Re: Review of HD1000 at Digital Producer. (Notentirelypositive)
Bart Harrison <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.roku.technical |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
EVERY HD-1000 I've come in contact with works well. I've hooked them to everything from a 13in TV screen to a 1920x1080 SMTPE phosphor professional broadcast monitor. Most of my HD production contemporaries are virtually unable to tell the difference between uncompressed 1080i material from a professional editing system and the same material output from the HD-1000. If there's a problem with your individual unit then get it replaced but don't S__T on the ones I use. THEY WORK VERY VERY WELL, THANK YOU !!!!! At 07:46 PM 5/27/2004 -0700, you wrote: >I realize that. But I notice that while all you guys fixate on resolution >issues, you ignore the main issue, mainly that the Roku HD-1000 is a piece >of S__T that doesn't work very well. > > >On May 27, 2004, at 7:38 PM, Jim Reitz wrote: > >>George Graves wrote: >> >>>and the picture quality is not as good as I expected (even with >>>6megapixel source material) >> >>Do the math. Since even HDTVs can only display around 1 megapixel (1280 * >>720), I would expect 6-megapixel images to look no better than 1-megapixel >>images. The only advantage of having images with higher resolution than your >>TV is that you'll have more available details to zoom into. The disadvantage >>is they take a lot longer to load... >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Roku-tech mailing list >>[email protected] >>http://lists.rokulabs.com/mailman/listinfo/roku-tech > >_______________________________________________ >Roku-tech mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.rokulabs.com/mailman/listinfo/roku-tech _______________________________________________ Roku-tech mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rokulabs.com/mailman/listinfo/roku-tech