gmane.linux.debian.ports.sparc archive

381 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Floppy issues
Wed, 29 Oct 2025 16:54:25 +0100
Florian Fuchs <[email protected]> • #20805
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 19:57:36 +0000
Peter Green <[email protected]> • #20804
Re: Floppy issues
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 19:52:40 +0100
Gregor Riepl <[email protected]> • #20803
Re: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 17:41:43 +0000 (UTC)
John Klos <[email protected]> • #20802
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 15:40:51 +0100
"Diederik de Haas" <[email protected]> • #20801
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 15:00:24 +0100
"Diederik de Haas" <[email protected]> • #20800
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 15:03:54 +0100
Marc Haber <[email protected]> • #20799
Bug#1119241: ippl: FTBFS when built with many parallel jobs
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 12:54:18 +0100
Marc Haber <[email protected]> • #20798
Re: Bug#1119241: ippl: FTBFS when built with many parallel jobs
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 12:52:14 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20797
Bug#1119241: ippl: FTBFS when built with many parallel jobs
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 11:53:54 +0100 (CET)
Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]> • #20796
AW: Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:35:00 +0000 (UTC)
Jan-Daniel Kaplanski <[email protected]> • #20795
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:48:20 +0100
Marc Haber <[email protected]> • #20794
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:32:36 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20793
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:30:57 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20792
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:15:37 +0100
Marc Haber <[email protected]> • #20791
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:07:07 +0100
Marc Haber <[email protected]> • #20790
Re: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:39:44 +0100
[email protected] • #20789
Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky)
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:59:11 +0100
Romain Dolbeau <[email protected]> • #20788
Bug#1119241: ippl: FTBFS when built with many parallel jobs
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:11:21 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20787
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 00:06:25 +0100
Kurt Roeckx <[email protected]> • #20786
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:18:38 +0200
Sicelo <[email protected]> • #20785
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 23:52:00 +0000 (UTC)
John Klos <[email protected]> • #20784
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 17:38:57 -0400
Milan Kupcevic <[email protected]> • #20783
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 15:25:30 -0500
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #20782
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 15:13:45 -0500
Rob Landley <[email protected]> • #20781
Re: Bug#1118963: gtk4: Please disable four more tests on sparc64
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 20:32:00 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20780
Re: Bug#1118963: gtk4: Please disable four more tests on sparc64
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 19:21:35 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20779
Re: gtk4: Mipmap tests fail 16/32-bit pixel format conversions due to memory alignment issues
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 16:24:27 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20778
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 16:00:11 +0530
kiruthikaanbusuresh <[email protected]> • #20777
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:20:29 +0100
Marcin Juszkiewicz <[email protected]> • #20776
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:20:06 +0100
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #20775
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 10:33:28 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20774
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 09:55:50 +0100
Gerardo Ballabio <[email protected]> • #20773
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 09:45:30 +0100
Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> • #20772
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 22:20:19 -0700
Tony Rodriguez <[email protected]> • #20771
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 09:51:01 +0900
Simon Richter <[email protected]> • #20770
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 17:29:02 -0700
Tony Rodriguez <[email protected]> • #20769
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Mon, 27 Oct 2025 01:15:57 +0100
Jan-Daniel Kaplanski <[email protected]> • #20768
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 20:12:08 +0100
Marco d'Itri <[email protected]> • #20767
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 11:22:17 -0700
Tony Rodriguez <[email protected]> • #20766
Architecture baseline for Forky
Sun, 26 Oct 2025 13:21:29 +0100
Bastian Blank <[email protected]> • #20765
Re: Finding SPARC patches worth upstreaming in the UEK kernel
Sat, 25 Oct 2025 18:19:40 -0400
Dennis Clarke <[email protected]> • #20764
Bug#1118963: gtk4: Please disable four more tests on sparc64
Sat, 25 Oct 2025 23:10:56 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20763
Bug#1118961: gtk4: Please set DRAW_USE_LLVM=0 for softpipe architectures
Sat, 25 Oct 2025 23:03:50 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20762
Re: gtk4: Mipmap tests fail 16/32-bit pixel format conversions due to memory alignment issues
Sat, 25 Oct 2025 22:58:43 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20761
Re: gtk4: Mipmap tests fail 16/32-bit pixel format conversions due to memory alignment issues
Sat, 25 Oct 2025 22:12:29 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20760
Re: gtk4: Mipmap tests fail 16/32-bit pixel format conversions due to memory alignment issues
Sat, 25 Oct 2025 22:12:21 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20759
Re: gtk4: Mipmap tests fail 16/32-bit pixel format conversions due to memory alignment issues
Sat, 25 Oct 2025 21:46:35 +0200
Gregor Riepl <[email protected]> • #20758
Re: gtk4: Mipmap tests fail 16/32-bit pixel format conversions due to memory alignment issues
Sat, 25 Oct 2025 21:35:57 +0200
Gregor Riepl <[email protected]> • #20757
Re: gtk4: Mipmap tests fail 16/32-bit pixel format conversions due to memory alignment issues
Sat, 25 Oct 2025 17:00:33 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20756
Re: gtk4: Mipmap tests fail 16/32-bit pixel format conversions due to memory alignment issues
Sat, 25 Oct 2025 16:38:48 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20755
Bug#1118780: gtk4: Mipmap tests fail 16/32-bit pixel format conversions due to memory alignment issues
Sat, 25 Oct 2025 16:06:53 +0200
Gregor Riepl <[email protected]> • #20754
Re: gtk4: Mipmap tests fail 16/32-bit pixel format conversions due to memory alignment issues
Sat, 25 Oct 2025 15:50:03 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20753
Re: gtk4: Mipmap tests fail 16/32-bit pixel format conversions due to memory alignment issues
Sat, 25 Oct 2025 15:44:07 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20752
gtk4: Mipmap tests fail 16/32-bit pixel format conversions due to memory alignment issues
Sat, 25 Oct 2025 14:45:13 +0200
Gregor Riepl <[email protected]> • #20751
Re: Floppy issues
Sat, 25 Oct 2025 14:42:31 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20750
Re: Floppy issues
Sat, 25 Oct 2025 14:26:21 +0200
Gregor Riepl <[email protected]> • #20749
Re: Floppy issues
Sat, 25 Oct 2025 14:05:27 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20748
Re: Floppy issues
Sat, 25 Oct 2025 12:35:49 +0200
Gregor Riepl <[email protected]> • #20747
Re: Floppy issues
Sat, 25 Oct 2025 11:39:44 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20746
Re: Floppy issues
Sat, 25 Oct 2025 11:23:52 +0200
Florian Fuchs <[email protected]> • #20745
Re: Floppy issues
Sat, 25 Oct 2025 11:00:14 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20744
Re: Floppy issues
Sat, 25 Oct 2025 10:58:30 +0200
Florian Fuchs <[email protected]> • #20743
Finding SPARC patches worth upstreaming in the UEK kernel
Sat, 25 Oct 2025 10:56:40 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20742
Re: Floppy issues
Sat, 25 Oct 2025 10:18:12 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20741
Floppy issues
Sat, 25 Oct 2025 01:19:29 +0200
Gregor Riepl <[email protected]> • #20740
Bug#1118647: LLVM 21 ftbfs on sparc64 with lld, ld.lld: error: unknown argument '-relax'
Thu, 23 Oct 2025 15:06:15 +0200
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #20739
Re: New Debian sparc64 test kernel for stack corruption issue
Wed, 22 Oct 2025 16:03:12 +0200
Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> • #20738
Re: New Debian sparc64 test kernel for stack corruption issue
Wed, 22 Oct 2025 02:09:39 +0200
Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> • #20737
Re: New Debian sparc64 test kernel for stack corruption issue
Mon, 20 Oct 2025 21:21:29 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20736
Re: New Debian sparc64 test kernel for stack corruption issue
Mon, 20 Oct 2025 20:05:00 +0200
Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> • #20735
New Debian sparc64 test kernel for stack corruption issue
Sun, 19 Oct 2025 17:51:13 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20734
Re: xedit segfault on open
Fri, 17 Oct 2025 15:56:15 -0400
Rick Leir <[email protected]> • #20733
Re: xedit segfault on open
Thu, 16 Oct 2025 15:46:51 +0200
Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> • #20732
Re: xedit segfault on open
Thu, 16 Oct 2025 15:39:16 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20731
Re: xedit segfault on open
Thu, 16 Oct 2025 15:32:47 +0200
Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> • #20730
Re: xedit segfault on open
Wed, 15 Oct 2025 09:06:08 -0700
Alan Coopersmith <[email protected]> • #20729
Re: xedit segfault on open
Wed, 15 Oct 2025 16:03:39 +0200
Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> • #20728
Re: xedit segfault on open
Wed, 15 Oct 2025 15:49:32 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20727
Re: xedit segfault on open
Wed, 15 Oct 2025 15:42:58 +0200
Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> • #20726
Re: choosing default kernel in grub
Wed, 15 Oct 2025 15:26:40 +0200
Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> • #20725
Re: missing editors (gvim, emacs...)
Wed, 15 Oct 2025 15:20:17 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20724
missing editors (gvim, emacs...)
Wed, 15 Oct 2025 15:03:15 +0200
Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> • #20723
Re: choosing default kernel in grub
Wed, 15 Oct 2025 14:57:16 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20722
choosing default kernel in grub
Wed, 15 Oct 2025 14:46:14 +0200
Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> • #20721
Re: xedit segfault on open
Wed, 15 Oct 2025 13:58:17 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20720
xedit segfault on open
Wed, 15 Oct 2025 13:57:57 +0200
Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> • #20719
Bug#1118149: passwordsafe: Please cherry-pick upstream patch to fix unaligned access
Wed, 15 Oct 2025 13:13:44 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20718
Resolved: ConnectX4-LX Tainted Kernel and Slow Performance
Tue, 14 Oct 2025 11:40:49 -0700
Tony Rodriguez <[email protected]> • #20717
Bug#1118023: xdelta3: Bus error on sparc64 in xd3_forward_match
Mon, 13 Oct 2025 23:46:24 +0200
Gregor Riepl <[email protected]> • #20716
Re: Please validate test kernel on UltraSPARC machines
Mon, 13 Oct 2025 16:48:59 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20715
Re: Please validate test kernel on UltraSPARC machines
Mon, 13 Oct 2025 16:50:53 +0200
Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> • #20714
Re: Please validate test kernel on UltraSPARC machines
Mon, 13 Oct 2025 14:34:17 +0200
Gregor Riepl <[email protected]> • #20713
Re: Please validate test kernel on UltraSPARC machines
Mon, 13 Oct 2025 13:44:18 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20712
Re: Please validate test kernel on UltraSPARC machines
Mon, 13 Oct 2025 13:39:57 +0200
Gregor Riepl <[email protected]> • #20711
Bug#1117937: libcgns: test_particlef and cgwrite_f03 tests fail on many architectures
Sun, 12 Oct 2025 21:04:56 +0200
Drew Parsons <[email protected]> • #20710
Bug#1116681: pixman: FTBFS on sparc64 due to unaligned access
Tue, 30 Sep 2025 08:37:40 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20709
Workaround for S7-2 regarding lastest Solaris 11.4.81.193.1 CBE
Sun, 28 Sep 2025 16:34:19 -0700
Tony Rodriguez <[email protected]> • #20708
Re: S7-2 Debian 12 ISO Installation via NFS
Thu, 25 Sep 2025 17:40:56 -0400
Dennis Clarke <[email protected]> • #20707
Re: S7-2 Debian 12 ISO Installation via NFS
Thu, 25 Sep 2025 21:50:23 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #20706
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.