RE: ASP dot Net CMS

Hi All,

E-GIF also covers categorisations like the EGCL - the eGovernment
Category List, which is not a technology issue at all.

E-GIF is about interoperability based on common standards (XML and XSL)
and common terminology (the eGMS meta data), be that passing data from a
to b in a common format, or classifying data within centrally managed
taxonomy - so when I move from one council to another they use the same
terminology for services, for example.

These standards (XML, XSL and structured meta data), by there very
nature, transcend technology.  In fact, that is most of there raison
d'etre.

The idea being that .NET system might 'talk' via XML (transformed by
XSL) to a J2EE system (or any other technology).  So, in the case of a
missing person your local council legacy system might pass personal
information on to a number of police and hospital systems, built in
different technologies, in a way that they all understand. The LGOL
project was designed to serve as a conduit for this messaging.

The idea that e-GIF lends itself to the .NET framework, flies in the
face of the fact that it is there to promote data interoperability in a
diverse technological landscape.
 
Kind regards

Angus  

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick de Voil
Sent: 23 February 2005 18:40
To: Paul Duthoit; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [CMS] ASP dot Net CMS

Paul

> XML Schemas in principal. I stress I am not a developer but 
> responsible
for
> business development and project initiation. A number public sector 
> bodies are 'inclined to .Net/MS' for this and other reasons - often 
> through lack
of
> knowledge.

As I understand it, under the e-GIF, there are three areas where XML
Schemas are important:

- metadata schemas (eGMS, Dublin Core)

- presentation schemas (XHTML etc)

- the harder-to-define area of "data integration" where data is to be
passed "between systems". In my experience of web content management
projects, people tend to overlook this one altogether, believing that
it's irrelevant, and this can be a mistake.

But I can't imagine why anyone would consider any of these three to be
particularly the province of .NET as opposed to, for example, J2EE.

Regards

-------------------------------------------------------------------
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
information and may be privileged and intended solely for the use of
the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.  If you are not
the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy
this email.  Please notify the sender immediately by email if you have
received this email by mistake and delete this email from your system.

Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not
accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this
message which arise as a result of email transmission. If verification
is required please request a hard-copy version. This message is
provided for informational purposes and should not be construed as a
solicitation for, or offer of contract.

This email has been scanned on 23/2/2005 for all detectable virus and code exploits.
Whilst we run anti-virus software, you are solely responsible for
ensuring that any email or attachment you receive is virus free.  We
disclaim any liability for any damage you suffer as a consequence of
receiving any virus.
-------------------------------------------------------------------