gmane.text.xml.schema.devel archive
392 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →
Re: Add an attribute
Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:52:59 +0000Add an attribute
Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:02:06 +0000Re: Redefinition of group, who's correct
Wed, 20 Mar 2013 21:59:12 +0000Re: Redefinition of group, who's correct
Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:50:43 +0100RE: Redefinition of group, who's correct
Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:49:13 +0000Re: Redefinition of group, who's correct
Wed, 20 Mar 2013 21:34:36 +0100 (CET)Re: Redefinition of group, who's correct
Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:05:31 +0000Redefinition of group, who's correct
Wed, 20 Mar 2013 18:56:06 +0100Re: Restriction error
Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:06:33 +0000Re: Restriction error
Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:58:03 +0000Re: Restriction error
Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:53:56 +0000Re: Restriction error
Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:40:57 +0100Restriction error
Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:03:38 +0000no_subject
Sat, 9 Mar 2013 08:22:30 -0800 (PST)Re: TR: COSOLUCE : Urgent - -> Problème de validation de schéma
Mon, 4 Mar 2013 23:58:01 +0800Re: TR: COSOLUCE : Urgent --> Problème de validation de schéma
Mon, 4 Mar 2013 08:18:18 -0700AImWD-2013: Deadline extension and final CFP
Mon, 4 Mar 2013 15:17:49 +0000Re: TR: COSOLUCE : Urgent --> Problème de v alidation de schéma
Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:07:46 +0000TR: COSOLUCE : Urgent --> Problème de validation de sch éma
Fri, 1 Mar 2013 13:08:04 +0000Re: Included <schema>
Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:43:47 +0100Re: Included <schema>
Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:26:16 +0100Re: [ann] oXygen 14.2 comes with complete support for XML Schema 1.1
Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:15:26 +0200Re: Included <schema>
Tue, 26 Feb 2013 06:20:19 +0100RE: [ann] oXygen 14.2 comes with complete support for XML Schema 1.1
Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:34:26 +0000XML Schema 1.1 Tutorial
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:30:12 -0800Re: Can root name in DOCTYPE be a XSD-validity thing?
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 23:33:32 -0500Re: Can root name in DOCTYPE be a XSD-validity thing?
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 23:13:24 -0500Re: Can root name in DOCTYPE be a XSD-validity thing?
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 04:59:47 +0100Re: Can root name in DOCTYPE be a XSD-validity thing?
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:15:39 -0700Re: Can root name in DOCTYPE be a XSD-validity thing?
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 12:00:26 +0100Re: Can root name in DOCTYPE be a XSD-validity thing?
Thu, 14 Feb 2013 12:12:14 -0700Re: Included <schema>
Thu, 14 Feb 2013 11:41:23 -0700[ann] oXygen 14.2 comes with complete support for XML Schema 1.1
Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:58:05 +0200Can root name in DOCTYPE be a XSD-validity thing?
Thu, 14 Feb 2013 07:13:35 +0100Re: Included <schema>
Wed, 13 Feb 2013 13:09:49 +0000Re: Included <schema>
Wed, 13 Feb 2013 11:52:58 +0000Re: Included <schema>
Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:28:47 +0200Re: Included <schema>
Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:10:56 +0200Re: Included <schema>
Tue, 12 Feb 2013 20:36:54 +0000Re: Included <schema>
Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:56:09 +0000Re: Included <schema>
Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:21:38 +0530<none>
Tue, 12 Feb 2013 04:06:10 -0800 (PST)Re: Included <schema>
Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:07:12 +0200Re: Included <schema>
Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:04:23 +0000Re: Included <schema>
Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:28:43 +0530Included <schema>
Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:48:00 +0200My Brutal Experience...............................!!! Help Needed!!!
Sat, 9 Feb 2013 00:50:46 -0800 (PST)Re: keyref to a key in a different scope
Mon, 14 Jan 2013 21:45:16 +0530Re: keyref to a key in a different scope
Mon, 14 Jan 2013 15:57:09 +0000Re: keyref to a key in a different scope
Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:47:07 +0200Re: keyref to a key in a different scope
Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:23:54 +0000Re: keyref to a key in a different scope
Mon, 14 Jan 2013 13:59:00 +0000keyref to a key in a different scope
Mon, 14 Jan 2013 15:16:20 +0200Re: Simple node type with attribute
Sat, 05 Jan 2013 17:49:54 +0000Simple node type with attribute
Fri, 4 Jan 2013 16:40:36 +0100CFP: 2nd International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence meets the Web of Data (AImWD-2013)
Mon, 24 Dec 2012 16:40:50 +0200The datatypes schema has the XML declaration positioned after the DOCTYPE, it should occur before the DOCTYPE
Sat, 22 Dec 2012 18:38:49 +0000A practical example of why mixed="true" would be positioned on a complexContent element and not its parent complexType element?
Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:38:03 +0000Re: Equivalent ways to declare an element with string content and an attribute
Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:16:00 +0000Equivalent ways to declare an element with string content and an attribute
Tue, 18 Dec 2012 12:41:58 +0000ANN: Updated XML Schema 1.1 Tutorial
Fri, 14 Dec 2012 21:16:25 +0000Re: A practical use case for a fixed ID attribute?
Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:52:39 -0700Re: A practical use case for a fixed ID attribute?
Sun, 09 Dec 2012 12:56:20 +0000Re: A practical use case for a fixed ID attribute?
Sat, 08 Dec 2012 14:23:26 -0500Re: A practical use case for a fixed ID attribute? (UNCLASSIFIED)
Sat, 08 Dec 2012 09:46:46 -0600Re: A practical use case for a fixed ID attribute?
Sat, 08 Dec 2012 08:24:39 -0500A practical use case for a fixed ID attribute?
Sat, 8 Dec 2012 12:56:09 +0000Re: The <xs:assert> element cannot use inheritable attributes?
Fri, 07 Dec 2012 10:16:30 +0000The <xs:assert> element cannot use inheritable attributes?
Fri, 7 Dec 2012 09:45:16 +0000Re: Determining what facets can operate on what datatype.
Mon, 3 Dec 2012 17:05:11 -0500Re: Determining what facets can operate on what datatype.
Mon, 3 Dec 2012 15:00:26 -0700Re: Determining what facets can operate on what datatype.
Mon, 3 Dec 2012 16:30:39 -0500Determining what facets can operate on what datatype.
Mon, 3 Dec 2012 16:18:20 -0500Re: Test suite?
Mon, 03 Dec 2012 18:05:13 +0000Re: Test suite?
Mon, 3 Dec 2012 11:56:42 -0500Re: Test suite?
Mon, 03 Dec 2012 16:44:23 +0000Re: Test suite?
Mon, 3 Dec 2012 11:27:17 -0500Test suite?
Mon, 3 Dec 2012 11:22:26 -0500Re: No declaration for "restriction" in the DTD for XML Schema 1.1
Sun, 2 Dec 2012 12:42:56 -0700No declaration for "restriction" in the DTD for XML Schema 1.1
Sun, 2 Dec 2012 13:34:00 +0000Re: xsd validation bug in scxml? cvc-complex-type.2.4.b
Sat, 24 Nov 2012 22:06:19 +0000Re: xsd validation bug in scxml? cvc-complex-type.2.4.b
Sat, 24 Nov 2012 21:42:58 +0000Re: xsd validation bug in scxml? cvc-complex-type.2.4.b
Sat, 24 Nov 2012 20:44:42 +0000Re: xsd validation bug in scxml? cvc-complex-type.2.4.b
Sat, 24 Nov 2012 20:35:28 +0000xsd validation bug in scxml? cvc-complex-type.2.4.b
Sat, 24 Nov 2012 13:45:12 +0000Re: Does anyone have a transform to change comments into annotations in an existing schema?
Wed, 21 Nov 2012 14:11:03 -0600Re: Does anyone have a transform to change comments into annotations in an existing schema?
Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:00:30 -0500Re: Does anyone have a transform to change comments into annotations in an existing schema?
Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:10:36 -0600Re: Does anyone have a transform to change comments into annotations in an existing schema?
Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:58:38 -0500Re: Does anyone have a transform to change comments into annotations in an existing schema?
Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:10:19 -0600Re: Does anyone have a transform to change comments into annotations in an existing schema?
Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:37:31 +0000Re: Does anyone have a transform to change comments into annotations in an existing schema?
Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:09:52 -0500Re: Does anyone have a transform to change comments into annotations in an existing schema?
Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:14:29 -0600Re: Does anyone have a transform to change comments into annotations in an existing schema?
Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:03:14 +0000Re: Does anyone have a transform to change comments into annotations in an existing schema?
Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:01:50 +0000Does anyone have a transform to change comments into annotations in an existing schema?
Wed, 21 Nov 2012 09:45:13 -0600Re: Restrict <CRLF> to the value \r\n ... the instance is <CRLF>\r\n</CRLF> ... error on validation -- why?
Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:15:19 -0600RE: Restrict <CRLF> to the value \r\n ... the instance is <CRLF>\r\n</CRLF> ... error on validation -- why?
Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:03:35 +0100Re: Restrict <CRLF> to the value \r\n ... the instance is <CRLF>\r\n</CRLF> ... error on validation -- why?
Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:53:27 -0400Re: Restrict <CRLF> to the value \r\n ... the instance is <CRLF>\r\n</CRLF> ... error on validation -- why?
Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:32:29 +0100
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.