Re: Lightproof extension integration broken
Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai <[email protected]> Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:06:20 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.ximian.openoffice |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I am looking into... Maybe not all goods were committed to master. Note, extension handling is changing in 3.3. http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Extensions_Integration_into_Installation_Set KAMI On 2010-07-27 15:58, Petr Mladek wrote: > Pavel Lastovicka píše v Čt 22. 07. 2010 v 16:25 +0200: >> Hello, >> >> I have noticed in the Windows OO.o installation program that there is empty item for >> the Lightproof extension under the Extensions feature. >> >> In scp2/source/extensions/module_extensions.scp there is: >> >> #ifndef WITHOUT_EXTENSION_LIGHTPROOF >> #ifdef WITH_EXTENSION_INTEGRATION >> Module gid_Module_Optional_Extensions_LightProof >> MOD_NAME_DESC(MODULE_OPTIONAL_EXTENSIONS_LIGHTPROOF); >> ParentID = gid_Module_Optional_Extensions; >> Minimal = NO; >> Default = YES; >> Styles = ( ); >> End >> #endif >> #endif >> >> The first line should be #ifdef WITH_EXTENSION_LIGHTPROOF. Also the "Files" >> statement is missing in module definition. > KAMI, could you please look at it? > > I do not pack this extensions and am not sure how it is supposed to > work. I guess that we need to pack more files: the main lightproof > extension and lang packs. > > I see only one file entry in scp2/source/extensions/file_extensions.scp. > It is used in the module definition in > scp2/source/extensions/module_extensions_lightproof.scp. > > The module definition in scp2/source/extensions/module_extensions.scp > seems to be broken and probably obsoleted. > > -- KAMI911Best regards, Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai | 神 | kami911 [at] gmail [dot] com My favorite projects: OxygenOffice Professional <http://ooop.sf.net/> - office suite - for everybody | Magyarul <http://hun.sf.net/> - In Hungarian Blog <http://bit.ly/10ucTR> | Support <http://bit.ly/eYZO6> Follow me <http://bit.ly/gJuJZ>, if you can <http://bit.ly/kDocB>
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 900 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJMTufgAAoJECCg8GbdPF49BggQAIE6TOgOP4S2gs7E0iiEWWXk PmjsHbovJLqhLxafDlIUFwMK5JtTKanK1rE9wY7H8id31Pftg+NCkPWjvfYD4XBk tlzV/ePSlXEjHRDGjLJ7OXqaQ50lGeTYyr6SjeXqR5UiydX1Nu6Clh2ccncTvAE/ olAE2hHW21Lzs+uZ/suIvVgbLwq4o3DXsrTsxmQu09vQ7sweBpdOfmMwHwu/MtaR 8nCbIWJtNdw0r0sapVChdGQYcbqcjl6dGiUimmRmVcA/j2tNiRKhBqT34xT263mN WRSL2w7fFC2qkUYr3ob5vHTzmeRix4jPsb2tmYcUbl2Uf7gI1/jTc+7l7irTYsK7 JdNxMJbwVIXGEnc0/4gmyclIJ1bsUyVylBK/FN72diLNu6f3yliORn9zQuUyI4w2 nkI50WjLkvQnBXyJ79//cpiGWoLCc5W+x+YNNfNpY19CnOmvbZJh8fk/B4DjCgt1 7HF0XzTVILASBXP3sTqiJlxGkqKVX9kki2A85yGCrwuCQCD6U6xJ9Mv/RCarmkEM V4XWoCtYjsBQgprDkxjhp+5nfFCkXZgHh+emeCghsGNLrhJnDDoemYlv0z3xId4f i7oCErZ9IV38doB5/Baoc8LCeWaYcqPD/o/+9PSsYY1KgF8IcVmKTVAhGy9yC9fT eMEAnZtQGjVNcx5iijgj =ktW8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----