Re: Archives of the group?
"'Fernando M. Roxo da Motta' [email protected] [hercules-390]" <[email protected]> Mon, 24 Feb 2020 14:42:11 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.emulators.hercules390.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Riltda |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 08:05:42 -0800, "'\'Fish\' \(David B. Trout\)' [email protected] [hercules-390]" <[email protected]> wrote: > Mark Rousell wrote: > > > It seems to me that if there is a Groups.io group then it > > would make sense to just go there and stop posting here. > > For those of us who are already members of the group, sure. But what > about new users? Those who are new to Hercules? Who have only just > discovered Hercules and are trying to join the group? What about > them? Well, if there still existed a group messages history, if we stop messaging to Yahoo and periodically post a message pointing to group.io, I guess that in no time the only message that history would be the one pointing to the new group. Without history I don't now what will happen. Anyway I thing we should just stop messaging here at all. HTH > > > > There's no need to shut this group down. It would be useful > > to post a message from time to time letting people know the > > address of the Group.io group. > > Such periodic "informative" messages would only be received by > EXISTING members, and then, ONLY to existing members which have > chosen to receive emails. > > One of the options Yahoo provided to members was the option to not > receive any emails at all, and to instead only access the group via > their user interface (which, as explained earlier, is now impossible). > > So once again, potential NEW members -- people *trying* to join the > "Hercules Support Forum" -- would be left out in the cold. THAT is > the problem that now (currently) exists the way things are right now > that I very much want to try and resolve. > > Potential new members are unable to join the group because all new > memberships are by invitation only, and further, must be approved by > the owner/moderator, and as far as I know, neither Jay nor Roger, > both being essential AWOL, are responding to such requests. The > group is essentially DYING due to their lack of > interest/involvement. :( > Roxo -- ---------------- Non luctari, ludare -------------------+ WYSIWYG Fernando M. Roxo da Motta <[email protected]> | Editor? Except where explicitly stated I speak on my own behalf.| VI !! PU5RXO | I see text, ------------ Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?-------------+ I get text!