gmane.linux.debian.ports.s390 archive

1130 archived articles, newest first (page 10 of 12). Latest articles →

1 New Message
Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:28:11 +0100
"Abudlaziz Ahmed" <[email protected]> • #4661
Re: s390x architecture status?
Thu, 31 Oct 2024 18:49:35 +0100
Alberto Garcia <[email protected]> • #4660
s390x architecture status?
Tue, 29 Oct 2024 06:24:06 +0000
Berli Gayathri <[email protected]> • #4659
Re: s390x architecture status?
Mon, 28 Oct 2024 10:52:55 -0700
"Elizabeth K. Joseph" <[email protected]> • #4658
Recent patches for big-endian systems in OpenSSH
Mon, 28 Oct 2024 11:33:36 -0600
"Nelson H. F. Beebe" <[email protected]> • #4657
Re: s390x architecture status?
Mon, 28 Oct 2024 12:35:40 +0100
Marco d'Itri <[email protected]> • #4656
Re: s390x architecture status?
Mon, 28 Oct 2024 12:29:20 +0000
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #4655
s390x architecture status?
Mon, 28 Oct 2024 10:24:04 +0100
Chris Hofstaedtler <[email protected]> • #4654
Bug#1080317: marked as done (s390-tools: FTBFS: passing argument 2 of 'EVP_PKEY_meth_set_copy' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types])
Sat, 26 Oct 2024 19:24:04 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #4653
Bug#1085162: marked as done (s390-tools: move aliased files from / to /usr (DEP17))
Sat, 26 Oct 2024 19:24:05 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #4652
s390-tools_2.16.0-2.2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Sat, 26 Oct 2024 19:21:47 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #4651
Re: autopkgtest on s390x (was: Migration blocked by tests of depending package)
Sat, 26 Oct 2024 11:15:41 +0100
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #4650
Bug#1080317: NMU for s390-tools
Wed, 23 Oct 2024 23:30:34 +0200
Michael Biebl <[email protected]> • #4649
Bug#1080317: NMU for s390-tools
Wed, 23 Oct 2024 23:12:52 +0200
Andreas Beckmann <[email protected]> • #4648
Processing of s390-tools_2.16.0-2.2_source.changes
Wed, 23 Oct 2024 18:53:11 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #4647
Processed: tagging 1080317, tagging 1085162
Wed, 23 Oct 2024 19:03:02 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #4646
Bug#1080317: NMU for s390-tools
Wed, 23 Oct 2024 20:53:14 +0200
Michael Biebl <[email protected]> • #4645
Bug#1085891: pygobject: 3.50.0 regression: FTBFS on big-endian: TestAsync failures
Wed, 23 Oct 2024 11:24:31 +0100
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #4644
Processed: reassign 1085162 to s390-tools, found 1085162 in 2.16.0-2.1
Mon, 21 Oct 2024 11:21:02 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #4643
Bug#1084987: O: s390-tools -- fundamental utilities for Linux on S/390
Sun, 20 Oct 2024 22:47:21 +0200
Chris Hofstaedtler <[email protected]> • #4642
Processed: tagging 1085162
Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:09:02 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #4641
Bug#1085162: s390-tools: move aliased files from / to /usr (DEP17)
Tue, 15 Oct 2024 18:28:26 +0200
Michael Biebl <[email protected]> • #4640
Bug#1084987: O: s390-tools
Sat, 12 Oct 2024 13:24:18 +0200
Chris Hofstaedtler <[email protected]> • #4639
Bug#1084411: s390-tools: move from fuse to fuse3
Mon, 07 Oct 2024 12:20:02 +0200
[email protected] • #4638
Re: [s390x] lots of "User process fault: interruption code XXXX"
Mon, 30 Sep 2024 21:07:39 +0200
Paul Gevers <[email protected]> • #4637
Bug#1080317: s390-tools: FTBFS: passing argument 2 of 'EVP_PKEY_meth_set_copy' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
Thu, 26 Sep 2024 11:20:13 +0000
Berli Gayathri <[email protected]> • #4636
Bug#1081850: qemu-arm64: can't run busybox:arm64 on s390x: Invalid note in PT_GNU_PROPERTY
Sun, 15 Sep 2024 16:00:14 +0100
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #4635
Re: Bug#1081515: gtk4: FTBFS with weston 14: many tests fail with --setup=wayland: Failed to open display
Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:59:26 +0100
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #4634
Bug#1081515: gtk4: FTBFS on -ports architectures: many tests fail with --setup=wayland: Failed to open display
Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:48:21 +0100
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #4633
Bug#1080324: libadwaita-1: FTBFS on s390x: test_adw_bottom_sheet_align: assertion failed (adw_bottom_sheet_get_align (sheet) == 0 (+/- 0.005)): (0.0078125 == 0)
Mon, 2 Sep 2024 10:05:35 +0100
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #4632
Bug#1080317: s390-tools: FTBFS: passing argument 2 of 'EVP_PKEY_meth_set_copy' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
Mon, 02 Sep 2024 08:56:09 +0200
Petter Reinholdtsen <[email protected]> • #4631
Bug#1079546: gtk4: two css tests are failing on s390x
Sat, 24 Aug 2024 09:29:57 -0400
Jeremy Bícha <[email protected]> • #4630
Re: Bug#1077757: gtk4: memorytexture test fails on s390x
Thu, 1 Aug 2024 17:41:39 +0100
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #4629
Bug#1077551: ffmpeg: Fails to build on s390x with gcc-14
Mon, 29 Jul 2024 17:41:12 -0400
Jeremy Bícha <[email protected]> • #4628
Re: Bug#1077192: gtk4: Test regression in 4.14 on s390x: assertion failure in 3 gsk tests
Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:11:10 +0100
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #4627
Bug#1077192: src:gtk4: Test regression with gtk4 4.14 in experimental on s390x
Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:03:30 +0200
Matthias Geiger <[email protected]> • #4626
Re: Bug#1076309: [s390x] lots of "User process fault: interruption code XXXX"
Wed, 24 Jul 2024 20:59:31 +0200
Paul Gevers <[email protected]> • #4625
Bug#1076309: [s390x] lots of "User process fault: interruption code XXXX"
Wed, 24 Jul 2024 10:57:51 +0200
Bastian Blank <[email protected]> • #4624
Re: [s390x] lots of "User process fault: interruption code XXXX"
Thu, 18 Jul 2024 08:06:46 +0200
Paul Gevers <[email protected]> • #4623
Bug#1074098: Add Depends: login if applicable
Sun, 23 Jun 2024 10:36:12 +0200
Chris Hofstaedtler <[email protected]> • #4622
Processing of s390-tools_2.16.0-2.1_source.changes
Tue, 11 Jun 2024 10:01:15 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #4621
Bug#1068119: marked as done (s390-tools: FTBFS: ../../include/boot/s390.h:418:17: error: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of ‘void[0]’ [-Werror=array-bounds=])
Tue, 11 Jun 2024 10:09:03 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #4620
s390-tools_2.16.0-2.1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Tue, 11 Jun 2024 10:04:38 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #4619
Bug#1068119: Solution for 1068119 - compile error for s390-tools 2.16.0-2
Tue, 11 Jun 2024 11:58:32 +0200
Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <[email protected]> • #4618
Processed: Re: Solution for 1068119 - compile error for s390-tools 2.16.0-2
Tue, 11 Jun 2024 10:03:03 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #4617
Bug#1063647: marked as done (sysconfig: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)
Mon, 10 Jun 2024 23:24:05 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #4616
Bug#1007056: marked as done (sysconfig: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format)
Mon, 10 Jun 2024 23:24:03 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #4615
sysconfig_0.0.14+nmu1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Mon, 10 Jun 2024 23:20:16 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #4614
FTBFS of package widelands, possibly linked to the handling of UTF?
Mon, 03 Jun 2024 15:03:27 +0200
Martin Quinson <[email protected]> • #4613
How to solve "Thread.create: Resource temporarily unavailable" ?
Sat, 01 Jun 2024 09:28:52 +0200
[email protected] • #4612
Processing of sysconfig_0.0.14+nmu1_source.changes
Fri, 31 May 2024 22:42:45 +0000
Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> • #4611
Bug#1063647: sysconfig: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Sat, 1 Jun 2024 00:35:47 +0200
Bastian Germann <[email protected]> • #4610
Bug#1068119: Solution for 1068119 - compile error for s390-tools 2.16.0-2
Mon, 27 May 2024 12:07:11 +0200
Steffen Eiden <[email protected]> • #4609
Z training by IBM for the Linux community (next Tuesday, 30th April 2024)
Sun, 28 Apr 2024 15:56:07 +0200
Sarah Julia Kriesch <[email protected]> • #4608
Re: Emboss not migrating due to autopkgtest error on s390x
Mon, 15 Apr 2024 10:06:00 +0300
Andrius Merkys <[email protected]> • #4607
Re: Emboss not migrating due to autopkgtest error on s390x
Mon, 15 Apr 2024 13:03:47 -0500
Steven Robbins <[email protected]> • #4606
Bug#1068509: liferea: autopkgtest on s390x suggests liferea is partially broken there
Sat, 6 Apr 2024 20:22:42 +0200
Paul Gevers <[email protected]> • #4605
Re: Bug#1057050 closed by Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> (reply to Patrick Franz <[email protected]>) (Bug#1057050: fixed in qt6-multimedia 6.6.1-1)
Wed, 03 Apr 2024 09:31:56 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #4604
Bug#1068119: s390-tools: FTBFS: ../../include/boot/s390.h:418:17: error: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of ‘void[0]’ [-Werror=array-bounds=]
Sun, 31 Mar 2024 10:27:10 +0200
Sebastian Ramacher <[email protected]> • #4603
bug 1064423: src:gnome-keyring: FTBFS on s390x
Sun, 24 Mar 2024 07:30:52 +0100
Paul Gevers <[email protected]> • #4602
Bug#1067026: graphviz: please build without librsvg except on rust platforms
Sun, 17 Mar 2024 01:15:48 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #4601
Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports
Thu, 14 Mar 2024 10:52:39 +0100
Helge Deller <[email protected]> • #4600
Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports
Thu, 14 Mar 2024 05:53:28 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #4599
Bug#1066832: fsverity-utils: hard Build-Depends on unportable package pandoc
Thu, 14 Mar 2024 02:40:37 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #4598
Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports
Mon, 11 Mar 2024 21:33:37 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #4597
Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports
Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:15:45 +0100
Jérémy Lal <[email protected]> • #4596
Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports
Mon, 11 Mar 2024 20:46:29 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #4595
Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports
Mon, 11 Mar 2024 21:31:35 +0100
Jérémy Lal <[email protected]> • #4594
python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports
Mon, 11 Mar 2024 19:05:52 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #4593
Bug#1064548: tracker-miners: bmp-basic-1 test fails on big-endian
Fri, 23 Feb 2024 19:53:40 -0500
Jeremy Bícha <[email protected]> • #4592
Bug#1063647: sysconfig: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Sat, 10 Feb 2024 13:24:57 +0100
Guillem Jover <[email protected]> • #4591
Re: Bug#1060735: glib2.0/experimental: FTBFS on s390x and other 64-bit BE: gdatetime test fails or crashes
Mon, 15 Jan 2024 13:12:26 +0000
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #4590
Re: Bug#1060735: glib2.0/experimental: FTBFS on s390x and other 64-bit BE: gdatetime test fails or crashes
Sat, 13 Jan 2024 19:32:56 +0000
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #4589
Re: Bug#1060735: glib2.0/experimental: FTBFS on s390x and other 64-bit BE: gdatetime test fails or crashes
Sat, 13 Jan 2024 16:21:33 +0000
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #4588
Bug#1060735: glib2.0/experimental: FTBFS on s390x and other 64-bit BE: gdatetime test fails or crashes
Sat, 13 Jan 2024 15:21:02 +0000
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #4587
s390x qemu support in autopkgtest?
Sun, 31 Dec 2023 19:44:23 +0100
Paul Gevers <[email protected]> • #4586
Bug#1058740: gtk4,librsvg: big-endian support is at risk of being removed
Fri, 15 Dec 2023 11:35:52 +0000
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #4585
Bug#1057782: gtk4: FTBFS on big-endian: memorytexture test fails
Fri, 8 Dec 2023 13:00:25 +0000
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #4584
Re: help needed with LibreOffice Java bridge on s390x/ppc64el
Sat, 2 Dec 2023 19:32:34 +0100
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #4583
Bug#1057203: r-bioc-rhdf5filters: missing build-dependency on big-endian architectures
Fri, 1 Dec 2023 14:45:33 -0100
Graham Inggs <[email protected]> • #4582
help needed with LibreOffice Java bridge on s390x/ppc64el
Sun, 29 Oct 2023 11:13:56 +0100
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #4581
Processed: tagging 1007049, tagging 1007084, tagging 1007061, tagging 1007085, tagging 1007086, tagging 1007081 ...
Fri, 13 Oct 2023 10:00:39 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #4580
Re: Bug#1053767: chromium: please to add support for s390x or armel
Tue, 10 Oct 2023 21:49:45 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #4579
Re: Bug#1038447: librsvg: FTBFS on big-endian architectures: multiple test regressions since September 2022
Sat, 30 Sep 2023 17:10:06 +0100
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #4578
gcc-13 regression
Mon, 28 Aug 2023 11:11:28 +0200
Sebastiaan Couwenberg <[email protected]> • #4577
Re: Enabling -fstack-clash-protection for trixie
Mon, 28 Aug 2023 06:10:28 +0200
Guillem Jover <[email protected]> • #4576
Bug#1050220: mutter: autopkgtest regression on s390x: tests time out after 5 minutes
Tue, 22 Aug 2023 10:09:22 +0100
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #4575
Enabling -fstack-clash-protection for trixie
Sun, 6 Aug 2023 23:25:23 +0200
Moritz Mühlenhoff <[email protected]> • #4574
Re: Bug#1038447: librsvg: FTBFS on big-endian architectures: multiple test regressions since September 2022
Sun, 30 Jul 2023 16:36:17 +0100
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #4573
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Fri, 28 Jul 2023 10:25:10 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #4572
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 13:08:17 -0400
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> • #4571
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 17:26:25 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #4570
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 16:09:38 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #4569
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 15:53:48 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #4568
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 16:04:03 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #4567
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 15:25:11 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #4566
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 15:22:43 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #4565
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 15:07:47 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #4564
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 15:02:54 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #4563
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Sat, 22 Jul 2023 14:34:53 +0200
Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> • #4562
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.