gmane.org.w3c.specifications archive

369 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: [Project review] How to make the best of GitHub for your specification? - 17 December 2015
Thu, 10 Dec 2015 10:55:54 -0500
Arthur Barstow <[email protected]> • #2209
[Project review] How to make the best of GitHub for your specification? - 17 December 2015
Thu, 10 Dec 2015 11:27:52 +0800
Xueyuan Jia <[email protected]> • #2208
New publication workflow: Echidna 1.4.0, Specberus 1.3.0
Thu, 3 Dec 2015 23:59:59 +0900
Antonio Olmo Titos <[email protected]> • #2207
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Wed, 2 Dec 2015 12:53:29 -0600
Shane McCarron <[email protected]> • #2206
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Wed, 2 Dec 2015 09:56:52 -0500
Philippe Le Hegaret <[email protected]> • #2205
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Mon, 30 Nov 2015 17:58:37 -0500
fantasai <[email protected]> • #2204
Re: Underline visibility (Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016)
Mon, 30 Nov 2015 17:49:09 -0500
fantasai <[email protected]> • #2203
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Sun, 29 Nov 2015 20:25:30 +1100
Marcos Caceres <[email protected]> • #2202
Re: Underline visibility (Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016)
Sun, 29 Nov 2015 20:03:44 +1100
Marcos Caceres <[email protected]> • #2201
W3C makes its data available through a Web API
Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:14:02 +0100
Vivien Lacourba <[email protected]> • #2200
Underline visibility (Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016)
Fri, 20 Nov 2015 18:23:28 +0100
Bert Bos <[email protected]> • #2199
Re: Can we please update Respec to support the new TR style for ED drafts?
Mon, 16 Nov 2015 17:01:34 -0800
fantasai <[email protected]> • #2198
Re: Can we please update Respec to support the new TR style for ED drafts?
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 13:31:25 -0600
Shane McCarron <[email protected]> • #2197
Re: Can we please update Respec to support the new TR style for ED drafts?
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:03:23 -0800
fantasai <[email protected]> • #2196
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 06:29:43 +0000
[email protected] • #2195
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Thu, 12 Nov 2015 22:09:24 -0600
Shane McCarron <[email protected]> • #2194
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:10:08 -0600
Shane McCarron <[email protected]> • #2193
Re: Can we please update Respec to support the new TR style for ED drafts?
Thu, 12 Nov 2015 08:45:08 -0600
Shane McCarron <[email protected]> • #2192
Can we please update Respec to support the new TR style for ED drafts?
Thu, 12 Nov 2015 14:07:24 +0000
[email protected] • #2191
TOC Sidebar (Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016)
Thu, 12 Nov 2015 08:39:02 -0500
Doug Schepers <[email protected]> • #2190
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Tue, 10 Nov 2015 23:09:12 +0100
Michiel Bijl <[email protected]> • #2189
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:35:48 -0800
Edward O'Connor <[email protected]> • #2188
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Tue, 10 Nov 2015 21:14:45 +0100
Michiel Bijl <[email protected]> • #2187
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Tue, 10 Nov 2015 20:53:26 +0100
Michiel Bijl <[email protected]> • #2186
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Tue, 10 Nov 2015 20:46:35 +0100
Michiel Bijl <[email protected]> • #2185
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:56:32 +0000
Alan Stearns <[email protected]> • #2184
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:51:58 -0800
Edward O'Connor <[email protected]> • #2183
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:50:33 -0800
Edward O'Connor <[email protected]> • #2182
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Tue, 10 Nov 2015 19:16:01 +0100
Michiel Bijl <[email protected]> • #2181
RE: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:28:51 -0600
"John Foliot" <[email protected]> • #2180
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:18:00 -0500
"Belfanti, Paul" <[email protected]> • #2179
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:32:33 +0100
Carlos A Velasco <[email protected]> • #2178
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Fri, 6 Nov 2015 16:39:13 +0000
[email protected] • #2177
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Fri, 6 Nov 2015 10:33:14 -0600
Shane McCarron <[email protected]> • #2176
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Fri, 6 Nov 2015 16:25:54 +0000
[email protected] • #2175
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Fri, 6 Nov 2015 14:01:42 +0000
David Carlisle <[email protected]> • #2174
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:23:06 -0800
"Tab Atkins Jr." <[email protected]> • #2173
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Thu, 05 Nov 2015 10:39:47 -0800
David Singer <[email protected]> • #2172
RE: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Thu, 5 Nov 2015 18:27:33 +0000
Steve Glaser <[email protected]> • #2171
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Thu, 5 Nov 2015 10:08:30 -0800
[email protected] (T.V Raman) • #2170
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Thu, 5 Nov 2015 09:55:31 -0800
Annette Greiner <[email protected]> • #2169
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Thu, 05 Nov 2015 15:56:05 +0100
Bert Bos <[email protected]> • #2168
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Tue, 3 Nov 2015 12:41:51 +1100
Marcos Caceres <[email protected]> • #2167
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Tue, 3 Nov 2015 10:38:51 +0900
fantasai <[email protected]> • #2166
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Tue, 3 Nov 2015 11:59:55 +1100
Marcos Caceres <[email protected]> • #2165
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Mon, 02 Nov 2015 16:05:05 -0800
Edward O'Connor <[email protected]> • #2164
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Sat, 31 Oct 2015 08:00:05 +0900
Ivan Herman <[email protected]> • #2163
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Sat, 31 Oct 2015 07:31:41 +0900
fantasai <[email protected]> • #2162
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Fri, 30 Oct 2015 18:27:47 +0900
fantasai <[email protected]> • #2161
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Fri, 30 Oct 2015 18:26:42 +0900
fantasai <[email protected]> • #2160
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Sat, 31 Oct 2015 05:08:17 +0900
Ivan Herman <[email protected]> • #2159
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:14:50 +0900
fantasai <[email protected]> • #2158
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Thu, 29 Oct 2015 22:16:33 -0700
[email protected] • #2157
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Fri, 30 Oct 2015 13:35:29 +0900
Shane McCarron <[email protected]> • #2156
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Fri, 30 Oct 2015 12:19:35 +0900
Giuseppe Pascale <[email protected]> • #2155
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Fri, 30 Oct 2015 03:50:09 +0100
Tobie Langel <[email protected]> • #2154
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Fri, 30 Oct 2015 08:58:17 +0900
Shane McCarron <[email protected]> • #2153
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Fri, 30 Oct 2015 08:51:47 +0900
Giuseppe Pascale <[email protected]> • #2152
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Fri, 30 Oct 2015 08:39:53 +0900
Shane McCarron <[email protected]> • #2151
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:17:11 +0100
Tobie Langel <[email protected]> • #2150
Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016
Fri, 30 Oct 2015 03:14:36 +0900
"Coralie Mercier" <[email protected]> • #2149
Re: Support for the new W3C license?
Wed, 7 Oct 2015 13:55:23 -0400
Marcos Caceres <[email protected]> • #2148
Re: Support for the new W3C license?
Wed, 7 Oct 2015 10:11:08 -0700
"Arnaud Le Hors" <[email protected]> • #2147
Re: Support for the new W3C license?
Wed, 7 Oct 2015 12:47:22 -0400
Marcos Caceres <[email protected]> • #2146
Re: Support for the new W3C license?
Fri, 2 Oct 2015 21:23:59 +0400
Denis Ah-Kang <[email protected]> • #2145
Re: Support for the new W3C license?
Fri, 2 Oct 2015 08:51:11 -0700
"Arnaud Le Hors" <[email protected]> • #2144
Re: Introducing W3C's JavaScript repository
Fri, 2 Oct 2015 10:16:35 -0400
timeless <[email protected]> • #2143
Re: Introducing W3C's JavaScript repository
Fri, 2 Oct 2015 19:02:51 +0900
Sangwhan Moon <[email protected]> • #2142
Re: Introducing W3C's JavaScript repository
Fri, 2 Oct 2015 00:07:01 -0400
Doug Schepers <[email protected]> • #2141
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.