Re: Supporting property modification in message body
"John P. Rouillard" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.bug-tracking.roundup.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In message <[email protected]>, Bernhard Reiter writes: >Am Dienstag, 26. Februar 2013, 20:07:32 schrieb John P. Rouillard: >> However this isn't always convenient, and some longer string fields >> can't be set this way. Plus creating new objects to be added to the >> item (e.g. a timelog) are an issue. Also some mailers (e.g. outlook) >> break the subject line in new and interesting ways that makes this >> mechanism difficult to use. >> >> What I am proposing is having in body property manipulation. > >In general it probably is a good idea. >I'm not sure if the syntax is ideal, '[' actually might happen in some >real emails. Well it would have to be the first non-blank line in the email and on a line on it's own. I don't see many emails starting with: [ >Debian's issue tracker has a different syntax. Is that documented anywhere? I was considering supporting property: value as well as: property = value so it looks like email headers which is supported by some addons to rt. >What is most inconvenient about email updates is that if you make a >mistake in the property changes, the whole email will be rejected. I agree, but we run that risk on the subject line as well and I think messing up that single line format is easier. -- -- rouilj John Rouillard =========================================================================== My employers don't acknowledge my existence much less my opinions. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb