perl.unicode archive

385 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Given 5.014 features, is encoding::warnings still needed?
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:57:27 +0200
[email protected] (Lars Dɪᴇᴄᴋᴏᴡ 迪拉斯) • #3318
Re: Unicode::Collate string replacements and case sensitivity
Thu, 05 May 2011 22:06:44 +0900
[email protected] (SADAHIRO Tomoyuki) • #3317
Unicode::Collate string replacements and case sensitivity
Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Frank Müller) • #3316
Re: encoding(UTF16-LE) on Windows
Tue, 01 Feb 2011 23:04:20 +0100
[email protected] (Erland Sommarskog) • #3315
Re: encoding(UTF16-LE) on Windows
Tue, 1 Feb 2011 02:32:37 +0100
[email protected] (Michael Ludwig) • #3314
Re: encoding(UTF16-LE) on Windows
Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:42:43 +0100
[email protected] (Erland Sommarskog) • #3313
Re: encoding(UTF16-LE) on Windows
Sun, 30 Jan 2011 19:02:34 +0100
[email protected] (Michael Ludwig) • #3312
RE: encoding(UTF16-LE) on Windows
Sat, 29 Jan 2011 14:02:33 +0100
[email protected] (Erland Sommarskog) • #3311
RE: encoding(UTF16-LE) on Windows
Fri, 28 Jan 2011 16:55:31 -0800
[email protected] ("Jan Dubois") • #3310
RE: encoding(UTF16-LE) on Windows
21 Jan 2011 15:56:48 -0000
[email protected] (Erland Sommarskog) • #3309
RE: encoding(UTF16-LE) on Windows
Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:04:17 -0800
[email protected] ("Jan Dubois") • #3308
RE: encoding(UTF16-LE) on Windows
Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:32:27 -0800
[email protected] ("Jan Dubois") • #3307
RE: encoding(UTF16-LE) on Windows
Fri, 21 Jan 2011 11:48:40 -0800
[email protected] ("Jan Dubois") • #3306
RE: encoding(UTF16-LE) on Windows
21 Jan 2011 08:38:41 -0000
[email protected] (Erland Sommarskog) • #3305
Re: encoding(UTF16-LE) on Windows
Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:40:09 -0600
[email protected] (Bob Hallissy) • #3304
Re: encoding(UTF16-LE) on Windows
Thu, 20 Jan 2011 23:10:56 +0100
[email protected] ('Michael Ludwig') • #3303
RE: encoding(UTF16-LE) on Windows
Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:46:48 -0800
[email protected] ("Jan Dubois") • #3302
RE: encoding(UTF16-LE) on Windows
Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:45:30 -0800
[email protected] ("Jan Dubois") • #3301
Re: encoding(UTF16-LE) on Windows
Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:52:38 +0100
[email protected] (Michael Ludwig) • #3300
RE: encoding(UTF16-LE) on Windows
20 Jan 2011 08:29:05 -0000
[email protected] (Erland Sommarskog) • #3299
Re: encoding(UTF16-LE) on Windows
Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:45:27 +0100
[email protected] ('Michael Ludwig') • #3298
RE: encoding(UTF16-LE) on Windows
Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:08:30 -0800
[email protected] ("Jan Dubois") • #3297
Re: encoding(UTF16-LE) on Windows
Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:11:41 +0100
[email protected] (Michael Ludwig) • #3296
encoding(UTF16-LE) on Windows
17 Jan 2011 13:57:43 -0000
[email protected] (Erland Sommarskog) • #3295
Re: Matching upper ASCII characters in RE patterns
Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:44:06 +0100
[email protected] (Aristotle Pagaltzis) • #3294
Re: Matching upper ASCII characters in RE patterns
Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:48:05 -0800
[email protected] (Jonathan Pool) • #3293
Re: Matching upper ASCII characters in RE patterns
Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:28:58 +0100
[email protected] (Michael Ludwig) • #3292
Re: Matching upper ASCII characters in RE patterns
Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:23:52 -0800
[email protected] (Darren Duncan) • #3291
Re: Matching upper ASCII characters in RE patterns
Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:27:06 -0800
[email protected] (Jonathan Pool) • #3290
Re: Matching upper ASCII characters in RE patterns
Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:18:56 -0700
[email protected] (karl williamson) • #3289
Re: Matching upper ASCII characters in RE patterns
Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:22:12 -0800
[email protected] (Jonathan Pool) • #3288
Re: Matching upper ASCII characters in RE patterns
Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:10:16 -0700
[email protected] (karl williamson) • #3287
Re: Matching upper ASCII characters in RE patterns
Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:25:39 -0700
[email protected] (karl williamson) • #3286
Matching upper ASCII characters in RE patterns
Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:11:20 -0800
[email protected] (Jonathan Pool) • #3285
Re: Am I correct in thinking that the only way to get ord() to return a value over 256 is to send the character as a Unicode string instead of a byte string?
Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:19:07 -0500
[email protected] (Dan Muey) • #3284
Re: Am I correct in thinking that the only way to get ord() to return a value over 256 is to send the character as a Unicode string instead of a byte string?
Fri, 29 Oct 2010 09:30:37 +0200
[email protected] (Aristotle Pagaltzis) • #3283
Re: Am I correct in thinking that the only way to get ord() to return a value over 256 is to send the character as a Unicode string instead of a byte string?
Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:59:14 -0500
[email protected] (Dan Muey) • #3282
Re: Am I correct in thinking that the only way to get ord() to return a value over 256 is to send the character as a Unicode string instead of a byte string?
Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:27:16 +0200
[email protected] (Michael Ludwig) • #3281
Am I correct in thinking that the only way to get ord() to return a value over 256 is to send the character as a Unicode string instead of a byte string?
Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:54:33 -0500
[email protected] (Dan Muey) • #3280
Re: Detecting malformed characters in files opened with '<:encoding(something)'
Sun, 03 Oct 2010 17:03:05 -0700
[email protected] (Darren Duncan) • #3279
Detecting malformed characters in files opened with '<:encoding(something)'
Sun, 3 Oct 2010 21:59:08 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] • #3278
Re: Unicode::Collate string replacements and whitespace
Mon, 27 Sep 2010 03:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Frank Müller) • #3277
Re: Unicode::Collate string replacements and whitespace
Thu, 23 Sep 2010 00:46:04 +0900
[email protected] (SADAHIRO Tomoyuki) • #3276
Unicode::Collate string replacements and whitespace
Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:17:25 +0200
[email protected] • #3275
Re: Encode-2.39 problem
Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:58:54 +0530
[email protected] (Sastry) • #3274
Encode-2.39 problem
Wed, 15 Sep 2010 15:59:07 +0800
[email protected] ("JI Delang") • #3273
Re: utf8 pragma, lexical scope
Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:21:24 +0200
[email protected] ('Michael Ludwig') • #3272
RE: utf8 pragma, lexical scope
Thu, 9 Sep 2010 13:13:24 -0700
[email protected] ("Jan Dubois") • #3271
utf8 pragma, lexical scope
Thu, 9 Sep 2010 22:00:48 +0200
[email protected] (Michael Ludwig) • #3270
Re: Workaround to a unicode bug needed
Tue, 7 Sep 2010 11:48:22 +0200
[email protected] (Pierre Nugues) • #3269
Re: Workaround to a unicode bug needed
Mon, 06 Sep 2010 15:07:19 -0600
[email protected] (karl williamson) • #3268
Re: Workaround to a unicode bug needed
Mon, 6 Sep 2010 22:27:16 +0200
[email protected] (Pierre Nugues) • #3267
Re: Workaround to a unicode bug needed
Mon, 6 Sep 2010 22:26:35 +0200
[email protected] (Michael Ludwig) • #3266
Re: Workaround to a unicode bug needed
Mon, 6 Sep 2010 22:10:24 +0200
[email protected] (Michael Ludwig) • #3265
Re: Workaround to a unicode bug needed
Mon, 6 Sep 2010 22:02:45 +0200
[email protected] (Pierre Nugues) • #3264
Re: Workaround to a unicode bug needed
Mon, 6 Sep 2010 20:55:44 +0200
[email protected] (Enrique Nell) • #3263
Re: Workaround to a unicode bug needed
Mon, 6 Sep 2010 20:08:37 +0200
[email protected] (Pierre Nugues) • #3262
Re: Workaround to a unicode bug needed
Mon, 06 Sep 2010 10:30:19 -0600
[email protected] (karl williamson) • #3261
Workaround to a unicode bug needed
Mon, 6 Sep 2010 11:09:42 +0200
[email protected] (Pierre Nugues) • #3260
Re: Silence “Wide charact er” warning globally one time
Tue, 3 Aug 2010 00:20:04 +0200
[email protected] (Aristotle Pagaltzis) • #3259
Re: Silence “Wide character” warning globally one time
Sun, 01 Aug 2010 16:49:12 -0600
[email protected] (karl williamson) • #3258
Re: Silence “Wide charact er” warning globally one time
Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:49:10 +0200
[email protected] (Michael Ludwig) • #3257
Re: Silence “Wide character” warning global ly one time
Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:39:21 -0500
[email protected] (Dan Muey) • #3256
Re: Silence “Wide character” warning global ly one time
Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:28:32 -0500
[email protected] (Dan Muey) • #3255
Re: Silence “Wide charact er” warning globally one time
Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:17:08 +0200
[email protected] (Michael Ludwig) • #3254
Silence “Wide character” warning globally o ne time
Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:59:27 -0500
[email protected] (Dan Muey) • #3253
Re: [ANN] Unicode::Collate 0.54 released
Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:26:02 +0530
[email protected] (Sastry) • #3252
[ANN] Unicode::Collate 0.54 released
Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:05:25 +0900
[email protected] (SADAHIRO Tomoyuki) • #3251
Re: Variation In Decoding Between Encode and XML::LibXML
Sat, 19 Jun 2010 13:02:35 +0200
[email protected] (Michael Ludwig) • #3250
Re: Variation In Decoding Between Encode and XML::LibXML
Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:41:01 -0700
[email protected] ("David E. Wheeler") • #3249
Re: Variation In Decoding Between Encode and XML::LibXML
Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:36:42 -0700
[email protected] ("David E. Wheeler") • #3248
RE: Variation In Decoding Between Encode and XML::LibXML
Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:30:41 +0200
[email protected] (Henning Michael Møller Just) • #3247
Re: Variation In Decoding Between Encode and XML::LibXML
Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:24:36 +0100
[email protected] (John Delacour) • #3246
Re: Variation In Decoding Between Encode and XML::LibXML
Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:05:28 +0100
[email protected] (John Delacour) • #3245
Re: Variation In Decoding Between Encode and XML::LibXML
Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:27:29 +0100
[email protected] (John Delacour) • #3244
Re: Variation In Decoding Between Encode and XML::LibXML
Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:06:34 -0700
[email protected] (Marvin Humphrey) • #3243
Re: Variation In Decoding Between Encode and XML::LibXML
Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:24:05 -0700
[email protected] ("David E. Wheeler") • #3242
Re: Variation In Decoding Between Encode and XML::LibXML
Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:17:52 -0700
[email protected] ("David E. Wheeler") • #3241
Re: Variation In Decoding Between Encode and XML::LibXML
Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:03:45 -0700
[email protected] (Marvin Humphrey) • #3240
Re: Variation In Decoding Between Encode and XML::LibXML
Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:34:44 -0700
[email protected] ("David E. Wheeler") • #3239
Re: Variation In Decoding Between Encode and XML::LibXML
Wed, 16 Jun 2010 16:47:18 -0700
[email protected] (Marvin Humphrey) • #3238
Re: Variation In Decoding Between Encode and XML::LibXML
Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:47:10 -0700
[email protected] ("David E. Wheeler") • #3237
Re: Variation In Decoding Between Encode and XML::LibXML
Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:07:34 +0100
[email protected] (John Delacour) • #3236
Re: Variation In Decoding Between Encode and XML::LibXML
Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:59:33 -0700
[email protected] ("David E. Wheeler") • #3235
Re: Variation In Decoding Between Encode and XML::LibXML
Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:07:18 -0700
[email protected] ("David E. Wheeler") • #3234
Re: Variation In Decoding Between Encode and XML::LibXML
Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:05:19 -0700
[email protected] ("David E. Wheeler") • #3233
Re: Variation In Decoding Between Encode and XML::LibXML
Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:03:01 -0700
[email protected] ("David E. Wheeler") • #3232
Re: Variation In Decoding Between Encode and XML::LibXML
Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:24:56 +0900
[email protected] (Daisuke Maki) • #3231
Re: Variation In Decoding Between Encode and XML::LibXML
Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:34:51 +0200
[email protected] (Michael Ludwig) • #3230
RE: Variation In Decoding Between Encode and XML::LibXML
Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:04:00 +0200
[email protected] (Henning Michael Møller Just) • #3229
Variation In Decoding Between Encode and XML::LibXML
Tue, 15 Jun 2010 22:55:31 -0700
[email protected] ("David E. Wheeler") • #3228
Re: Don't use the \C escape in regexes - Why not?
Tue, 4 May 2010 19:44:54 +0200
[email protected] (Aristotle Pagaltzis) • #3227
Re: Don't use the \C escape in regexes - Why not?
Tue, 4 May 2010 11:09:43 +0200
[email protected] (Gisle Aas) • #3226
Re: Don't use the \C escape in regexes - Why not?
Tue, 4 May 2010 14:56:08 +0200
[email protected] (Michael Ludwig) • #3225
Re: Don't use the \C escape in regexes - Why not?
Tue, 4 May 2010 13:24:59 +0200
[email protected] (Aristotle Pagaltzis) • #3224
Re: Don't use the \C escape in regexes - Why not?
Tue, 4 May 2010 13:22:11 +0200
[email protected] (Michael Ludwig) • #3223
Re: Don't use the \C escape in regexes - Why not?
Tue, 4 May 2010 13:06:41 +0200
[email protected] (Michael Ludwig) • #3222
Re: Don't use the \C escape in regexes - Why not?
Tue, 4 May 2010 11:42:29 +0200
[email protected] (Michael Ludwig) • #3221
Don't use the \C escape in regexes - Why not?
Mon, 3 May 2010 20:34:53 +0200
[email protected] (Michael Ludwig) • #3220
Re: Effect of -C command line switch on `warn` and `die`
Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:05:55 +0200
[email protected] (Michael Ludwig) • #3219
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.