Re: ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException in ContentField.activate(...)

Hi Benjamin,

No, not really. Unless maybe an operation failed or Tomcat was shutdown 
during an operation and it was tried later or something like that.

Regards,
  Serge Huber.

[email protected] wrote:

>
> Hi Serge,
>
> yes, it solves the problem. Do you have an idea why those duplicates 
> could happen?
>
> Greetings,
> Benjamin Papez
>
> System Architect
> ***************************************************
> COMMARO mobile trading systems GmbH
> Lakeside B04
> A-9020 Klagenfurt - Austria/Europe
>
> phone: +43 (463) 298505-38
> fax: +43 (463) 298505-22
> ***************************************************
>
>
> *Serge Huber <[email protected]>*
>
> 08.06.2005 12:00
> Please respond to
> <[email protected]>
>
>
> 	
> To
> 	[email protected]
> cc
> 	
> Subject
> 	Re: ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException in ContentField.activate(...)
>
>
>
> 	
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> Indeed those duplicates are sure to cause problems. I would recommend
> shutting down Jahia, purging the duplicates and relaunching, to see if
> it solves the problem.
>
> Regards,
>  Serge Huber.
>
> [email protected] wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi Serge!
> >
> > Finally I could reproduce the exception I was mentioning a month ago.
> > It somehow happens that for some fields there are two same entries in
> > the database. Here is an excerpt of our JAHIA_FIELDS_DATA table.
> > *ID_JAHIA_FIELDS_DATA*                  *JAHIAID_JAHIA_FIELDS_DATA*
> > *PAGEID_JAHIA_FIELDS_DATA*                  *CTNID_JAHIA_FIELDS_DATA*
> > *FIELDDEFID_JAHIA_FIELDS_DATA*                 
>  *TYPE_JAHIA_FIELDS_DATA*
> > *CONNECTTYPE_JAHIA_FIELDS_DATA*                 
>  *VALUE_JAHIA_FIELDS_DATA*
> > *RANK_JAHIA_FIELDS_DATA*                  *RIGHTS_JAHIA_FIELDS_DATA* 
>                  *VERSION_ID*
> > *WORKFLOW_STATE*                  *LANGUAGE_CODE*
> > 10263                  1                  1                  10043   
>                10041                  1                  0             
>      100                  0                  11685                  0 
>                  2                  shared
> > 10263                  1                  1                  10043   
>                10041                  1                  0             
>      100                  0                  11685                  0 
>                  2                  shared
> > 10264                  1                  1                  10043   
>                10042                  20                  0           
>        
> >                  0                  11686                  0         
>          2                  shared
> > 10264                  1                  1                  10043   
>                10042                  20                  0           
>        
> >                  0                  11686                  0         
>          2                  shared
> > 10265                  1                  1                  10043   
>                10043                  20                  0           
>        
> >                  0                  11687                  0         
>          2                  shared
> > 10265                  1                  1                  10043   
>                10043                  20                  0           
>        
> >                  0                  11687                  0         
>          2                  shared
> > 10266                  1                  1                  10043   
>                10039                  2                  0             
>      test                  0                  11688                  0 
>                  2                  de
> > 10267                  1                  1                  10043   
>                10040                  20                  0           
>        
> >                  0                  11689                  0         
>          2                  shared
> >
> >
> >
> > For those fields, which have two entries, we get the mentioned
> > exceptions. How come, that there are two same entries? I guess it is
> > not a normal behaviour and how can we prevent this exception, which
> > blocks the workflow as a page cannot be activated anymore?
> >
> > Greetings,
> > Benjamin
> >
> > Serge wrote on Fri, 13 May 2005 02:17:07 -0700
> >
> > Hi Benjamin,
> >
> > Do you have a reliable way of reproducing this so that we may test it
> > ? We haven't be able to reproduce it here during our testing. Also
> > which JVM are you using ?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Serge Huber.
> >
> > Benjamin wrote on Wed, 11 May 2005 03:09:32 -0700 :
> >
> > We are still using Jahia 4.0.5, but on heavy testing we encounter that
> > the workflow process is quite unstable sometimes. When looking in the
> > LOG files, I for instance can see an ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException in
> > the ContentField.acivate(...) method.
> >
> > In this loop we get this exception in the line
> > activeAndStagingEntryStates.remove (i);, because i has the value -1.
> > It seem strange anyway that the removing from the
> > activeAndStagingEntryStates collection is happening in the inner loop
> > and not in the outer loop. As you haven't changed the code in the 4.1
> > version it seems to work for everybody else, or could it be that there
> > is a bug?
> >
> > // we backup all active entries that will be replaced
> > for (int i = 0; i < activeAndStagingEntryStates.size (); i++) {
> > ContentObjectEntryState actEntryState = (ContentObjectEntryState)
> > activeAndStagingEntryStates.get (
> > i);
> > if (actEntryState.isActive ()) {
> > for (int j = 0; j < stagedEntries.size (); j++) {
> > ContentObjectEntryState staEntryState = (ContentObjectEntryState)
> > stagedEntries.get (
> > j);
> > if (actEntryState.getLanguageCode ().equals (
> > staEntryState.getLanguageCode ())) {
> > // ok appollo, we catched an active entry here! we handle this..
> > if (versioningEnabled) {
> >
> > ContentObjectEntryState backupEntryState = ContentFieldDB.getInstance
> > ().backupDBValue (
> > this, actEntryState); // we backup the active version
> > // ok we backuped an entry of the field
> > if (backupEntryState != null) {
> > // if the entry state list is loaded, let's update it
> > if (versioningEntryStates != null) {
> > versioningEntryStates.add (backupEntryState);
> > }
> > // also we must call the changeEntryState because, like, we changed
> > the version or
> > // something hehe..
> > this.changeEntryState (actEntryState, backupEntryState,
> > jParams, stateModifContext);
> > }
> > } else {
> > // if versioning is not enabled, we delete the old value content!
> > this.deleteEntry (actEntryState);
> > }
> > // we then delete the active entry
> > ContentFieldDB.getInstance ().deleteDBValue (this, actEntryState);
> > activeAndStagingEntryStates.remove (i);
> > i -= 1;
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > }
> >
> > Greetings,
> > Benjamin Papez
>
>