gmane.org.gnu.discuss archive

542 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 6). Latest articles →

Re: cURL author receives rude LogJ4 security inquiry
Tue, 22 Feb 2022 08:31:55 +0300
Jean Louis <[email protected]> • #20864
Re: cURL author receives rude LogJ4 security inquiry
Mon, 21 Feb 2022 21:26:01 -0600
Jacob Bachmeyer <[email protected]> • #20863
Re: cURL author receives rude LogJ4 security inquiry
Mon, 21 Feb 2022 21:51:58 -0500
dick <[email protected]> • #20862
Re: cURL author receives rude LogJ4 security inquiry
Mon, 21 Feb 2022 21:51:42 -0500
dick <[email protected]> • #20861
Re: cURL author receives rude LogJ4 security inquiry
Tue, 22 Feb 2022 08:22:26 +0900 (added by [email protected])
Akira Urushibata <[email protected]> • #20860
Re: Richard Stallman should be reinstated to President of the FSF
Mon, 21 Feb 2022 19:14:39 +0100
<[email protected]> • #20859
Re: Richard Stallman should be reinstated to President of the FSF
Mon, 21 Feb 2022 12:06:51 -0500
dick <[email protected]> • #20858
Re: Richard Stallman should be reinstated to President of the FSF
Mon, 21 Feb 2022 17:40:40 +0100
inasprecali <[email protected]> • #20857
Re: Richard Stallman should be reinstated to President of the FSF
Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:17:10 -0500
dick <[email protected]> • #20856
Re: Richard Stallman should be reinstated to President of the FSF
Mon, 21 Feb 2022 14:29:18 +0300
Jean Louis <[email protected]> • #20855
Re: Richard Stallman should be reinstated to President of the FSF
Mon, 21 Feb 2022 06:01:51 -0500
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[email protected]> • #20854
Re: Richard Stallman should be reinstated to President of the FSF
Mon, 21 Feb 2022 13:47:30 +0300
Jean Louis <[email protected]> • #20853
Re: Richard Stallman should be reinstated to President of the FSF
Mon, 21 Feb 2022 10:56:39 +0100
inasprecali <[email protected]> • #20852
Re: Richard Stallman should be reinstated to President of the FSF
Sun, 20 Feb 2022 20:53:51 -0500
dick <[email protected]> • #20851
Re: Richard Stallman should be reinstated to President of the FSF
Sun, 13 Feb 2022 17:48:21 +0800
andrew <[email protected]> • #20850
Re: Richard Stallman should be reinstated to President of the FSF
Fri, 18 Feb 2022 11:11:22 -0000
[email protected] • #20849
Re: cURL author receives rude LogJ4 security inquiry
Fri, 18 Feb 2022 09:46:28 +0300
Jean Louis <[email protected]> • #20848
Re: cURL author receives rude LogJ4 security inquiry
Fri, 18 Feb 2022 07:15:25 +0900 (added by [email protected])
Akira Urushibata <[email protected]> • #20847
Re: Richard Stallman should be reinstated to President of the FSF
Tue, 01 Feb 2022 17:41:24 +0100
GNU Hacker <[email protected]> • #20846
Re: cURL author receives rude LogJ4 security inquiry
Mon, 31 Jan 2022 23:07:47 +0300
Jean Louis <[email protected]> • #20845
Re: cURL author receives rude LogJ4 security inquiry
Mon, 31 Jan 2022 14:01:42 -0500
dick <[email protected]> • #20844
Re: cURL author receives rude LogJ4 security inquiry
Mon, 31 Jan 2022 21:23:54 +0300
Jean Louis <[email protected]> • #20843
Re: cURL author receives rude LogJ4 security inquiry
Mon, 31 Jan 2022 10:09:36 -0800
"Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <[email protected]> • #20842
Re: cURL author receives rude LogJ4 security inquiry
Mon, 31 Jan 2022 13:05:37 -0500
dick <[email protected]> • #20841
Re: cURL author receives rude LogJ4 security inquiry
Mon, 31 Jan 2022 20:21:17 +0300
Jean Louis <[email protected]> • #20840
Re: cURL author receives rude LogJ4 security inquiry
Mon, 31 Jan 2022 02:58:25 -0500
dick <[email protected]> • #20839
Re: cURL author receives rude LogJ4 security inquiry
Sun, 30 Jan 2022 23:52:30 -0500
DJ Delorie <[email protected]> • #20838
cURL author receives rude LogJ4 security inquiry
Mon, 31 Jan 2022 13:32:20 +0900 (added by [email protected])
Akira Urushibata <[email protected]> • #20837
A "best efforts" official statement?
Thu, 06 Jan 2022 18:32:23 -0500
dick <[email protected]> • #20836
Re: Do mirages appear when images are enlarged?
Thu, 25 Nov 2021 23:09:39 -0500
DJ Delorie <[email protected]> • #20835
Do mirages appear when images are enlarged?
Fri, 26 Nov 2021 07:46:52 +0900 (added by [email protected])
Akira Urushibata <[email protected]> • #20834
Lawyers complain about compressed video image
Fri, 19 Nov 2021 07:05:12 +0900 (added by [email protected])
Akira Urushibata <[email protected]> • #20833
Re: Judge declares zoom of iPhone image unacceptable in court
Thu, 18 Nov 2021 09:06:33 +0900 (added by [email protected])
Akira Urushibata <[email protected]> • #20832
Re: Judge declares zoom of iPhone image unacceptable in court
Mon, 15 Nov 2021 19:12:55 -0300
Jorge P. de Morais Neto <[email protected]> • #20831
Re: Judge declares zoom of iPhone image unacceptable in court
Mon, 15 Nov 2021 20:18:44 -0800
"Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <[email protected]> • #20830
Re: Judge declares zoom of iPhone image unacceptable in court
Mon, 15 Nov 2021 21:48:20 -0600
Jacob Bachmeyer <[email protected]> • #20829
Judge declares zoom of iPhone image unacceptable in court
Tue, 16 Nov 2021 06:36:02 +0900 (added by [email protected])
Akira Urushibata <[email protected]> • #20828
Re: "Freedom" is really the wrong word
Sun, 14 Nov 2021 19:37:44 -0600
Jacob Bachmeyer <[email protected]> • #20827
Re: "Freedom" is really the wrong word
Fri, 5 Nov 2021 16:02:29 -0000
[email protected] • #20826
Re: "Freedom" is really the wrong word
Sat, 06 Nov 2021 07:45:47 -0400
dick <[email protected]> • #20825
Re: "Freedom" is really the wrong word
Tue, 09 Nov 2021 11:31:30 -0800
"Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <[email protected]> • #20824
Re: "Freedom" is really the wrong word
Mon, 08 Nov 2021 09:04:03 -0800
"Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <[email protected]> • #20823
Re: "Freedom" is really the wrong word
Sat, 06 Nov 2021 11:55:58 +0000
Jean Louis <[email protected]> • #20822
Re: "Freedom" is really the wrong word
Sat, 06 Nov 2021 08:26:32 +0000
Jean Louis <[email protected]> • #20821
Re: "Freedom" is really the wrong word
Fri, 05 Nov 2021 19:05:50 -0500
Jacob Bachmeyer <[email protected]> • #20820
Re: "Freedom" is really the wrong word
Thu, 04 Nov 2021 20:31:50 -0400
dick <[email protected]> • #20819
Re: "Freedom" is really the wrong word
Thu, 04 Nov 2021 13:06:44 -0400
dick <[email protected]> • #20818
Re: "Freedom" is really the wrong word
Thu, 04 Nov 2021 18:42:15 -0500
Jacob Bachmeyer <[email protected]> • #20817
Re: "Freedom" is really the wrong word
Thu, 04 Nov 2021 14:06:48 -0400
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[email protected]> • #20816
Re: "Freedom" is really the wrong word
Thu, 04 Nov 2021 12:05:16 -0400
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[email protected]> • #20815
"Freedom" is really the wrong word
Sat, 30 Oct 2021 09:28:05 -0400
dick <[email protected]> • #20814
Re: Shouting into a pillow for nonfree rapprochement
Fri, 29 Oct 2021 20:27:39 -0500
Jacob Bachmeyer <[email protected]> • #20813
Shouting into a pillow for nonfree rapprochement
Wed, 27 Oct 2021 15:56:08 -0400
dick <[email protected]> • #20812
Re: Calls mount for Facebook transparency
Thu, 21 Oct 2021 19:24:37 -0300
Jorge P. de Morais Neto <[email protected]> • #20811
Re: Asahi Shimbun on face recognition
Sun, 10 Oct 2021 12:43:44 -0300
Jorge P. de Morais Neto <[email protected]> • #20810
Calls mount for Facebook transparency
Mon, 11 Oct 2021 10:47:08 +0900 (added by [email protected])
Akira Urushibata <[email protected]> • #20809
Asahi Shimbun on face recognition
Sun, 3 Oct 2021 09:13:49 +0900 (added by [email protected])
Akira Urushibata <[email protected]> • #20808
BBC on Elizabeth Holmes and Theranos
Sat, 11 Sep 2021 06:15:53 +0900 (added by [email protected])
Akira Urushibata <[email protected]> • #20807
Re: Ghost soldiers: fear will give you false figures
Sat, 21 Aug 2021 14:51:31 +0300
Jean Louis <[email protected]> • #20806
Re: Ghost soldiers: fear will give you false figures
Sat, 21 Aug 2021 08:40:45 +0200
John Darrington <[email protected]> • #20805
Ghost soldiers: fear will give you false figures
Wed, 18 Aug 2021 09:49:47 +0900 (added by [email protected])
Akira Urushibata <[email protected]> • #20804
Re: Bill Gates in the news: Deja vu
Mon, 12 Jul 2021 19:31:55 +0300
Jean Louis <[email protected]> • #20803
Re: Bill Gates in the news: Deja vu
Mon, 12 Jul 2021 17:03:24 +0200
Alexandre Garreau <[email protected]> • #20802
Re: "Bad behavior" loosely defined
Tue, 22 Jun 2021 20:19:56 -0400
shulie <[email protected]> • #20801
"Bad behavior" loosely defined
Wed, 23 Jun 2021 07:34:55 +0900 (added by [email protected])
Akira Urushibata <[email protected]> • #20800
Re: Bill Gates in the news: Deja vu
Sat, 22 May 2021 05:15:40 +0900 (added by [email protected])
Akira Urushibata <[email protected]> • #20799
Re: Bill Gates in the news: Deja vu
Wed, 19 May 2021 20:42:38 +0430
Ali Reza Hayati <[email protected]> • #20798
Re: Bill Gates in the news: Deja vu
Wed, 19 May 2021 07:00:39 +0000
Ali Reza Hayati <[email protected]> • #20797
Re: Bill Gates in the news: Deja vu
Wed, 19 May 2021 04:29:14 +0430
Ali Reza Hayati <[email protected]> • #20796
Bill Gates in the news: Deja vu
Wed, 19 May 2021 08:08:07 +0900 (added by [email protected])
Akira Urushibata <[email protected]> • #20795
Re: Censorship protest relevance (was: Re: Continuation of my previous mail)
Fri, 14 May 2021 15:00:53 -0400
DJ Delorie <[email protected]> • #20794
Re: Censorship protest relevance (was: Re: Continuation of my previous mail)
Thu, 13 May 2021 12:56:19 -0400
shulie <[email protected]> • #20793
Re: Censorship protest relevance (was: Re: Continuation of my previous mail)
Thu, 13 May 2021 01:56:04 -0400
DJ Delorie <[email protected]> • #20792
Re: Censorship protest relevance (was: Re: Continuation of my previous mail)
Thu, 13 May 2021 09:50:39 +0300
"Federico Leva (Nemo)" <[email protected]> • #20791
Censorship protest relevance (was: Re: Continuation of my previous mail)
Wed, 12 May 2021 20:32:03 -0500
Jacob Bachmeyer <[email protected]> • #20790
Re: Continuation of my previous mail
Mon, 10 May 2021 12:58:21 +0300
Jean Louis <[email protected]> • #20789
Re: Boxer syndrome
Wed, 12 May 2021 07:20:33 +0900 (added by [email protected])
Akira Urushibata <[email protected]> • #20788
Boxer syndrome
Sun, 9 May 2021 01:29:29 +0430
Ali Reza Hayati <[email protected]> • #20787
Re: Continuation of my previous mail
Wed, 5 May 2021 21:52:37 +0430
Ali Reza Hayati <[email protected]> • #20786
Re: Continuation of my previous mail
Wed, 05 May 2021 09:46:21 -0700
"Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <[email protected]> • #20785
Subject: Re: The anti-GNU defamatory group of Ludovic Court ès - Re: assessment of the GNU Assembly project
Mon, 03 May 2021 13:53:21 -0400
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[email protected]> • #20784
Re: The anti-GNU defamatory group of Ludovic Court ès - Re: assessment of the GNU Assembly project
Tue, 4 May 2021 21:46:14 -0400
shulie <[email protected]> • #20783
Re: The anti-GNU defamatory group of Ludovic Courtè s - Re: assessment of the GNU Assembly project
Tue, 4 May 2021 09:21:57 +0200
"Andreas R." <[email protected]> • #20782
Continuation of my previous mail
Tue, 04 May 2021 12:36:13 +0530
Rohit Dutt via General GNU project and free software discussions <[email protected]> • #20781
Subject: Re: The anti-GNU defamatory group of Ludovic Court ès - Re: assessment of the GNU Assembly project
Mon, 03 May 2021 13:40:04 -0400
DJ Delorie <[email protected]> • #20780
Subject: Re: The anti-GNU defamatory group of Ludovic Court ès - Re: assessment of the GNU Assembly project
Mon, 03 May 2021 12:40:08 -0400
DJ Delorie <[email protected]> • #20779
Subject: Re: The anti-GNU defamatory group of Ludovic Court ès - Re: assessment of the GNU Assembly project
Mon, 03 May 2021 13:28:02 -0400
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[email protected]> • #20778
Re: The anti-GNU defamatory group of Ludovic Court ès - Re: assessment of the GNU Assembly project
Mon, 3 May 2021 17:00:52 +0430
Ali Reza Hayati <[email protected]> • #20777
Re: The anti-GNU defamatory group of Ludovic Courtè s - Re: assessment of the GNU Assembly project
Sun, 02 May 2021 23:56:38 -0500
Jacob Bachmeyer <[email protected]> • #20776
Re: obtaining source with Guix (was : The anti-GNU defamatory group of Ludovic Courtès - Re: assessment of the GNU Ass embly project)
Mon, 03 May 2021 00:03:30 -0500
Jacob Bachmeyer <[email protected]> • #20775
Re: The anti-GNU defamatory group of Ludovic Court ès - Re: assessment of the GNU Assembly project
Sun, 2 May 2021 02:20:53 -0400
shulie <[email protected]> • #20774
Re: assessment of the GNU Assembly project
Sat, 1 May 2021 03:26:51 +0200
Taylan Kammer <[email protected]> • #20773
Re: assessment of the GNU Assembly project
Sat, 1 May 2021 21:58:12 -0400
shulie <[email protected]> • #20772
Re: assessment of the GNU Assembly project
Sat, 1 May 2021 10:22:18 +0300
Jean Louis <[email protected]> • #20771
Re: assessment of the GNU Assembly project
Sat, 1 May 2021 22:02:55 -0400
shulie <[email protected]> • #20770
Re: assessment of the GNU Assembly project
Sat, 1 May 2021 03:45:38 +0200
Taylan Kammer <[email protected]> • #20769
Re: The anti-GNU defamatory group of Ludovic Courtè s - Re: assessment of the GNU Assembly project
Sun, 2 May 2021 13:09:53 -0500
"Adrienne G. Thompson" <[email protected]> • #20768
Serious licensing flaws in Guix
Sat, 1 May 2021 11:05:27 +0300
Jean Louis <[email protected]> • #20767
Subject: Re: The anti-GNU defamatory group of Ludovic Court ès - Re: assessment of the GNU Assembly project
Sun, 02 May 2021 12:19:11 -0400
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams-mXXj517/[email protected]> • #20766
Subject: Re: The anti-GNU defamatory group of Ludovic Court ès - Re: assessment of the GNU Assembly project
Sun, 02 May 2021 12:19:13 -0400
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams-mXXj517/[email protected]> • #20765
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.