gmane.os.hurd.l4 archive

355 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Binutils faised to build with texinfo
Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:55:18 +0530
arnuld uttre <[email protected]> • #6037
Re: Building viengoos on AMD64
Sun, 24 Aug 2014 22:39:33 +0200
"Neal H. Walfield" <[email protected]> • #6036
Building viengoos on AMD64
Sun, 24 Aug 2014 10:41:03 +0530
arnuld uttre <[email protected]> • #6035
Re: Improving performance of Hurd.
Fri, 21 Feb 2014 14:49:00 -0800 (PST)
Jetro Costa <[email protected]> • #6034
Re: Improving performance of Hurd.
Fri, 21 Feb 2014 14:31:00 -0800 (PST)
Jetro Costa <[email protected]> • #6033
Re: Improving performance of Hurd.
Fri, 21 Feb 2014 14:44:21 -0800 (PST)
Jetro Costa <[email protected]> • #6032
Re: what happend?
Fri, 19 Apr 2013 20:23:36 +1000
William ML Leslie <[email protected]> • #6031
what happend?
Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:36:26 -0500
rob fon <[email protected]> • #6030
Check out my profile on LinkedIn
Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:30:02 +0000 (UTC)
Mohamad Rezaei <[email protected]> • #6029
Re: GNU Hurd on $scheme
Mon, 04 Feb 2013 13:32:58 +0100
[email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) • #6028
Re: GNU Hurd on $scheme
Sun, 3 Feb 2013 08:04:46 +0800
Daniel Hartwig <[email protected]> • #6027
Re: GNU Hurd on $scheme
Sat, 02 Feb 2013 17:44:07 +0100
[email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) • #6026
Re: GNU Hurd on $scheme
Sun, 03 Feb 2013 00:36:02 +0800
Nala Ginrut <[email protected]> • #6025
Re: GNU Hurd on $scheme
Sat, 02 Feb 2013 11:19:01 +0100
[email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) • #6024
Re: GNU Hurd on $scheme
Sat, 02 Feb 2013 11:19:01 +0100
[email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) • #6023
Re: GNU Hurd on $scheme (was: [ANN] the Guile 100 Programs Project)
Sat, 02 Feb 2013 11:51:43 +0800
Nala Ginrut <[email protected]> • #6022
GNU Hurd on $scheme (was: [ANN] the Guile 100 Programs Project)
Sat, 2 Feb 2013 10:49:24 +0800
Daniel Hartwig <[email protected]> • #6021
Re: FOSDEM 2012 -- devroom dedicated to [multiserver] microkernels, or generic alt-OS
Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:22:46 +0100
Thomas Schwinge <[email protected]> • #6020
FOSDEM 2012 - Multiserver, microkernel-based operating systems devroom
Tue, 22 Nov 2011 23:29:48 +0100
Jakub Jermar <[email protected]> • #6019
FOSDEM 2012 -- devroom dedicated to [multiserver] microkernels, or generic alt-OS
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:01:01 +0200
Thomas Schwinge <[email protected]> • #6018
[ANNOUNCE] NOVA Microhypervisor 0.4 prerelease
Thu, 28 Jul 2011 20:04:47 +0200
"Udo A. Steinberg" <[email protected]> • #6017
Re: Introducing FOSS Factory -- a Bounty System for GNU Hurd Work
Wed, 4 May 2011 20:57:01 +0200
Tanguy LE CARROUR <[email protected]> • #6016
Re: Introducing FOSS Factory -- a Bounty System for GNU Hurd Work
Mon, 2 May 2011 12:56:09 +0200
Tanguy LE CARROUR <[email protected]> • #6015
Introducing FOSS Factory -- a Bounty System for GNU Hurd Work
Mon, 02 May 2011 11:38:21 +0200
Thomas Schwinge <[email protected]> • #6014
uint64_t OR l4_uint64_t
Thu, 7 Apr 2011 20:22:57 +0430
"Naghizodeh,T.A-H" <[email protected]> • #6013
Error - Building Time
Wed, 06 Apr 2011 19:01:39 -0400
Andrew Engelbrecht <[email protected]> • #6012
booting viengoos with GRUB2 v. 1.99~rc1
Wed, 6 Apr 2011 18:43:54 -0400
Andrew Engelbrecht <[email protected]> • #6011
Re: Error - Building Time
Thu, 07 Apr 2011 09:45:14 +0200
"Neal H. Walfield" <[email protected]> • #6010
Error - Building Time
Wed, 6 Apr 2011 22:24:58 +0430
"Naghizodeh,T.A-H" <[email protected]> • #6009
Re: Some Mistakes at StarUp
Wed, 06 Apr 2011 15:14:50 +0200
"Neal H. Walfield" <[email protected]> • #6008
Some Mistakes at StarUp
Tue, 05 Apr 2011 21:21:44 +0430
"Naghizodeh T.,A-H" <[email protected]> • #6007
Re: YotH 2010 -- a Year of the Hurd 2010
Sun, 13 Mar 2011 21:10:41 +0000
Michael Dorrington <[email protected]> • #6006
[ANNOUNCE] NOVA Userland 0.3 prerelease
Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:08:56 +0100
Julian Stecklina <[email protected]> • #6005
[ANNOUNCE] NOVA Microhypervisor 0.3 prerelease
Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:55:10 +0100
"Udo A. Steinberg" <[email protected]> • #6004
YotH 2010 -- a Year of the Hurd 2010
Sun, 09 Jan 2011 23:37:09 +0100
Thomas Schwinge <[email protected]> • #6003
Re: Hurd status
Mon, 3 Jan 2011 15:11:34 +0100
<[email protected]> • #6002
Re: Hurd status
Fri, 31 Dec 2010 09:46:33 +0100
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #6001
Re: Hurd status
Thu, 30 Dec 2010 23:29:54 -0600
Oz <[email protected]> • #6000
Re: Hurd status
Thu, 30 Dec 2010 20:12:02 +0100
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #5999
Re: Hurd status
Wed, 29 Dec 2010 19:53:17 +0530
Parantapa Bhattacharya <[email protected]> • #5998
Re: Hurd status
Wed, 29 Dec 2010 06:05:38 -0600
Oz <[email protected]> • #5997
Re: Hurd status
Mon, 27 Dec 2010 07:17:06 +0100
<[email protected]> • #5996
Re: Hurd status (was: Viengoos still active?)
Mon, 27 Dec 2010 14:07:23 +1100
William ML Leslie <[email protected]> • #5995
Re: Hurd status (was: Viengoos still active?)
Sun, 26 Dec 2010 18:19:27 +0000
Bjartur Thorlacius <[email protected]> • #5994
Re: Hurd status (was: Viengoos still active?)
Sun, 26 Dec 2010 09:57:03 -0600
Oz <[email protected]> • #5993
Hurd status (was: Viengoos still active?)
Thu, 23 Dec 2010 03:12:10 +0100
<[email protected]> • #5992
FOSDEM 2011
Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:19:24 +0100
Thomas Schwinge <[email protected]> • #5991
Re: Viengoos still active?
Sun, 5 Dec 2010 19:19:04 -0600
Oz <[email protected]> • #5990
Re: Viengoos still active?
Sun, 05 Dec 2010 13:37:08 +0100
"Neal H. Walfield" <[email protected]> • #5989
Viengoos still active?
Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:54:19 -0800 (PST)
Dok Sander <[email protected]> • #5988
If help is needed
Tue, 10 Aug 2010 23:57:01 +0300
TDTwister Gmail <[email protected]> • #5987
Userland [was] NOVA Microhypervisor 0.2 prerelease
Sat, 7 Aug 2010 10:33:15 -0400
"John van V." <[email protected]> • #5986
Re: [ANNOUNCE] NOVA Microhypervisor 0.2 prerelease
Fri, 06 Aug 2010 20:21:06 +0200
Julian Stecklina <[email protected]> • #5985
[ANNOUNCE] NOVA Microhypervisor 0.2 prerelease
Fri, 6 Aug 2010 18:49:24 +0200
"Udo A. Steinberg" <[email protected]> • #5984
Scheduling of "foreground" applications
Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:00:54 +0200
<[email protected]> • #5983
Re: a bug of the slab implementation in viengoos?
Mon, 31 May 2010 18:20:48 +0200
[email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) • #5982
a bug of the slab implementation in viengoos?
Mon, 31 May 2010 21:26:49 +0800
Da Zheng <[email protected]> • #5981
Re: Contributing to Hurd
Sat, 1 May 2010 13:31:34 +0200
<[email protected]> • #5980
Re: licensing
Wed, 28 Apr 2010 20:55:02 -0400
steve paesani <[email protected]> • #5979
Re: Contributing to Hurd
Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:46:36 +0200
Thomas Schwinge <[email protected]> • #5978
Re: Contributing to Hurd
Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:55:44 +0530
arnuld uttre <[email protected]> • #5977
Re: licensing
Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:13:26 -0700
"Jonathan S. Shapiro" <[email protected]> • #5976
Re: Contributing to Hurd
Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:15:05 +0200
<[email protected]> • #5975
Re: licensing
Sun, 25 Apr 2010 20:05:46 +0200
<[email protected]> • #5974
licensing
Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:37:13 -0400
steve paesani <[email protected]> • #5973
Re: Contributing to Hurd
Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:15:49 +0530
arnuld uttre <[email protected]> • #5972
Re: Contributing to Hurd
Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:56:33 +0800
Da Zheng <[email protected]> • #5971
Re: Contributing to Hurd
Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:26:57 +0300
Sergiu Ivanov <[email protected]> • #5970
Re: Contributing to Hurd
Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:39:00 +0530
arnuld uttre <[email protected]> • #5969
Re: Contributing to Hurd
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:42:48 +0200
<[email protected]> • #5968
Re: Contributing to Hurd
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:58:36 +0200
"Neal H. Walfield" <[email protected]> • #5967
Contributing to Hurd
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:43:36 +0530
arnuld uttre <[email protected]> • #5966
Codezero v0.3 is out
Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:26:18 +0200
Bahadir Balban <[email protected]> • #5965
FOSDEM
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:52:09 +0100
Bas Wijnen <[email protected]> • #5964
Re: viengoos build errors
Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:04:37 +0100
"Neal H. Walfield" <[email protected]> • #5963
viengoos build errors
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:31:25 -0500
[email protected] • #5962
Re: [Ghm-discuss] GNU at FOSDEM 6-7 Feb 2010
Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:28:52 +0100
Thomas Schwinge <[email protected]> • #5961
Re: FOSDEM 2010
Sat, 2 Jan 2010 19:56:31 +0100
Michael Banck <[email protected]> • #5960
Re: FOSDEM 2010
Thu, 31 Dec 2009 04:37:12 +0100
<[email protected]> • #5959
Re: [ANNOUNCE] NOVA Userland 0.1
Fri, 25 Dec 2009 03:44:41 +0100
"Udo A. Steinberg" <[email protected]> • #5958
Re: [ANNOUNCE] NOVA Userland 0.1
Thu, 24 Dec 2009 18:00:58 +0100
Tom Bachmann <[email protected]> • #5957
[ANNOUNCE] NOVA Userland 0.1
Thu, 24 Dec 2009 17:38:29 +0100
Bernhard Kauer <[email protected]> • #5956
Re: What would it take....
Thu, 24 Dec 2009 16:56:45 +0800
Da Zheng <[email protected]> • #5955
Re: What would it take....
Thu, 24 Dec 2009 01:55:15 +0100
Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> • #5954
Re: What would it take....
Thu, 24 Dec 2009 08:50:14 +0800
Da Zheng <[email protected]> • #5953
Re: What would it take....
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:37:28 +0100
Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> • #5952
Re: What would it take....
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:23:04 +0100
<[email protected]> • #5951
Re: What would it take....
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:28:58 +0100
<[email protected]> • #5950
[ANNOUNCE] NOVA Microhypervisor 0.1 prerelease
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:04:12 +0100
"Udo A. Steinberg" <[email protected]> • #5949
Re: What would it take....
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:23:23 +0800
Da Zheng <[email protected]> • #5948
Re: What would it take....
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:45:27 +0100
Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> • #5947
Re: What would it take....
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:28:35 +0800
Da Zheng <[email protected]> • #5946
Re: What would it take....
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:17:43 +0800
Da Zheng <[email protected]> • #5945
Re: What would it take....
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:29:19 +0100
Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> • #5944
Re: What would it take....
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:26:09 +0100
Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> • #5943
Re: What would it take....
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:46:34 +0800
Da Zheng <[email protected]> • #5942
Re: What would it take....
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:09:41 +0100
Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> • #5941
Re: What would it take....
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:49:01 +0800
Da Zheng <[email protected]> • #5940
Re: What would it take....
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 08:33:32 +0100
Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> • #5939
Re: What would it take....
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:21:50 +0800
Da Zheng <[email protected]> • #5938
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.