gmane.comp.gnome.ximian.openoffice

4567 articles on record, showing the most recent 50.

[ANN] ooo-build has been folded into LibreOffice
Wed, 9 Feb 2011 09:10:51 +0100
Thorsten Behrens <[email protected]> • #4599
Re: IllegalArgumentException in Java-Extension only in Go-oo
Wed, 9 Feb 2011 11:16:45 +0800
Yifan Jiang <[email protected]> • #4598
IllegalArgumentException in Java-Extension only in Go-oo
Sun, 06 Feb 2011 11:22:24 +0100
Dietmar <[email protected]> • #4597
Re: Problem while building openoffice go from sources.
Thu, 6 Jan 2011 15:58:53 +0100
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #4596
Re: Problem while building openoffice go from sources.
Wed, 05 Jan 2011 11:09:52 +0100
Cedric Bosdonnat <[email protected]> • #4595
Problem while building openoffice go from sources.
Wed, 05 Jan 2011 10:09:38 +0100
Morgoth Evil <[email protected]> • #4594
[Issue 113330] ooo hangs on opening doc uments on nfs filesystems
11 Dec 2010 11:51:18 -0000
[email protected] • #4593
[Issue 113330] ooo hangs on opening doc uments on nfs filesystems
11 Dec 2010 11:40:08 -0000
[email protected] • #4592
[ANN] ooo-build is going to be folded into LibreOffice
Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:50:47 +0200
Thorsten Behrens <[email protected]> • #4591
[Issue 114570] spreadsheet with about 2 4000 rows can not be opened
17 Oct 2010 06:33:29 -0000
[email protected] • #4590
[Issue 114569] vertical aligned text in cells disappears
17 Oct 2010 06:32:46 -0000
[email protected] • #4589
[Issue 113330] oowriter cannot open doc uments on nfs shares
15 Oct 2010 23:48:46 -0000
[email protected] • #4588
[Issue 113330] oowriter cannot open doc uments on nfs shares
15 Oct 2010 12:40:56 -0000
[email protected] • #4587
Re: Do you consider Go-oo project to be a fork of OpenOffice.org?
Wed, 06 Oct 2010 23:32:04 -0400
Kohei Yoshida <[email protected]> • #4586
Re: Do you consider Go-oo project to be a fork of OpenOffice.org?
Wed, 06 Oct 2010 23:31:12 -0400
Kohei Yoshida <[email protected]> • #4585
Re: Do you consider Go-oo project to be a fork of OpenOffice.org?
Wed, 06 Oct 2010 23:46:50 -0400
Kohei Yoshida <[email protected]> • #4584
Re: Do you consider Go-oo project to be a fork of OpenOffice.org?
Thu, 07 Oct 2010 01:08:36 +0100
espinosa_cz <[email protected]> • #4583
Re: Do you consider Go-oo project to be a fork of OpenOffice.org?
Thu, 07 Oct 2010 00:54:08 +0100
espinosa_cz <[email protected]> • #4582
Re: Slovak Translations of go-oo
Mon, 04 Oct 2010 12:32:35 +0200
Petr Mladek <[email protected]> • #4581
Re: libreoffice 3.2.99.1 mono compile error
Sun, 3 Oct 2010 16:18:31 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #4580
Re: Slovak Translations of go-oo
Sun, 3 Oct 2010 13:04:28 +0200
Miklos Vajna <[email protected]> • #4579
Re: Slovak Translations of go-oo
Sun, 3 Oct 2010 09:57:41 +0200
Branislav Klocok <[email protected]> • #4578
Re: Slovak Translations of go-oo
Sat, 2 Oct 2010 17:59:26 +0200
Andras Timar <[email protected]> • #4577
libreoffice 3.2.99.1 mono compile error
Sat, 2 Oct 2010 18:12:50 +0300
Gökçen Eraslan <[email protected]> • #4576
Re: Do you consider Go-oo project to be a fork of OpenOffice.org?
Sat, 2 Oct 2010 18:23:09 +0530
Muthu Subramanian K <[email protected]> • #4575
Re: Slovak Translations of go-oo
Sat, 2 Oct 2010 12:56:56 +0200
Branislav Klocok <[email protected]> • #4574
Re: Slovak Translations of go-oo
Fri, 1 Oct 2010 19:04:26 +0200
Andras Timar <[email protected]> • #4573
Slovak Translations of go-oo
Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:59:27 +0200
Branislav Klocok <[email protected]> • #4572
Re: Do you consider Go-oo project to be a fork of OpenOffice.org?
Fri, 01 Oct 2010 01:31:39 +0100
espinosa_cz <[email protected]> • #4571
Re: Do you consider Go-oo project to be a fork of OpenOffice.org?
Thu, 30 Sep 2010 01:56:24 -0600
"Tor Lillqvist" <[email protected]> • #4570
Do you consider Go-oo project to be a fork of OpenOffice.org?
Thu, 30 Sep 2010 01:39:19 +0100
espinosa_cz <[email protected]> • #4569
Re: Failed to compile go-oo
Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:38:10 +0200
Nadav Vinik <[email protected]> • #4568
Re: Patch for building against libxml2 version 2.7.4 and 2.7.5
Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:25:12 +0200
Jonas Finnemann Jensen <[email protected]> • #4567
Re: Patch for building against libxml2 version 2.7.4 and 2.7.5
Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:02:01 -0600
"Fridrich Strba" <[email protected]> • #4566
Patch for building against libxml2 version 2.7.4 and 2.7.5
Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:47:17 +0200
Jonas Finnemann Jensen <[email protected]> • #4565
Re: Failed to compile go-oo
Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:56:01 +0200
Nadav Vinik <[email protected]> • #4564
Re: Failed to compile go-oo
Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:50:32 +0200
Nadav Vinik <[email protected]> • #4563
Opengrok for Go-oo
Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:29:11 +0200
Cédric Bosdonnat <[email protected]> • #4562
Re: Failed to compile go-oo
Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:51:24 +0100
Caolán McNamara <[email protected]> • #4561
Re: Failed to compile go-oo
Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:37:46 +0200
Thorsten Behrens <[email protected]> • #4560
Re: Failed to compile go-oo
Sat, 25 Sep 2010 23:54:26 +0200
Nadav Vinik <[email protected]> • #4559
Re: Failed to compile go-oo
Sat, 25 Sep 2010 11:44:06 +0200
Nadav Vinik <[email protected]> • #4558
Re: Failed to compile go-oo
Sat, 25 Sep 2010 08:34:37 +0200
Fridrich Strba <[email protected]> • #4557
Failed to compile go-oo
Sat, 25 Sep 2010 07:52:43 +0200
Nadav Vinik <[email protected]> • #4556
Re: Add Romanian translation
Fri, 24 Sep 2010 20:38:51 +0200
Petr Mladek <[email protected]> • #4555
Re: icu4c 4.2.1 problem in master
Fri, 24 Sep 2010 12:45:07 +0200
Cédric Bosdonnat <[email protected]> • #4554
Re: icu4c 4.2.1 problem in master
Fri, 24 Sep 2010 12:30:20 +0200
Miklos Vajna <[email protected]> • #4553
Re: icu4c 4.2.1 problem in master
Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:23:34 +0200
Cédric Bosdonnat <[email protected]> • #4552
Re: icu4c 4.2.1 problem in master
Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:16:18 -0400
Kohei Yoshida <[email protected]> • #4551
New translations commited in the old stale GNOME repo of ooo-build
Fri, 24 Sep 2010 03:08:59 +0300
Lucian Adrian Grijincu <[email protected]> • #4550