gmane.linux.file-systems.cifs archive

1447 archived articles, newest first (page 11 of 15). Latest articles →

Re: SMB Trans Vs SMB Write / SMB Read
Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:06:42 -0500
Shirish Pargaonkar <[email protected]> • #5292
Re: [linux-cifs-client] SMB Trans Vs SMB Write / SMB Read
Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:57:31 +0200
Volker Lendecke <[email protected]> • #5291
SMB Trans Vs SMB Write / SMB Read
Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:20:49 -0500
Shirish Pargaonkar <[email protected]> • #5290
[PATCH] cifs: eliminate cifs_init_private
Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:09:13 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5289
Re: broken cifsFileInfo handling in cifs_reopen_file codepath
Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:34:30 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5288
[PATCH] cifs: convert oplock breaks to use slow_work facility (try #4)
Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:47:50 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5287
Re: broken cifsFileInfo handling in cifs_reopen_file codepath
Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:45:56 -0500
Steve French <[email protected]> • #5286
Re: broken cifsFileInfo handling in cifs_reopen_file codepath
Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:55:34 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5285
Re: broken cifsFileInfo handling in cifs_reopen_file codepath
Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:10:35 -0500
Steve French <[email protected]> • #5284
broken cifsFileInfo handling in cifs_reopen_file codepath
Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:06:33 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5283
Re: 2.6.31-rc8: CIFS with 5 seconds hiccups
Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:24:18 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5282
Re: 2.6.31-rc8: CIFS with 5 seconds hiccups
Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:26:04 -0400 (EDT)
Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> • #5281
Re: 2.6.31-rc8: CIFS with 5 seconds hiccups
Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:34:05 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5280
(64 bit dump) Re: 2.6.31-rc8: CIFS with 5 seconds hiccups
Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:16:41 -0400 (EDT)
Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> • #5279
Re: 2.6.31-rc8: CIFS with 5 seconds hiccups
Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:10:47 -0400 (EDT)
Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> • #5278
Re: [PATCH 4/4] cifs: convert oplock breaks to use slow_work facility
Mon, 14 Sep 2009 08:01:22 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5277
SOLVED: Re: Can not mount AD share with Kerberos ticket: mount error 126 = Required key not available
Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:50:47 +0200
Robert Euhus <[email protected]> • #5276
Re: [PATCH 4/4] cifs: convert oplock breaks to use slow_work facility
Sat, 12 Sep 2009 07:59:53 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5275
[PATCH] cifs: fix oplock request handling in posix codepath
Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:49:37 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5274
Re: [PATCH] return error code for a partial/short send for a retry of the send
Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:06:59 -0500
Shirish Pargaonkar <[email protected]> • #5273
Re: [PATCH] return error code for a partial/short send for a retry of the send
Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:58:54 -0500
Shirish Pargaonkar <[email protected]> • #5272
Re: [PATCH 0/4] cifs: convert oplock breaks to use slow_work facility
Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:57:29 -0500
Steve French <[email protected]> • #5271
Re: Can not mount AD share with Kerberos ticket: mount error 126 = Required key not available
Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:40:29 +0400
"Q (Igor Mammedov)" <[email protected]> • #5270
Re: Can not mount AD share with Kerberos ticket: mount error 126 = Required key not available
Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:55:27 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5269
Can not mount AD share with Kerberos ticket: mount error 126 = Required key not available
Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:49:04 +0200
Robert Euhus <[email protected]> • #5268
[PATCH 4/4] cifs: convert oplock breaks to use slow_work facility
Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:14:08 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5267
[PATCH 2/4] cifs: take read lock on GlobalSMBSes_lock in is_valid_oplock_break
Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:14:06 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5266
[PATCH 3/4] cifs: have cifsFileInfo hold an extra inode reference
Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:14:07 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5265
[PATCH 1/4] cifs: remove cifsInodeInfo.oplockPending flag
Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:14:05 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5264
[PATCH 0/4] cifs: convert oplock breaks to use slow_work facility
Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:14:04 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5263
Re: [PATCH] return error code for a partial/short send for a retry of the send
Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:43:26 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5262
Re: 2.6.31-rc8: CIFS with 5 seconds hiccups
Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:19:32 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5261
Re: 2.6.31-rc8: CIFS with 5 seconds hiccups
Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:42:46 -0400 (EDT)
Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> • #5260
Re: 2.6.31-rc8: CIFS with 5 seconds hiccups
Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:27:53 -0400 (EDT)
Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> • #5259
Re: 2.6.31-rc8: CIFS with 5 seconds hiccups
Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:57:57 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5258
Re: 2.6.31-rc8: CIFS with 5 seconds hiccups
Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:42:28 -0400 (EDT)
Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> • #5257
Re: 2.6.31-rc8: CIFS with 5 seconds hiccups
Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:33:47 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5256
Re: 2.6.31-rc8: CIFS with 5 seconds hiccups
Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:53:12 -0400 (EDT)
Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> • #5255
Re: 2.6.31-rc8: CIFS with 5 seconds hiccups
Wed, 9 Sep 2009 20:55:48 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5254
Re: 2.6.31-rc8: CIFS with 5 seconds hiccups
Wed, 9 Sep 2009 17:27:57 -0400 (EDT)
Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> • #5253
Re: [patch] add info about how to obtain cifs module in cifs mount heleper manpages - retry
Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:14:44 +0200
Volker Lendecke <[email protected]> • #5252
Re: [patch] add info about how to obtain cifs module in cifs mount heleper manpages - retry
Wed, 9 Sep 2009 15:50:17 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5251
[patch] add info about how to obtain cifs module in cifs mount heleper manpages - retry
Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:37:51 -0500
Shirish Pargaonkar <[email protected]> • #5250
Re: 2.6.31-rc8: CIFS with 5 seconds hiccups
Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:02:57 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5249
Re: 2.6.31-rc8: CIFS with 5 seconds hiccups
Wed, 9 Sep 2009 13:57:54 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5248
Re: 2.6.31-rc8: CIFS with 5 seconds hiccups
Wed, 9 Sep 2009 13:33:33 -0400 (EDT)
Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> • #5247
Re: 2.6.31-rc8: CIFS with 5 seconds hiccups
Wed, 9 Sep 2009 13:28:24 -0400 (EDT)
Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> • #5246
Re: 2.6.31-rc8: CIFS with 5 seconds hiccups
Wed, 9 Sep 2009 13:20:39 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5245
Re: 2.6.31-rc8: CIFS with 5 seconds hiccups
Wed, 9 Sep 2009 13:07:52 -0400 (EDT)
Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> • #5244
Re: 2.6.31-rc8: CIFS with 5 seconds hiccups
Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:53:52 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5243
Re: 2.6.31-rc8: CIFS with 5 seconds hiccups
Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:33:21 -0400 (EDT)
Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> • #5242
Re: [PATCH 0/4] cifs: alternate approach to fixing oplock queue races
Wed, 9 Sep 2009 11:49:04 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5241
[PATCH] return error code for a partial/short send for a retry of the send
Wed, 9 Sep 2009 03:40:13 -0500
Shirish Pargaonkar <[email protected]> • #5240
Re: [patch] add info about how to obtain cifs module in cifs mount heleper manpages
Tue, 8 Sep 2009 22:39:19 -0500
Shirish Pargaonkar <[email protected]> • #5239
Re: [PATCH 0/4] cifs: alternate approach to fixing oplock queue races
Tue, 8 Sep 2009 13:28:58 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5238
Re: [PATCH 0/4] cifs: alternate approach to fixing oplock queue races
Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:12:22 -0500
Steve French <[email protected]> • #5237
[PATCH 4/4] cifs: turn oplock breaks into a workqueue job
Tue, 8 Sep 2009 10:12:59 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5236
[PATCH 2/4] cifs: take read lock on GlobalSMBSes_lock in is_valid_oplock_break
Tue, 8 Sep 2009 10:12:57 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5235
[PATCH 3/4] cifs: have cifsFileInfo hold an extra inode reference
Tue, 8 Sep 2009 10:12:58 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5234
[PATCH 1/4] cifs: remove cifsInodeInfo.oplockPending flag
Tue, 8 Sep 2009 10:12:56 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5233
[PATCH 0/4] cifs: alternate approach to fixing oplock queue races
Tue, 8 Sep 2009 10:12:55 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5232
Re: [patch] add info about how to obtain cifs module in cifs mount heleper manpages
Tue, 8 Sep 2009 10:04:15 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5231
Re: [patch] add info about how to obtain cifs module in cifs mount heleper manpages
Tue, 8 Sep 2009 08:26:25 -0500
Shirish Pargaonkar <[email protected]> • #5230
Re: 2.6.31-rc8: CIFS with 5 seconds hiccups
Sat, 5 Sep 2009 07:10:52 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5229
Re: mount error 13 = Permission denied -> what is the correct samba configuration for guest access from windows client
Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:01:16 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5228
Re: [linux-cifs-client] [PATCH] cifs.upcall: do a brute-force search for KRB5 credcache
Fri, 4 Sep 2009 06:33:54 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5227
Re: [PATCH] cifs: consolidate reconnect logic in smb_init routines
Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:59:47 -0500
Steve French <[email protected]> • #5226
Re: [PATCH] cifs: consolidate reconnect logic in smb_init routines
Thu, 3 Sep 2009 10:24:43 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5225
Re: [PATCH] cifs: consolidate reconnect logic in smb_init routines
Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:00:35 -0500
Steve French <[email protected]> • #5224
Re: [PATCH] cifs: consolidate reconnect logic in smb_init routines
Thu, 3 Sep 2009 07:40:09 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5223
mount error 13 = Permission denied -> what is the correct samba configuration for guest access from windows client
Thu, 03 Sep 2009 09:15:35 +0200
[email protected] • #5222
Re: [PATCH] cifs: consolidate reconnect logic in smb_init routines
Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:38:49 -0500
Steve French <[email protected]> • #5221
Re: PATCH] cifs: fix broken mounts when a SSH tunnel is used (try #4)
Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:22:07 -0500
Steve French <[email protected]> • #5220
Re: [PATCH] cifs: potential NULL dereference in parse_DFS_referrals()
Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:29:57 -0500
Steve French <[email protected]> • #5219
Re: [PATCH 4/5] cifs: take reference to inode for oplock breaks
Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:17:15 -0500
Shirish Pargaonkar <[email protected]> • #5218
Re: [PATCH 4/5] cifs: take reference to inode for oplock breaks
Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:41:24 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5217
Re: [patch] prevent slab corruption by fixing race codition in cifs
Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:30:45 -0500
Shirish Pargaonkar <[email protected]> • #5216
Re: [PATCH 2/5] cifs: take tcon reference for oplock breaks
Sun, 30 Aug 2009 00:10:39 -0500
Shirish Pargaonkar <[email protected]> • #5215
Re: [PATCH 2/5] cifs: take tcon reference for oplock breaks
Sat, 29 Aug 2009 19:13:45 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5214
Re: [PATCH 2/5] cifs: take tcon reference for oplock breaks
Sat, 29 Aug 2009 12:17:13 -0500
Shirish Pargaonkar <[email protected]> • #5213
Re: [PATCH 3/5] cifs: clean up cifs_oplock_thread loop
Sat, 29 Aug 2009 08:04:13 -0500
Shirish Pargaonkar <[email protected]> • #5212
[PATCH] cifs.upcall: do a brute-force search for KRB5 credcache
Sat, 29 Aug 2009 06:48:19 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5211
Re: [PATCH 5/5] cifs: cancel oplock release callbacks during reconnect
Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:09:40 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5210
Re: [PATCH 4/5] cifs: take reference to inode for oplock breaks
Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:53:19 -0500
Shirish Pargaonkar <[email protected]> • #5209
Re: [PATCH 5/5] cifs: cancel oplock release callbacks during reconnect
Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:38:28 -0500
Shirish Pargaonkar <[email protected]> • #5208
Re: [PATCH 5/5] cifs: cancel oplock release callbacks during reconnect
Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:26:06 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5207
Re: [PATCH 5/5] cifs: cancel oplock release callbacks during reconnect
Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:14:43 -0500
Shirish Pargaonkar <[email protected]> • #5206
Re: [PATCH 1/5] cifs: protect GlobalOplock_Q with its own spinlock
Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:38:39 -0500
Shirish Pargaonkar <[email protected]> • #5205
Timeout when writing to disconnected drive
Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:23:25 +0200
Stefan Windfeldt <[email protected]> • #5204
Re: [linux-cifs-client] are SMB TID's specific to the SMB UID used in the tree connect call?
Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:11:05 -0500
"Christopher R. Hertel" <[email protected]> • #5203
Re: are SMB TID's specific to the SMB UID used in the tree connect call?
Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:04:45 +0200
Volker Lendecke <[email protected]> • #5202
[patch] add info about how to obtain cifs module in cifs mount heleper manpages
Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:55:39 -0500
Shirish Pargaonkar <[email protected]> • #5201
wiki pages for CIFS VFS
Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:03:35 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5200
Re: [linux-cifs-client] are SMB TID's specific to the SMB UID used in the tree connect call?
Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:29:25 -0500
"Christopher R. Hertel" <[email protected]> • #5199
are SMB TID's specific to the SMB UID used in the tree connect call?
Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:55:37 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5198
Re: [patch] prevent slab corruption by fixing race codition in cifs
Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:02:41 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5197
Re: [PATCH] cifs.upcall: make using ip address conditional on new option
Wed, 26 Aug 2009 08:35:21 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5196
Re: [PATCH] cifs.upcall: make using ip address conditional on new option
Wed, 26 Aug 2009 08:02:59 -0400
simo <[email protected]> • #5195
Re: [PATCH] cifs.upcall: switch to getopt_long
Wed, 26 Aug 2009 08:01:42 -0400
simo <[email protected]> • #5194
Re: Netapp and krb5
Wed, 26 Aug 2009 07:18:42 -0400
Jeff Layton <[email protected]> • #5193
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.