gmane.linux.debian.ports.s390 archive

1130 archived articles, newest first (page 7 of 12). Latest articles →

OMP fixed in the llvm-21 packaging
Tue, 2 Dec 2025 09:28:28 +0100
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #4961
RE: Bug#1120809: stress-ng FTCBFS for s390x: -fmodulo-sched is not removed
Mon, 1 Dec 2025 03:06:54 +0000
Pranav P <[email protected]> • #4960
Bug#1121707: rust-landlock: FTBFS on !x86: error[E0432]: unresolved import `self::landlock`
Sun, 30 Nov 2025 23:37:33 +0100
Sebastian Ramacher <[email protected]> • #4959
Bug#1121477: src:ruby-murmurhash3: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x
Thu, 27 Nov 2025 09:58:44 +0100
Paul Gevers <[email protected]> • #4958
Bug#1121387: src:pthreadpool: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x
Tue, 25 Nov 2025 18:59:40 +0100
Paul Gevers <[email protected]> • #4957
RE: Bug#1120809: stress-ng FTCBFS for s390x: -fmodulo-sched is not removed
Mon, 24 Nov 2025 14:28:37 +0000
Pranav P <[email protected]> • #4956
64mb limitation of qemu-system-sh4 board
Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:31:03 +0100
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <[email protected]> • #4955
Re: qemu-system-sh4eb build has something hinky in the ethernet
Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:18:58 +0100
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <[email protected]> • #4954
Re: 64mb limitation of qemu-system-sh4 board
Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:33:11 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #4953
Re: Bug#1120809: stress-ng FTCBFS for s390x: -fmodulo-sched is not removed
Thu, 20 Nov 2025 10:00:13 +0100
Helmut Grohne <[email protected]> • #4952
gcc-16, first packaging bits
Sun, 23 Nov 2025 13:12:30 +0100
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #4951
Bug#1121190: s390-tools: FTBFS with gcc-15
Sat, 22 Nov 2025 15:44:26 +0100
Chris Hofstaedtler <[email protected]> • #4950
Bug#1121149: pyroute2: autopkgtest regression on s390x
Fri, 21 Nov 2025 22:05:41 +0100
Paul Gevers <[email protected]> • #4949
Re: Bug#1120809: stress-ng FTCBFS for s390x: -fmodulo-sched is not removed
Thu, 20 Nov 2025 05:56:26 +0000
Pranav P <[email protected]> • #4948
Bug#1121002: libstreamvbyte: Consider disabling the build on unsupported architectures
Wed, 19 Nov 2025 13:02:39 +0100
Florent 'Skia' Jacquet <[email protected]> • #4947
Bug#1120809: stress-ng FTCBFS for s390x: -fmodulo-sched is not removed
Fri, 14 Nov 2025 23:08:23 +0100
Helmut Grohne <[email protected]> • #4946
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Wed, 12 Nov 2025 23:05:44 +0100
Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]> • #4945
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Wed, 12 Nov 2025 20:27:20 +0200
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> • #4944
Re: Bug#1120262: curl 8.14.1-2+deb13u1 flagged for acceptance
Sun, 9 Nov 2025 17:10:14 +0100
Paul Gevers <[email protected]> • #4943
Bug#1120262: curl 8.14.1-2+deb13u1 flagged for acceptance
Sun, 9 Nov 2025 15:08:07 +0200
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> • #4942
Re: Bug#1120262: curl 8.14.1-2+deb13u1 flagged for acceptance
Sun, 9 Nov 2025 11:56:19 +0100
Paul Gevers <[email protected]> • #4941
RE: Bug#1118779: charliecloud: autopkgtest regression on s390x: seccomp root emulation failed
Sat, 8 Nov 2025 16:49:42 +0000
Pranav P <[email protected]> • #4940
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Thu, 6 Nov 2025 08:27:28 +0000
Holger Levsen <[email protected]> • #4939
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Wed, 5 Nov 2025 20:42:08 +0100
Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]> • #4938
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD)
Wed, 05 Nov 2025 10:50:59 +0100
Philipp Kern <[email protected]> • #4937
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Tue, 4 Nov 2025 09:49:27 -0600
Falco Girgis <[email protected]> • #4936
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD)
Tue, 4 Nov 2025 09:19:02 -0500
John David Anglin <[email protected]> • #4935
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Tue, 4 Nov 2025 12:57:25 +0100
Christopher Huhn <[email protected]> • #4934
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Tue, 04 Nov 2025 12:56:58 +0100
"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" <[email protected]> • #4933
Re: Planned obsolescence ?
Tue, 4 Nov 2025 12:32:02 +0100
Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> • #4932
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Tue, 4 Nov 2025 09:48:43 +0100
Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> • #4931
Re: Planned obsolescence ?
Tue, 04 Nov 2025 09:22:10 +0100 (CET)
Jaromír Cápík <[email protected]> • #4930
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Mon, 3 Nov 2025 17:19:25 -0600
David Starner <[email protected]> • #4929
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Mon, 3 Nov 2025 23:20:01 +0100
Jan-Daniel Kaplanski <[email protected]> • #4928
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Mon, 3 Nov 2025 15:16:40 -0600
David Starner <[email protected]> • #4927
Re: Bug#1119833: src:stress-ng: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x
Mon, 3 Nov 2025 12:20:24 +0000
Pranav P <[email protected]> • #4926
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Mon, 3 Nov 2025 01:04:52 +0100
Jan-Daniel Kaplanski <[email protected]> • #4925
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD)
Sun, 2 Nov 2025 17:23:52 -0500
Paul Tagliamonte <[email protected]> • #4924
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD)
Sun, 02 Nov 2025 21:35:49 +0000
[email protected] • #4923
RE: Bug#1118779: charliecloud: autopkgtest regression on s390x: seccomp root emulation failed
Sun, 2 Nov 2025 07:46:49 +0000
Pranav P <[email protected]> • #4922
Re: Bug#1119833: src:stress-ng: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x
Sun, 2 Nov 2025 07:45:29 +0000
Pranav P <[email protected]> • #4921
Re: Bug#1118779: charliecloud: autopkgtest regression on s390x: seccomp root emulation failed
Sat, 1 Nov 2025 22:42:59 +0100
Peter Wienemann <[email protected]> • #4920
Bug#1119870: emacs: FTBFS on s390x: Ran 7698 tests, 7394 results as expected, 1 unexpected, 303 skipped
Sat, 1 Nov 2025 16:27:47 +0100
Sebastian Ramacher <[email protected]> • #4919
Bug#1119833: src:stress-ng: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x
Sat, 1 Nov 2025 09:36:55 +0100
Paul Gevers <[email protected]> • #4918
Re: Bug#1118779: charliecloud: autopkgtest regression on s390x: seccomp root emulation failed
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 10:49:10 +0000
Pranav P <[email protected]> • #4917
Re: Planned obsolescence ?
Thu, 30 Oct 2025 09:58:04 +0100
Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> • #4916
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 19:57:36 +0000
Peter Green <[email protected]> • #4915
Re: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 17:41:43 +0000 (UTC)
John Klos <[email protected]> • #4914
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 15:40:51 +0100
"Diederik de Haas" <[email protected]> • #4913
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 15:00:24 +0100
"Diederik de Haas" <[email protected]> • #4912
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 15:03:54 +0100
Marc Haber <[email protected]> • #4911
AW: Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:35:00 +0000 (UTC)
Jan-Daniel Kaplanski <[email protected]> • #4910
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:48:20 +0100
Marc Haber <[email protected]> • #4909
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:32:36 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #4908
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:30:57 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #4907
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:15:37 +0100
Marc Haber <[email protected]> • #4906
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:07:07 +0100
Marc Haber <[email protected]> • #4905
Re: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:39:44 +0100
[email protected] • #4904
Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:59:11 +0100
Romain Dolbeau <[email protected]> • #4903
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 00:06:25 +0100
Kurt Roeckx <[email protected]> • #4902
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:18:38 +0200
Sicelo <[email protected]> • #4901
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 23:52:00 +0000 (UTC)
John Klos <[email protected]> • #4900
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 17:38:57 -0400
Milan Kupcevic <[email protected]> • #4899
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 15:25:30 -0500
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #4898
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 15:13:45 -0500
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #4897
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 16:00:11 +0530
kiruthikaanbusuresh <[email protected]> • #4896
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:20:29 +0100
Marcin Juszkiewicz <[email protected]> • #4895
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:20:06 +0100
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #4894
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 10:33:28 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #4893
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 09:55:50 +0100
Gerardo Ballabio <[email protected]> • #4892
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 09:45:30 +0100
Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> • #4891
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 22:20:19 -0700
Tony Rodriguez <[email protected]> • #4890
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 09:51:01 +0900
Simon Richter <[email protected]> • #4889
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 17:29:02 -0700
Tony Rodriguez <[email protected]> • #4888
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 01:15:57 +0100
Jan-Daniel Kaplanski <[email protected]> • #4887
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 20:12:08 +0100
Marco d'Itri <[email protected]> • #4886
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 11:22:17 -0700
Tony Rodriguez <[email protected]> • #4885
Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 13:21:29 +0100
Bastian Blank <[email protected]> • #4884
Bug#1118779: charliecloud: autopkgtest regression on s390x: seccomp root emulation failed
Sat, 25 Oct 2025 13:27:11 +0200
Peter Wienemann <[email protected]> • #4883
Bug#1118519: opentsne: autopkgtest regression on some architectures with scikit 1.7.2
Tue, 21 Oct 2025 15:18:38 +0200
Timo Röhling <[email protected]> • #4882
Re: Bug#1118463: pygobject: FTBFS on 64-bit BE: "Fatal Python error: Aborted" in test_length_array_utf8_optional_inout()
Mon, 20 Oct 2025 16:28:59 +0100
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #4881
Bug#1118463: pygobject: FTBFS on 64-bit BE: "Fatal Python error: Aborted" in test_length_array_utf8_optional_inout()
Mon, 20 Oct 2025 16:15:42 +0100
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #4880
Bug#1118369: RM: godot3 [armhf i386 s390x] -- NBS; Unsupported upstream
Sat, 18 Oct 2025 20:16:28 +0200
Travis Wrightsman <[email protected]> • #4879
RE: Bug#1117971: src:lua-system: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x
Wed, 15 Oct 2025 05:44:25 +0000
Pranav P <[email protected]> • #4878
Re: Bug#1117971: src:lua-system: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x
Wed, 15 Oct 2025 07:37:28 +0200
Paul Gevers <[email protected]> • #4877
Re: Bug#1117971: src:lua-system: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x
Wed, 15 Oct 2025 05:18:19 +0000
Pranav P <[email protected]> • #4876
Re: Bug#1117971: src:lua-system: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x
Tue, 14 Oct 2025 10:48:53 +0000
Pranav P <[email protected]> • #4875
Re: binutils: Build of BCC fails with relocation of misaligned symbol during link on s390x
Mon, 13 Oct 2025 09:54:14 +0000
Pranav P <[email protected]> • #4874
Re: binutils: Build of BCC fails with relocation of misaligned symbol during link on s390x
Mon, 13 Oct 2025 05:30:32 +0000
Pranav P <[email protected]> • #4873
Bug#1117971: src:lua-system: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x
Mon, 13 Oct 2025 07:23:18 +0200
Paul Gevers <[email protected]> • #4872
Bug#1117937: libcgns: test_particlef and cgwrite_f03 tests fail on many architectures
Sun, 12 Oct 2025 21:04:56 +0200
Drew Parsons <[email protected]> • #4871
Re: Bug#1116657: src:libgig: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x
Sun, 12 Oct 2025 16:10:49 +0000
Pranav P <[email protected]> • #4870
Bug#1117885: src:picotool: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest failure on s390x
Sun, 12 Oct 2025 08:01:22 +0200
Paul Gevers <[email protected]> • #4869
Re: Bug#1116657: src:libgig: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x
Tue, 30 Sep 2025 05:34:25 +0000
Pranav P <[email protected]> • #4868
Bug#1116657: src:libgig: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x
Mon, 29 Sep 2025 21:37:09 +0200
Paul Gevers <[email protected]> • #4867
Re: emboss: all executables segfault on s390x
Thu, 25 Sep 2025 15:32:18 +0200
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #4866
Bug#1069098: emboss: all executables segfault on s390x
Thu, 25 Sep 2025 13:24:37 +0300
Andrius Merkys <[email protected]> • #4865
RE: emboss: all executables segfault on s390x
Thu, 25 Sep 2025 08:51:48 +0000
Pranav P <[email protected]> • #4864
Bug#1069098: emboss: all executables segfault on s390x
Thu, 25 Sep 2025 10:43:04 +0300
Andrius Merkys <[email protected]> • #4863
RE: emboss: all executables segfault on s390x
Thu, 25 Sep 2025 07:08:07 +0000
Pranav P <[email protected]> • #4862
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.