Re: Archives of the group?

"'Fernando M. Roxo da Motta' [email protected] [hercules-390]" <[email protected]> Mon, 24 Feb 2020 14:42:11 -0300
Newsgroups gmane.comp.emulators.hercules390.general
Organization Riltda
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 08:05:42 -0800, "'\'Fish\' \(David B. Trout\)'
[email protected] [hercules-390]" <[email protected]>
wrote:


> Mark Rousell wrote:
> 
> > It seems to me that if there is a Groups.io group then it
> > would make sense to just go there and stop posting here.  
> 
> For those of us who are already members of the group, sure.  But what
> about new users?  Those who are new to Hercules?  Who have only just
> discovered Hercules and are trying to join the group?  What about
> them?

   Well, if there still existed a group messages history, if we stop
messaging to Yahoo and periodically post a message pointing to
group.io, I guess that in no time the only message that history would
be the one pointing to the new group.

  Without history I don't now what will happen.

  Anyway I thing we should just stop messaging here at all.


  HTH

> 
> 
> > There's no need to shut this group down. It would be useful
> > to post a message from time to time letting people know the
> > address of the Group.io group.  
> 
> Such periodic "informative" messages would only be received by
> EXISTING members, and then, ONLY to existing members which have
> chosen to receive emails.
> 
> One of the options Yahoo provided to members was the option to not
> receive any emails at all, and to instead only access the group via
> their user interface (which, as explained earlier, is now impossible).
> 
> So once again, potential NEW members -- people *trying* to join the
> "Hercules Support Forum" -- would be left out in the cold.  THAT is
> the problem that now (currently) exists the way things are right now
> that I very much want to try and resolve.
> 
> Potential new members are unable to join the group because all new
> memberships are by invitation only, and further, must be approved by
> the owner/moderator, and as far as I know, neither Jay nor Roger,
> both being essential AWOL, are responding to such requests.  The
> group is essentially DYING due to their lack of
> interest/involvement.  :(
> 







  Roxo

--
---------------- Non luctari, ludare -------------------+ WYSIWYG
Fernando M. Roxo da Motta <[email protected]>                | Editor?
Except where explicitly stated I speak on my own behalf.|  VI !!
                PU5RXO                                  | I see text,
------------ Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?-------------+ I get text!