gmane.linux.debian.ports.hurd archive

413 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 5). Latest articles →

vim and gnupg2 stuck on buildd
Sat, 28 Mar 2026 12:06:25 +0900
Luke Yasuda <[email protected]> • #21762
Bug#1132100: gcc-16: FTBFS on hurd-amd64 and hurd-i386: internal compiler error: illegal instrucion
Sat, 28 Mar 2026 02:46:39 +0000
Luke Yasuda <[email protected]> • #21761
Bug#1132083: openntpd: FTBFS on Hurd
Fri, 27 Mar 2026 22:11:02 +0200
Martin-Éric Racine <[email protected]> • #21760
Bug#1132081: gpsd: FTBFS on Hurd
Fri, 27 Mar 2026 22:01:24 +0200
Martin-Éric Racine <[email protected]> • #21759
Bug#1132024: Add insserv-bin binary package with /usr/libexec/insserv for easily creating Hurd chroots
Fri, 27 Mar 2026 08:54:49 +0100
Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <[email protected]> • #21758
Bug#1132001: 0.91.5: sbuild doesn't respect $chroot_mode (on hurd)
Thu, 26 Mar 2026 19:10:38 +0000
Luke Yasuda <[email protected]> • #21757
Bug#1131933: RM: r-cran-ragg [armhf i386 s390x] -- ROM; Architectures not supported upstream
Thu, 26 Mar 2026 19:10:03 +0900
Charles Plessy <[email protected]> • #21756
gnumach_1.8+git20260224-5_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Wed, 25 Mar 2026 22:25:02 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #21755
Processing of gnumach_1.8+git20260224-5_source.changes
Wed, 25 Mar 2026 21:57:47 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #21754
Bug#1131734: RM: r-cran-partykit [armhf i386 s390x] -- ROM; Architectures not supported upstream
Tue, 24 Mar 2026 03:40:52 +0900
Charles Plessy <[email protected]> • #21753
Bug#1131733: RM: r-cran-evaluate [armhf i386 s390x] -- ROM; Architectures not supported upstream
Tue, 24 Mar 2026 03:26:20 +0900
Charles Plessy <[email protected]> • #21752
Bug#1131732: RM: r-cran-ps [armhf i386 s390x] -- ROM; Architectures not supported upstream
Tue, 24 Mar 2026 03:24:10 +0900
Charles Plessy <[email protected]> • #21751
Bug#1131731: RM: r-cran-stringi [armhf i386 s390x] -- ROM; Architectures not supported upstream
Tue, 24 Mar 2026 03:22:36 +0900
Charles Plessy <[email protected]> • #21750
Bug#1131730: RM: r-cran-xfun [armhf i386 s390x] -- ROM; Architectures not supported upstream
Tue, 24 Mar 2026 03:20:20 +0900
Charles Plessy <[email protected]> • #21749
Bug#1131729: RM: r-cran-roxygen2 [armhf i386 s390x] -- ROM; Architectures not supported upstream
Tue, 24 Mar 2026 03:17:34 +0900
Charles Plessy <[email protected]> • #21748
Bug#1131728: RM: r-cran-rlang [armhf i386 s390x] -- ROM; Architectures not supported upstream
Tue, 24 Mar 2026 03:11:36 +0900
Charles Plessy <[email protected]> • #21747
Processing of crosshurd_1.7.66_source.changes
Sun, 15 Mar 2026 17:08:08 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #21746
crosshurd_1.7.66_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Sun, 15 Mar 2026 17:18:53 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #21745
crosshurd_1.7.65_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Sat, 14 Mar 2026 15:00:17 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #21744
Processing of crosshurd_1.7.65_amd64.changes
Sat, 14 Mar 2026 00:53:53 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #21743
crosshurd_1.7.65_amd64.changes is NEW
Sat, 14 Mar 2026 01:04:03 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #21742
Processing of gnumach_1.8+git20260224-4_source.changes
Wed, 11 Mar 2026 17:34:07 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #21741
gnumach_1.8+git20260224-4_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Wed, 11 Mar 2026 17:48:33 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #21740
Re: Fwd: [cfarm-users] cfarm{431,432}: hurd-{amd64,i386}
Wed, 11 Mar 2026 16:46:04 +0100
Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> • #21739
Re: Fwd: [cfarm-users] cfarm{431,432}: hurd-{amd64,i386}
Wed, 11 Mar 2026 22:43:51 +0900
Luke Yasuda <[email protected]> • #21738
Bug#1130328: please support $DPKG_ROOT in maintainer scripts
Wed, 11 Mar 2026 09:23:50 +0100
Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <[email protected]> • #21737
Bug#1130327: mosh: FTBFS on hurd-amd64 and hurd-i386
Wed, 11 Mar 2026 08:01:28 +0000
Luke Yasuda <[email protected]> • #21736
Re: Fwd: [cfarm-users] cfarm{431,432}: hurd-{amd64,i386}
Tue, 10 Mar 2026 14:09:41 +0100
Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> • #21735
Re: Fwd: [cfarm-users] cfarm{431,432}: hurd-{amd64,i386}
Tue, 10 Mar 2026 09:05:37 -0400
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #21734
Re: Fwd: [cfarm-users] cfarm{431,432}: hurd-{amd64,i386}
Tue, 10 Mar 2026 13:20:54 +0100
Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> • #21733
Fwd: [cfarm-users] cfarm{431,432}: hurd-{amd64,i386}
Tue, 10 Mar 2026 08:12:53 -0400
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #21732
Processing of mig_1.8+git20231217-10_source.changes
Mon, 09 Mar 2026 23:25:09 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #21731
Bug#1128787: marked as done (targeted mig builds miss mig-for-host)
Mon, 09 Mar 2026 23:37:03 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #21730
mig_1.8+git20231217-10_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Mon, 09 Mar 2026 23:35:09 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #21729
Re: gnupg2 FTBFS Hurd
Mon, 9 Mar 2026 23:36:36 +0100
Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> • #21728
Bug#1128066: getty-run: /dev/console needs a getty on hurd
Mon, 9 Mar 2026 16:11:32 +0100
Lorenzo <[email protected]> • #21727
Re: gnupg2 FTBFS Hurd
Mon, 9 Mar 2026 13:17:53 +0000
Stephen Lyons <[email protected]> • #21726
Processing of hurd_0.9.git20251029-7_source.changes
Sun, 08 Mar 2026 12:16:40 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #21725
hurd_0.9.git20251029-7_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Sun, 08 Mar 2026 12:21:41 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #21724
Re: gnupg2 FTBFS Hurd
Sun, 8 Mar 2026 11:36:36 +0100
Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> • #21723
Re: gnupg2 FTBFS Hurd
Sun, 8 Mar 2026 11:35:14 +0100
Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> • #21722
Re: gnupg2 FTBFS Hurd
Sun, 8 Mar 2026 12:16:16 +0200
Martin-Éric Racine <[email protected]> • #21721
Re: gnupg2 FTBFS Hurd
Sun, 8 Mar 2026 11:07:53 +0100
Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> • #21720
gnupg2 FTBFS Hurd
Sun, 8 Mar 2026 11:25:11 +0200
Martin-Éric Racine <[email protected]> • #21719
Re: sites down?
Wed, 4 Mar 2026 16:09:30 -0800
NexusSfan <[email protected]> • #21718
Re: sites down?
Wed, 04 Mar 2026 12:35:19 +0000
[email protected] • #21717
Re: sites down?
Wed, 04 Mar 2026 12:31:48 +0000
[email protected] • #21716
Re: sites down?
Wed, 04 Mar 2026 00:36:11 +0000
Nicodemo Alvaro <[email protected]> • #21715
Re: sites down?
Wed, 4 Mar 2026 01:45:25 +0100
Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> • #21714
Re: sites down?
Wed, 04 Mar 2026 00:42:48 +0000
[email protected] • #21713
Processing of gnumach_1.8+git20260224-3_source.changes
Tue, 03 Mar 2026 10:09:03 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #21712
gnumach_1.8+git20260224-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Tue, 03 Mar 2026 10:18:48 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #21711
gnumach_1.8+git20260224-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Sun, 01 Mar 2026 21:36:29 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #21710
Processing of gnumach_1.8+git20260224-2_source.changes
Sun, 01 Mar 2026 21:17:54 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #21709
Re: amd64-smp kernel is there
Sat, 28 Feb 2026 15:53:02 +0100
Jan Jaeger <[email protected]> • #21708
Re: amd64-smp kernel is there
Fri, 27 Feb 2026 15:00:47 -0800
NexusSfan <[email protected]> • #21707
Re: amd64-smp kernel is there
Fri, 27 Feb 2026 16:30:49 +0100
Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> • #21706
Re: "Your installation media couldn't be mounted"
Fri, 27 Feb 2026 13:42:16 +0000
[email protected] • #21705
Re: amd64-smp kernel is there
Fri, 27 Feb 2026 15:55:39 +0200
Guy Fleury <[email protected]> • #21704
Re: amd64-smp kernel is there
Fri, 27 Feb 2026 13:37:54 +0000
[email protected] • #21703
Re: amd64-smp kernel is there
Fri, 27 Feb 2026 13:20:57 +0000
[email protected] • #21702
Re: "Your installation media couldn't be mounted"
Fri, 27 Feb 2026 11:05:10 +0100
Philipp Klaus Krause <[email protected]> • #21701
Re: amd64-smp kernel is there
Fri, 27 Feb 2026 09:17:24 +0100
Jan Jaeger <[email protected]> • #21700
Re: amd64-smp kernel is there
Thu, 26 Feb 2026 15:36:14 -0800
NexusSfan <[email protected]> • #21699
Re: amd64-smp kernel is there
Thu, 26 Feb 2026 23:34:38 +0100
Chukwuma Akunyili <[email protected]> • #21698
Re: amd64-smp kernel is there
Thu, 26 Feb 2026 23:19:40 +0100
Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> • #21697
Re: amd64-smp kernel is there
Thu, 26 Feb 2026 22:35:33 +0100
Chukwuma Akunyili <[email protected]> • #21696
Re: amd64-smp kernel is there
Thu, 26 Feb 2026 19:11:34 +0000
[email protected] • #21695
Re: "Your installation media couldn't be mounted"
Thu, 26 Feb 2026 16:01:18 +0000
[email protected] • #21694
Re: "Your installation media couldn't be mounted"
Thu, 26 Feb 2026 00:02:31 +0100
Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> • #21693
Re: "Your installation media couldn't be mounted"
Wed, 25 Feb 2026 21:05:56 +0100
Philipp Klaus Krause <[email protected]> • #21692
Re: "Your installation media couldn't be mounted"
Wed, 25 Feb 2026 18:52:11 +0100
Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> • #21691
Re: "Your installation media couldn't be mounted"
Wed, 25 Feb 2026 18:40:49 +0100
Philipp Klaus Krause <[email protected]> • #21690
Re: "Your installation media couldn't be mounted"
Wed, 25 Feb 2026 18:25:07 +0100
Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> • #21689
Re: "Your installation media couldn't be mounted"
Wed, 25 Feb 2026 18:21:46 +0100
Philipp Klaus Krause <[email protected]> • #21688
Re: "Your installation media couldn't be mounted"
Wed, 25 Feb 2026 15:07:11 +0100
Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> • #21687
Re: "Your installation media couldn't be mounted"
Wed, 25 Feb 2026 14:52:58 +0100
Philipp Klaus Krause <[email protected]> • #21686
amd64-smp kernel is there
Wed, 25 Feb 2026 14:49:53 +0100
Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> • #21685
Re: "Your installation media couldn't be mounted"
Wed, 25 Feb 2026 14:30:03 +0100
Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> • #21684
Re: "Your installation media couldn't be mounted"
Wed, 25 Feb 2026 14:27:02 +0100
Jose Luis Alarcon Sanchez <[email protected]> • #21683
"Your installation media couldn't be mounted"
Wed, 25 Feb 2026 12:38:02 +0100
Philipp Klaus Krause <[email protected]> • #21682
gnumach_1.8+git20260224-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Wed, 25 Feb 2026 10:00:47 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #21681
Processing of gnumach_1.8+git20260224-1_amd64.changes
Tue, 24 Feb 2026 09:58:09 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #21680
gnumach_1.8+git20260224-1_amd64.changes is NEW
Tue, 24 Feb 2026 10:06:09 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #21679
Re: Bug#1128631: std::condition_variable::wait_for() broken on GNU/Hurd
Sun, 22 Feb 2026 23:39:14 +0100
Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> • #21678
Processed: tagging 1128787
Sun, 22 Feb 2026 19:49:02 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #21677
Bug#1128787: targeted mig builds miss mig-for-host
Sun, 22 Feb 2026 07:40:18 +0100
Helmut Grohne <[email protected]> • #21676
Processing of mig_1.8+git20231217-9_source.changes
Sun, 22 Feb 2026 16:16:25 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #21675
Bug#1128694: marked as done (mig: FTBFS with glibc 2.43 due to ISO C23 const return types)
Sun, 22 Feb 2026 16:23:01 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #21674
mig_1.8+git20231217-9_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Sun, 22 Feb 2026 16:20:33 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #21673
Bug#1128694: mig: FTBFS with glibc 2.43 due to ISO C23 const return types
Sun, 22 Feb 2026 15:48:01 +0100
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #21672
Re: sites down?
Sun, 22 Feb 2026 05:36:21 +0000
[email protected] • #21671
Re: sites down?
Sat, 21 Feb 2026 19:04:53 -0800
NexusSfan <[email protected]> • #21670
Re: sites down?
Sat, 21 Feb 2026 18:05:30 -0800
NexusSfan <[email protected]> • #21669
Re: sites down?
Sun, 22 Feb 2026 02:58:48 +0100
Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> • #21668
Re: Bug#1128631: std::condition_variable::wait_for() broken on GNU/Hurd
Sun, 22 Feb 2026 02:50:15 +0100
Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> • #21667
Bug#1128631: std::condition_variable::wait_for() broken on GNU/Hurd
Sun, 22 Feb 2026 02:14:06 +0100
Mattias Ellert <[email protected]> • #21666
Re: sites down?
Sat, 21 Feb 2026 16:06:46 -0800
NexusSfan <[email protected]> • #21665
Re: sites down?
Sun, 22 Feb 2026 00:58:40 +0100
Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> • #21664
Re: sites down?
Sat, 21 Feb 2026 15:57:23 -0800
NexusSfan <[email protected]> • #21663
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.