Re: MSP-FET430UIF and mspdebug

Daniel Beer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.hardware.texas-instruments.msp430.gcc.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 08:29:13PM +0000, Sarfraz Nawaz wrote:
> I thought about it but the board probably requires more than the 60mA
> that FET can source, so I decided against it. Do you know if there is
> protection available on FET against larger source currents?

Hi Sarfraz,

Not sure about that, but I haven't broken mine yet :-). There is
software regulation of the power source at least. I'd guess that it'd be
safe.

Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
Daniel Beer <[email protected]>    www.dlbeer.co.nz
IRC: inittab (Freenode)    PGP key: 2048D/160A553B

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce.
With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. 
Faster operations. Version large binaries.  Built-in WAN optimization and the
freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.