gmane.os.netbsd.devel.crypto archive

670 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 7). Latest articles →

Re: randomness (crypto?) code example wanted please?
Mon, 26 Jun 2017 11:11:01 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #579
Re: randomness (crypto?) code example wanted please?
Sun, 25 Jun 2017 12:30:20 -0700
Alistair Crooks <[email protected]> • #578
Re: randomness (crypto?) code example wanted please?
Sun, 25 Jun 2017 18:18:13 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #577
Re: randomness (crypto?) code example wanted please?
Sun, 25 Jun 2017 23:10:54 +0700
Robert Elz <[email protected]> • #576
Re: randomness (crypto?) code example wanted please?
Sun, 25 Jun 2017 15:28:25 +0100
Roy Marples <[email protected]> • #575
Re: randomness (crypto?) code example wanted please?
Sun, 25 Jun 2017 15:22:07 +0100
Roy Marples <[email protected]> • #574
Re: randomness (crypto?) code example wanted please?
Sun, 25 Jun 2017 21:19:04 +0700
Robert Elz <[email protected]> • #573
Re: randomness (crypto?) code example wanted please?
Sun, 25 Jun 2017 21:05:01 +0700
Robert Elz <[email protected]> • #572
Re: randomness (crypto?) code example wanted please?
Sun, 25 Jun 2017 15:28:59 +0200
Kamil Rytarowski <[email protected]> • #571
Re: randomness (crypto?) code example wanted please?
Sun, 25 Jun 2017 14:06:02 +0200
Martin Husemann <[email protected]> • #570
Re: randomness (crypto?) code example wanted please?
Sun, 25 Jun 2017 13:53:02 +0200
Kamil Rytarowski <[email protected]> • #569
randomness (crypto?) code example wanted please?
Sun, 25 Jun 2017 15:21:54 +0700
Robert Elz <[email protected]> • #568
Re: Proposal: Remove MKCRYPTO_RC5
Sat, 6 May 2017 19:13:09 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #567
Re: Proposal: Remove MKCRYPTO_RC5
Sat, 6 May 2017 16:19:58 +0800 (+08)
Paul Goyette <[email protected]> • #566
Re: Proposal: Remove MKCRYPTO_RC5
Fri, 5 May 2017 21:29:29 +0200
Joerg Sonnenberger <[email protected]> • #565
Proposal: Remove MKCRYPTO
Sat, 6 May 2017 01:31:02 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #564
Proposal: Remove MKCRYPTO_RC5
Fri, 5 May 2017 17:49:39 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #563
Re: 10Gb and 40Gb equipment available
Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:07:41 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #562
Re: AES XTS in cgd
Tue, 13 Dec 2016 07:22:39 +0000
Alexander Nasonov <[email protected]> • #561
Re: AES XTS in cgd
Tue, 6 Dec 2016 06:28:08 +0800 (PHT)
Paul Goyette <[email protected]> • #560
Re: AES XTS in cgd
Mon, 5 Dec 2016 21:26:12 +0000
Alexander Nasonov <[email protected]> • #559
Re: AES XTS in cgd
Sat, 12 Nov 2016 18:02:24 +0000
Alexander Nasonov <[email protected]> • #558
AES XTS in cgd
Sun, 6 Nov 2016 16:58:36 +0000
Alexander Nasonov <[email protected]> • #557
Re: sync rijndael-alg-fst.c with OpenBSD
Sat, 1 Oct 2016 23:32:41 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #556
re: sync rijndael-alg-fst.c with OpenBSD
Sun, 02 Oct 2016 09:03:52 +1100
matthew green <[email protected]> • #555
Re: sync rijndael-alg-fst.c with OpenBSD
Sat, 1 Oct 2016 20:13:19 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #554
Re: sync rijndael-alg-fst.c with OpenBSD
Sat, 1 Oct 2016 20:26:18 +0100
Alexander Nasonov <[email protected]> • #553
Re: sync rijndael-alg-fst.c with OpenBSD
Sat, 1 Oct 2016 16:39:37 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #552
Re: sync rijndael-alg-fst.c with OpenBSD
Sat, 1 Oct 2016 16:45:22 +0100
Alexander Nasonov <[email protected]> • #551
Re: sync rijndael-alg-fst.c with OpenBSD
Sat, 1 Oct 2016 12:51:26 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #550
sync rijndael-alg-fst.c with OpenBSD
Fri, 30 Sep 2016 22:36:13 +0100
Alexander Nasonov <[email protected]> • #549
Re: Patch: CPU RNG framework with stub x86 implementation
Mon, 11 Jan 2016 21:59:20 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #548
Re: Patch: CPU RNG framework with stub x86 implementation
Mon, 11 Jan 2016 19:58:09 -0500
Andrew Cagney <[email protected]> • #547
Re: Patch: CPU RNG framework with stub x86 implementation
Mon, 11 Jan 2016 08:38:47 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #546
Re: Patch: CPU RNG framework with stub x86 implementation
Mon, 11 Jan 2016 06:36:56 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #545
Patch: CPU RNG framework with stub x86 implementation
Sun, 10 Jan 2016 21:08:45 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #544
Re: x86 CPU RNG support, take 2
Mon, 4 Jan 2016 13:46:40 -0500
Gabriel Rosenkoetter <[email protected]> • #543
Re: x86 CPU RNG support, take 2
Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:39:35 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #542
Re: x86 CPU RNG support, take 2
Sat, 2 Jan 2016 17:01:05 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #541
Re: x86 CPU RNG support, take 2
Fri, 1 Jan 2016 14:37:53 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #540
Re: x86 CPU RNG support, take 2
Thu, 31 Dec 2015 05:04:06 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] (Christos Zoulas) • #539
Re: x86 CPU RNG support, take 2
Tue, 29 Dec 2015 19:57:43 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #538
Re: x86 CPU RNG support, take 2
Sun, 27 Dec 2015 02:26:36 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #537
x86 CPU RNG support, take 2
Fri, 25 Dec 2015 18:27:50 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #536
Re: Lightweight support for instruction RNGs
Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:04:55 -0500 (EST)
[email protected] • #535
Re: Lightweight support for instruction RNGs
Tue, 22 Dec 2015 23:46:23 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] (Christos Zoulas) • #534
Re: Lightweight support for instruction RNGs
Tue, 22 Dec 2015 18:24:30 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #533
Re: Lightweight support for instruction RNGs
Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:27:45 +0000
<[email protected]> • #532
Re: Lightweight support for instruction RNGs
Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:50:37 -0800
Alistair Crooks <[email protected]> • #531
Re: Lightweight support for instruction RNGs
Mon, 21 Dec 2015 19:38:57 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #530
Re: Lightweight support for instruction RNGs
Mon, 21 Dec 2015 09:28:40 -0800
Alistair Crooks <[email protected]> • #529
Re: `harmless extra entropy' [was Re: Lightweight support for instruction RNGs]
Mon, 21 Dec 2015 15:30:04 +0000
<[email protected]> • #528
`harmless extra entropy' [was Re: Lightweight support for instruction RNGs]
Mon, 21 Dec 2015 05:37:48 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #527
Re: Lightweight support for instruction RNGs
Mon, 21 Dec 2015 02:14:32 +0000
<[email protected]> • #526
Re: Lightweight support for instruction RNGs
Sun, 20 Dec 2015 19:19:44 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #525
Re: Lightweight support for instruction RNGs
Mon, 21 Dec 2015 00:06:38 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #524
Re: Lightweight support for instruction RNGs
Sun, 20 Dec 2015 17:54:16 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #523
Re: Lightweight support for instruction RNGs
Sun, 20 Dec 2015 17:44:35 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #522
Re: Lightweight support for instruction RNGs
Sun, 20 Dec 2015 22:34:29 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #521
Re: Lightweight support for instruction RNGs
Sat, 19 Dec 2015 21:33:01 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #520
Re: Lightweight support for instruction RNGs
Sat, 19 Dec 2015 20:10:00 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #519
Re: Lightweight support for instruction RNGs
Sat, 19 Dec 2015 17:23:58 -0800
Alistair Crooks <[email protected]> • #518
Re: Lightweight support for instruction RNGs
Sat, 19 Dec 2015 16:54:20 -0800
Alistair Crooks <[email protected]> • #517
Re: Lightweight support for instruction RNGs
Sat, 19 Dec 2015 19:46:47 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #516
Re: Lightweight support for instruction RNGs
Sat, 19 Dec 2015 16:42:54 -0800
Alistair Crooks <[email protected]> • #515
Lightweight support for instruction RNGs
Sat, 19 Dec 2015 19:37:22 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #514
Re: /dev/crypto
Wed, 3 Dec 2014 13:41:44 +0000
Patrick Welche <[email protected]> • #513
Re: /dev/crypto
Mon, 1 Dec 2014 16:56:11 -0500
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #512
Re: /dev/crypto
Thu, 27 Nov 2014 20:10:43 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] (Christos Zoulas) • #511
/dev/crypto
Thu, 27 Nov 2014 11:02:41 +0000
Patrick Welche <[email protected]> • #510
Re: cprng_fast implementation benchmarks
Sat, 26 Apr 2014 21:44:03 +0000
<[email protected]> • #509
Re: cprng_fast implementation benchmarks
Sat, 26 Apr 2014 08:42:18 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #508
Re: cprng_fast implementation benchmarks
Fri, 25 Apr 2014 22:09:55 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #507
Re: cprng_fast implementation benchmarks
Fri, 25 Apr 2014 20:58:54 +0000
<[email protected]> • #506
Re: cprng_fast implementation benchmarks
Fri, 25 Apr 2014 16:31:55 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #505
Re: cprng_fast implementation benchmarks
Fri, 25 Apr 2014 13:53:13 +0000
<[email protected]> • #504
Re: cprng_fast implementation benchmarks
Thu, 24 Apr 2014 22:09:54 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #503
Re: cprng_fast implementation benchmarks
Thu, 24 Apr 2014 19:23:41 +0000
<[email protected]> • #502
Re: cprng_fast implementation benchmarks
Thu, 24 Apr 2014 20:03:49 +0100
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius <[email protected]> • #501
Re: cprng_fast implementation benchmarks
Thu, 24 Apr 2014 18:21:13 +0000
<[email protected]> • #500
Re: cprng_fast implementation benchmarks
Thu, 24 Apr 2014 17:40:28 +0100
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius <[email protected]> • #499
Re: cprng_fast implementation benchmarks
Thu, 24 Apr 2014 14:03:32 +0000
<[email protected]> • #498
Re: cprng_fast implementation benchmarks
Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:56:28 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #497
Re: Patch: cprng_fast performance - please review.
Wed, 23 Apr 2014 22:50:13 +0100
David Laight <[email protected]> • #496
Re: cprng_fast implementation benchmarks
Wed, 23 Apr 2014 14:21:31 +0000
<[email protected]> • #495
Re: cprng_fast implementation benchmarks
Wed, 23 Apr 2014 09:59:55 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #494
Re: cprng_fast implementation benchmarks
Wed, 23 Apr 2014 14:34:33 +0100
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius <[email protected]> • #493
Re: cprng_fast implementation benchmarks
Wed, 23 Apr 2014 09:06:12 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #492
Re: cprng_fast implementation benchmarks
Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:16:42 +0100
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius <[email protected]> • #491
Re: Patch: cprng_fast performance - please review.
Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:50:47 +0100
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius <[email protected]> • #490
Re: Towards design criteria for cprng_fast()
Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:15:08 +0100
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius <[email protected]> • #489
Re: cprng_fast implementation benchmarks
Wed, 23 Apr 2014 05:02:33 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #488
Re: cprng_fast implementation benchmarks
Tue, 22 Apr 2014 23:59:38 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #487
Re: Towards design criteria for cprng_fast()
Wed, 23 Apr 2014 03:48:23 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #486
cprng_fast and interrupts [was Re: Patch: cprng_fast performance - please review.]
Wed, 23 Apr 2014 03:04:00 +0000
Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> • #485
Re: cprng_fast implementation benchmarks
Mon, 21 Apr 2014 16:39:52 -0700
Dennis Ferguson <[email protected]> • #484
cprng_fast implementation benchmarks
Sun, 20 Apr 2014 03:18:03 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #483
Re: Patch: cprng_fast performance - please review.
Sat, 19 Apr 2014 19:51:03 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] • #482
Re: Patch: cprng_fast performance - please review.
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 21:50:46 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> • #481
Re: Patch: cprng_fast performance - please review.
Sat, 19 Apr 2014 06:33:44 +0900
Izumi Tsutsui <[email protected]> • #480
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.