Re: Re: RE: Re: (...)and Java Questions
"Jones, Gregory James" <[email protected]> Fri, 17 Oct 2003 10:01:52 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.handhelds.zaurus.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 11:01:10 -0400 > From: Matthew Zaleski <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Zaurus-general] RE: Re: (...)and Java Questions > To: <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <2003101611110.279961@kirk> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > <<<snipped>>> > > No disagreement here. What I'm looking for is a heavyweight Swing-enabled > 1.4.x JVM on my Zaurus. If memory recalls correctly, none of the JVM's > are in that boat. If I'm wrong, I would be delighted to hear of the > beastly JVM that rocks the boat. > One of the ones that I mentioned is supposed to have a lightweight swing replacement. I am new to java and haven't explored it yet, so your on your own. > > My biggest gripe with the "lightweights" as I call them is the massive > fragmentation of the GUI features both between desktop and palmtop and > among the palmtop JVM's themselves. I've researched, but not used, some > of the JVM's and Swing replacements mentioned. The palmtop Java app > developer's situation seems to be none-too-desirable. > There was a great blog entry on O'Reilly Net (www.oreillynet.com) the other day titled "What If the iApps had been jApps?" and is the basis for a talk that will be given at the upcoming MacOS conference (Why Mac users HATE Java.) It is a fascinating portrayal of what Java COULD be... I got excited reading it and only then remembered that it was a fiction piece. Too bad too... I would hope that Sun would pay attention to this one entry and change the world of computing. Check it out: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/wlg/3889 Oreillynet is a great way to start your day, by the way... my homepage. > > None of my arguments apply to the cell-phone developers. They have major > constraints on footprint and horsepower that high-end palmtops can > generally ignore. > > Perhaps the ideal world would be for IBM and Sun to get along on Java GUI > stuff and support both Swing/AWT and IBM's SWT in more environments/IDE's. > My guess is that SWT would have better performance on a handheld. > It does seem odd that IBM which seems to be embracing the Zaurus with some of its websphere and other enterprise development technologies isn't releasing more tools for the platform. Hmmm??? > > -Matt > * All opinions are my own and not those of anyone else or any other institution. No one else would want them.*