Re: USB Receiver Advice?

Bengt Martensson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.hardware.lirc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 10/21/17 16:39, VDR User wrote:
>>> My point is valid. It's inconvenient and (imo) unreasonable to suggest
>>> a person should have to use a second system just to create a remote
>>> config. Aside of that, they may not even have a second/desktop system
>>> to use.
>>
>> Ok, I am going to leave it with that.
>>
>> But the main problem with irrecord is _not_ that it lacks a GUI. The program
>> was written around 20 years ago, and we have acquired a lot of knowledge
>> since then, knowledge that is not in that program. It is essentially the
>> same program as Christoph Bartelmus wrote in 1998. It shows its age, and has
>> a lot of problems. That is the problem, not GUI/CLI.
> 
> Yes, exactly! The lack of a gui is a benefit, it's the outdatedness
> that should be address. That's why I said, "I've used irrecord in the
> past both successfully and unsuccessfully. I don't know what's wrong
> with it but perhaps the better option is to fix whatever is ailing it
> because a command-line only config generator is certainly a useful
> tool to have for a lot of people."

IrScrutinizer is not irrecord with a GUI. It does not suffer from the 
same shortcomings as irrecord (but possibly others?). It separates 
clearly the GUI from the core functionality, the latter packed into an 
OO framework with a documented API, that is designed to be used as such. 
On top of that API, a GUI is written. Another user interface, for 
example CLI based, can comparatively easily be built on top of the API.

You are invited to contribute, for example in this vein. Sources are 
GPL3 and found on Github
https://github.com/bengtmartensson/harctoolboxbundle .

Personally, I consider life too short to address the needs of those who 
"may not even have a second/desktop system to use".


>> You should measure the frequency of the signal. IrScrutinizer does that (of
>> course assuming appropriate hardware). irrecord does not -- it basically
>> supports demodulating receivers only.
> 
> I'm guessing I don't have the hardware since I don't know how to do
> that. Do you know of any inexpensive options similar to how building a
> homebrew serial ir is cheap?

How 'bout http://www.harctoolbox.org/arduino_nano.html ? I use to say 
"the price of a small pizza". You already mentioned that you possess a 
TSMP58000, which is the hardest component to get. The IrToy also works, 
but it is slightly more expensive.

Greetz,

Bengt

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.