perl.perl6.licenses archive

357 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

RE: RFC idea
Mon, 25 Sep 2000 11:25:59 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #157
RE: RFC idea
Mon, 25 Sep 2000 10:53:53 -0400
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) • #156
RE: RFC idea
Mon, 25 Sep 2000 10:42:07 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #155
RE: RFC idea
Mon, 25 Sep 2000 10:15:31 -0400
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) • #154
RE: RFC idea
Mon, 25 Sep 2000 10:03:40 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #153
RE: RFC idea
Mon, 25 Sep 2000 10:03:45 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #152
RE: RFC idea
Mon, 25 Sep 2000 08:00:32 -0400
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) • #151
RE: RFC idea
Mon, 25 Sep 2000 07:12:49 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #150
RE: RFC idea
Sun, 24 Sep 2000 23:42:43 -0500
[email protected] (David Grove) • #149
Re: Hopefully last draft of AL
Mon, 25 Sep 2000 00:57:05 -0400
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #148
Re: RFC idea
Mon, 25 Sep 2000 00:58:46 -0400
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #147
RFC idea
Sun, 24 Sep 2000 19:37:40 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #146
Re: Hopefully last draft of AL
Sun, 24 Sep 2000 19:32:22 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #145
Re: Hopefully last draft of AL
Sun, 24 Sep 2000 18:51:02 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #144
Re: Hopefully last draft of AL
23 Sep 2000 13:06:54 -0700
[email protected] (Russ Allbery) • #143
Re: Hopefully last draft of AL
Sat, 23 Sep 2000 13:59:03 -0400
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #142
RE: Hopefully last draft of AL
Sat, 23 Sep 2000 13:35:32 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #141
RE: Hopefully last draft of AL
Sat, 23 Sep 2000 10:31:19 -0500
[email protected] (Garrett Goebel) • #140
RE: Hopefully last draft of AL
Fri, 22 Sep 2000 23:41:57 -0400
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #139
Re: Hopefully last draft of AL
Fri, 22 Sep 2000 23:40:51 -0400
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #138
RE: Hopefully last draft of AL
Fri, 22 Sep 2000 17:18:47 -0500
[email protected] (Garrett Goebel) • #137
Re: Hopefully last draft of AL
22 Sep 2000 14:40:47 -0700
[email protected] (Russ Allbery) • #136
Re: Hopefully last draft of AL
Fri, 22 Sep 2000 16:58:34 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #135
RE: Hopefully last draft of AL
Fri, 22 Sep 2000 16:55:18 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #134
RE: Hopefully last draft of AL
Fri, 22 Sep 2000 16:36:19 EDT
[email protected] ((Charles Lane)) • #133
RE: Hopefully last draft of AL
Fri, 22 Sep 2000 16:00:47 -0400
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #132
RE: Hopefully last draft of AL
Fri, 22 Sep 2000 14:29:08 -0500
[email protected] (Garrett Goebel) • #131
Re: Hopefully last draft of AL
Fri, 22 Sep 2000 15:08:17 -0400
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #130
Re: Hopefully last draft of AL
Fri, 22 Sep 2000 11:37:16 -0400
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) • #129
Re: Hopefully last draft of AL
Fri, 22 Sep 2000 11:33:05 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #128
Re: Hopefully last draft of AL
Fri, 22 Sep 2000 11:06:37 -0400
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) • #127
Re: Hopefully last draft of AL
Fri, 22 Sep 2000 11:01:09 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #126
Re: Hopefully last draft of AL
Fri, 22 Sep 2000 10:24:54 -0400
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #125
Re: Hopefully last draft of AL
Fri, 22 Sep 2000 07:00:21 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #124
Hopefully last draft of AL
Fri, 22 Sep 2000 06:28:43 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #123
Re: Deadline for all RFCs? If so, why?
Tue, 19 Sep 2000 21:01:39 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #122
Re: Deadline for all RFCs? If so, why?
Tue, 19 Sep 2000 20:23:41 -0400
[email protected] (Adam Turoff) • #121
Deadline for all RFCs? If so, why?
Tue, 19 Sep 2000 19:26:17 -0400
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #120
Re: RFC 211 (v1) The Artistic License Must Be Changed
Fri, 15 Sep 2000 10:35:18 -0400
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #119
Another pass at redrafting the Artistic License
Fri, 15 Sep 2000 03:41:30 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #118
Re: A new AL proposal
Thu, 14 Sep 2000 17:28:14 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #117
Re: subsets of licenses and copyright holders (was Re: I think the AL needs a rewrite)
Thu, 14 Sep 2000 16:44:25 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #116
Re: RFC 219 (v1) Perl6's License Should Be a Minor Bugfix of Perl5's License
Thu, 14 Sep 2000 15:48:53 -0400
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #115
Re: subsets of licenses and copyright holders (was Re: I think the AL needs a rewrite)
Thu, 14 Sep 2000 15:44:59 -0400
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #114
Re: subsets of licenses and copyright holders (was Re: I think the AL needs a rewrite)
Thu, 14 Sep 2000 15:43:36 -0400
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #113
Re: A new AL proposal
Thu, 14 Sep 2000 15:38:02 -0400
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #112
Re: Lawyers and licenses
Thu, 14 Sep 2000 15:29:52 -0400
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #111
Re: A new AL, take 2
Thu, 14 Sep 2000 13:33:46 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #110
Re: A new AL, take 2
Thu, 14 Sep 2000 17:45:26 +0100 (BST)
[email protected] (Nick Ing-Simmons) • #109
Re: A new AL, take 2
Thu, 14 Sep 2000 09:18:03 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #108
A new AL, take 2
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 23:38:08 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #107
Two advertising clauses need to be removed
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 21:36:35 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #106
Re: RFC 219 (v1) Perl6's License Should Be a Minor Bugfix of Perl5's License
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 17:17:18 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #105
RFC 219 (v1) Perl6's License Should Be a Minor Bugfix of Perl5's License
13 Sep 2000 20:45:28 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #104
Re: RFC 211 (v1) The Artistic License Must Be Changed
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 20:25:34 +0100
[email protected] ("Mike Lacey") • #103
Re: RFC 211 (v1) The Artistic License Must Be Changed
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 14:41:30 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #102
subsets of licenses and copyright holders (was Re: I think the AL needs a rewrite)
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 18:30:05 +0100 (BST)
[email protected] (Nick Ing-Simmons) • #101
Re: RFC 211 (v1) The Artistic License Must Be Changed
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 18:05:24 +0100 (BST)
[email protected] (Nick Ing-Simmons) • #100
Re: An attempt to be constructive
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 17:44:49 +0100 (BST)
[email protected] (Nick Ing-Simmons) • #99
Re: I think the AL needs a rewrite
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 17:15:41 +0100 (BST)
[email protected] (Nick Ing-Simmons) • #98
RFC 211 (v1) The Artistic License Must Be Changed
13 Sep 2000 07:04:25 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #97
Re: Lawyers and licenses
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 17:28:49 +0100 (BST)
[email protected] (Nick Ing-Simmons) • #96
Re: An attempt to be constructive
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 16:53:47 +0100 (BST)
[email protected] (Nick Ing-Simmons) • #95
Re: An attempt to be constructive
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 16:49:03 +0100 (BST)
[email protected] (Nick Ing-Simmons) • #94
Re: I think the AL needs a rewrite
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 12:44:53 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #93
Re: A new AL proposal
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 12:37:10 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #92
Re: RFC 211 (v1) The Artistic License Must Be Changed
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 12:25:42 -0400
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) • #91
Re: An attempt to be constructive
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 12:13:21 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #90
Re: A new AL proposal
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 11:49:43 -0400
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #89
Re: subsets of licenses and copyright holders (was Re: I think the AL needs a rewrite)
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 11:49:14 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #88
copyright holders (was Re: Licensing of perl5 (was Re: Storable integration in core))
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 11:31:41 -0400
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #87
subsets of licenses and copyright holders (was Re: I think the AL needs a rewrite)
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 11:14:09 -0400
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #86
The Artistic License is trivially invalid
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 10:00:23 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #85
Re: A new AL proposal
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 09:44:45 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #84
RE: An attempt to be constructive
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 08:32:27 -0500
[email protected] (Fisher Mark) • #83
A new AL proposal
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 08:16:52 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #82
Re: Licensing of perl5 (was Re: Storable integration in core)
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 08:07:20 -0400
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) • #81
Re: An attempt to be constructive
12 Sep 2000 23:00:55 -0700
[email protected] (Russ Allbery) • #80
Re: An attempt to be constructive
12 Sep 2000 22:47:21 -0700
[email protected] (Russ Allbery) • #79
Re: I think the AL needs a rewrite
12 Sep 2000 20:45:39 -0700
[email protected] (Russ Allbery) • #78
Re: I think the AL needs a rewrite
12 Sep 2000 20:41:20 -0700
[email protected] (Russ Allbery) • #77
Re: Licensing of perl5 (was Re: Storable integration in core)
12 Sep 2000 20:29:01 -0700
[email protected] (Russ Allbery) • #76
Re: An attempt to be constructive
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 16:38:17 -0400
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) • #75
Re: An attempt to be constructive
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 12:44:38 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Dave Storrs) • #74
Re: Lawyers and licenses
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 13:21:07 -0400
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) • #73
Re: I think the AL needs a rewrite
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 13:07:53 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #72
Re: Lawyers and licenses
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 12:50:55 -0400
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #71
Re: I think the AL needs a rewrite
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 12:45:46 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #70
Re: I think the AL needs a rewrite
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 12:31:01 -0400
[email protected] (Ajit Deshpande) • #69
Re: I think the AL needs a rewrite
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 12:16:53 -0400
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #68
RE: Lawyers and licenses
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 12:00:12 -0400
[email protected] ("Adams, Johnnie W") • #67
Re: Lawyers and licenses
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 11:29:38 -0400
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) • #66
Re: I think the AL needs a rewrite
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 11:27:58 -0400
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) • #65
Lawyers and licenses
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 11:22:56 -0400
[email protected] ("Adams, Johnnie W") • #64
Re: I think the AL needs a rewrite
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 11:05:35 -0400
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) • #63
Re: I think the AL needs a rewrite
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 10:59:58 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #62
Re: I think the AL needs a rewrite
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 10:48:17 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #61
Re: An attempt to be constructive
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 09:41:33 -0400
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) • #60
Re: I think the AL needs a rewrite
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 09:39:10 -0400
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) • #59
Re: An attempt to be constructive
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 09:32:04 EDT
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #58
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.