gmane.os.freebsd.devel.ppc archive

3454 archived articles, newest first (page 26 of 35). Latest articles →

[Bug 233807] devel/msbuild Fails on PowerPC64
Fri, 10 May 2019 18:38:49 +0000
[email protected] • #10953
Re: X.org colour issues on PowerMac G5 with GeForce 6600
Fri, 10 May 2019 15:42:12 +0100
Francis Little <[email protected]> • #10952
[Bug 233863] Various PowerMac G5 models may require kern.smp.disabled=1 and must set usefdt=1 which causes net interface reorder
Fri, 10 May 2019 10:47:25 +0000
[email protected] • #10951
Re: 970/PowerMac G5 cpudep_ap_bootstrap slb-related hangup *solved* . . .
Fri, 10 May 2019 03:23:36 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10950
970/PowerMac G5 cpudep_ap_bootstrap slb-related hangup *solved* . . .
Fri, 10 May 2019 02:15:43 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10949
970/G5 powerpc64: why are HIOR (311), HID0, HID1 set in cpudep_ap_setup *AFTER* cpudep_ap_bootstrap tries general PSL_IR|PSL_DR activity for pcpup->pc_curthread->td_pcb->
Fri, 10 May 2019 00:29:39 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10948
Re: cpudep_ap_early_bootstrap: IBM970 SPR_HID4 and SPR_HID5 updates are not following documented, 970-family-specific rules
Thu, 9 May 2019 22:38:15 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10947
cpudep_ap_early_bootstrap: IBM970 SPR_HID4 and SPR_HID5 updates are not following documented, 970-family-specific rules
Thu, 9 May 2019 21:11:42 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10946
PowerMac G5's vs. PSL_ME manipulation in the msr: mtmsr ignores it, only rfid can set it? (How to avoid checkstop on the ap's?)
Thu, 9 May 2019 20:05:48 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10945
Re: powerpc64 context: aim/locore64.S __start TMPSTKSZ-48 vs. TMPSTKSZ-96 (-r277392 and later) vs. modern aim/trap_subr64.S cpu_reset_handler: (TMPSTKSZ-48)?
Wed, 8 May 2019 15:16:11 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10944
Re: powerpc64 context: aim/locore64.S __start TMPSTKSZ-48 vs. TMPSTKSZ-96 (-r277392 and later) vs. modern aim/trap_subr64.S cpu_reset_handler: (TMPSTKSZ-48)?
Wed, 8 May 2019 15:10:45 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10943
powerpc64 context: aim/locore64.S __start TMPSTKSZ-48 vs. TMPSTKSZ-96 (-r277392 and later) vs. modern aim/trap_subr64.S cpu_reset_handler: (TMPSTKSZ-48)?
Wed, 8 May 2019 13:53:17 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10942
X.org colour issues on PowerMac G5 with GeForce 6600
Wed, 8 May 2019 15:59:44 +0100
Francis Little <[email protected]> • #10941
Re: head -r347003 on 2-socket/2-cores-each G5 PowerMac11,2's: one type of boot-blocking context found (CPU 1 evidence)
Wed, 8 May 2019 05:30:52 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10940
2-socket/2-cores-each G5 PowerMac11, 2: I show the initial slb content *before* the FreeBSD kernel makes changes
Tue, 7 May 2019 22:18:36 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10939
Re: head -r347003 on 2-socket/2-cores-each G5 PowerMac11,2's: one type of boot-blocking context found
Tue, 7 May 2019 19:57:40 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10938
Re: head -r347003 on 2-socket/2-cores-each G5 PowerMac11,2's: one type of boot-blocking context found
Tue, 7 May 2019 11:54:01 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10937
Re: head -r347003 on 2-socket/2-cores-each G5 PowerMac11,2's: one type of boot-blocking context found
Tue, 7 May 2019 13:06:54 -0500
Justin Hibbits <[email protected]> • #10936
PowerMac G5 context: kernel_va_to_slbv(...) and SLBV_L use vs. addresses < DMAP_BASE_ADDRESS
Tue, 7 May 2019 02:34:58 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10935
PowerMac G5 live slb entries before moea64_mid_bootstrap for bsp vs. later: are duplications of ESID's avoided?
Tue, 7 May 2019 02:05:27 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10934
head -r347003 on 2-socket/2-cores-each G5 PowerMac11, 2's: one type of boot-blocking context found
Mon, 6 May 2019 22:43:36 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10933
powerpc64: kern_slbtrap double mtlr, one from (PC_SLBSAVE+120)(%r1) and one from (PC_SLBSAVE+136)(%r1)?
Mon, 6 May 2019 13:42:35 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10932
[Bug 237370] java/openjdk12: Add powerpc64 support
Mon, 06 May 2019 19:53:16 +0000
[email protected] • #10931
[Bug 237370] java/openjdk12: Add powerpc64 support
Mon, 06 May 2019 18:57:17 +0000
[email protected] • #10930
[Bug 237370] java/openjdk12: Add powerpc64 support
Mon, 06 May 2019 18:54:46 +0000
[email protected] • #10929
[Bug 237370] java/openjdk12: Add powerpc64 support
Mon, 06 May 2019 18:40:42 +0000
[email protected] • #10928
[Bug 237370] java/openjdk12: Add powerpc64 support
Mon, 06 May 2019 16:42:30 +0000
[email protected] • #10927
[Bug 237370] java/openjdk12: Add powerpc64 support
Mon, 06 May 2019 16:37:21 +0000
[email protected] • #10926
[Bug 237370] java/openjdk12: Add powerpc64 support
Mon, 06 May 2019 13:38:08 +0000
[email protected] • #10925
Re: Remote Firewire dcons use shows my G5 "hang-up point" reports have been wrong: shows lines not shown on the problem context's display
Sun, 5 May 2019 21:13:42 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10924
Remote Firewire dcons use shows my G5 "hang-up point" reports have been wrong: shows lines not shown on the problem context's display
Sun, 5 May 2019 15:25:12 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10923
[Bug 237370] java/openjdk12: Add powerpc64 support
Sun, 05 May 2019 20:17:01 +0000
[email protected] • #10922
CTR2(KTR_PMAP, "moea64_bootstrap: kstack0 at %#x (%#x)", pa, va); truncates va values for powerpc64
Sat, 4 May 2019 18:30:52 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10921
Examples of early boot variability in handle_kernel_slb_spill happening on 2-socket/2-core-each G5 PowerMac11,2
Sat, 4 May 2019 18:24:18 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10920
Re: The first 2 handle_kernel_slb_spill calls on the 2-socket/2-cores-each G5 example context: as expected? (short)
Sat, 4 May 2019 01:35:46 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10919
Re: The first 2 handle_kernel_slb_spill calls on the 2-socket/2-cores-each G5 example context: as expected? (short)
Sat, 4 May 2019 00:03:50 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10918
Re: The first 2 handle_kernel_slb_spill calls on the 2-socket/2-cores-each G5 example context: as expected? (short)
Fri, 3 May 2019 23:52:42 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10917
The first 2 handle_kernel_slb_spill calls on the 2-socket/2-cores-each G5 example context: as expected? (short)
Fri, 3 May 2019 20:22:05 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10916
Re: 970MP PowerMac G5s: What printf's show about cpu_mp_unleash hangups on the test variant of head -r347003 (found cpu_mp_unleash counterexample)
Fri, 3 May 2019 14:52:02 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10915
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Fri, 03 May 2019 21:45:06 +0000
[email protected] • #10914
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Fri, 03 May 2019 10:01:30 +0000
[email protected] • #10913
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Fri, 03 May 2019 16:14:02 +0000
[email protected] • #10912
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Fri, 03 May 2019 14:35:58 +0000
[email protected] • #10911
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Fri, 03 May 2019 19:22:19 +0000
[email protected] • #10910
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Fri, 03 May 2019 09:14:25 +0000
[email protected] • #10909
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Fri, 03 May 2019 19:16:00 +0000
[email protected] • #10908
Re: 970MP PowerMac G5s: What printf's show about cpu_mp_unleash hangups on the test variant of head -r347003 (found cpu_mp_unleash counterexample)
Fri, 3 May 2019 11:09:03 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10907
970MP PowerMac G5s: What some basic printf's show about vt_upgrade and fhanew_init hang-ups
Fri, 3 May 2019 02:24:05 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10906
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Fri, 03 May 2019 17:02:01 +0000
[email protected] • #10905
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Fri, 03 May 2019 09:19:20 +0000
[email protected] • #10904
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Fri, 03 May 2019 16:57:49 +0000
[email protected] • #10903
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Fri, 03 May 2019 13:14:15 +0000
[email protected] • #10902
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Fri, 03 May 2019 17:13:42 +0000
[email protected] • #10901
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Fri, 03 May 2019 17:07:43 +0000
[email protected] • #10900
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Fri, 03 May 2019 12:31:37 +0000
[email protected] • #10899
970MP PowerMac G5s: What printf's show about cpu_mp_unleash hangups on the test variant of head -r347003 (surprising, important)
Thu, 2 May 2019 22:23:25 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10898
Re: kernel mode EXC_DSE handling depends on td->td_pcb-> not slb faulting in setting up its slbmte use?
Thu, 2 May 2019 18:28:51 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10897
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Fri, 03 May 2019 01:10:13 +0000
[email protected] • #10896
slbmte, slbie, slbia isync paranoyia for -r347003 investigation: does it change any behavior as stands? (yes)
Thu, 2 May 2019 16:10:37 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10895
kernel mode EXC_DSE handling depends on td->td_pcb-> not slb faulting in setting up its slbmte use?
Thu, 2 May 2019 14:40:46 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10894
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Thu, 02 May 2019 21:01:14 +0000
[email protected] • #10893
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Thu, 02 May 2019 19:50:45 +0000
[email protected] • #10892
[Bug 235060] [boot] FreeBSD 12.0 Release DVD and CD will not boot on PowerMac G5 Quad
Thu, 02 May 2019 19:19:05 +0000
[email protected] • #10891
[Bug 235060] [boot] FreeBSD 12.0 Release DVD and CD will not boot on PowerMac G5 Quad
Thu, 02 May 2019 19:17:23 +0000
[email protected] • #10890
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Thu, 02 May 2019 18:17:25 +0000
[email protected] • #10889
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Thu, 02 May 2019 17:41:00 +0000
[email protected] • #10888
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Thu, 02 May 2019 15:16:55 +0000
[email protected] • #10887
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Thu, 02 May 2019 15:11:12 +0000
[email protected] • #10886
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Thu, 02 May 2019 12:41:40 +0000
[email protected] • #10885
Re: How many segments does it take to span from VM_MIN_KERNEL_ADDRESS through VM_MAX_SAFE_KERNEL_ADDRESS? 128 in moea64_late_bootstrap
Thu, 2 May 2019 03:45:47 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10884
[Bug 235060] [boot] FreeBSD 12.0 Release DVD and CD will not boot on PowerMac G5 Quad
Thu, 02 May 2019 10:30:57 +0000
[email protected] • #10883
[Bug 235060] [boot] FreeBSD 12.0 Release DVD and CD will not boot on PowerMac G5 Quad
Thu, 02 May 2019 09:56:24 +0000
[email protected] • #10882
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Thu, 02 May 2019 06:37:49 +0000
[email protected] • #10881
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Thu, 02 May 2019 06:36:54 +0000
[email protected] • #10880
Re: How many segments does it take to span from VM_MIN_KERNEL_ADDRESS through VM_MAX_SAFE_KERNEL_ADDRESS? 128 in moea64_late_bootstrap
Wed, 1 May 2019 23:21:43 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10879
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Thu, 02 May 2019 01:19:23 +0000
[email protected] • #10878
Re: How many segments does it take to span from VM_MIN_KERNEL_ADDRESS through VM_MAX_SAFE_KERNEL_ADDRESS? 128 in moea64_late_bootstrap
Wed, 1 May 2019 17:22:56 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10877
Re: How many segments does it take to span from VM_MIN_KERNEL_ADDRESS through VM_MAX_SAFE_KERNEL_ADDRESS? 128 in moea64_late_bootstrap
Wed, 1 May 2019 16:54:03 -0500
Justin Hibbits <[email protected]> • #10876
Re: How many segments does it take to span from VM_MIN_KERNEL_ADDRESS through VM_MAX_SAFE_KERNEL_ADDRESS? 128 in moea64_late_bootstrap
Wed, 1 May 2019 14:35:56 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10875
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Wed, 01 May 2019 20:19:25 +0000
[email protected] • #10874
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Wed, 01 May 2019 20:12:57 +0000
[email protected] • #10873
Re: How many segments does it take to span from VM_MIN_KERNEL_ADDRESS through VM_MAX_SAFE_KERNEL_ADDRESS? 128 in moea64_late_bootstrap
Wed, 1 May 2019 15:10:52 -0500
Justin Hibbits <[email protected]> • #10872
[Bug 235060] [boot] FreeBSD 12.0 Release DVD and CD will not boot on PowerMac G5 Quad
Wed, 01 May 2019 19:48:57 +0000
[email protected] • #10871
[Bug 233863] Various PowerMac G5 models may require kern.smp.disabled=1 and must set usefdt=1 which causes net interface reorder
Wed, 01 May 2019 18:57:46 +0000
[email protected] • #10870
Re: How many segments does it take to span from VM_MIN_KERNEL_ADDRESS through VM_MAX_SAFE_KERNEL_ADDRESS? 128 in moea64_late_bootstrap
Wed, 1 May 2019 11:51:44 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10869
[Bug 233863] Various PowerMac G5 models may require kern.smp.disabled=1 and must set usefdt=1 which causes net interface reorder
Wed, 01 May 2019 18:25:39 +0000
[email protected] • #10868
[Bug 233863] Various PowerMac G5 models may require kern.smp.disabled=1 and must set usefdt=1 which causes net interface reorder
Wed, 01 May 2019 18:24:22 +0000
[email protected] • #10867
[Bug 233863] Various PowerMac G5 models may require kern.smp.disabled=1 and must set usefdt=1 which causes net interface reorder
Wed, 01 May 2019 18:23:05 +0000
[email protected] • #10866
[Bug 233863] Various PowerMac G5 models may require kern.smp.disabled=1 and must set usefdt=1 which causes net interface reorder
Wed, 01 May 2019 18:21:14 +0000
[email protected] • #10865
[Bug 233863] Various PowerMac G5 models may require kern.smp.disabled=1 and must set usefdt=1 which causes net interface reorder
Wed, 01 May 2019 18:20:33 +0000
[email protected] • #10864
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Wed, 01 May 2019 15:41:34 +0000
[email protected] • #10863
Re: How many segments does it take to span from VM_MIN_KERNEL_ADDRESS through VM_MAX_SAFE_KERNEL_ADDRESS? 128 in moea64_late_bootstrap
Wed, 1 May 2019 09:40:29 -0500
Justin Hibbits <[email protected]> • #10862
[Bug 235060] [boot] FreeBSD 12.0 Release DVD and CD will not boot on PowerMac G5 Quad
Wed, 01 May 2019 13:11:00 +0000
[email protected] • #10861
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Wed, 01 May 2019 09:42:34 +0000
[email protected] • #10860
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Wed, 01 May 2019 09:14:24 +0000
[email protected] • #10859
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Wed, 01 May 2019 09:43:37 +0000
[email protected] • #10858
[Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
Wed, 01 May 2019 09:21:57 +0000
[email protected] • #10857
Tiny summary of todays explorations: __pcpu[] has no reserved kernel slb entry(s) to cover it; slbmte and the like missing some isync use
Tue, 30 Apr 2019 22:52:28 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10856
Re: How many segments does it take to span from VM_MIN_KERNEL_ADDRESS through VM_MAX_SAFE_KERNEL_ADDRESS? 128 in moea64_late_bootstrap
Tue, 30 Apr 2019 21:45:00 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10855
How many segments does it take to span from VM_MIN_KERNEL_ADDRESS through VM_MAX_SAFE_KERNEL_ADDRESS? 128 in moea64_late_bootstrap
Tue, 30 Apr 2019 20:58:49 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-ppc <[email protected]> • #10854
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.