Re: OS X - Java Deprecated. Moneydance future?
Vinicius Provenzano <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.finance.moneydance.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Is there any chance to have moneydance "ported" to Obj-C? Vinicius Provenzano On 23/10/2010, at 02:11, Andy Pastuszak <[email protected]> wrote: > I expect Java to survive. I just don't expect anyone to be using Oracle's > JVM 2 years from now. The openJDK will have all patent encumbered code > removed, and much like LibreOffice, will move on from Oracle's control. > On Oct 22, 2010 11:50 PM, "Sean Reilly" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I posted an entry on the Moneydance blog regarding Apple's announcement > regarding Java: >> http://moneydance.com/blog/archives/279 >> >> It's hard to say what the future of Java on Mac might be, but Moneydance > does have a future (on the Mac and elsewhere) regardless. It would be nice > if Apple would be a bit more clear about Java on Lion and on the mac app > store. For example, they say that apps depending upon "deprecated > technologies" such as Java are not allowed on the app store, but if an app > is bundled with it's own JVM is it ok? >> >> I think a recent tweet from Tim Bray (of Google, formerly of Sun, inventor > of XML) is worth reading: >> "Unclench, everyone. There are millions of Java devs, all their tools are > in Java, they like Macs, one way or another it'll be there." >> >> Cheers, >> Sean >> >> >> On Oct 22, 2010, at 11:20 PM, Rick Floyd wrote: >> >>> >>>> Most likely that company will be named "Oracle." >>>> >>> The justification that Apple (Jobs) is giving for deprecating Java on OS > X is that Apple's port is always behind and so it's better if it comes from > the vendor. Perhaps it will happen, although Oracle is showing itself pretty > resistant to doing any work that doesn't provide a direct revenue stream. In > any case, isn't there a better way to make this transition than deprecating > Java? I also wonder how much work Oracle can or will put into integrating > Java into OS X. I'd much rather have "integrated" than "current" at this > point in Java's lifecycle. Take a look at a Java app on Linux to see how bad > it can get without that integration. >>> >>> A more immediate effect of the deprecation comes from Apple's position > that applications based on deprecated interfaces (explicitly including Java) > will be banned from Apple's app store when it opens in a few months. That's > a pretty unfriendly thing to do to developers who have supported Apple for > so long. >>> >>> See: >>> >>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/10/22/jobs_on_java_for_mac/ >>> >>> for more speculation on where this might be going. >>> >>> I think that the original poster is right to be worried. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> moneydance-info mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://moneydance.com/mailman/listinfo/moneydance-info >> >> _______________________________________________ >> moneydance-info mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://moneydance.com/mailman/listinfo/moneydance-info > _______________________________________________ > moneydance-info mailing list > [email protected] > http://moneydance.com/mailman/listinfo/moneydance-info