Re: DRAFT: eXIf 2017-03-02
Willem van Schaik <[email protected]> Fri, 3 Mar 2017 14:20:32 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.png.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
the purpose of a PNG EXIF chunk is simply to store the EXIF data (from a JPEG image) if you take elements out of the JPEG (or whatever) EXIF data and store them in a PNG chunk then that's not an EXIF chunk anymore call it a GPS chunk, a THUMBNAIL chunk, etc. but not EXIF and you don't need a new GPS chunk, because you can just define a GPS keyword in a TEXT/ITXT chunk I like the current proposal on simplesystems it is SIMPLE :-) Willem On 2017-03-03 10:14, Glenn Randers-Pehrson wrote: > On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 10:50 AM, John Bowler > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 4:28 AM, Glenn Randers-Pehrson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I also don't see why I shouldn't just put the EXIF tags into IFD[0]; >> the level of indirection is of no benefit in a single-image format. > > It would be a redesign of the eXIf chunk, but we could do that. > Just eliminate the TIFF header and IFD structure, and only put > a consecutive stream of EXIF/GPS/thumbnail tags in eXIf. > > That's more or less what I tried to do 10-12 years ago, but > the project died due to lack of interest. > > That means conversion back to JPEG or TIFF would involve > rebuilding the IFD structure, but that's pretty simple. > > Glenn > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > png-mng-misc mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-misc > > -- Willem van Schaik [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot