, 2 Dec 2024 13:08:53 +0000
"Booth, Harold (Fed)" <[email protected]> • #21343
Re: Should Debian ask for a CPE when a CVE in Debian is found?
Sun, 1 Dec 2024 15:29:41 -0500
"David A. Wheeler" <[email protected]> • #21342
Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped)
Sun, 1 Dec 2024 15:08:20 +0100
Salvatore Bonaccorso <[email protected]> • #21341
Re: I forgot my password and Debian need password when booting
Thu, 28 Nov 2024 15:31:22 -0500
CMH <[email protected]> • #21340
Re: (No Subject)
Thu, 28 Nov 2024 10:47:17 +0100 (CET)
Povl Ole Haarlev Olsen <[email protected]> • #21339
Re: (No Subject)
Thu, 28 Nov 2024 09:52:53 +0000
"Sergey S." <[email protected]> • #21338
(No Subject)
Thu, 28 Nov 2024 09:27:03 +0000
"Sergey S." <[email protected]> • #21337
Re: bind9 update 9.16.50 -- too many record
Thu, 28 Nov 2024 10:07:16 +0100
Guillaume Bienkowski <[email protected]> • #21336
Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped)
Wed, 27 Nov 2024 23:28:50 +0000
Samuel Henrique <[email protected]> • #21335
Re: Latent bugs in armel, armhf packages built before t64 transition
Wed, 27 Nov 2024 20:08:04 -0300
Leandro Cunha <[email protected]> • #21334
Re: Latent bugs in armel, armhf packages built before t64 transition
Wed, 27 Nov 2024 22:43:02 +0000
Martin <[email protected]> • #21333
Securing Debian Manual, Out of Date?
Sun, 17 Nov 2024 02:18:17 +0000
[email protected] • #21332
Fwd: gnome-settings-daemon breaks existing usbguard rules, allowing all usb device by default
Fri, 15 Nov 2024 22:39:55 +0000
jan kapoli <[email protected]> • #21331
Bug#539352: /etc/init.d/mountkernfs.sh: Please mount debugfs when available in the kernel
Mon, 11 Nov 2024 18:17:43 +0000
Mark Hindley <[email protected]> • #21330
Re: Upcoming stable point releases: 12.8 and 12.9
Sat, 09 Nov 2024 10:36:05 +0000
"Adam D. Barratt" <[email protected]> • #21329
Re: dpkg MD5
Fri, 8 Nov 2024 14:33:18 -0500
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #21328
Re: dpkg MD5
Fri, 8 Nov 2024 17:22:36 +0000
Jeremy Stanley <[email protected]> • #21327
Re: dpkg MD5
Fri, 08 Nov 2024 16:52:19 +0100
SZÉPE Viktor <[email protected]> • #21326
Re: dpkg MD5
Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:41:25 +0000
Jeremy Stanley <[email protected]> • #21325
Re: dpkg MD5
Fri, 08 Nov 2024 09:35:17 +0100
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #21324
Re: dpkg MD5
Fri, 8 Nov 2024 00:20:35 -0500
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #21323
Re: dpkg MD5
Fri, 8 Nov 2024 00:10:05 -0500
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #21322
Re: I Joined This List
Fri, 8 Nov 2024 00:04:26 -0500
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #21321
Re: dpkg MD5
Fri, 08 Nov 2024 04:04:19 +0000
[email protected] • #21320
Re: dpkg MD5
Fri, 8 Nov 2024 03:12:17 +0000
Jeremy Stanley <[email protected]> • #21319
Re: dpkg MD5
Thu, 7 Nov 2024 21:30:26 -0500
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #21318
I Joined This List
Thu, 7 Nov 2024 20:07:25 -0500
David Campbell <[email protected]> • #21317
Re: dpkg MD5
Thu, 7 Nov 2024 23:37:41 +0000
Jeremy Stanley <[email protected]> • #21316
Re: dpkg MD5
Thu, 7 Nov 2024 17:12:53 -0500
David Campbell <[email protected]> • #21315
Re: dpkg MD5
Thu, 07 Nov 2024 16:08:33 -0600
Jonathan Hutchins <[email protected]> • #21314
dpkg MD5
Thu, 7 Nov 2024 16:45:54 -0500
David Campbell <[email protected]> • #21313
Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped)
Sat, 2 Nov 2024 20:02:38 +0000
Samuel Henrique <[email protected]> • #21312
Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped)
Tue, 29 Oct 2024 20:43:53 +0100
Salvatore Bonaccorso <[email protected]> • #21311
Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped)
Tue, 29 Oct 2024 19:06:23 +0000
Samuel Henrique <[email protected]> • #21310
Upcoming stable point releases: 12.8 and 12.9
Sun, 13 Oct 2024 11:47:04 +0100
Jonathan Wiltshire <[email protected]> • #21309
Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped)
Wed, 4 Sep 2024 13:47:46 +0200
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[email protected]> • #21308
Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped)
Sat, 31 Aug 2024 19:07:15 +0100
Samuel Henrique <[email protected]> • #21307
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.