Re: Net6501 Boot from msata fails
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.soekris.technical |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all, small update: I upgraded to 2.2.1 via Web UI without any problem so far. The box is running since 2.5 days without a crash or real issue. The only thing which troubles me a bit is the reported temperatur of 74° Celsius. The box is in a lap env without any traffic or connectivity. Power D is turned on and runs on adaptive. I spotted some reports which indicate the reported temp is off by 10° degrees (so should be 64° Celsius in my example), but still too much in my opinion. It might be caused however due to missing connectivity, can't tell. I will bring the box live in a few days . Regards, Marcel Am 25.03.2015 um 22:28 schrieb Giles Coochey: > On 24/03/2015 18:55, [email protected] wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> thanks for the pointer with 2.1.5. Indeed it's booting ... finally. >> >> I guess it is a bad idea to upgrade via user interface to pfsense to >> 2.2.1 now as I'm then back on "won't boot" or crash daily path. Am I >> correct on this ? >> > My experience says yes - I can't afford the time to try it again and > see whether it was a one off, or whether it is solved with 2.2.1 > instead of 2.2.0. As 2.1.5 "works" I will stick with it for as long as > possible. > >> Is there already a "bug report" logged on pfsense for this boot issue >> on 2.2,1 ? Are they aware of it ? >> > Kind of thought the attitude will be that the problem is upstream in > FreeBSD and can't be solved by the pfsense team, might be wrong, > however, as I said above - I don't have the time to assist in > troubleshooting the issue. > >> Regards, >> >> Marcel >> >> >> Am 24.03.2015 um 16:02 schrieb ED Fochler: >>> Ditto. 2.2.0 on msata was catastrophic. 2.2.1 full install on a >>> regular SATA drive still fails for me on 6501-50. Sticking with >>> 2.1.5 for the foreseeable future. >>> >>> >>>> On 2015, Mar 24, at 7:01 AM, Giles Coochey <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 24/03/2015 09:41, Martin Johnson wrote: >>>>> Are you using the correct image? >>>>> >>>>> You need a NanoBSD image with serial console >>>>> >>>>> So something like: pfSense-2.2.1-RELEASE-1g-i386-nanobsd.img.gz >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I was running pfsense 2.1.5 on a 6501-70 with a mSata drive. I >>>> upgraded to 2.2.0 and found that the system was rebooting every >>>> day, eventually it completely failed, and I could not install 2.2.0 >>>> correctly at all. I have reverted to 2.1.5 until I heard something >>>> about it in the pfsense / soekris mailing lists. >>>> Sounds like a similar problem to me. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Giles Coochey, CCNP, CCNA, CCNAS >>>> NetSecSpec Ltd >>>> +44 (0) 8444 780677 >>>> +44 (0) 7584 634135 >>>> http://www.coochey.net >>>> http://www.netsecspec.co.uk >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Soekris-tech mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech > > > -- > Regards, > > Giles Coochey, CCNP, CCNA, CCNAS > NetSecSpec Ltd > +44 (0) 8444 780677 > +44 (0) 7584 634135 > http://www.coochey.net > http://www.netsecspec.co.uk > [email protected] > > > _______________________________________________ > Soekris-tech mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech _______________________________________________ Soekris-tech mailing list [email protected] http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
smime.p7s
(application/pkcs7-signature, 4.2 KB) - not displayed